Infections associated with locking reconstruction plates: A retrospective review
Identifieur interne : 000599 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000598; suivant : 000600Infections associated with locking reconstruction plates: A retrospective review
Auteurs : David Kirkpatrick ; Rahul Gandhi ; Joseph E. Van SickelsSource :
- Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery [ 0278-2391 ] ; 2003.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Purpose: In this study, we examined the incidence of infection with the use of a locking reconstruction bone plate/system. Patients and Methods: All patients, treated with a locking reconstruction bone plate/screw system for mandible fractures in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery service over a 28-month period at a level I trauma center, were evaluated through a retrospective chart review by independent examiners. The use of a locking reconstruction plate was determined by the attending staff involved in the patient's care. Patient population included single, bilateral, and comminuted fractures. Patient characteristics were noted and include dentate versus edentulous, smoking history, and history of previous infection. Results: Fifty-six locking bone plates were placed in 42 patients. Eight (19%) of the patients were infected before treatment. A persistent infection remained in 3 of these 8 patients (37.5%). Two patients (5.8%), with 3 fracture sites (6.4%) developed postoperative infection that required further intervention. All 5 of the patients who were infected after surgery were heavy smokers. History of preoperative infection and smoking appear to be significant factors in the etiology of postoperative infection. All postoperative infections resolved successfully with local measures and with no loss of fixation. Conclusion: The use of locking reconstruction plates can facilitate the management of complicated fractures; however, it does not eliminate complications. Postoperative infections are related to numerous factors, including preoperative incidence of infection, smoking, and proper use of the plates.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
pA |
|
---|
Format Inist (serveur)
NO : | PASCAL 03-0263548 INIST |
---|---|
ET : | Infections associated with locking reconstruction plates: A retrospective review |
AU : | KIRKPATRICK (David); GANDHI (Rahul); VAN SICKELS (Joseph E.) |
AF : | University of Kentucky/Lexington, KY/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut.) |
DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
SO : | Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery; ISSN 0278-2391; Coden JOMSDA; Etats-Unis; Da. 2003; Vol. 61; No. 4; Pp. 462-466; Bibl. 20 ref. |
LA : | Anglais |
EA : | Purpose: In this study, we examined the incidence of infection with the use of a locking reconstruction bone plate/system. Patients and Methods: All patients, treated with a locking reconstruction bone plate/screw system for mandible fractures in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery service over a 28-month period at a level I trauma center, were evaluated through a retrospective chart review by independent examiners. The use of a locking reconstruction plate was determined by the attending staff involved in the patient's care. Patient population included single, bilateral, and comminuted fractures. Patient characteristics were noted and include dentate versus edentulous, smoking history, and history of previous infection. Results: Fifty-six locking bone plates were placed in 42 patients. Eight (19%) of the patients were infected before treatment. A persistent infection remained in 3 of these 8 patients (37.5%). Two patients (5.8%), with 3 fracture sites (6.4%) developed postoperative infection that required further intervention. All 5 of the patients who were infected after surgery were heavy smokers. History of preoperative infection and smoking appear to be significant factors in the etiology of postoperative infection. All postoperative infections resolved successfully with local measures and with no loss of fixation. Conclusion: The use of locking reconstruction plates can facilitate the management of complicated fractures; however, it does not eliminate complications. Postoperative infections are related to numerous factors, including preoperative incidence of infection, smoking, and proper use of the plates. |
CC : | 002B25C02; 002B16D |
FD : | Fracture; Mandibule; Traitement; Ostéosynthèse; Vis plaque; Evaluation performance; Technique; Reconstruction anatomique; Biomatériau; Radiographie panoramique; Exploration; Efficacité traitement; Epidémiologie; Incidence; Complication; Infection; Homme; Etats Unis |
FG : | Amérique du Nord; Amérique; Système ostéoarticulaire pathologie; Stomatologie; Maxillaire pathologie; Traumatisme; ORL pathologie; Chirurgie; Génie biomédical; Radiodiagnostic; Imagerie médicale; Santé publique |
ED : | Fracture; Mandible; Treatment; Osteosynthesis; Screw plate; Performance evaluation; Technique; Anatomical reconstruction; Biomaterial; Panoramic radiography; Exploration; Treatment efficiency; Epidemiology; Incidence; Complication; Infection; Human; United States |
EG : | North America; America; Diseases of the osteoarticular system; Stomatology; Maxillary disease; Trauma; ENT disease; Surgery; Biomedical engineering; Radiodiagnosis; Medical imagery; Public health |
SD : | Fractura; Mandíbula; Tratamiento; Osteosíntesis; Tornillo placa; Evaluación prestación; Técnica; Reconstrucción anatómica; Biomaterial; Radiografía panorámica; Exploración; Eficacia tratamiento; Epidemiología; Incidencia; Complicación; Infección; Hombre; Estados Unidos |
LO : | INIST-3005.354000119364580100 |
ID : | 03-0263548 |
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:03-0263548Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Infections associated with locking reconstruction plates: A retrospective review</title>
<author><name sortKey="Kirkpatrick, David" sort="Kirkpatrick, David" uniqKey="Kirkpatrick D" first="David" last="Kirkpatrick">David Kirkpatrick</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Kentucky</s1>
<s2>Lexington, KY</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Gandhi, Rahul" sort="Gandhi, Rahul" uniqKey="Gandhi R" first="Rahul" last="Gandhi">Rahul Gandhi</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Kentucky</s1>
<s2>Lexington, KY</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van Sickels, Joseph E" sort="Van Sickels, Joseph E" uniqKey="Van Sickels J" first="Joseph E." last="Van Sickels">Joseph E. Van Sickels</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Kentucky</s1>
<s2>Lexington, KY</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">03-0263548</idno>
<date when="2003">2003</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 03-0263548 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:03-0263548</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000599</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Infections associated with locking reconstruction plates: A retrospective review</title>
<author><name sortKey="Kirkpatrick, David" sort="Kirkpatrick, David" uniqKey="Kirkpatrick D" first="David" last="Kirkpatrick">David Kirkpatrick</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Kentucky</s1>
<s2>Lexington, KY</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Gandhi, Rahul" sort="Gandhi, Rahul" uniqKey="Gandhi R" first="Rahul" last="Gandhi">Rahul Gandhi</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Kentucky</s1>
<s2>Lexington, KY</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van Sickels, Joseph E" sort="Van Sickels, Joseph E" uniqKey="Van Sickels J" first="Joseph E." last="Van Sickels">Joseph E. Van Sickels</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Kentucky</s1>
<s2>Lexington, KY</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. oral maxillofac. surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0278-2391</idno>
<imprint><date when="2003">2003</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. oral maxillofac. surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0278-2391</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Anatomical reconstruction</term>
<term>Biomaterial</term>
<term>Complication</term>
<term>Epidemiology</term>
<term>Exploration</term>
<term>Fracture</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Incidence</term>
<term>Infection</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Osteosynthesis</term>
<term>Panoramic radiography</term>
<term>Performance evaluation</term>
<term>Screw plate</term>
<term>Technique</term>
<term>Treatment</term>
<term>Treatment efficiency</term>
<term>United States</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Fracture</term>
<term>Mandibule</term>
<term>Traitement</term>
<term>Ostéosynthèse</term>
<term>Vis plaque</term>
<term>Evaluation performance</term>
<term>Technique</term>
<term>Reconstruction anatomique</term>
<term>Biomatériau</term>
<term>Radiographie panoramique</term>
<term>Exploration</term>
<term>Efficacité traitement</term>
<term>Epidémiologie</term>
<term>Incidence</term>
<term>Complication</term>
<term>Infection</term>
<term>Homme</term>
<term>Etats Unis</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Purpose: In this study, we examined the incidence of infection with the use of a locking reconstruction bone plate/system. Patients and Methods: All patients, treated with a locking reconstruction bone plate/screw system for mandible fractures in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery service over a 28-month period at a level I trauma center, were evaluated through a retrospective chart review by independent examiners. The use of a locking reconstruction plate was determined by the attending staff involved in the patient's care. Patient population included single, bilateral, and comminuted fractures. Patient characteristics were noted and include dentate versus edentulous, smoking history, and history of previous infection. Results: Fifty-six locking bone plates were placed in 42 patients. Eight (19%) of the patients were infected before treatment. A persistent infection remained in 3 of these 8 patients (37.5%). Two patients (5.8%), with 3 fracture sites (6.4%) developed postoperative infection that required further intervention. All 5 of the patients who were infected after surgery were heavy smokers. History of preoperative infection and smoking appear to be significant factors in the etiology of postoperative infection. All postoperative infections resolved successfully with local measures and with no loss of fixation. Conclusion: The use of locking reconstruction plates can facilitate the management of complicated fractures; however, it does not eliminate complications. Postoperative infections are related to numerous factors, including preoperative incidence of infection, smoking, and proper use of the plates.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0278-2391</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>JOMSDA</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. oral maxillofac. surg.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>61</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>4</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Infections associated with locking reconstruction plates: A retrospective review</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>KIRKPATRICK (David)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>GANDHI (Rahul)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>VAN SICKELS (Joseph E.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Kentucky</s1>
<s2>Lexington, KY</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>462-466</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2003</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>3005</s2>
<s5>354000119364580100</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2003 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>20 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>03-0263548</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Purpose: In this study, we examined the incidence of infection with the use of a locking reconstruction bone plate/system. Patients and Methods: All patients, treated with a locking reconstruction bone plate/screw system for mandible fractures in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery service over a 28-month period at a level I trauma center, were evaluated through a retrospective chart review by independent examiners. The use of a locking reconstruction plate was determined by the attending staff involved in the patient's care. Patient population included single, bilateral, and comminuted fractures. Patient characteristics were noted and include dentate versus edentulous, smoking history, and history of previous infection. Results: Fifty-six locking bone plates were placed in 42 patients. Eight (19%) of the patients were infected before treatment. A persistent infection remained in 3 of these 8 patients (37.5%). Two patients (5.8%), with 3 fracture sites (6.4%) developed postoperative infection that required further intervention. All 5 of the patients who were infected after surgery were heavy smokers. History of preoperative infection and smoking appear to be significant factors in the etiology of postoperative infection. All postoperative infections resolved successfully with local measures and with no loss of fixation. Conclusion: The use of locking reconstruction plates can facilitate the management of complicated fractures; however, it does not eliminate complications. Postoperative infections are related to numerous factors, including preoperative incidence of infection, smoking, and proper use of the plates.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B25C02</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>002B16D</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Fracture</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Fracture</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Fractura</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Mandibule</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Mandible</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Mandíbula</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Traitement</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Treatment</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tratamiento</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Ostéosynthèse</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Osteosynthesis</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Osteosíntesis</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Vis plaque</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Screw plate</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tornillo placa</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Evaluation performance</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Performance evaluation</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Evaluación prestación</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Technique</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Technique</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Técnica</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Reconstruction anatomique</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Anatomical reconstruction</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Reconstrucción anatómica</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Biomatériau</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Biomaterial</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Biomaterial</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Radiographie panoramique</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Panoramic radiography</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Radiografía panorámica</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Exploration</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Exploration</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Exploración</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Efficacité traitement</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Treatment efficiency</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Eficacia tratamiento</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Epidémiologie</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Epidemiology</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Epidemiología</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Incidence</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Incidence</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Incidencia</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="15" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Complication</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="15" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Complication</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="15" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Complicación</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="16" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Infection</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="16" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Infection</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="16" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Infección</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="17" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="17" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="17" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="18" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etats Unis</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="18" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>United States</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="18" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estados Unidos</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Amérique du Nord</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>North America</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>America del norte</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Amérique</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>America</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>America</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Système ostéoarticulaire pathologie</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sistema osteoarticular patología</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Stomatologie</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Stomatology</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estomatología</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Maxillaire pathologie</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Maxillary disease</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Maxilar patología</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Traumatisme</s0>
<s5>40</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Trauma</s0>
<s5>40</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Traumatismo</s0>
<s5>40</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>ORL pathologie</s0>
<s5>41</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>ENT disease</s0>
<s5>41</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>ORL patología</s0>
<s5>41</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Chirurgie</s0>
<s5>45</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Surgery</s0>
<s5>45</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cirugía</s0>
<s5>45</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Génie biomédical</s0>
<s5>53</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Biomedical engineering</s0>
<s5>53</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Ingeniería biomédica</s0>
<s5>53</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Radiodiagnostic</s0>
<s5>61</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Radiodiagnosis</s0>
<s5>61</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Radiodiagnóstico</s0>
<s5>61</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Imagerie médicale</s0>
<s5>62</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Medical imagery</s0>
<s5>62</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Imaginería médica</s0>
<s5>62</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Santé publique</s0>
<s5>69</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Public health</s0>
<s5>69</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Salud pública</s0>
<s5>69</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>167</s1>
</fN21>
<fN82><s1>PSI</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 03-0263548 INIST</NO>
<ET>Infections associated with locking reconstruction plates: A retrospective review</ET>
<AU>KIRKPATRICK (David); GANDHI (Rahul); VAN SICKELS (Joseph E.)</AU>
<AF>University of Kentucky/Lexington, KY/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery; ISSN 0278-2391; Coden JOMSDA; Etats-Unis; Da. 2003; Vol. 61; No. 4; Pp. 462-466; Bibl. 20 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Purpose: In this study, we examined the incidence of infection with the use of a locking reconstruction bone plate/system. Patients and Methods: All patients, treated with a locking reconstruction bone plate/screw system for mandible fractures in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery service over a 28-month period at a level I trauma center, were evaluated through a retrospective chart review by independent examiners. The use of a locking reconstruction plate was determined by the attending staff involved in the patient's care. Patient population included single, bilateral, and comminuted fractures. Patient characteristics were noted and include dentate versus edentulous, smoking history, and history of previous infection. Results: Fifty-six locking bone plates were placed in 42 patients. Eight (19%) of the patients were infected before treatment. A persistent infection remained in 3 of these 8 patients (37.5%). Two patients (5.8%), with 3 fracture sites (6.4%) developed postoperative infection that required further intervention. All 5 of the patients who were infected after surgery were heavy smokers. History of preoperative infection and smoking appear to be significant factors in the etiology of postoperative infection. All postoperative infections resolved successfully with local measures and with no loss of fixation. Conclusion: The use of locking reconstruction plates can facilitate the management of complicated fractures; however, it does not eliminate complications. Postoperative infections are related to numerous factors, including preoperative incidence of infection, smoking, and proper use of the plates.</EA>
<CC>002B25C02; 002B16D</CC>
<FD>Fracture; Mandibule; Traitement; Ostéosynthèse; Vis plaque; Evaluation performance; Technique; Reconstruction anatomique; Biomatériau; Radiographie panoramique; Exploration; Efficacité traitement; Epidémiologie; Incidence; Complication; Infection; Homme; Etats Unis</FD>
<FG>Amérique du Nord; Amérique; Système ostéoarticulaire pathologie; Stomatologie; Maxillaire pathologie; Traumatisme; ORL pathologie; Chirurgie; Génie biomédical; Radiodiagnostic; Imagerie médicale; Santé publique</FG>
<ED>Fracture; Mandible; Treatment; Osteosynthesis; Screw plate; Performance evaluation; Technique; Anatomical reconstruction; Biomaterial; Panoramic radiography; Exploration; Treatment efficiency; Epidemiology; Incidence; Complication; Infection; Human; United States</ED>
<EG>North America; America; Diseases of the osteoarticular system; Stomatology; Maxillary disease; Trauma; ENT disease; Surgery; Biomedical engineering; Radiodiagnosis; Medical imagery; Public health</EG>
<SD>Fractura; Mandíbula; Tratamiento; Osteosíntesis; Tornillo placa; Evaluación prestación; Técnica; Reconstrucción anatómica; Biomaterial; Radiografía panorámica; Exploración; Eficacia tratamiento; Epidemiología; Incidencia; Complicación; Infección; Hombre; Estados Unidos</SD>
<LO>INIST-3005.354000119364580100</LO>
<ID>03-0263548</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000599 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000599 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= Pascal:03-0263548 |texte= Infections associated with locking reconstruction plates: A retrospective review }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. | ![]() |