An Analysis of Patient Perceptions and Expectations to Dental Implants: Is There a Significant Effect on Long-Term Satisfaction Levels?
Identifieur interne : 000327 ( Pmc/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000326; suivant : 000328An Analysis of Patient Perceptions and Expectations to Dental Implants: Is There a Significant Effect on Long-Term Satisfaction Levels?
Auteurs : Shane J. J. Mccrea [Royaume-Uni]Source :
- International Journal of Dentistry [ 1687-8728 ] ; 2017.
Abstract
Here we present an analysis of patient perceptions and expectations to dental implant placement and their prosthetic reconstruction, to then consider whether they have an effect on long-term satisfaction levels. A Post-Treatment Completion Questionnaire was designed to analyse whether patient satisfaction is influenced by age and/or gender; has an effect on patient-reported self-confidence levels; contributes to increased levels of oral hygiene; provides further insight into the average pain levels during and after the surgical intervention; or influences further acceptance of dental implant surgery. And then whether relationships exist between any of these factors. 182 consecutive patients completed the survey: 68 males and 114 females (age mean 64.68 years ± 11.23 SD); the average number of months since treatment completion was 37.4 (males) and 62.6 (females). There is a significant relationship between comfort rating and “how well informed” the patient was (
Url:
DOI: 10.1155/2017/8230618
PubMed: 28928771
PubMed Central: 5591937
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
PMC:5591937Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">An Analysis of Patient Perceptions and Expectations to Dental Implants: Is There a Significant Effect on Long-Term Satisfaction Levels?</title><author><name sortKey="Mccrea, Shane J J" sort="Mccrea, Shane J J" uniqKey="Mccrea S" first="Shane J. J." last="Mccrea">Shane J. J. Mccrea</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="I1">The Dental Implant and Gingival-Plastic Surgery Centre, Bournemouth, Dorset BH7 6AF, UK</nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>The Dental Implant and Gingival-Plastic Surgery Centre, Bournemouth, Dorset BH7 6AF</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Dorset BH7 6AF</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">28928771</idno><idno type="pmc">5591937</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5591937</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:5591937</idno><idno type="doi">10.1155/2017/8230618</idno><date when="2017">2017</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">002E22</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">002E22</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">002E22</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Curation">002E22</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">000327</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000327</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">An Analysis of Patient Perceptions and Expectations to Dental Implants: Is There a Significant Effect on Long-Term Satisfaction Levels?</title><author><name sortKey="Mccrea, Shane J J" sort="Mccrea, Shane J J" uniqKey="Mccrea S" first="Shane J. J." last="Mccrea">Shane J. J. Mccrea</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="I1">The Dental Implant and Gingival-Plastic Surgery Centre, Bournemouth, Dorset BH7 6AF, UK</nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>The Dental Implant and Gingival-Plastic Surgery Centre, Bournemouth, Dorset BH7 6AF</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Dorset BH7 6AF</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">International Journal of Dentistry</title><idno type="ISSN">1687-8728</idno><idno type="eISSN">1687-8736</idno><imprint><date when="2017">2017</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p>Here we present an analysis of patient perceptions and expectations to dental implant placement and their prosthetic reconstruction, to then consider whether they have an effect on long-term satisfaction levels. A Post-Treatment Completion Questionnaire was designed to analyse whether patient satisfaction is influenced by age and/or gender; has an effect on patient-reported self-confidence levels; contributes to increased levels of oral hygiene; provides further insight into the average pain levels during and after the surgical intervention; or influences further acceptance of dental implant surgery. And then whether relationships exist between any of these factors. 182 consecutive patients completed the survey: 68 males and 114 females (age mean 64.68 years ± 11.23 SD); the average number of months since treatment completion was 37.4 (males) and 62.6 (females). There is a significant relationship between comfort rating and “how well informed” the patient was (<italic>p</italic> = 0.015). A significantly positive relationship exists between “considering dental implants in the future” and “overall experience” (<italic>p</italic> = 0.001). A significantly positive relationship exists between “overall satisfaction with appearance” and “satisfaction with comfort” (<italic>p</italic> = 0.011). A significant relationship exists between “overall satisfaction with appearance,” “satisfaction with comfort,” and “overall satisfaction with experience” (<italic>p</italic> = 0.001). The results amplify the need to transmit logical, truthful information to patients when dental implant treatment is being considered. The “fully informed” patient will have realistic expectations that lead to high degrees of satisfaction.</p></div></front><back><div1 type="bibliography"><listBibl><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Yao, J" uniqKey="Yao J">J. Yao</name></author><author><name sortKey="Tang, H" uniqKey="Tang H">H. Tang</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gao, X L" uniqKey="Gao X">X.-L. Gao</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mcgrath, C" uniqKey="Mcgrath C">C. McGrath</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mattheos, N" uniqKey="Mattheos N">N. Mattheos</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Crow, R" uniqKey="Crow R">R. Crow</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gage, H" uniqKey="Gage H">H. Gage</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hampson, S" uniqKey="Hampson S">S. Hampson</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Jackson, J L" uniqKey="Jackson J">J. L. Jackson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kroenke, K" uniqKey="Kroenke K">K. Kroenke</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Menassa, M" uniqKey="Menassa M">M. Menassa</name></author><author><name sortKey="De Grandmont, P" uniqKey="De Grandmont P">P. de Grandmont</name></author><author><name sortKey="Audy, N" uniqKey="Audy N">N. Audy</name></author><author><name sortKey="Durand, R" uniqKey="Durand R">R. Durand</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rompre, P" uniqKey="Rompre P">P. Rompré</name></author><author><name sortKey="Emami, E" uniqKey="Emami E">E. Emami</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Awad, Ma" uniqKey="Awad M">MA. Awad</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lund, Jp" uniqKey="Lund J">JP. Lund</name></author><author><name sortKey="Shapiro, Sh" uniqKey="Shapiro S">SH. Shapiro</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Heydecke, G" uniqKey="Heydecke G">G. Heydecke</name></author><author><name sortKey="Thomason, J M" uniqKey="Thomason J">J. M. Thomason</name></author><author><name sortKey="Awad, M A" uniqKey="Awad M">M. A. Awad</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lund, J P" uniqKey="Lund J">J. P. Lund</name></author><author><name sortKey="Feine, J S" uniqKey="Feine J">J. S. Feine</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Albrektsson, T" uniqKey="Albrektsson T">T. Albrektsson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Zarb, G" uniqKey="Zarb G">G. Zarb</name></author><author><name sortKey="Worthington, P" uniqKey="Worthington P">P. Worthington</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Carr, A" uniqKey="Carr A">A. Carr</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wolfaardt, J" uniqKey="Wolfaardt J">J. Wolfaardt</name></author><author><name sortKey="Garrett, N" uniqKey="Garrett N">N. Garrett</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Mcgrath, C" uniqKey="Mcgrath C">C. McGrath</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bedi, R" uniqKey="Bedi R">R. Bedi</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Ra Ed Omar, A H" uniqKey="Ra Ed Omar A">A. H. Ra'ed Omar</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mahmoud Khalid, A" uniqKey="Mahmoud Khalid A">A. Mahmoud Khalid</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ahed Mahmoud, A" uniqKey="Ahed Mahmoud A">A. Ahed Mahmoud</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Belser, U C" uniqKey="Belser U">U. C. Belser</name></author><author><name sortKey="Schmid, B" uniqKey="Schmid B">B. Schmid</name></author><author><name sortKey="Higginbottom, F" uniqKey="Higginbottom F">F. Higginbottom</name></author><author><name sortKey="Buser, D" uniqKey="Buser D">D. Buser</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Den Hartog, L" uniqKey="Den Hartog L">L. Den Hartog</name></author><author><name sortKey="Slater, J J R H" uniqKey="Slater J">J. J. R. H. Slater</name></author><author><name sortKey="Vissink, A" uniqKey="Vissink A">A. Vissink</name></author><author><name sortKey="Meijer, H J A" uniqKey="Meijer H">H. J. A. Meijer</name></author><author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, G M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G">G. M. Raghoebar</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Moghadam, M" uniqKey="Moghadam M">M. Moghadam</name></author><author><name sortKey="Dias, R" uniqKey="Dias R">R. Dias</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kuyinu, E" uniqKey="Kuyinu E">E. Kuyinu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ferguson, M B" uniqKey="Ferguson M">M. B. Ferguson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mucciolo, T" uniqKey="Mucciolo T">T. Mucciolo</name></author><author><name sortKey="Jahangiri, L" uniqKey="Jahangiri L">L. Jahangiri</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Bowling, A" uniqKey="Bowling A">A. Bowling</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rowe, G" uniqKey="Rowe G">G. Rowe</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lambert, N" uniqKey="Lambert N">N. Lambert</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Rustemeyer, J" uniqKey="Rustemeyer J">J. Rustemeyer</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bremerich, A" uniqKey="Bremerich A">A. Bremerich</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Pommer, B" uniqKey="Pommer B">B. Pommer</name></author><author><name sortKey="Zechner, W" uniqKey="Zechner W">W. Zechner</name></author><author><name sortKey="Watzak, G" uniqKey="Watzak G">G. Watzak</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ulm, C" uniqKey="Ulm C">C. Ulm</name></author><author><name sortKey="Watzek, G" uniqKey="Watzek G">G. Watzek</name></author><author><name sortKey="Tepper, G" uniqKey="Tepper G">G. Tepper</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Alvesalo, I" uniqKey="Alvesalo I">I. Alvesalo</name></author><author><name sortKey="Uusi Heikkila, Y" uniqKey="Uusi Heikkila Y">Y. Uusi-Heikkila</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Tepper, G" uniqKey="Tepper G">G. Tepper</name></author><author><name sortKey="Haas, R" uniqKey="Haas R">R. Haas</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mailath, G" uniqKey="Mailath G">G. Mailath</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Ben Sira, Z" uniqKey="Ben Sira Z">Z. Ben-Sira</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Ross, C E" uniqKey="Ross C">C. E. Ross</name></author><author><name sortKey="Duff, R S" uniqKey="Duff R">R. S. Duff</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Chaffin, J G" uniqKey="Chaffin J">J. G. Chaffin</name></author><author><name sortKey="Chaffin, S D" uniqKey="Chaffin S">S. D. Chaffin</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mangelsdorff, A D" uniqKey="Mangelsdorff A">A. D. Mangelsdorff</name></author><author><name sortKey="Finstuen, K" uniqKey="Finstuen K">K. Finstuen</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Cooper, B R" uniqKey="Cooper B">B. R. Cooper</name></author><author><name sortKey="Monson, A L" uniqKey="Monson A">A. L. Monson</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Burke, L" uniqKey="Burke L">L. Burke</name></author><author><name sortKey="Croucher, R" uniqKey="Croucher R">R. Croucher</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Gurdal, P" uniqKey="Gurdal P">P. Gürdal</name></author><author><name sortKey="Cankaya, H" uniqKey="Cankaya H">H. Çankaya</name></author><author><name sortKey="Onem, E" uniqKey="Onem E">E. Önem</name></author><author><name sortKey="Dincer, S" uniqKey="Dincer S">S. Dinçer</name></author><author><name sortKey="Yilmaz, T" uniqKey="Yilmaz T">T. Yilmaz</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Mogil, J S" uniqKey="Mogil J">J. S. Mogil</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Bartley, E J" uniqKey="Bartley E">E. J. Bartley</name></author><author><name sortKey="Fillingim, R B" uniqKey="Fillingim R">R. B. Fillingim</name></author></analytic></biblStruct></listBibl></div1></back></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-dir>properties open_access</pmc-dir>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Int J Dent</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Int J Dent</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJD</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Dentistry</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1687-8728</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1687-8736</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Hindawi</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">28928771</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">5591937</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2017/8230618</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>An Analysis of Patient Perceptions and Expectations to Dental Implants: Is There a Significant Effect on Long-Term Satisfaction Levels?</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid" authenticated="false">http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1546-4591</contrib-id><name><surname>McCrea</surname><given-names>Shane J. J.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="I1"></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="I1">The Dental Implant and Gingival-Plastic Surgery Centre, Bournemouth, Dorset BH7 6AF, UK</aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">*Shane J. J. McCrea: <email>shanemccrea@aol.com</email></corresp><fn fn-type="other"><p>Academic Editor: Carlos A. Munoz-Viveros</p></fn></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><year>2017</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>8</day><month>8</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>2017</volume><elocation-id>8230618</elocation-id><history><date date-type="received"><day>21</day><month>3</month><year>2017</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>27</day><month>6</month><year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright © 2017 Shane J. J. McCrea.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2017</copyright-year><license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>Here we present an analysis of patient perceptions and expectations to dental implant placement and their prosthetic reconstruction, to then consider whether they have an effect on long-term satisfaction levels. A Post-Treatment Completion Questionnaire was designed to analyse whether patient satisfaction is influenced by age and/or gender; has an effect on patient-reported self-confidence levels; contributes to increased levels of oral hygiene; provides further insight into the average pain levels during and after the surgical intervention; or influences further acceptance of dental implant surgery. And then whether relationships exist between any of these factors. 182 consecutive patients completed the survey: 68 males and 114 females (age mean 64.68 years ± 11.23 SD); the average number of months since treatment completion was 37.4 (males) and 62.6 (females). There is a significant relationship between comfort rating and “how well informed” the patient was (<italic>p</italic> = 0.015). A significantly positive relationship exists between “considering dental implants in the future” and “overall experience” (<italic>p</italic> = 0.001). A significantly positive relationship exists between “overall satisfaction with appearance” and “satisfaction with comfort” (<italic>p</italic> = 0.011). A significant relationship exists between “overall satisfaction with appearance,” “satisfaction with comfort,” and “overall satisfaction with experience” (<italic>p</italic> = 0.001). The results amplify the need to transmit logical, truthful information to patients when dental implant treatment is being considered. The “fully informed” patient will have realistic expectations that lead to high degrees of satisfaction.</p></abstract></article-meta></front><floats-group><table-wrap id="tab1" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>Correlations between crown satisfaction, gum level satisfaction, and self-confidence levels.</p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> </th><th align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> </th><th align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Crown satisfaction</th><th align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Gum level satisfaction</th><th align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Self-confidence levels</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="3" align="left" colspan="1">Crown satisfaction</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Pearson correlation</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.428<sup><italic>∗∗</italic></sup></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.076</td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> </td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.001</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.329</td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic>N</italic></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">168</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">162</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">166</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5" rowspan="1"><hr></hr></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3" align="left" colspan="1">Gum level satisfaction</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Pearson correlation</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.428<sup><italic>∗∗</italic></sup></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.148</td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.001</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> </td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.054</td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic>N</italic></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">162</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">173</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">170</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5" rowspan="1"><hr></hr></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3" align="left" colspan="1">Self-confidence levels</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Pearson correlation</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.076</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.148</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.329</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.054</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> </td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic>N</italic></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">166</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">170</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">178</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn><p><sup><italic>∗∗</italic></sup>Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). The table shows that there is a significant positive relationship between the crown satisfaction levels and the gum level satisfaction: <italic>r</italic> = 0.428, <italic>n</italic> = 162, and <italic>p</italic> = 0.001. There is no significant relationship between the self-confidence levels and the gum level satisfaction and crown satisfaction: <italic>r</italic> = 0.148, <italic>n</italic> = 166, and <italic>p</italic> = 0.054.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="tab2" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p>Correlations between overall satisfaction of appearance, comfort, and pain levels.</p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> </th><th align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> </th><th align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Overall satisfaction appearance</th><th align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Overall comfort satisfaction</th><th align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Pain levels</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="3" align="left" colspan="1">Overall satisfaction appearance</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Pearson correlation</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.464<sup><italic>∗∗</italic></sup></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.105</td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> </td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.001</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.165</td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic>N</italic></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">181</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">181</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">178</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5" rowspan="1"><hr></hr></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3" align="left" colspan="1">Overall comfort satisfaction</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Pearson correlation</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.464<sup><italic>∗∗</italic></sup></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.190<sup><italic>∗</italic></sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.001</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> </td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.011</td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic>N</italic></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">181</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">182</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">179</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5" rowspan="1"><hr></hr></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3" align="left" colspan="1">Pain levels</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Pearson correlation</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.105</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.190<sup><italic>∗</italic></sup></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.165</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.011</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> </td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic>N</italic></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">178</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">179</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">179</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn><p><sup><italic>∗∗</italic></sup>Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). <sup><italic>∗</italic></sup>Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). A significant relationship exists between the overall satisfaction of appearance and satisfaction with comfort: <italic>r</italic> = 0.464, <italic>n</italic> = 181, and <italic>p</italic> = 0.001. In addition, there is a significant relationship between the comfort rating and the pain levels: <italic>r</italic> = 0.190, <italic>n</italic> = 178, and <italic>p</italic> = 0.011.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="tab3" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p>Correlations between overall satisfaction of appearance, comfort, and how well informed the patient felt.</p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> </th><th align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> </th><th align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Overall satisfaction appearance</th><th align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Overall comfort satisfaction</th><th align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Well informed</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="3" align="left" colspan="1">Overall appearance satisfaction</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Pearson correlation</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.464<sup><italic>∗∗</italic></sup></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.066</td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> </td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.001</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.383</td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic>N</italic></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">181</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">181</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">179</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5" rowspan="1"><hr></hr></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3" align="left" colspan="1">Overall comfort satisfaction</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Pearson correlation</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.464<sup><italic>∗∗</italic></sup></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.181<sup><italic>∗</italic></sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.001</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> </td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.015</td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic>N</italic></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">181</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">182</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">180</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5" rowspan="1"><hr></hr></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3" align="left" colspan="1">Well informed</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Pearson correlation</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.066</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.181<sup><italic>∗</italic></sup></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.383</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.015</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> </td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic>N</italic></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">179</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">180</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">180</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn><p><sup><italic>∗∗</italic></sup>Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). <sup><italic>∗</italic></sup>Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). There is a significant relationship between the comfort rating and how well informed the patient was: <italic>r</italic> = 0.181, <italic>n</italic> = 179, and <italic>p</italic> = 0.015.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="tab4" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Table 4</label><caption><p>Correlations between overall satisfaction of appearance, comfort, and overall satisfaction with experience.</p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> </th><th align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> </th><th align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Overall satisfaction appearance</th><th align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Overall comfort satisfaction</th><th align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Overall experience</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="3" align="left" colspan="1">Overall satisfaction appearance</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Pearson correlation</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.464<sup><italic>∗∗</italic></sup></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.255<sup><italic>∗∗</italic></sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> </td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.001</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic>N</italic></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">181</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">181</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">179</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5" rowspan="1"><hr></hr></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3" align="left" colspan="1">Overall comfort satisfaction</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Pearson correlation</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.464<sup><italic>∗∗</italic></sup></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.301<sup><italic>∗∗</italic></sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.001</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> </td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic>N</italic></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">181</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">182</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">180</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5" rowspan="1"><hr></hr></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3" align="left" colspan="1">Overall experience</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Pearson correlation</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.255<sup><italic>∗∗</italic></sup></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.301<sup><italic>∗∗</italic></sup></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.001</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.001</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> </td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic>N</italic></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">179</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">180</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">180</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn><p><sup><italic>∗∗</italic></sup>Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). A significant relationship exists between the comfort rating and the overall experience of the patient: <italic>r</italic> = 0.301, <italic>n</italic> = 179, and <italic>p</italic> = 0.001.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="tab5" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Table 5</label><caption><p>Correlations between the consideration of dental implants in the future and the participants overall experience.</p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> </th><th align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> </th><th align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Consider dental implants in the future</th><th align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Overall experience</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="3" align="left" colspan="1">Consider implants in the future</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Pearson correlation</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.285<sup><italic>∗∗</italic></sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> </td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic>N</italic></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">173</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">173</td></tr><tr><td colspan="4" rowspan="1"><hr></hr></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3" align="left" colspan="1">Overall experience</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Pearson correlation</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.285<sup><italic>∗∗</italic></sup></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.001</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> </td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic>N</italic></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">173</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">180</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn><p><sup><italic>∗∗</italic></sup>Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Here a significant positive relationship exists between the overall dental implant experience and the consideration of dental implants again in the future. <italic>r</italic> = 0.285, <italic>n</italic> = 173, and <italic>p</italic> = 0.001.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="tab6" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Table 6</label><caption><p>Correlations between recommending a friend, satisfaction with dental practitioner and self-confidence levels.</p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> </th><th align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> </th><th align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Recommend a friend</th><th align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Satisfaction with dental practitioner</th><th align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Self-confidence levels</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="3" align="left" colspan="1">Recommend a friend</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Pearson correlation</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.387<sup><italic>∗∗</italic></sup></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.258<sup><italic>∗∗</italic></sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> </td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.001</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic>N</italic></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">180</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">177</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">176</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5" rowspan="1"><hr></hr></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3" align="left" colspan="1">Satisfaction with dental practitioner</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Pearson correlation</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.387<sup><italic>∗∗</italic></sup></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.064</td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.001</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> </td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.402</td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic>N</italic></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">177</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">177</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">174</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5" rowspan="1"><hr></hr></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3" align="left" colspan="1">Self-confidence levels</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Pearson correlation</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.258<sup><italic>∗∗</italic></sup></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.064</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.001</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">.402</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"> </td></tr><tr><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic>N</italic></td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">176</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">174</td><td align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">178</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn><p><sup><italic>∗∗</italic></sup>Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). The table indicates that there is a significant relationship between recommending a friend for dental implants and the satisfaction with the dental practitioner: <italic>r</italic> = 0.387, <italic>n</italic> = 180, and <italic>p</italic> = 0.001. In addition, there is a significant relationship between the satisfaction with the dental practitioner and the self-confidence levels of the patient: <italic>r</italic> = 0.285, <italic>n</italic> = 176, and <italic>p</italic> = 0.001.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></floats-group></pmc><affiliations><list><country><li>Royaume-Uni</li></country></list><tree><country name="Royaume-Uni"><noRegion><name sortKey="Mccrea, Shane J J" sort="Mccrea, Shane J J" uniqKey="Mccrea S" first="Shane J. J." last="Mccrea">Shane J. J. Mccrea</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Pmc/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000327 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000327 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= PMC:5591937
|texte= An Analysis of Patient Perceptions and Expectations to Dental Implants: Is There a Significant Effect on Long-Term Satisfaction Levels?
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:28928771" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |