Links to Exploration step
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Mandibular Angle Fractures: A Clinical and Biomechanical Comparison—the Works of Ellis and Haug</title><author><name sortKey="Haug, Richard H" sort="Haug, Richard H" uniqKey="Haug R" first="Richard H." last="Haug">Richard H. Haug</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="a01031-1">University of Kentucky, College of Dentistry, Lexington, Kentucky</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Serafin, Bethany L" sort="Serafin, Bethany L" uniqKey="Serafin B" first="Bethany L." last="Serafin">Bethany L. Serafin</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="a01031-2">Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky</nlm:aff></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">22110787</idno><idno type="pmc">3052729</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3052729</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:3052729</idno><idno type="doi">10.1055/s-0028-1098961</idno><date when="2008">2008</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000037</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">000037</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Mandibular Angle Fractures: A Clinical and Biomechanical Comparison—the Works of Ellis and Haug</title><author><name sortKey="Haug, Richard H" sort="Haug, Richard H" uniqKey="Haug R" first="Richard H." last="Haug">Richard H. Haug</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="a01031-1">University of Kentucky, College of Dentistry, Lexington, Kentucky</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Serafin, Bethany L" sort="Serafin, Bethany L" uniqKey="Serafin B" first="Bethany L." last="Serafin">Bethany L. Serafin</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="a01031-2">Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky</nlm:aff></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction</title><idno type="ISSN">1943-3875</idno><idno type="eISSN">1943-3883</idno><imprint><date when="2008">2008</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p>In a series of articles spanning 8 years, Ed Ellis reviewed the clinical results of the treatment of 478 mandibular angle fractures managed by eight different techniques. During a series of benchtop investigations employing polyurethane synthetic mandible replicas, Rich Haug investigated the biomechanical behavior of approximately 15 different techniques designed to reconstruct mandibular angle fractures. This article reviews these two series of investigations in an attempt to gain insight into the biomechanical and biological factors that affect the successful reconstruction of mandibular angle fractures. It appears that the current techniques used to reconstruct mandibular angle fractures are sound from the standpoint of biomechanics within a range of forces encountered during clinical function. It also appears that an unsuccessful reconstruction is based on a biological result of a behavioral issue such as noncompliance, substance abuse, and/or nutritional or immune compromise.</p></div></front></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1943-3875</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1943-3883</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Thieme Medical Publishers</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">22110787</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">3052729</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1055/s-0028-1098961</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Mandibular Angle Fractures: A Clinical and Biomechanical Comparison—the Works of Ellis and Haug</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Haug</surname><given-names>Richard H.</given-names></name><degrees>D.D.S.</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="a01031-1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Serafin</surname><given-names>Bethany L.</given-names></name><degrees>D.M.D.</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="a01031-2">2</xref></contrib>
<aff id="a01031-1"><label>1</label>University of Kentucky, College of Dentistry, Lexington, Kentucky</aff><aff id="a01031-2"><label>2</label>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky</aff></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp>Address for correspondence and reprint requests: Richard H. Haug, D.D.S. <institution>Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Executive Associate Dean, University of Kentucky, College of Dentistry</institution> <addr-line>D-136, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536-0297</addr-line> <email>rhhaug2@uky.edu</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>11</month><year>2008</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>31</fpage><lpage>38</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>© Thieme Medical Publishers</copyright-statement></permissions><abstract><p>In a series of articles spanning 8 years, Ed Ellis reviewed the clinical results of the treatment of 478 mandibular angle fractures managed by eight different techniques. During a series of benchtop investigations employing polyurethane synthetic mandible replicas, Rich Haug investigated the biomechanical behavior of approximately 15 different techniques designed to reconstruct mandibular angle fractures. This article reviews these two series of investigations in an attempt to gain insight into the biomechanical and biological factors that affect the successful reconstruction of mandibular angle fractures. It appears that the current techniques used to reconstruct mandibular angle fractures are sound from the standpoint of biomechanics within a range of forces encountered during clinical function. It also appears that an unsuccessful reconstruction is based on a biological result of a behavioral issue such as noncompliance, substance abuse, and/or nutritional or immune compromise.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Mandibular angle fractures</kwd><kwd>yield point</kwd><kwd>yield load</kwd><kwd>yield displacement</kwd><kwd>stiffness</kwd><kwd>biomechanics</kwd><kwd>polyurethane synthetic mandible replicas</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></pmc></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 0000370 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 0000370 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé=
|texte=
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |