RCT comparing implants with turned and anodically oxidized surfaces: A pilot study, a 3-year follow-up
Identifieur interne : 000670 ( PascalFrancis/Curation ); précédent : 000669; suivant : 000671RCT comparing implants with turned and anodically oxidized surfaces: A pilot study, a 3-year follow-up
Auteurs : Elena A. Nick [Pays-Bas] ; Nele Van Assche [Belgique] ; Wim Coucke [Belgique] ; Wim Teughels [Belgique] ; Marc Quirynen [Belgique]Source :
- Journal of clinical periodontology [ 0303-6979 ] ; 2012.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Aim: This 3-year prospective randomized controlled trial compared the clinical, microbiological and biochemical outcome of minimally (Turned, Tur) and moderately rough (TiUnite®, TiU) implant surfaces in a split-mouth design. Material and methods: The study population included 14 subjects: nine fully edentulous and five partially edentulous subjects with a history of periodontitis. Implants (n = 78, 39 Tur and 39 TiU) were installed randomly in each patient. Peri-implant clinical parameters and intra-oral radiographs were recorded after 3 years of loading. Subgingival plaque and peri-implant crevicular fluid samples were collected and analysed using culture and quantitative polymerase chain reaction for the biofilm, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the concentration of osteoprotegerin and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand, respectively. Results: No statistically significant differences in clinical, microbiological and biochemical parameters could be observed when comparing the Tur and TiU implant surfaces. Conclusion: After 3 years of loading, in periodontitis susceptible patients, the moderately rough, TiU implants demonstrated a similar clinical outcome compared with the smoother, turned implants. Longer follow-up and studies using different implant types are needed to confirm the statement that minimally and moderately rough implant surfaces perform similar, both from a clinical and from a microbiological point of view.
| pA |
|
|---|
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PascalFrancis, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000026
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:13-0028734Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">RCT comparing implants with turned and anodically oxidized surfaces: A pilot study, a 3-year follow-up</title><author><name sortKey="Nick, Elena A" sort="Nick, Elena A" uniqKey="Nick E" first="Elena A." last="Nick">Elena A. Nick</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Periodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam</s1><s2>Amsterdam</s2><s3>NLD</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Pays-Bas</country></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Assche, Nele" sort="Van Assche, Nele" uniqKey="Van Assche N" first="Nele" last="Van Assche">Nele Van Assche</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven</s1><s2>Leuven</s2><s3>BEL</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ><sZ>4 aut.</sZ><sZ>5 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Belgique</country></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Coucke, Wim" sort="Coucke, Wim" uniqKey="Coucke W" first="Wim" last="Coucke">Wim Coucke</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Clinical Biology, Scientific Institute of Public Health</s1><s2>Brussels</s2><s3>BEL</s3><sZ>3 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Belgique</country></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Teughels, Wim" sort="Teughels, Wim" uniqKey="Teughels W" first="Wim" last="Teughels">Wim Teughels</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven</s1><s2>Leuven</s2><s3>BEL</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ><sZ>4 aut.</sZ><sZ>5 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Belgique</country></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, Marc" sort="Quirynen, Marc" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="Marc" last="Quirynen">Marc Quirynen</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven</s1><s2>Leuven</s2><s3>BEL</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ><sZ>4 aut.</sZ><sZ>5 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Belgique</country></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno><idno type="inist">13-0028734</idno><date when="2012">2012</date><idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 13-0028734 INIST</idno><idno type="RBID">Pascal:13-0028734</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000026</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">000670</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">RCT comparing implants with turned and anodically oxidized surfaces: A pilot study, a 3-year follow-up</title><author><name sortKey="Nick, Elena A" sort="Nick, Elena A" uniqKey="Nick E" first="Elena A." last="Nick">Elena A. Nick</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Periodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam</s1><s2>Amsterdam</s2><s3>NLD</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Pays-Bas</country></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Assche, Nele" sort="Van Assche, Nele" uniqKey="Van Assche N" first="Nele" last="Van Assche">Nele Van Assche</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven</s1><s2>Leuven</s2><s3>BEL</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ><sZ>4 aut.</sZ><sZ>5 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Belgique</country></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Coucke, Wim" sort="Coucke, Wim" uniqKey="Coucke W" first="Wim" last="Coucke">Wim Coucke</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Clinical Biology, Scientific Institute of Public Health</s1><s2>Brussels</s2><s3>BEL</s3><sZ>3 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Belgique</country></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Teughels, Wim" sort="Teughels, Wim" uniqKey="Teughels W" first="Wim" last="Teughels">Wim Teughels</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven</s1><s2>Leuven</s2><s3>BEL</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ><sZ>4 aut.</sZ><sZ>5 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Belgique</country></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, Marc" sort="Quirynen, Marc" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="Marc" last="Quirynen">Marc Quirynen</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven</s1><s2>Leuven</s2><s3>BEL</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ><sZ>4 aut.</sZ><sZ>5 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Belgique</country></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of clinical periodontology</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. clin. periodontol.</title><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno><imprint><date when="2012">2012</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of clinical periodontology</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. clin. periodontol.</title><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Dentistry</term><term>Evaluation</term><term>Follow up study</term><term>Implant</term><term>Microbiology</term><term>Osteopenia</term><term>Roughness</term><term>Surface</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Ostéopénie</term><term>Implant</term><term>Surface</term><term>Etude longitudinale</term><term>Evaluation</term><term>Rugosité</term><term>Microbiologie</term><term>Dentisterie</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Aim: This 3-year prospective randomized controlled trial compared the clinical, microbiological and biochemical outcome of minimally (Turned, Tur) and moderately rough (TiUnite®, TiU) implant surfaces in a split-mouth design. Material and methods: The study population included 14 subjects: nine fully edentulous and five partially edentulous subjects with a history of periodontitis. Implants (n = 78, 39 Tur and 39 TiU) were installed randomly in each patient. Peri-implant clinical parameters and intra-oral radiographs were recorded after 3 years of loading. Subgingival plaque and peri-implant crevicular fluid samples were collected and analysed using culture and quantitative polymerase chain reaction for the biofilm, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the concentration of osteoprotegerin and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand, respectively. Results: No statistically significant differences in clinical, microbiological and biochemical parameters could be observed when comparing the Tur and TiU implant surfaces. Conclusion: After 3 years of loading, in periodontitis susceptible patients, the moderately rough, TiU implants demonstrated a similar clinical outcome compared with the smoother, turned implants. Longer follow-up and studies using different implant types are needed to confirm the statement that minimally and moderately rough implant surfaces perform similar, both from a clinical and from a microbiological point of view.</div></front></TEI><inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0303-6979</s0></fA01><fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. clin. periodontol.</s0></fA03><fA05><s2>39</s2></fA05><fA06><s2>12</s2></fA06><fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>RCT comparing implants with turned and anodically oxidized surfaces: A pilot study, a 3-year follow-up</s1></fA08><fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>NICK (Elena A.)</s1></fA11><fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>VAN ASSCHE (Nele)</s1></fA11><fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>COUCKE (Wim)</s1></fA11><fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>TEUGHELS (Wim)</s1></fA11><fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>QUIRYNEN (Marc)</s1></fA11><fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Periodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam</s1><s2>Amsterdam</s2><s3>NLD</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></fA14><fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven</s1><s2>Leuven</s2><s3>BEL</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ><sZ>4 aut.</sZ><sZ>5 aut.</sZ></fA14><fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Clinical Biology, Scientific Institute of Public Health</s1><s2>Brussels</s2><s3>BEL</s3><sZ>3 aut.</sZ></fA14><fA20><s1>1183-1190</s1></fA20><fA21><s1>2012</s1></fA21><fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0></fA23><fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1><s2>16273</s2><s5>354000505431080090</s5></fA43><fA44><s0>0000</s0><s1>© 2013 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1></fA44><fA45><s0>1 p.1/2</s0></fA45><fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>13-0028734</s0></fA47><fA60><s1>P</s1></fA60><fA61><s0>A</s0></fA61><fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of clinical periodontology</s0></fA64><fA66 i1="01"><s0>GBR</s0></fA66><fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Aim: This 3-year prospective randomized controlled trial compared the clinical, microbiological and biochemical outcome of minimally (Turned, Tur) and moderately rough (TiUnite®, TiU) implant surfaces in a split-mouth design. Material and methods: The study population included 14 subjects: nine fully edentulous and five partially edentulous subjects with a history of periodontitis. Implants (n = 78, 39 Tur and 39 TiU) were installed randomly in each patient. Peri-implant clinical parameters and intra-oral radiographs were recorded after 3 years of loading. Subgingival plaque and peri-implant crevicular fluid samples were collected and analysed using culture and quantitative polymerase chain reaction for the biofilm, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the concentration of osteoprotegerin and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand, respectively. Results: No statistically significant differences in clinical, microbiological and biochemical parameters could be observed when comparing the Tur and TiU implant surfaces. Conclusion: After 3 years of loading, in periodontitis susceptible patients, the moderately rough, TiU implants demonstrated a similar clinical outcome compared with the smoother, turned implants. Longer follow-up and studies using different implant types are needed to confirm the statement that minimally and moderately rough implant surfaces perform similar, both from a clinical and from a microbiological point of view.</s0></fC01><fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B10C02</s0></fC02><fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>002B15A</s0></fC02><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Ostéopénie</s0><s5>01</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Osteopenia</s0><s5>01</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Osteopenia</s0><s5>01</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Implant</s0><s5>07</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Implant</s0><s5>07</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Implante</s0><s5>07</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Surface</s0><s5>08</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Surface</s0><s5>08</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Superficie</s0><s5>08</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude longitudinale</s0><s5>09</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Follow up study</s0><s5>09</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio longitudinal</s0><s5>09</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Evaluation</s0><s5>13</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Evaluation</s0><s5>13</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Evaluación</s0><s5>13</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Rugosité</s0><s5>14</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Roughness</s0><s5>14</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Rugosidad</s0><s5>14</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Microbiologie</s0><s5>15</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Microbiology</s0><s5>15</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Microbiología</s0><s5>15</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dentisterie</s0><s5>30</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Dentistry</s0><s5>30</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Odontología</s0><s5>30</s5></fC03><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pathologie du système ostéoarticulaire</s0><s5>37</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</s0><s5>37</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sistema osteoarticular patología</s0><s5>37</s5></fC07><fN21><s1>014</s1></fN21><fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1></fN44><fN82><s1>OTO</s1></fN82></pA></standard></inist></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000670 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000670 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PascalFrancis
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= Pascal:13-0028734
|texte= RCT comparing implants with turned and anodically oxidized surfaces: A pilot study, a 3-year follow-up
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |