EdenteV2, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000808

Patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures : A comparison of three treatment strategies with ITI-dental implants

Identifieur interne : 000808 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000807; suivant : 000809

Patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures : A comparison of three treatment strategies with ITI-dental implants

Auteurs : D. Wismeijer ; M. A. J. Van Waas ; J. I. J. F. Vermeeren ; J. Mulder ; W. Kalk

Source :

International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery [ 0901-5027 ] ; 1997.

RBID : Pascal:97-0428829

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Prothèse, Dent, Implant, Edentation, Atrophie, Mandibule, Satisfaction, Malade, Etude comparative, Traitement, Technique, Homme, Essai clinique.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Atrophia, Clinical trial, Comparative study, Edentulousness, Human, Implant, Mandible, Patient, Prosthesis, Satisfaction, Technique, Tooth, Treatment.

Abstract

In a randomized, controlled clinical trial, 110 edentulous patients with atrophic mandibles were treated with International Team for Oral Implantologydental implants using three different treatment strategies: a mandibular overdenture supported by two implants with ball attachments, two implants with an interconnecting bar, or four interconnected implants. The patients' opinions and their social functioning were evaluated by means of a questionnaire directly before and 16 months after treatment. Before treatment most patients had complaints about the retention of their mandibular denture. Sixteen months after treatment almost all patients were generally satisfied with their dentures. Since no significant difference was found between the three treatment strategies, it was concluded that simple implant treatment such as an overdenture retained by two ball attachments is sufficient.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0901-5027`
A02	`01`			`@0 IJOSE9`
A03		`1`		`@0 Int. j. oral maxillofac. surg.`
A05				`@2 26`
A06				`@2 4`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures : A comparison of three treatment strategies with ITI-dental implants`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 WISMEIJER (D.)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 VAN WAAS (M. A. J.)`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 VERMEEREN (J. I. J. F.)`
A11	`04`	`1`		`@1 MULDER (J.)`
A11	`05`	`1`		`@1 KALK (W.)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Department of Oral Function, Academic Centre for Dentistry, Dental School @2 Amsterdam @3 NLD @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut.`
A14	`02`			`@1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Department of Special Dental Care and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, Ignatius Teaching Hospital @2 Breda @3 NLD @Z 1 aut. @Z 3 aut.`
A14	`03`			`@1 Department of Medical Statistics, University of Nijmegen @2 Nijmegen @3 NLD @Z 4 aut.`
A14	`04`			`@1 Department of Oral Function, University of Nijmegen Dental School @2 Nijmegen @3 NLD @Z 5 aut.`
A20				`@1 263-267`
A21				`@1 1997`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 16201 @5 354000067916600050`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 1997 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 25 ref.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 97-0428829`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery`
A66	`01`			`@0 DNK`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 In a randomized, controlled clinical trial, 110 edentulous patients with atrophic mandibles were treated with International Team for Oral Implantologydental implants using three different treatment strategies: a mandibular overdenture supported by two implants with ball attachments, two implants with an interconnecting bar, or four interconnected implants. The patients' opinions and their social functioning were evaluated by means of a questionnaire directly before and 16 months after treatment. Before treatment most patients had complaints about the retention of their mandibular denture. Sixteen months after treatment almost all patients were generally satisfied with their dentures. Since no significant difference was found between the three treatment strategies, it was concluded that simple implant treatment such as an overdenture retained by two ball attachments is sufficient.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002B25C02`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Prothèse @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Prosthesis @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`GER`	`@0 Prothese @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Prótesis @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Dent @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Tooth @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Diente @5 02`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Implant @5 04`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Implant @5 04`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Implante @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Edentation @5 07`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Edentulousness @5 07`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Edentación @5 07`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Atrophie @5 10`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Atrophia @5 10`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Atrofia @5 10`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Mandibule @5 11`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Mandible @5 11`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Mandíbula @5 11`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Satisfaction @5 13`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Satisfaction @5 13`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Satisfacción @5 13`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Malade @5 14`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Patient @5 14`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Enfermo @5 14`
C03	`09`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Etude comparative @5 16`
C03	`09`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Comparative study @5 16`
C03	`09`	`X`	`GER`	`@0 Vergleich @5 16`
C03	`09`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estudio comparativo @5 16`
C03	`10`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Traitement @5 17`
C03	`10`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Treatment @5 17`
C03	`10`	`X`	`GER`	`@0 Aufbereiten @5 17`
C03	`10`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Tratamiento @5 17`
C03	`11`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Technique @5 18`
C03	`11`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Technique @5 18`
C03	`11`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Técnica @5 18`
C03	`12`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Homme @5 20`
C03	`12`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Human @5 20`
C03	`12`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Hombre @5 20`
C03	`13`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Essai clinique @5 23`
C03	`13`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Clinical trial @5 23`
C03	`13`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Ensayo clínico @5 23`
C07	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Appareillage @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Instrumentation @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Instrumentación @5 37`
C07	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Chirurgie @5 45`
C07	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Surgery @5 45`
C07	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cirugía @5 45`
C07	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Stomatologie @5 53`
C07	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Stomatology @5 53`
C07	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estomatología @5 53`
C07	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Dent pathologie @5 54`
C07	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Dental disease @5 54`
C07	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Diente patología @5 54`
C07	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Système ostéoarticulaire pathologie @5 61`
C07	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Diseases of the osteoarticular system @5 61`
C07	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Sistema osteoarticular patología @5 61`
C07	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Maxillaire pathologie @5 63`
C07	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Maxillary disease @5 63`
C07	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Maxilar patología @5 63`
N21				`@1 258`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 97-0428829 INIST
ET :	Patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures : A comparison of three treatment strategies with ITI-dental implants
AU :	WISMEIJER (D.); VAN WAAS (M. A. J.); VERMEEREN (J. I. J. F.); MULDER (J.); KALK (W.)
AF :	Department of Oral Function, Academic Centre for Dentistry, Dental School/Amsterdam/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 2 aut.); Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Department of Special Dental Care and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, Ignatius Teaching Hospital/Breda/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 3 aut.); Department of Medical Statistics, University of Nijmegen/Nijmegen/Pays-Bas (4 aut.); Department of Oral Function, University of Nijmegen Dental School/Nijmegen/Pays-Bas (5 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery; ISSN 0901-5027; Coden IJOSE9; Danemark; Da. 1997; Vol. 26; No. 4; Pp. 263-267; Bibl. 25 ref.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	In a randomized, controlled clinical trial, 110 edentulous patients with atrophic mandibles were treated with International Team for Oral Implantologydental implants using three different treatment strategies: a mandibular overdenture supported by two implants with ball attachments, two implants with an interconnecting bar, or four interconnected implants. The patients' opinions and their social functioning were evaluated by means of a questionnaire directly before and 16 months after treatment. Before treatment most patients had complaints about the retention of their mandibular denture. Sixteen months after treatment almost all patients were generally satisfied with their dentures. Since no significant difference was found between the three treatment strategies, it was concluded that simple implant treatment such as an overdenture retained by two ball attachments is sufficient.
CC :	002B25C02
FD :	Prothèse; Dent; Implant; Edentation; Atrophie; Mandibule; Satisfaction; Malade; Etude comparative; Traitement; Technique; Homme; Essai clinique
FG :	Appareillage; Chirurgie; Stomatologie; Dent pathologie; Système ostéoarticulaire pathologie; Maxillaire pathologie
ED :	Prosthesis; Tooth; Implant; Edentulousness; Atrophia; Mandible; Satisfaction; Patient; Comparative study; Treatment; Technique; Human; Clinical trial
EG :	Instrumentation; Surgery; Stomatology; Dental disease; Diseases of the osteoarticular system; Maxillary disease
GD :	Prothese; Vergleich; Aufbereiten
SD :	Prótesis; Diente; Implante; Edentación; Atrofia; Mandíbula; Satisfacción; Enfermo; Estudio comparativo; Tratamiento; Técnica; Hombre; Ensayo clínico
LO :	INIST-16201.354000067916600050
ID :	97-0428829

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:97-0428829

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures : A comparison of three treatment strategies with ITI-dental implants</title>
<author><name sortKey="Wismeijer, D" sort="Wismeijer, D" uniqKey="Wismeijer D" first="D." last="Wismeijer">D. Wismeijer</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral Function, Academic Centre for Dentistry, Dental School</s1>
<s2>Amsterdam</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Department of Special Dental Care and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, Ignatius Teaching Hospital</s1>
<s2>Breda</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van Waas, M A J" sort="Van Waas, M A J" uniqKey="Van Waas M" first="M. A. J." last="Van Waas">M. A. J. Van Waas</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral Function, Academic Centre for Dentistry, Dental School</s1>
<s2>Amsterdam</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Vermeeren, J I J F" sort="Vermeeren, J I J F" uniqKey="Vermeeren J" first="J. I. J. F." last="Vermeeren">J. I. J. F. Vermeeren</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Department of Special Dental Care and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, Ignatius Teaching Hospital</s1>
<s2>Breda</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mulder, J" sort="Mulder, J" uniqKey="Mulder J" first="J." last="Mulder">J. Mulder</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Medical Statistics, University of Nijmegen</s1>
<s2>Nijmegen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kalk, W" sort="Kalk, W" uniqKey="Kalk W" first="W." last="Kalk">W. Kalk</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Department of Oral Function, University of Nijmegen Dental School</s1>
<s2>Nijmegen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">97-0428829</idno>
<date when="1997">1997</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 97-0428829 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:97-0428829</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000808</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures : A comparison of three treatment strategies with ITI-dental implants</title>
<author><name sortKey="Wismeijer, D" sort="Wismeijer, D" uniqKey="Wismeijer D" first="D." last="Wismeijer">D. Wismeijer</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral Function, Academic Centre for Dentistry, Dental School</s1>
<s2>Amsterdam</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Department of Special Dental Care and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, Ignatius Teaching Hospital</s1>
<s2>Breda</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van Waas, M A J" sort="Van Waas, M A J" uniqKey="Van Waas M" first="M. A. J." last="Van Waas">M. A. J. Van Waas</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral Function, Academic Centre for Dentistry, Dental School</s1>
<s2>Amsterdam</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Vermeeren, J I J F" sort="Vermeeren, J I J F" uniqKey="Vermeeren J" first="J. I. J. F." last="Vermeeren">J. I. J. F. Vermeeren</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Department of Special Dental Care and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, Ignatius Teaching Hospital</s1>
<s2>Breda</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mulder, J" sort="Mulder, J" uniqKey="Mulder J" first="J." last="Mulder">J. Mulder</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Medical Statistics, University of Nijmegen</s1>
<s2>Nijmegen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kalk, W" sort="Kalk, W" uniqKey="Kalk W" first="W." last="Kalk">W. Kalk</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Department of Oral Function, University of Nijmegen Dental School</s1>
<s2>Nijmegen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Int. j. oral maxillofac. surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0901-5027</idno>
<imprint><date when="1997">1997</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Int. j. oral maxillofac. surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0901-5027</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Atrophia</term>
<term>Clinical trial</term>
<term>Comparative study</term>
<term>Edentulousness</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Patient</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Satisfaction</term>
<term>Technique</term>
<term>Tooth</term>
<term>Treatment</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Prothèse</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Edentation</term>
<term>Atrophie</term>
<term>Mandibule</term>
<term>Satisfaction</term>
<term>Malade</term>
<term>Etude comparative</term>
<term>Traitement</term>
<term>Technique</term>
<term>Homme</term>
<term>Essai clinique</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In a randomized, controlled clinical trial, 110 edentulous patients with atrophic mandibles were treated with International Team for Oral Implantologydental implants using three different treatment strategies: a mandibular overdenture supported by two implants with ball attachments, two implants with an interconnecting bar, or four interconnected implants. The patients' opinions and their social functioning were evaluated by means of a questionnaire directly before and 16 months after treatment. Before treatment most patients had complaints about the retention of their mandibular denture. Sixteen months after treatment almost all patients were generally satisfied with their dentures. Since no significant difference was found between the three treatment strategies, it was concluded that simple implant treatment such as an overdenture retained by two ball attachments is sufficient.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0901-5027</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>IJOSE9</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Int. j. oral maxillofac. surg.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>26</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>4</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures : A comparison of three treatment strategies with ITI-dental implants</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>WISMEIJER (D.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>VAN WAAS (M. A. J.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>VERMEEREN (J. I. J. F.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>MULDER (J.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>KALK (W.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral Function, Academic Centre for Dentistry, Dental School</s1>
<s2>Amsterdam</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Department of Special Dental Care and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, Ignatius Teaching Hospital</s1>
<s2>Breda</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Medical Statistics, University of Nijmegen</s1>
<s2>Nijmegen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="04"><s1>Department of Oral Function, University of Nijmegen Dental School</s1>
<s2>Nijmegen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>263-267</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>1997</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>16201</s2>
<s5>354000067916600050</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 1997 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>25 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>97-0428829</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>DNK</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>In a randomized, controlled clinical trial, 110 edentulous patients with atrophic mandibles were treated with International Team for Oral Implantologydental implants using three different treatment strategies: a mandibular overdenture supported by two implants with ball attachments, two implants with an interconnecting bar, or four interconnected implants. The patients' opinions and their social functioning were evaluated by means of a questionnaire directly before and 16 months after treatment. Before treatment most patients had complaints about the retention of their mandibular denture. Sixteen months after treatment almost all patients were generally satisfied with their dentures. Since no significant difference was found between the three treatment strategies, it was concluded that simple implant treatment such as an overdenture retained by two ball attachments is sufficient.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B25C02</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Prothèse</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Prosthesis</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="GER"><s0>Prothese</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Prótesis</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dent</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Tooth</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Diente</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Implant</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Implant</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Implante</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Edentation</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Edentulousness</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Edentación</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Atrophie</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Atrophia</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Atrofia</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Mandibule</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Mandible</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Mandíbula</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Satisfaction</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Satisfaction</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Satisfacción</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Malade</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Patient</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Enfermo</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude comparative</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Comparative study</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="GER"><s0>Vergleich</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio comparativo</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Traitement</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Treatment</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="GER"><s0>Aufbereiten</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tratamiento</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Technique</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Technique</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Técnica</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Essai clinique</s0>
<s5>23</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Clinical trial</s0>
<s5>23</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Ensayo clínico</s0>
<s5>23</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Appareillage</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Instrumentation</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Instrumentación</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Chirurgie</s0>
<s5>45</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Surgery</s0>
<s5>45</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cirugía</s0>
<s5>45</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Stomatologie</s0>
<s5>53</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Stomatology</s0>
<s5>53</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estomatología</s0>
<s5>53</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dent pathologie</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Dental disease</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Diente patología</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Système ostéoarticulaire pathologie</s0>
<s5>61</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</s0>
<s5>61</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sistema osteoarticular patología</s0>
<s5>61</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Maxillaire pathologie</s0>
<s5>63</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Maxillary disease</s0>
<s5>63</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Maxilar patología</s0>
<s5>63</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>258</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 97-0428829 INIST</NO>
<ET>Patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures : A comparison of three treatment strategies with ITI-dental implants</ET>
<AU>WISMEIJER (D.); VAN WAAS (M. A. J.); VERMEEREN (J. I. J. F.); MULDER (J.); KALK (W.)</AU>
<AF>Department of Oral Function, Academic Centre for Dentistry, Dental School/Amsterdam/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 2 aut.); Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Department of Special Dental Care and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, Ignatius Teaching Hospital/Breda/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 3 aut.); Department of Medical Statistics, University of Nijmegen/Nijmegen/Pays-Bas (4 aut.); Department of Oral Function, University of Nijmegen Dental School/Nijmegen/Pays-Bas (5 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery; ISSN 0901-5027; Coden IJOSE9; Danemark; Da. 1997; Vol. 26; No. 4; Pp. 263-267; Bibl. 25 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>In a randomized, controlled clinical trial, 110 edentulous patients with atrophic mandibles were treated with International Team for Oral Implantologydental implants using three different treatment strategies: a mandibular overdenture supported by two implants with ball attachments, two implants with an interconnecting bar, or four interconnected implants. The patients' opinions and their social functioning were evaluated by means of a questionnaire directly before and 16 months after treatment. Before treatment most patients had complaints about the retention of their mandibular denture. Sixteen months after treatment almost all patients were generally satisfied with their dentures. Since no significant difference was found between the three treatment strategies, it was concluded that simple implant treatment such as an overdenture retained by two ball attachments is sufficient.</EA>
<CC>002B25C02</CC>
<FD>Prothèse; Dent; Implant; Edentation; Atrophie; Mandibule; Satisfaction; Malade; Etude comparative; Traitement; Technique; Homme; Essai clinique</FD>
<FG>Appareillage; Chirurgie; Stomatologie; Dent pathologie; Système ostéoarticulaire pathologie; Maxillaire pathologie</FG>
<ED>Prosthesis; Tooth; Implant; Edentulousness; Atrophia; Mandible; Satisfaction; Patient; Comparative study; Treatment; Technique; Human; Clinical trial</ED>
<EG>Instrumentation; Surgery; Stomatology; Dental disease; Diseases of the osteoarticular system; Maxillary disease</EG>
<GD>Prothese; Vergleich; Aufbereiten</GD>
<SD>Prótesis; Diente; Implante; Edentación; Atrofia; Mandíbula; Satisfacción; Enfermo; Estudio comparativo; Tratamiento; Técnica; Hombre; Ensayo clínico</SD>
<LO>INIST-16201.354000067916600050</LO>
<ID>97-0428829</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000808 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000808 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:97-0428829
   |texte=   Patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures : A comparison of three treatment strategies with ITI-dental implants
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022

	Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures : A comparison of three treatment strategies with ITI-dental implants

Patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures : A comparison of three treatment strategies with ITI-dental implants

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri