Supraglottic Airway Devices: the Search for the Best Insertion Technique or the Time to Change Our Point of View?
Identifieur interne : 000046 ( Pmc/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000045; suivant : 000047Supraglottic Airway Devices: the Search for the Best Insertion Technique or the Time to Change Our Point of View?
Auteurs : Massimiliano Sorbello [Italie] ; Flavia Petrini [Italie]Source :
- Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation [ 2149-0937 ] ; 2017.
Abstract
In the crowded world of supraglottic airway devices (SADs), many papers compare the easiness of insertion based on the different endpoints of an operator’s satisfaction: first pass success, ventilation effectiveness, complications and morbidity. Proseal LMA™ (Laryngeal Mask Airway, Teleflex Medical, Dublin, Ireland) has been extensively studied because on one hand it has a steeper learning curve and more complex insertion when compared with other SADs and on the other hand many alternative techniques are available to facilitate insertion. This research is part of a larger body of studies exploring the issue that some devices are more difficult to insert because of many features related to sizing, constructive material, airway conduit and cuff design, performance and last but not least experience. Nevertheless, the biggest question might be the search for a systematic categorization of insertion difficulty features and identification of criteria allowing the choice for the best device and consequently for the best insertion technique. Given that, as a result of many intrinsic characteristics of the device we are using, insertion might become the secondary issue to be considered only after we clearly identify what makes it difficult, and to be counterbalanced on the results we expect from the device, performance we can achieve and degree of airway protection it could grant. The aim of this narrative review is to consider which factors might affect or condition SAD insertion difficulty and to try identifying some criteria addressing physicians pertaining to the use of SADs in clinical practice.
Url:
DOI: 10.5152/TJAR.2017.67764
PubMed: 28439437
PubMed Central: 5396902
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
PMC:5396902Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Supraglottic Airway Devices: the Search for the Best Insertion Technique or the Time to Change Our Point of View?</title>
<author><name sortKey="Sorbello, Massimiliano" sort="Sorbello, Massimiliano" uniqKey="Sorbello M" first="Massimiliano" last="Sorbello">Massimiliano Sorbello</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="af1-trd-45-2-76">Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, AOU Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele, Catania, Italy</nlm:aff>
<country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, AOU Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele, Catania</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Catania</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Petrini, Flavia" sort="Petrini, Flavia" uniqKey="Petrini F" first="Flavia" last="Petrini">Flavia Petrini</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="af2-trd-45-2-76">Department of Perioperative Medicine, Pain, ICU and RRS, Chieti University Hospital, ASL 2 Abruzzo, Italy</nlm:aff>
<country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Perioperative Medicine, Pain, ICU and RRS, Chieti University Hospital, ASL 2 Abruzzo</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>ASL 2 Abruzzo</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="pmid">28439437</idno>
<idno type="pmc">5396902</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5396902</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:5396902</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.5152/TJAR.2017.67764</idno>
<date when="2017">2017</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">001924</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">001924</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">001924</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Curation">001924</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">000046</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000046</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Supraglottic Airway Devices: the Search for the Best Insertion Technique or the Time to Change Our Point of View?</title>
<author><name sortKey="Sorbello, Massimiliano" sort="Sorbello, Massimiliano" uniqKey="Sorbello M" first="Massimiliano" last="Sorbello">Massimiliano Sorbello</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="af1-trd-45-2-76">Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, AOU Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele, Catania, Italy</nlm:aff>
<country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, AOU Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele, Catania</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Catania</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Petrini, Flavia" sort="Petrini, Flavia" uniqKey="Petrini F" first="Flavia" last="Petrini">Flavia Petrini</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="af2-trd-45-2-76">Department of Perioperative Medicine, Pain, ICU and RRS, Chieti University Hospital, ASL 2 Abruzzo, Italy</nlm:aff>
<country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Perioperative Medicine, Pain, ICU and RRS, Chieti University Hospital, ASL 2 Abruzzo</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>ASL 2 Abruzzo</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation</title>
<idno type="ISSN">2149-0937</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">2149-276X</idno>
<imprint><date when="2017">2017</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p>In the crowded world of supraglottic airway devices (SADs), many papers compare the easiness of insertion based on the different endpoints of an operator’s satisfaction: first pass success, ventilation effectiveness, complications and morbidity. Proseal LMA<sup>™</sup>
(Laryngeal Mask Airway, Teleflex Medical, Dublin, Ireland) has been extensively studied because on one hand it has a steeper learning curve and more complex insertion when compared with other SADs and on the other hand many alternative techniques are available to facilitate insertion. This research is part of a larger body of studies exploring the issue that some devices are more difficult to insert because of many features related to sizing, constructive material, airway conduit and cuff design, performance and last but not least experience. Nevertheless, the biggest question might be the search for a systematic categorization of insertion difficulty features and identification of criteria allowing the choice for the best device and consequently for the best insertion technique. Given that, as a result of many intrinsic characteristics of the device we are using, insertion might become the secondary issue to be considered only after we clearly identify what makes it difficult, and to be counterbalanced on the results we expect from the device, performance we can achieve and degree of airway protection it could grant. The aim of this narrative review is to consider which factors might affect or condition SAD insertion difficulty and to try identifying some criteria addressing physicians pertaining to the use of SADs in clinical practice.</p>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pmc article-type="article-commentary"><pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim</journal-id>
<journal-title-group><journal-title>Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">2149-0937</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">2149-276X</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Turkish Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Society</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">28439437</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="pmc">5396902</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5152/TJAR.2017.67764</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">trd-45-2-76</article-id>
<article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Editorial Comment</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group><article-title>Supraglottic Airway Devices: the Search for the Best Insertion Technique or the Time to Change Our Point of View?</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Sorbello</surname>
<given-names>Massimiliano</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-trd-45-2-76">1</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1-trd-45-2-76"></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Petrini</surname>
<given-names>Flavia</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="af2-trd-45-2-76">2</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="af1-trd-45-2-76"><label>1</label>
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, AOU Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele, Catania, Italy</aff>
<aff id="af2-trd-45-2-76"><label>2</label>
Department of Perioperative Medicine, Pain, ICU and RRS, Chieti University Hospital, ASL 2 Abruzzo, Italy</aff>
<author-notes><corresp id="c1-trd-45-2-76">Address for Correspondence: Massimiliano Sorbello, E-mail: <email>maxsorbello@gmail.com</email>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>4</month>
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>01</day>
<month>4</month>
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>45</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>76</fpage>
<lpage>82</lpage>
<history><date date-type="received"><day>21</day>
<month>3</month>
<year>2017</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted"><day>22</day>
<month>3</month>
<year>2017</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions><copyright-statement>© Copyright 2017 by Turkish Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Society</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
</permissions>
<abstract><p>In the crowded world of supraglottic airway devices (SADs), many papers compare the easiness of insertion based on the different endpoints of an operator’s satisfaction: first pass success, ventilation effectiveness, complications and morbidity. Proseal LMA<sup>™</sup>
(Laryngeal Mask Airway, Teleflex Medical, Dublin, Ireland) has been extensively studied because on one hand it has a steeper learning curve and more complex insertion when compared with other SADs and on the other hand many alternative techniques are available to facilitate insertion. This research is part of a larger body of studies exploring the issue that some devices are more difficult to insert because of many features related to sizing, constructive material, airway conduit and cuff design, performance and last but not least experience. Nevertheless, the biggest question might be the search for a systematic categorization of insertion difficulty features and identification of criteria allowing the choice for the best device and consequently for the best insertion technique. Given that, as a result of many intrinsic characteristics of the device we are using, insertion might become the secondary issue to be considered only after we clearly identify what makes it difficult, and to be counterbalanced on the results we expect from the device, performance we can achieve and degree of airway protection it could grant. The aim of this narrative review is to consider which factors might affect or condition SAD insertion difficulty and to try identifying some criteria addressing physicians pertaining to the use of SADs in clinical practice.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group><kwd>Supraglottic airway devices</kwd>
<kwd>laryngeal mask airway</kwd>
<kwd>sore throat</kwd>
<kwd>airway management</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
</pmc>
<affiliations><list><country><li>Italie</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree><country name="Italie"><noRegion><name sortKey="Sorbello, Massimiliano" sort="Sorbello, Massimiliano" uniqKey="Sorbello M" first="Massimiliano" last="Sorbello">Massimiliano Sorbello</name>
</noRegion>
<name sortKey="Petrini, Flavia" sort="Petrini, Flavia" uniqKey="Petrini F" first="Flavia" last="Petrini">Flavia Petrini</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Pmc/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000046 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000046 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Pmc |étape= Checkpoint |type= RBID |clé= PMC:5396902 |texte= Supraglottic Airway Devices: the Search for the Best Insertion Technique or the Time to Change Our Point of View? }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:28439437" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. | ![]() |