EdenteV2, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000794

Implant site assessment using panoramic cross-sectional tomographic imaging

Identifieur interne : 000794 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000793; suivant : 000795

Implant site assessment using panoramic cross-sectional tomographic imaging

Auteurs : B. J. Potter ; M. K. Shrout ; C. M. Russell ; M. Sharawy

Source :

Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics [ 1079-2104 ] ; 1997.

RBID : Pascal:97-0542539

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Tomodensitométrie, Radiographie panoramique, Coupe transversale, Mandibule, Postérieur, Dimension, Axe vertical, Implant, Site, Edentation, Etude expérimentale, Exploration, Homme, Cadavre.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Cadaver, Computerized axial tomography, Cross section, Dimension, Edentulousness, Experimental study, Exploration, Human, Implant, Mandible, Panoramic radiography, Posterior, Site, Vertical axis.

Abstract

Objectives. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of two different panoramic imaging systems to produce cross-sectional images with accurate vertical dimensions of the posterior mandible. Study design. Three partially edentulous human cadaver mandibles were used for this study. On each mandible, three potential implant sites were arbitrarily identified in an area between the mental foramen and the ascending ramus. Each site was imaged using two different panoramic machines. Using each image, the mandible's outline, cortical thickness, and position of the mandibular canal were traced on clear acetate film. The mandibles were then sectioned at each site to serve as a gold standard. The cadaver sections and tracings (corrected for magnification) were measured, recording the overall mandibular height, distance from the crest of the ridge to the superior aspect of the mandibular canal, and the thickness of the cortical bone at the most inferior aspect of the mandible. Results. There were no significant differences between either of the system's image measures and the gold standard when considering the distance between the crest and the mandibular canal. Differences were noted between the systems measures and the gold standard in the assessment of the cortical bone thickness and the overall mandibular height. Conclusions. Both imaging systems can be useful for vertical measurements of a potential implant site in the posterior mandible.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 1079-2104`
A03		`1`		`@0 Oral surg. oral med. oral pathol. oral radiol. endo.`
A05				`@2 84`
A06				`@2 4`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Implant site assessment using panoramic cross-sectional tomographic imaging`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 POTTER (B. J.)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 SHROUT (M. K.)`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 RUSSELL (C. M.)`
A11	`04`	`1`		`@1 SHARAWY (M.)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Medical College of Georgia @3 USA @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut. @Z 4 aut.`
A20				`@1 436-442`
A21				`@1 1997`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 5101 @5 354000069870370220`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 1997 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 26 ref.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 97-0542539`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics`
A66	`01`			`@0 USA`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 Objectives. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of two different panoramic imaging systems to produce cross-sectional images with accurate vertical dimensions of the posterior mandible. Study design. Three partially edentulous human cadaver mandibles were used for this study. On each mandible, three potential implant sites were arbitrarily identified in an area between the mental foramen and the ascending ramus. Each site was imaged using two different panoramic machines. Using each image, the mandible's outline, cortical thickness, and position of the mandibular canal were traced on clear acetate film. The mandibles were then sectioned at each site to serve as a gold standard. The cadaver sections and tracings (corrected for magnification) were measured, recording the overall mandibular height, distance from the crest of the ridge to the superior aspect of the mandibular canal, and the thickness of the cortical bone at the most inferior aspect of the mandible. Results. There were no significant differences between either of the system's image measures and the gold standard when considering the distance between the crest and the mandibular canal. Differences were noted between the systems measures and the gold standard in the assessment of the cortical bone thickness and the overall mandibular height. Conclusions. Both imaging systems can be useful for vertical measurements of a potential implant site in the posterior mandible.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002B24A01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Tomodensitométrie @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Computerized axial tomography @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`GER`	`@0 Computer Tomographie @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Tomodensitometría @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Radiographie panoramique @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Panoramic radiography @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`GER`	`@0 Panoramaradiographie @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Radiografía panorámica @5 02`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Coupe transversale @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Cross section @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Corte transverso @5 03`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Mandibule @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Mandible @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Mandíbula @5 04`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Postérieur @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Posterior @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Posterior @5 05`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Dimension @5 06`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Dimension @5 06`
C03	`06`	`X`	`GER`	`@0 Dimension @5 06`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Dimensión @5 06`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Axe vertical @5 07`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Vertical axis @5 07`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Eje vertical @5 07`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Implant @5 10`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Implant @5 10`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Implante @5 10`
C03	`09`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Site @5 11`
C03	`09`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Site @5 11`
C03	`09`	`X`	`GER`	`@0 Standort @5 11`
C03	`09`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Sitio @5 11`
C03	`10`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Edentation @5 13`
C03	`10`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Edentulousness @5 13`
C03	`10`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Edentación @5 13`
C03	`11`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Etude expérimentale @5 16`
C03	`11`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Experimental study @5 16`
C03	`11`	`X`	`GER`	`@0 Experimentelle Untersuchung @5 16`
C03	`11`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estudio experimental @5 16`
C03	`12`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Exploration @5 17`
C03	`12`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Exploration @5 17`
C03	`12`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Exploración @5 17`
C03	`13`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Homme @5 20`
C03	`13`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Human @5 20`
C03	`13`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Hombre @5 20`
C03	`14`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Cadavre @5 21`
C03	`14`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Cadaver @5 21`
C03	`14`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cadáver @5 21`
C07	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Radiodiagnostic @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Radiodiagnosis @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Radiodiagnóstico @5 37`
C07	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Imagerie médicale @5 38`
C07	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Medical imagery @5 38`
C07	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Imageneria medical @5 38`
C07	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Chirurgie @5 61`
C07	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Surgery @5 61`
C07	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cirugía @5 61`
C07	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Stomatologie @5 69`
C07	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Stomatology @5 69`
C07	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estomatología @5 69`
C07	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Dent pathologie @5 70`
C07	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Dental disease @5 70`
C07	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Diente patología @5 70`
N21				`@1 336`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 97-0542539 INIST
ET :	Implant site assessment using panoramic cross-sectional tomographic imaging
AU :	POTTER (B. J.); SHROUT (M. K.); RUSSELL (C. M.); SHARAWY (M.)
AF :	Medical College of Georgia/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics; ISSN 1079-2104; Etats-Unis; Da. 1997; Vol. 84; No. 4; Pp. 436-442; Bibl. 26 ref.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	Objectives. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of two different panoramic imaging systems to produce cross-sectional images with accurate vertical dimensions of the posterior mandible. Study design. Three partially edentulous human cadaver mandibles were used for this study. On each mandible, three potential implant sites were arbitrarily identified in an area between the mental foramen and the ascending ramus. Each site was imaged using two different panoramic machines. Using each image, the mandible's outline, cortical thickness, and position of the mandibular canal were traced on clear acetate film. The mandibles were then sectioned at each site to serve as a gold standard. The cadaver sections and tracings (corrected for magnification) were measured, recording the overall mandibular height, distance from the crest of the ridge to the superior aspect of the mandibular canal, and the thickness of the cortical bone at the most inferior aspect of the mandible. Results. There were no significant differences between either of the system's image measures and the gold standard when considering the distance between the crest and the mandibular canal. Differences were noted between the systems measures and the gold standard in the assessment of the cortical bone thickness and the overall mandibular height. Conclusions. Both imaging systems can be useful for vertical measurements of a potential implant site in the posterior mandible.
CC :	002B24A01
FD :	Tomodensitométrie; Radiographie panoramique; Coupe transversale; Mandibule; Postérieur; Dimension; Axe vertical; Implant; Site; Edentation; Etude expérimentale; Exploration; Homme; Cadavre
FG :	Radiodiagnostic; Imagerie médicale; Chirurgie; Stomatologie; Dent pathologie
ED :	Computerized axial tomography; Panoramic radiography; Cross section; Mandible; Posterior; Dimension; Vertical axis; Implant; Site; Edentulousness; Experimental study; Exploration; Human; Cadaver
EG :	Radiodiagnosis; Medical imagery; Surgery; Stomatology; Dental disease
GD :	Computer Tomographie; Panoramaradiographie; Dimension; Standort; Experimentelle Untersuchung
SD :	Tomodensitometría; Radiografía panorámica; Corte transverso; Mandíbula; Posterior; Dimensión; Eje vertical; Implante; Sitio; Edentación; Estudio experimental; Exploración; Hombre; Cadáver
LO :	INIST-5101.354000069870370220
ID :	97-0542539

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:97-0542539

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Implant site assessment using panoramic cross-sectional tomographic imaging</title>
<author><name sortKey="Potter, B J" sort="Potter, B J" uniqKey="Potter B" first="B. J." last="Potter">B. J. Potter</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Medical College of Georgia</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Shrout, M K" sort="Shrout, M K" uniqKey="Shrout M" first="M. K." last="Shrout">M. K. Shrout</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Medical College of Georgia</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Russell, C M" sort="Russell, C M" uniqKey="Russell C" first="C. M." last="Russell">C. M. Russell</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Medical College of Georgia</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Sharawy, M" sort="Sharawy, M" uniqKey="Sharawy M" first="M." last="Sharawy">M. Sharawy</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Medical College of Georgia</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">97-0542539</idno>
<date when="1997">1997</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 97-0542539 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:97-0542539</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000794</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Implant site assessment using panoramic cross-sectional tomographic imaging</title>
<author><name sortKey="Potter, B J" sort="Potter, B J" uniqKey="Potter B" first="B. J." last="Potter">B. J. Potter</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Medical College of Georgia</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Shrout, M K" sort="Shrout, M K" uniqKey="Shrout M" first="M. K." last="Shrout">M. K. Shrout</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Medical College of Georgia</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Russell, C M" sort="Russell, C M" uniqKey="Russell C" first="C. M." last="Russell">C. M. Russell</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Medical College of Georgia</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Sharawy, M" sort="Sharawy, M" uniqKey="Sharawy M" first="M." last="Sharawy">M. Sharawy</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Medical College of Georgia</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Oral surg. oral med. oral pathol. oral radiol. endo.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1079-2104</idno>
<imprint><date when="1997">1997</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Oral surg. oral med. oral pathol. oral radiol. endo.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1079-2104</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Cadaver</term>
<term>Computerized axial tomography</term>
<term>Cross section</term>
<term>Dimension</term>
<term>Edentulousness</term>
<term>Experimental study</term>
<term>Exploration</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Panoramic radiography</term>
<term>Posterior</term>
<term>Site</term>
<term>Vertical axis</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Tomodensitométrie</term>
<term>Radiographie panoramique</term>
<term>Coupe transversale</term>
<term>Mandibule</term>
<term>Postérieur</term>
<term>Dimension</term>
<term>Axe vertical</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Site</term>
<term>Edentation</term>
<term>Etude expérimentale</term>
<term>Exploration</term>
<term>Homme</term>
<term>Cadavre</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Objectives. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of two different panoramic imaging systems to produce cross-sectional images with accurate vertical dimensions of the posterior mandible. Study design. Three partially edentulous human cadaver mandibles were used for this study. On each mandible, three potential implant sites were arbitrarily identified in an area between the mental foramen and the ascending ramus. Each site was imaged using two different panoramic machines. Using each image, the mandible's outline, cortical thickness, and position of the mandibular canal were traced on clear acetate film. The mandibles were then sectioned at each site to serve as a gold standard. The cadaver sections and tracings (corrected for magnification) were measured, recording the overall mandibular height, distance from the crest of the ridge to the superior aspect of the mandibular canal, and the thickness of the cortical bone at the most inferior aspect of the mandible. Results. There were no significant differences between either of the system's image measures and the gold standard when considering the distance between the crest and the mandibular canal. Differences were noted between the systems measures and the gold standard in the assessment of the cortical bone thickness and the overall mandibular height. Conclusions. Both imaging systems can be useful for vertical measurements of a potential implant site in the posterior mandible.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>1079-2104</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Oral surg. oral med. oral pathol. oral radiol. endo.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>84</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>4</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Implant site assessment using panoramic cross-sectional tomographic imaging</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>POTTER (B. J.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>SHROUT (M. K.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>RUSSELL (C. M.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>SHARAWY (M.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Medical College of Georgia</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>436-442</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>1997</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>5101</s2>
<s5>354000069870370220</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 1997 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>26 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>97-0542539</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Objectives. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of two different panoramic imaging systems to produce cross-sectional images with accurate vertical dimensions of the posterior mandible. Study design. Three partially edentulous human cadaver mandibles were used for this study. On each mandible, three potential implant sites were arbitrarily identified in an area between the mental foramen and the ascending ramus. Each site was imaged using two different panoramic machines. Using each image, the mandible's outline, cortical thickness, and position of the mandibular canal were traced on clear acetate film. The mandibles were then sectioned at each site to serve as a gold standard. The cadaver sections and tracings (corrected for magnification) were measured, recording the overall mandibular height, distance from the crest of the ridge to the superior aspect of the mandibular canal, and the thickness of the cortical bone at the most inferior aspect of the mandible. Results. There were no significant differences between either of the system's image measures and the gold standard when considering the distance between the crest and the mandibular canal. Differences were noted between the systems measures and the gold standard in the assessment of the cortical bone thickness and the overall mandibular height. Conclusions. Both imaging systems can be useful for vertical measurements of a potential implant site in the posterior mandible.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B24A01</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Tomodensitométrie</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Computerized axial tomography</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="GER"><s0>Computer Tomographie</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tomodensitometría</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Radiographie panoramique</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Panoramic radiography</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="GER"><s0>Panoramaradiographie</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Radiografía panorámica</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Coupe transversale</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cross section</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Corte transverso</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Mandibule</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Mandible</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Mandíbula</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Postérieur</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Posterior</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Posterior</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dimension</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Dimension</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="GER"><s0>Dimension</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Dimensión</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Axe vertical</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Vertical axis</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Eje vertical</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Implant</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Implant</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Implante</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Site</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Site</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="GER"><s0>Standort</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sitio</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Edentation</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Edentulousness</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Edentación</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude expérimentale</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Experimental study</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="GER"><s0>Experimentelle Untersuchung</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio experimental</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Exploration</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Exploration</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Exploración</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cadavre</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cadaver</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cadáver</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Radiodiagnostic</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Radiodiagnosis</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Radiodiagnóstico</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Imagerie médicale</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Medical imagery</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Imageneria medical</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Chirurgie</s0>
<s5>61</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Surgery</s0>
<s5>61</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cirugía</s0>
<s5>61</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Stomatologie</s0>
<s5>69</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Stomatology</s0>
<s5>69</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estomatología</s0>
<s5>69</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dent pathologie</s0>
<s5>70</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Dental disease</s0>
<s5>70</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Diente patología</s0>
<s5>70</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>336</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 97-0542539 INIST</NO>
<ET>Implant site assessment using panoramic cross-sectional tomographic imaging</ET>
<AU>POTTER (B. J.); SHROUT (M. K.); RUSSELL (C. M.); SHARAWY (M.)</AU>
<AF>Medical College of Georgia/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics; ISSN 1079-2104; Etats-Unis; Da. 1997; Vol. 84; No. 4; Pp. 436-442; Bibl. 26 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Objectives. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of two different panoramic imaging systems to produce cross-sectional images with accurate vertical dimensions of the posterior mandible. Study design. Three partially edentulous human cadaver mandibles were used for this study. On each mandible, three potential implant sites were arbitrarily identified in an area between the mental foramen and the ascending ramus. Each site was imaged using two different panoramic machines. Using each image, the mandible's outline, cortical thickness, and position of the mandibular canal were traced on clear acetate film. The mandibles were then sectioned at each site to serve as a gold standard. The cadaver sections and tracings (corrected for magnification) were measured, recording the overall mandibular height, distance from the crest of the ridge to the superior aspect of the mandibular canal, and the thickness of the cortical bone at the most inferior aspect of the mandible. Results. There were no significant differences between either of the system's image measures and the gold standard when considering the distance between the crest and the mandibular canal. Differences were noted between the systems measures and the gold standard in the assessment of the cortical bone thickness and the overall mandibular height. Conclusions. Both imaging systems can be useful for vertical measurements of a potential implant site in the posterior mandible.</EA>
<CC>002B24A01</CC>
<FD>Tomodensitométrie; Radiographie panoramique; Coupe transversale; Mandibule; Postérieur; Dimension; Axe vertical; Implant; Site; Edentation; Etude expérimentale; Exploration; Homme; Cadavre</FD>
<FG>Radiodiagnostic; Imagerie médicale; Chirurgie; Stomatologie; Dent pathologie</FG>
<ED>Computerized axial tomography; Panoramic radiography; Cross section; Mandible; Posterior; Dimension; Vertical axis; Implant; Site; Edentulousness; Experimental study; Exploration; Human; Cadaver</ED>
<EG>Radiodiagnosis; Medical imagery; Surgery; Stomatology; Dental disease</EG>
<GD>Computer Tomographie; Panoramaradiographie; Dimension; Standort; Experimentelle Untersuchung</GD>
<SD>Tomodensitometría; Radiografía panorámica; Corte transverso; Mandíbula; Posterior; Dimensión; Eje vertical; Implante; Sitio; Edentación; Estudio experimental; Exploración; Hombre; Cadáver</SD>
<LO>INIST-5101.354000069870370220</LO>
<ID>97-0542539</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000794 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000794 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:97-0542539
   |texte=   Implant site assessment using panoramic cross-sectional tomographic imaging
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022

	Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Implant site assessment using panoramic cross-sectional tomographic imaging

Implant site assessment using panoramic cross-sectional tomographic imaging

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri