Curation
PascalFrancis
Racine
Curation
Checkpoint
PascalFrancis
Racine
PascalFrancis
Exploration
Accueil
Racine
Racine

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Accuracy assessment of computer-assisted flapless implant placement in partial edentulism

Identifieur interne : 000474 ( PascalFrancis/Curation ); précédent : 000473; suivant : 000475

Accuracy assessment of computer-assisted flapless implant placement in partial edentulism

Auteurs : N. Van Assche [Belgique] ; D. Van Steenberghe [Belgique] ; M. Quirynen [Belgique] ; R. Jacobs [Belgique]

Source :

RBID : Pascal:10-0176536

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Aim: To assess the accuracy of implants placed flapless by a stereolithographic template in partially edentulous patients. Material and Methods: Eight patients, requiring two to four implants (maxilla or mandible), were consecutively recruited. Radiographical data were obtained by means of a cone beam or a multi-slice CT scan and imported in a software program. Implants (n = 21) were planned in a virtual environment, leading to the manufacture of one stereolithographic template per patient to guide the implant placement in a one-stage flapless procedure. A postoperative cone beam CT was performed to calculate the difference between virtual implant (n = 21) positions in the preoperative planning and postoperative situation. Results: A mean angular deviation of 2.7° (range 0.4-8, SD 1.9), with a mean deviation at the apex of 1.0 mm (range 0.2-3.0, SD 0.7), was observed. If one patient, a dropout because of non-conformity with the protocol, was excluded, the angular deviation was reduced to 2.2° (range 0.6-3.9, SD 1.1), and the apical deviation to 0.9 mm (range 0.2-1.8). Conclusion: Based on this limited patient population, a flapless implant installation appears to be a useful procedure even when based on accurate and reliable 3D CT-based image data and a dedicated implant planning software.
pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0303-6979
A03   1    @0 J. clin. periodontol.
A05       @2 37
A06       @2 4
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Accuracy assessment of computer-assisted flapless implant placement in partial edentulism
A11 01  1    @1 VAN ASSCHE (N.)
A11 02  1    @1 VAN STEENBERGHE (D.)
A11 03  1    @1 QUIRYNEN (M.)
A11 04  1    @1 JACOBS (R.)
A14 01      @1 Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven @2 Leuven @3 BEL @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut.
A14 02      @1 Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven @2 Leuven @3 BEL @Z 2 aut.
A14 03      @1 Oral Imaging Center, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven @2 Leuven @3 BEL @Z 4 aut.
A20       @1 398-403
A21       @1 2010
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 16273 @5 354000181495760110
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2010 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 3/4 p.
A47 01  1    @0 10-0176536
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Journal of clinical periodontology
A66 01      @0 GBR
C01 01    ENG  @0 Aim: To assess the accuracy of implants placed flapless by a stereolithographic template in partially edentulous patients. Material and Methods: Eight patients, requiring two to four implants (maxilla or mandible), were consecutively recruited. Radiographical data were obtained by means of a cone beam or a multi-slice CT scan and imported in a software program. Implants (n = 21) were planned in a virtual environment, leading to the manufacture of one stereolithographic template per patient to guide the implant placement in a one-stage flapless procedure. A postoperative cone beam CT was performed to calculate the difference between virtual implant (n = 21) positions in the preoperative planning and postoperative situation. Results: A mean angular deviation of 2.7° (range 0.4-8, SD 1.9), with a mean deviation at the apex of 1.0 mm (range 0.2-3.0, SD 0.7), was observed. If one patient, a dropout because of non-conformity with the protocol, was excluded, the angular deviation was reduced to 2.2° (range 0.6-3.9, SD 1.1), and the apical deviation to 0.9 mm (range 0.2-1.8). Conclusion: Based on this limited patient population, a flapless implant installation appears to be a useful procedure even when based on accurate and reliable 3D CT-based image data and a dedicated implant planning software.
C02 01  X    @0 002B10C02
C02 02  X    @0 002B25C02
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Edentation @5 01
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Edentulousness @5 01
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Edentación @5 01
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Tomodensitométrie @5 04
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Computerized axial tomography @5 04
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Tomodensitometría @5 04
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Image tridimensionnelle @5 05
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 Tridimensional image @5 05
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Imagen tridimensional @5 05
C03 04  X  FRE  @0 Précision @5 07
C03 04  X  ENG  @0 Accuracy @5 07
C03 04  X  SPA  @0 Precisión @5 07
C03 05  X  FRE  @0 Assistance ordinateur @5 08
C03 05  X  ENG  @0 Computer aid @5 08
C03 05  X  SPA  @0 Asistencia ordenador @5 08
C03 06  X  FRE  @0 Implanté @5 09
C03 06  X  ENG  @0 Implanted @5 09
C03 06  X  SPA  @0 Implantado @5 09
C03 07  X  FRE  @0 Partiel @5 13
C03 07  X  ENG  @0 Partial @5 13
C03 07  X  SPA  @0 Parcial @5 13
C03 08  X  FRE  @0 Stéréolithographie @5 14
C03 08  X  ENG  @0 Stereolithography @5 14
C03 08  X  SPA  @0 Stereolitografia @5 14
C03 09  X  FRE  @0 Dentisterie @5 30
C03 09  X  ENG  @0 Dentistry @5 30
C03 09  X  SPA  @0 Odontología @5 30
C03 10  X  FRE  @0 Traitement @5 31
C03 10  X  ENG  @0 Treatment @5 31
C03 10  X  SPA  @0 Tratamiento @5 31
C03 11  X  FRE  @0 Implant dentaire @4 CD @5 96
C03 11  X  ENG  @0 Dental implant @4 CD @5 96
C03 12  X  FRE  @0 Chirurgie assistée par ordinateur @4 CD @5 97
C03 12  X  ENG  @0 Computer-assisted surgery @4 CD @5 97
C03 13  X  FRE  @0 Faisceau conique @4 CD @5 98
C03 13  X  ENG  @0 Cone beam @4 CD @5 98
C07 01  X  FRE  @0 Pathologie dentaire @5 37
C07 01  X  ENG  @0 Dental disease @5 37
C07 01  X  SPA  @0 Diente patología @5 37
C07 02  X  FRE  @0 Stomatologie @5 38
C07 02  X  ENG  @0 Stomatology @5 38
C07 02  X  SPA  @0 Estomatología @5 38
C07 03  X  FRE  @0 Imagerie médicale @5 39
C07 03  X  ENG  @0 Medical imagery @5 39
C07 03  X  SPA  @0 Imaginería médica @5 39
C07 04  X  FRE  @0 Radiodiagnostic @5 40
C07 04  X  ENG  @0 Radiodiagnosis @5 40
C07 04  X  SPA  @0 Radiodiagnóstico @5 40
N21       @1 116
N44 01      @1 OTO
N82       @1 OTO

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:10-0176536

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Accuracy assessment of computer-assisted flapless implant placement in partial edentulism</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Assche, N" sort="Van Assche, N" uniqKey="Van Assche N" first="N." last="Van Assche">N. Van Assche</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven</s1>
<s2>Leuven</s2>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Belgique</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" sort="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="D." last="Van Steenberghe">D. Van Steenberghe</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven</s1>
<s2>Leuven</s2>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Belgique</country>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven</s1>
<s2>Leuven</s2>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Belgique</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Quirynen, M" sort="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="M." last="Quirynen">M. Quirynen</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven</s1>
<s2>Leuven</s2>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Belgique</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Jacobs, R" sort="Jacobs, R" uniqKey="Jacobs R" first="R." last="Jacobs">R. Jacobs</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="03">
<s1>Oral Imaging Center, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven</s1>
<s2>Leuven</s2>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Belgique</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">10-0176536</idno>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 10-0176536 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:10-0176536</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000227</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">000474</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Accuracy assessment of computer-assisted flapless implant placement in partial edentulism</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Assche, N" sort="Van Assche, N" uniqKey="Van Assche N" first="N." last="Van Assche">N. Van Assche</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven</s1>
<s2>Leuven</s2>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Belgique</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" sort="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="D." last="Van Steenberghe">D. Van Steenberghe</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven</s1>
<s2>Leuven</s2>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Belgique</country>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven</s1>
<s2>Leuven</s2>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Belgique</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Quirynen, M" sort="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="M." last="Quirynen">M. Quirynen</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven</s1>
<s2>Leuven</s2>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Belgique</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Jacobs, R" sort="Jacobs, R" uniqKey="Jacobs R" first="R." last="Jacobs">R. Jacobs</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="03">
<s1>Oral Imaging Center, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven</s1>
<s2>Leuven</s2>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Belgique</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of clinical periodontology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. clin. periodontol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of clinical periodontology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. clin. periodontol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Accuracy</term>
<term>Computer aid</term>
<term>Computer-assisted surgery</term>
<term>Computerized axial tomography</term>
<term>Cone beam</term>
<term>Dental implant</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Edentulousness</term>
<term>Implanted</term>
<term>Partial</term>
<term>Stereolithography</term>
<term>Treatment</term>
<term>Tridimensional image</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Edentation</term>
<term>Tomodensitométrie</term>
<term>Image tridimensionnelle</term>
<term>Précision</term>
<term>Assistance ordinateur</term>
<term>Implanté</term>
<term>Partiel</term>
<term>Stéréolithographie</term>
<term>Dentisterie</term>
<term>Traitement</term>
<term>Implant dentaire</term>
<term>Chirurgie assistée par ordinateur</term>
<term>Faisceau conique</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Aim: To assess the accuracy of implants placed flapless by a stereolithographic template in partially edentulous patients. Material and Methods: Eight patients, requiring two to four implants (maxilla or mandible), were consecutively recruited. Radiographical data were obtained by means of a cone beam or a multi-slice CT scan and imported in a software program. Implants (n = 21) were planned in a virtual environment, leading to the manufacture of one stereolithographic template per patient to guide the implant placement in a one-stage flapless procedure. A postoperative cone beam CT was performed to calculate the difference between virtual implant (n = 21) positions in the preoperative planning and postoperative situation. Results: A mean angular deviation of 2.7° (range 0.4-8, SD 1.9), with a mean deviation at the apex of 1.0 mm (range 0.2-3.0, SD 0.7), was observed. If one patient, a dropout because of non-conformity with the protocol, was excluded, the angular deviation was reduced to 2.2° (range 0.6-3.9, SD 1.1), and the apical deviation to 0.9 mm (range 0.2-1.8). Conclusion: Based on this limited patient population, a flapless implant installation appears to be a useful procedure even when based on accurate and reliable 3D CT-based image data and a dedicated implant planning software.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0303-6979</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>J. clin. periodontol.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>37</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>4</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Accuracy assessment of computer-assisted flapless implant placement in partial edentulism</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>VAN ASSCHE (N.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>VAN STEENBERGHE (D.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1">
<s1>QUIRYNEN (M.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1">
<s1>JACOBS (R.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven</s1>
<s2>Leuven</s2>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven</s1>
<s2>Leuven</s2>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03">
<s1>Oral Imaging Center, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven</s1>
<s2>Leuven</s2>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>398-403</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2010</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>16273</s2>
<s5>354000181495760110</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2010 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>3/4 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>10-0176536</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Journal of clinical periodontology</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>GBR</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>Aim: To assess the accuracy of implants placed flapless by a stereolithographic template in partially edentulous patients. Material and Methods: Eight patients, requiring two to four implants (maxilla or mandible), were consecutively recruited. Radiographical data were obtained by means of a cone beam or a multi-slice CT scan and imported in a software program. Implants (n = 21) were planned in a virtual environment, leading to the manufacture of one stereolithographic template per patient to guide the implant placement in a one-stage flapless procedure. A postoperative cone beam CT was performed to calculate the difference between virtual implant (n = 21) positions in the preoperative planning and postoperative situation. Results: A mean angular deviation of 2.7° (range 0.4-8, SD 1.9), with a mean deviation at the apex of 1.0 mm (range 0.2-3.0, SD 0.7), was observed. If one patient, a dropout because of non-conformity with the protocol, was excluded, the angular deviation was reduced to 2.2° (range 0.6-3.9, SD 1.1), and the apical deviation to 0.9 mm (range 0.2-1.8). Conclusion: Based on this limited patient population, a flapless implant installation appears to be a useful procedure even when based on accurate and reliable 3D CT-based image data and a dedicated implant planning software.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>002B10C02</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X">
<s0>002B25C02</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Edentation</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Edentulousness</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Edentación</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Tomodensitométrie</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Computerized axial tomography</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Tomodensitometría</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Image tridimensionnelle</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Tridimensional image</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Imagen tridimensional</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Précision</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Accuracy</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Precisión</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Assistance ordinateur</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Computer aid</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Asistencia ordenador</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Implanté</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Implanted</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Implantado</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Partiel</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Partial</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Parcial</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Stéréolithographie</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Stereolithography</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Stereolitografia</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Dentisterie</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Dentistry</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Odontología</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Traitement</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Treatment</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Tratamiento</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Implant dentaire</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Dental implant</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Chirurgie assistée par ordinateur</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>97</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Computer-assisted surgery</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>97</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Faisceau conique</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>98</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Cone beam</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>98</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Pathologie dentaire</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Dental disease</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Diente patología</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Stomatologie</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Stomatology</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Estomatología</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Imagerie médicale</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Medical imagery</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Imaginería médica</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Radiodiagnostic</s0>
<s5>40</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Radiodiagnosis</s0>
<s5>40</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Radiodiagnóstico</s0>
<s5>40</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21>
<s1>116</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01">
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82>
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000474 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000474 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:10-0176536
   |texte=   Accuracy assessment of computer-assisted flapless implant placement in partial edentulism
}}
Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022