Assessment of Bite Force in Patients Treated with 2.0-mm Traditional Miniplates versus 2.0-mm Locking Plates for Mandibular Fracture
Identifieur interne : 000023 ( Pmc/Corpus ); précédent : 000022; suivant : 000024Assessment of Bite Force in Patients Treated with 2.0-mm Traditional Miniplates versus 2.0-mm Locking Plates for Mandibular Fracture
Auteurs : Sanjay Rastogi ; Mahendra Parvath Reddy ; Azeez Gaurav Swarup ; Divya Swarup ; Rupshikha ChoudhurySource :
- Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction [ 1943-3875 ] ; 2015.
Abstract
The objective of this study is to analyze the difference in bite forces in patients treated for mandibular fractures with 2.0 mm conventional and locking titanium plating system. A randomized study was performed for the treatment of fractures of mandible. In this study, 20 adult patients with isolated mandibular fracture were included. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups, that is, Group I—2.0 mm nonlocking (traditional) and Group II—2.0 mm locking plates. Bite force was evaluated at 1st, 3rd, and 6th weeks. Comparison of all the assessed parameters between both the groups depicted no significant difference in terms of pain, swelling including the incidence of infection, paresthesia, and hardware failure. Although same was true in case of bite force between both the groups at various time intervals, there was statistically significant increase in the bite force within the group comprising patients in whom locking plates was used between 1st and 3rd weeks follow-up period and highly significant increase in bite force between 1st and 6th weeks of follow-up period. The rapid improvement of bite force values when locking plates were used implies that the locking plate can be used in preference to conventional plates to achieve early mobilization with assured stability in the treatment of mandibular fractures.
Url:
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1563697
PubMed: 26889350
PubMed Central: 4755733
Links to Exploration step
PMC:4755733Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Assessment of Bite Force in Patients Treated with 2.0-mm Traditional Miniplates versus 2.0-mm Locking Plates for Mandibular Fracture</title><author><name sortKey="Rastogi, Sanjay" sort="Rastogi, Sanjay" uniqKey="Rastogi S" first="Sanjay" last="Rastogi">Sanjay Rastogi</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="AF140404oa-1"><institution>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Implantology, Institute of Dental Sciences, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India</institution></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Reddy, Mahendra Parvath" sort="Reddy, Mahendra Parvath" uniqKey="Reddy M" first="Mahendra Parvath" last="Reddy">Mahendra Parvath Reddy</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="AF140404oa-2"><institution>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Jaipur Dental College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India</institution></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Swarup, Azeez Gaurav" sort="Swarup, Azeez Gaurav" uniqKey="Swarup A" first="Azeez Gaurav" last="Swarup">Azeez Gaurav Swarup</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="AF140404oa-3"><institution>Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts</institution></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Swarup, Divya" sort="Swarup, Divya" uniqKey="Swarup D" first="Divya" last="Swarup">Divya Swarup</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="AF140404oa-3"><institution>Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts</institution></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Choudhury, Rupshikha" sort="Choudhury, Rupshikha" uniqKey="Choudhury R" first="Rupshikha" last="Choudhury">Rupshikha Choudhury</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="AF140404oa-4"><institution>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Private Practice, Guwahati, India</institution></nlm:aff></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">26889350</idno><idno type="pmc">4755733</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4755733</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:4755733</idno><idno type="doi">10.1055/s-0035-1563697</idno><date when="2015">2015</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000023</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">000023</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Assessment of Bite Force in Patients Treated with 2.0-mm Traditional Miniplates versus 2.0-mm Locking Plates for Mandibular Fracture</title><author><name sortKey="Rastogi, Sanjay" sort="Rastogi, Sanjay" uniqKey="Rastogi S" first="Sanjay" last="Rastogi">Sanjay Rastogi</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="AF140404oa-1"><institution>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Implantology, Institute of Dental Sciences, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India</institution></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Reddy, Mahendra Parvath" sort="Reddy, Mahendra Parvath" uniqKey="Reddy M" first="Mahendra Parvath" last="Reddy">Mahendra Parvath Reddy</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="AF140404oa-2"><institution>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Jaipur Dental College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India</institution></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Swarup, Azeez Gaurav" sort="Swarup, Azeez Gaurav" uniqKey="Swarup A" first="Azeez Gaurav" last="Swarup">Azeez Gaurav Swarup</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="AF140404oa-3"><institution>Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts</institution></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Swarup, Divya" sort="Swarup, Divya" uniqKey="Swarup D" first="Divya" last="Swarup">Divya Swarup</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="AF140404oa-3"><institution>Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts</institution></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Choudhury, Rupshikha" sort="Choudhury, Rupshikha" uniqKey="Choudhury R" first="Rupshikha" last="Choudhury">Rupshikha Choudhury</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="AF140404oa-4"><institution>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Private Practice, Guwahati, India</institution></nlm:aff></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction</title><idno type="ISSN">1943-3875</idno><idno type="eISSN">1943-3883</idno><imprint><date when="2015">2015</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p>The objective of this study is to analyze the difference in bite forces in patients treated for mandibular fractures with 2.0 mm conventional and locking titanium plating system. A randomized study was performed for the treatment of fractures of mandible. In this study, 20 adult patients with isolated mandibular fracture were included. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups, that is, Group I—2.0 mm nonlocking (traditional) and Group II—2.0 mm locking plates. Bite force was evaluated at 1st, 3rd, and 6th weeks. Comparison of all the assessed parameters between both the groups depicted no significant difference in terms of pain, swelling including the incidence of infection, paresthesia, and hardware failure. Although same was true in case of bite force between both the groups at various time intervals, there was statistically significant increase in the bite force within the group comprising patients in whom locking plates was used between 1st and 3rd weeks follow-up period and highly significant increase in bite force between 1st and 6th weeks of follow-up period. The rapid improvement of bite force values when locking plates were used implies that the locking plate can be used in preference to conventional plates to achieve early mobilization with assured stability in the treatment of mandibular fractures.</p></div></front></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="doi">10.1055/s-00000151</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1943-3875</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1943-3883</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Thieme Medical Publishers</publisher-name><publisher-loc>333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">26889350</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">4755733</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1055/s-0035-1563697</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">140404oa</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Assessment of Bite Force in Patients Treated with 2.0-mm Traditional Miniplates versus 2.0-mm Locking Plates for Mandibular Fracture</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Rastogi</surname><given-names>Sanjay</given-names></name><degrees>MDS</degrees><xref rid="AF140404oa-1" ref-type="aff">1</xref><xref rid="CO140404oa-1" ref-type="author-notes"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Reddy</surname><given-names>Mahendra Parvath</given-names></name><degrees>MDS</degrees><xref rid="AF140404oa-2" ref-type="aff">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Swarup</surname><given-names>Azeez Gaurav</given-names></name><degrees>DMD</degrees><xref rid="AF140404oa-3" ref-type="aff">3</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Swarup</surname><given-names>Divya</given-names></name><degrees>DMD</degrees><xref rid="AF140404oa-3" ref-type="aff">3</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Choudhury</surname><given-names>Rupshikha</given-names></name><degrees>MDS</degrees><xref rid="AF140404oa-4" ref-type="aff">4</xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="AF140404oa-1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Implantology, Institute of Dental Sciences, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India</institution></aff><aff id="AF140404oa-2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Jaipur Dental College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India</institution></aff><aff id="AF140404oa-3"><label>3</label><institution>Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts</institution></aff><aff id="AF140404oa-4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Private Practice, Guwahati, India</institution></aff><author-notes><corresp id="CO140404oa-1"><bold>Address for correspondence </bold>Sanjay Rastogi, MDS <institution>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Implantology, Institute of Dental Sciences</institution><addr-line>Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh</addr-line><country>India</country><email>docos79@gmail.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>21</day><month>9</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>3</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>62</fpage><lpage>68</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>09</day><month>10</month><year>2014</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>13</day><month>6</month><year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>© Thieme Medical Publishers</copyright-statement></permissions><abstract><p>The objective of this study is to analyze the difference in bite forces in patients treated for mandibular fractures with 2.0 mm conventional and locking titanium plating system. A randomized study was performed for the treatment of fractures of mandible. In this study, 20 adult patients with isolated mandibular fracture were included. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups, that is, Group I—2.0 mm nonlocking (traditional) and Group II—2.0 mm locking plates. Bite force was evaluated at 1st, 3rd, and 6th weeks. Comparison of all the assessed parameters between both the groups depicted no significant difference in terms of pain, swelling including the incidence of infection, paresthesia, and hardware failure. Although same was true in case of bite force between both the groups at various time intervals, there was statistically significant increase in the bite force within the group comprising patients in whom locking plates was used between 1st and 3rd weeks follow-up period and highly significant increase in bite force between 1st and 6th weeks of follow-up period. The rapid improvement of bite force values when locking plates were used implies that the locking plate can be used in preference to conventional plates to achieve early mobilization with assured stability in the treatment of mandibular fractures.</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><title>Keywords</title><kwd>mandibular fractures</kwd><kwd>locking plates</kwd><kwd>nonlocking plates</kwd><kwd>bite force</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></pmc></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000023 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000023 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= PMC:4755733
|texte= Assessment of Bite Force in Patients Treated with 2.0-mm Traditional Miniplates versus 2.0-mm Locking Plates for Mandibular Fracture
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:26889350" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |