EdenteV2, PascalFrancis, Curation, bibRecord, 000364

Dental rehabilitation in 101 primarily reconstructed jaws after segmental resections : Possibilities and problems. An 18-year study

Identifieur interne : 000364 ( PascalFrancis/Curation ); précédent : 000363; suivant : 000365

Dental rehabilitation in 101 primarily reconstructed jaws after segmental resections : Possibilities and problems. An 18-year study

Auteurs : Ragnar Adell [Suède] ; Börje Svensson [Suède] ; Torun Bagenholm [Suède]

Source :

Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery [ 1010-5182 ] ; 2008.

RBID : Pascal:08-0466547

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Résection chirurgicale, Reconstruction anatomique, Chirurgie, Dent, Réhabilitation, Réadaptation, Rééducation, Mâchoire, Segmentaire, Prothèse, Implant, Microchirurgie, Stomatologie, Traitement.
Wicri :
- topic : Chirurgie.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Anatomical reconstruction, Implant, Jaw, Microsurgery, Prosthesis, Reeducation, Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation(human), Segmental, Stomatology, Surgery, Surgical resection, Tooth, Treatment.

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the possibility of providing every patient with dental rehabilitation after segmental resections and primary jaw reconstructions. Materials and methods: Ninety-five consecutive patients, followed for more than 1 year, were retrospectively evaluated without any exclusions, using the patients' records. Results: • Forty percent received dental substitutes after a mean of 32 months for implant bridges and 20 months for removable dentures. Thirty-one percent were implant bridges and 9% removable dentures. • Of patients with mandibles, reconstructed with bone, 48% were dentally rehabilitated. • Seventeen percent decided against dental rehabilitation, either because they could manage with their remaining teeth or - in edentulous cases - because they could not cope with the additional treatment thought-to-be necessary for dental rehabilitation. • Jaws, reconstructed without bone, did not receive any dental rehabilitation • The overall survival rate of the dental reconstructions was 92% with a mean observation time of 36 months (0-129). For implant-supported bridges, the survival ratio was 90% with a mean observation time of 39 months (0-129). • The overall survival rate of dental implants was 90% with a mean observation time of 53 months (12-149). Conclusions: When all patients were accounted for, less than 50% had their dentitions restored. This took more than 2 years to accomplish. Edentulous jaws, reconstructed without bone, never became rehabilitated. Several patients could not cope with the additional treatment necessary to restore their dentitions. The overall survival rate of dental reconstructions and implants was at least 90%.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 1010-5182`
A02	`01`			`@0 JCMSET`
A03		`1`		`@0 J. cranio-maxillo-fac. surg.`
A05				`@2 36`
A06				`@2 7`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Dental rehabilitation in 101 primarily reconstructed jaws after segmental resections : Possibilities and problems. An 18-year study`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 ADELL (Ragnar)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 SVENSSON (Börje)`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 BAGENHOLM (Torun)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Centre for Head and Neck Oncology Örebro University Hospital @3 SWE @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut.`
A14	`02`			`@1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Örebro University Hospital @3 SWE @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut.`
A20				`@1 395-402`
A21				`@1 2008`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 15904 @5 354000185630240050`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2008 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 1 p.1/4`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 08-0466547`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery`
A66	`01`			`@0 GBR`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 Aims: To evaluate the possibility of providing every patient with dental rehabilitation after segmental resections and primary jaw reconstructions. Materials and methods: Ninety-five consecutive patients, followed for more than 1 year, were retrospectively evaluated without any exclusions, using the patients' records. Results: • Forty percent received dental substitutes after a mean of 32 months for implant bridges and 20 months for removable dentures. Thirty-one percent were implant bridges and 9% removable dentures. • Of patients with mandibles, reconstructed with bone, 48% were dentally rehabilitated. • Seventeen percent decided against dental rehabilitation, either because they could manage with their remaining teeth or - in edentulous cases - because they could not cope with the additional treatment thought-to-be necessary for dental rehabilitation. • Jaws, reconstructed without bone, did not receive any dental rehabilitation • The overall survival rate of the dental reconstructions was 92% with a mean observation time of 36 months (0-129). For implant-supported bridges, the survival ratio was 90% with a mean observation time of 39 months (0-129). • The overall survival rate of dental implants was 90% with a mean observation time of 53 months (12-149). Conclusions: When all patients were accounted for, less than 50% had their dentitions restored. This took more than 2 years to accomplish. Edentulous jaws, reconstructed without bone, never became rehabilitated. Several patients could not cope with the additional treatment necessary to restore their dentitions. The overall survival rate of dental reconstructions and implants was at least 90%.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002B10`
C02	`02`	`X`		`@0 002B26O`
C02	`03`	`X`		`@0 002B25I`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Résection chirurgicale @5 04`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Surgical resection @5 04`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Resección quirúrgica @5 04`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Reconstruction anatomique @5 05`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Anatomical reconstruction @5 05`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Reconstrucción anatómica @5 05`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Chirurgie @5 06`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Surgery @5 06`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cirugía @5 06`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Dent @5 07`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Tooth @5 07`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Diente @5 07`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Réhabilitation @5 08`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Rehabilitation @5 08`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Rehabilitación @5 08`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Réadaptation @5 09`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Rehabilitation(human) @5 09`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Readaptación @5 09`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Rééducation @5 13`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Reeducation @5 13`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Reeducación @5 13`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Mâchoire @5 14`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Jaw @5 14`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Maxilar @5 14`
C03	`09`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Segmentaire @5 15`
C03	`09`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Segmental @5 15`
C03	`09`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Segmentario @5 15`
C03	`10`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Prothèse @5 16`
C03	`10`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Prosthesis @5 16`
C03	`10`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Prótesis @5 16`
C03	`11`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Implant @5 17`
C03	`11`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Implant @5 17`
C03	`11`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Implante @5 17`
C03	`12`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Microchirurgie @5 18`
C03	`12`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Microsurgery @5 18`
C03	`12`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Microcirugía @5 18`
C03	`13`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Stomatologie @5 19`
C03	`13`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Stomatology @5 19`
C03	`13`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estomatología @5 19`
C03	`14`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Traitement @5 30`
C03	`14`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Treatment @5 30`
C03	`14`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Tratamiento @5 30`
N21				`@1 301`
N44	`01`			`@1 OTO`
N82				`@1 OTO`

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

to stream PascalFrancis, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000339

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:08-0466547

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Dental rehabilitation in 101 primarily reconstructed jaws after segmental resections : Possibilities and problems. An 18-year study</title>
<author><name sortKey="Adell, Ragnar" sort="Adell, Ragnar" uniqKey="Adell R" first="Ragnar" last="Adell">Ragnar Adell</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Centre for Head and Neck Oncology Örebro University Hospital</s1>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Suède</country>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Örebro University Hospital</s1>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Suède</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Svensson, Borje" sort="Svensson, Borje" uniqKey="Svensson B" first="Börje" last="Svensson">Börje Svensson</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Centre for Head and Neck Oncology Örebro University Hospital</s1>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Suède</country>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Örebro University Hospital</s1>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Suède</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Bagenholm, Torun" sort="Bagenholm, Torun" uniqKey="Bagenholm T" first="Torun" last="Bagenholm">Torun Bagenholm</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Centre for Head and Neck Oncology Örebro University Hospital</s1>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Suède</country>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Örebro University Hospital</s1>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Suède</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">08-0466547</idno>
<date when="2008">2008</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 08-0466547 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:08-0466547</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000339</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">000364</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Dental rehabilitation in 101 primarily reconstructed jaws after segmental resections : Possibilities and problems. An 18-year study</title>
<author><name sortKey="Adell, Ragnar" sort="Adell, Ragnar" uniqKey="Adell R" first="Ragnar" last="Adell">Ragnar Adell</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Centre for Head and Neck Oncology Örebro University Hospital</s1>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Suède</country>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Örebro University Hospital</s1>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Suède</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Svensson, Borje" sort="Svensson, Borje" uniqKey="Svensson B" first="Börje" last="Svensson">Börje Svensson</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Centre for Head and Neck Oncology Örebro University Hospital</s1>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Suède</country>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Örebro University Hospital</s1>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Suède</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Bagenholm, Torun" sort="Bagenholm, Torun" uniqKey="Bagenholm T" first="Torun" last="Bagenholm">Torun Bagenholm</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Centre for Head and Neck Oncology Örebro University Hospital</s1>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Suède</country>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Örebro University Hospital</s1>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Suède</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. cranio-maxillo-fac. surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1010-5182</idno>
<imprint><date when="2008">2008</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. cranio-maxillo-fac. surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1010-5182</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Anatomical reconstruction</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Jaw</term>
<term>Microsurgery</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Reeducation</term>
<term>Rehabilitation</term>
<term>Rehabilitation(human)</term>
<term>Segmental</term>
<term>Stomatology</term>
<term>Surgery</term>
<term>Surgical resection</term>
<term>Tooth</term>
<term>Treatment</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Résection chirurgicale</term>
<term>Reconstruction anatomique</term>
<term>Chirurgie</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Réhabilitation</term>
<term>Réadaptation</term>
<term>Rééducation</term>
<term>Mâchoire</term>
<term>Segmentaire</term>
<term>Prothèse</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Microchirurgie</term>
<term>Stomatologie</term>
<term>Traitement</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Chirurgie</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Aims: To evaluate the possibility of providing every patient with dental rehabilitation after segmental resections and primary jaw reconstructions. Materials and methods: Ninety-five consecutive patients, followed for more than 1 year, were retrospectively evaluated without any exclusions, using the patients' records. Results: • Forty percent received dental substitutes after a mean of 32 months for implant bridges and 20 months for removable dentures. Thirty-one percent were implant bridges and 9% removable dentures. • Of patients with mandibles, reconstructed with bone, 48% were dentally rehabilitated. • Seventeen percent decided against dental rehabilitation, either because they could manage with their remaining teeth or - in edentulous cases - because they could not cope with the additional treatment thought-to-be necessary for dental rehabilitation. • Jaws, reconstructed without bone, did not receive any dental rehabilitation • The overall survival rate of the dental reconstructions was 92% with a mean observation time of 36 months (0-129). For implant-supported bridges, the survival ratio was 90% with a mean observation time of 39 months (0-129). • The overall survival rate of dental implants was 90% with a mean observation time of 53 months (12-149). Conclusions: When all patients were accounted for, less than 50% had their dentitions restored. This took more than 2 years to accomplish. Edentulous jaws, reconstructed without bone, never became rehabilitated. Several patients could not cope with the additional treatment necessary to restore their dentitions. The overall survival rate of dental reconstructions and implants was at least 90%.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>1010-5182</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>JCMSET</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. cranio-maxillo-fac. surg.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>36</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>7</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Dental rehabilitation in 101 primarily reconstructed jaws after segmental resections : Possibilities and problems. An 18-year study</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>ADELL (Ragnar)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>SVENSSON (Börje)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>BAGENHOLM (Torun)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Centre for Head and Neck Oncology Örebro University Hospital</s1>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Örebro University Hospital</s1>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>395-402</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2008</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>15904</s2>
<s5>354000185630240050</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2008 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>1 p.1/4</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>08-0466547</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>GBR</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Aims: To evaluate the possibility of providing every patient with dental rehabilitation after segmental resections and primary jaw reconstructions. Materials and methods: Ninety-five consecutive patients, followed for more than 1 year, were retrospectively evaluated without any exclusions, using the patients' records. Results: • Forty percent received dental substitutes after a mean of 32 months for implant bridges and 20 months for removable dentures. Thirty-one percent were implant bridges and 9% removable dentures. • Of patients with mandibles, reconstructed with bone, 48% were dentally rehabilitated. • Seventeen percent decided against dental rehabilitation, either because they could manage with their remaining teeth or - in edentulous cases - because they could not cope with the additional treatment thought-to-be necessary for dental rehabilitation. • Jaws, reconstructed without bone, did not receive any dental rehabilitation • The overall survival rate of the dental reconstructions was 92% with a mean observation time of 36 months (0-129). For implant-supported bridges, the survival ratio was 90% with a mean observation time of 39 months (0-129). • The overall survival rate of dental implants was 90% with a mean observation time of 53 months (12-149). Conclusions: When all patients were accounted for, less than 50% had their dentitions restored. This took more than 2 years to accomplish. Edentulous jaws, reconstructed without bone, never became rehabilitated. Several patients could not cope with the additional treatment necessary to restore their dentitions. The overall survival rate of dental reconstructions and implants was at least 90%.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B10</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>002B26O</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="03" i2="X"><s0>002B25I</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Résection chirurgicale</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Surgical resection</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Resección quirúrgica</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Reconstruction anatomique</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Anatomical reconstruction</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Reconstrucción anatómica</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Chirurgie</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Surgery</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cirugía</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dent</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Tooth</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Diente</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Réhabilitation</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Rehabilitation</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Rehabilitación</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Réadaptation</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Rehabilitation(human)</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Readaptación</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Rééducation</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Reeducation</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Reeducación</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Mâchoire</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Jaw</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Maxilar</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Segmentaire</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Segmental</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Segmentario</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Prothèse</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Prosthesis</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Prótesis</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Implant</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Implant</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Implante</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Microchirurgie</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Microsurgery</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Microcirugía</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Stomatologie</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Stomatology</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estomatología</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Traitement</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Treatment</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tratamiento</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21><s1>301</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000364 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000364 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:08-0466547
   |texte=   Dental rehabilitation in 101 primarily reconstructed jaws after segmental resections : Possibilities and problems. An 18-year study
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022

	Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Dental rehabilitation in 101 primarily reconstructed jaws after segmental resections : Possibilities and problems. An 18-year study

Dental rehabilitation in 101 primarily reconstructed jaws after segmental resections : Possibilities and problems. An 18-year study

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri