Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Single-fraction vs. fractionated linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: A single-institution study

Identifieur interne : 000584 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000583; suivant : 000585

Single-fraction vs. fractionated linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: A single-institution study

Auteurs : O. W. M. Meijer ; W. P. Vandertop ; J. C. Baayen ; B. J. Slotman

Source :

RBID : Pascal:03-0492770

Abstract

Purpose: In this single-institution trial, we investigated whether fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy is superior to single-fraction linac-based radiosurgery with respect to treatment-related toxicity and local control in patients with vestibular schwannoma. Methods and Materials: All 129 vestibular schwannoma patients treated between 1992 and June 2000 at our linac-based radiosurgery facility were analyzed with respect to treatment schedule. Dentate patients were prospectively selected for a fractionated schedule of 5 x 4 Gy and later on 5 x 5 Gy at the 80% isodose in 1 week with a relocatable stereotactic frame. Edentate patients were prospectively selected for a nonfractionated treatment of 1 x 10 Gy and later on 1 x 12.5 Gy at 80% isodose with an invasive stereotactic frame. Both MRI and CT scans were made in all 129 patients within 1 week before treatment. All patients were followed yearly with MRI and physical examination. Results: A fractionated schedule was given to 80 patients and a single fraction to 49 patients. Mean follow-up time was 33 months (range: 12-107 months). There was no statistically significant difference between the single-fraction group and the fractionated group with respect to mean tumor diameter (2.6 vs. 2.5 cm) or mean follow-up time (both 33 months). Only mean age (63 years vs. 49 years) was statistically significantly different (p = 0.001). Outcome differences between the single-fraction treatment group and the fractionated treatment group with respect to 5-year local control probability (100% vs. 94%), 5-year facial nerve preservation probability (93% vs. 97%), and 5-year hearing preservation probability (75% vs. 61%) were not statistically significant. The difference in 5-year trigeminal nerve preservation (92% vs. 98%) reached statistical significance (p = 0.048). Conclusion: Linac-based single-fraction radiosurgery seems to be as good as linac-based fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy in vestibular schwannoma patients, except for a small difference in trigeminal nerve preservation rate in favor of a fractionated schedule.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0360-3016
A02 01      @0 IOBPD3
A03   1    @0 Int. j. radiat. oncol. biol. phys.
A05       @2 56
A06       @2 5
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Single-fraction vs. fractionated linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: A single-institution study
A11 01  1    @1 MEIJER (O. W. M.)
A11 02  1    @1 VANDERTOP (W. P.)
A11 03  1    @1 BAAYEN (J. C.)
A11 04  1    @1 SLOTMAN (B. J.)
A14 01      @1 Department of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center @2 Amsterdam @3 NLD @Z 1 aut. @Z 4 aut.
A14 02      @1 Department of Neurosurgery, VU University Medical Center @2 Amsterdam @3 NLD @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut.
A20       @1 1390-1396
A21       @1 2003
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 17180 @5 354000119990010230
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2003 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 31 ref.
A47 01  1    @0 03-0492770
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
A66 01      @0 USA
C01 01    ENG  @0 Purpose: In this single-institution trial, we investigated whether fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy is superior to single-fraction linac-based radiosurgery with respect to treatment-related toxicity and local control in patients with vestibular schwannoma. Methods and Materials: All 129 vestibular schwannoma patients treated between 1992 and June 2000 at our linac-based radiosurgery facility were analyzed with respect to treatment schedule. Dentate patients were prospectively selected for a fractionated schedule of 5 x 4 Gy and later on 5 x 5 Gy at the 80% isodose in 1 week with a relocatable stereotactic frame. Edentate patients were prospectively selected for a nonfractionated treatment of 1 x 10 Gy and later on 1 x 12.5 Gy at 80% isodose with an invasive stereotactic frame. Both MRI and CT scans were made in all 129 patients within 1 week before treatment. All patients were followed yearly with MRI and physical examination. Results: A fractionated schedule was given to 80 patients and a single fraction to 49 patients. Mean follow-up time was 33 months (range: 12-107 months). There was no statistically significant difference between the single-fraction group and the fractionated group with respect to mean tumor diameter (2.6 vs. 2.5 cm) or mean follow-up time (both 33 months). Only mean age (63 years vs. 49 years) was statistically significantly different (p = 0.001). Outcome differences between the single-fraction treatment group and the fractionated treatment group with respect to 5-year local control probability (100% vs. 94%), 5-year facial nerve preservation probability (93% vs. 97%), and 5-year hearing preservation probability (75% vs. 61%) were not statistically significant. The difference in 5-year trigeminal nerve preservation (92% vs. 98%) reached statistical significance (p = 0.048). Conclusion: Linac-based single-fraction radiosurgery seems to be as good as linac-based fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy in vestibular schwannoma patients, except for a small difference in trigeminal nerve preservation rate in favor of a fractionated schedule.
C02 01  X    @0 002B
N21       @1 328
N82       @1 DST

Format Inist (serveur)

NO : PASCAL 03-0492770 INIST
ET : Single-fraction vs. fractionated linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: A single-institution study
AU : MEIJER (O. W. M.); VANDERTOP (W. P.); BAAYEN (J. C.); SLOTMAN (B. J.)
AF : Department of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center/Amsterdam/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 4 aut.); Department of Neurosurgery, VU University Medical Center/Amsterdam/Pays-Bas (2 aut., 3 aut.)
DT : Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO : International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics; ISSN 0360-3016; Coden IOBPD3; Etats-Unis; Da. 2003; Vol. 56; No. 5; Pp. 1390-1396; Bibl. 31 ref.
LA : Anglais
EA : Purpose: In this single-institution trial, we investigated whether fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy is superior to single-fraction linac-based radiosurgery with respect to treatment-related toxicity and local control in patients with vestibular schwannoma. Methods and Materials: All 129 vestibular schwannoma patients treated between 1992 and June 2000 at our linac-based radiosurgery facility were analyzed with respect to treatment schedule. Dentate patients were prospectively selected for a fractionated schedule of 5 x 4 Gy and later on 5 x 5 Gy at the 80% isodose in 1 week with a relocatable stereotactic frame. Edentate patients were prospectively selected for a nonfractionated treatment of 1 x 10 Gy and later on 1 x 12.5 Gy at 80% isodose with an invasive stereotactic frame. Both MRI and CT scans were made in all 129 patients within 1 week before treatment. All patients were followed yearly with MRI and physical examination. Results: A fractionated schedule was given to 80 patients and a single fraction to 49 patients. Mean follow-up time was 33 months (range: 12-107 months). There was no statistically significant difference between the single-fraction group and the fractionated group with respect to mean tumor diameter (2.6 vs. 2.5 cm) or mean follow-up time (both 33 months). Only mean age (63 years vs. 49 years) was statistically significantly different (p = 0.001). Outcome differences between the single-fraction treatment group and the fractionated treatment group with respect to 5-year local control probability (100% vs. 94%), 5-year facial nerve preservation probability (93% vs. 97%), and 5-year hearing preservation probability (75% vs. 61%) were not statistically significant. The difference in 5-year trigeminal nerve preservation (92% vs. 98%) reached statistical significance (p = 0.048). Conclusion: Linac-based single-fraction radiosurgery seems to be as good as linac-based fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy in vestibular schwannoma patients, except for a small difference in trigeminal nerve preservation rate in favor of a fractionated schedule.
CC : 002B
LO : INIST-17180.354000119990010230
ID : 03-0492770

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:03-0492770

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Single-fraction vs. fractionated linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: A single-institution study</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Meijer, O W M" sort="Meijer, O W M" uniqKey="Meijer O" first="O. W. M." last="Meijer">O. W. M. Meijer</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center</s1>
<s2>Amsterdam</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Vandertop, W P" sort="Vandertop, W P" uniqKey="Vandertop W" first="W. P." last="Vandertop">W. P. Vandertop</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Department of Neurosurgery, VU University Medical Center</s1>
<s2>Amsterdam</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Baayen, J C" sort="Baayen, J C" uniqKey="Baayen J" first="J. C." last="Baayen">J. C. Baayen</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Department of Neurosurgery, VU University Medical Center</s1>
<s2>Amsterdam</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Slotman, B J" sort="Slotman, B J" uniqKey="Slotman B" first="B. J." last="Slotman">B. J. Slotman</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center</s1>
<s2>Amsterdam</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">03-0492770</idno>
<date when="2003">2003</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 03-0492770 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:03-0492770</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000584</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Single-fraction vs. fractionated linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: A single-institution study</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Meijer, O W M" sort="Meijer, O W M" uniqKey="Meijer O" first="O. W. M." last="Meijer">O. W. M. Meijer</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center</s1>
<s2>Amsterdam</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Vandertop, W P" sort="Vandertop, W P" uniqKey="Vandertop W" first="W. P." last="Vandertop">W. P. Vandertop</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Department of Neurosurgery, VU University Medical Center</s1>
<s2>Amsterdam</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Baayen, J C" sort="Baayen, J C" uniqKey="Baayen J" first="J. C." last="Baayen">J. C. Baayen</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Department of Neurosurgery, VU University Medical Center</s1>
<s2>Amsterdam</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Slotman, B J" sort="Slotman, B J" uniqKey="Slotman B" first="B. J." last="Slotman">B. J. Slotman</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center</s1>
<s2>Amsterdam</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Int. j. radiat. oncol. biol. phys.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0360-3016</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2003">2003</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Int. j. radiat. oncol. biol. phys.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0360-3016</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Purpose: In this single-institution trial, we investigated whether fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy is superior to single-fraction linac-based radiosurgery with respect to treatment-related toxicity and local control in patients with vestibular schwannoma. Methods and Materials: All 129 vestibular schwannoma patients treated between 1992 and June 2000 at our linac-based radiosurgery facility were analyzed with respect to treatment schedule. Dentate patients were prospectively selected for a fractionated schedule of 5 x 4 Gy and later on 5 x 5 Gy at the 80% isodose in 1 week with a relocatable stereotactic frame. Edentate patients were prospectively selected for a nonfractionated treatment of 1 x 10 Gy and later on 1 x 12.5 Gy at 80% isodose with an invasive stereotactic frame. Both MRI and CT scans were made in all 129 patients within 1 week before treatment. All patients were followed yearly with MRI and physical examination. Results: A fractionated schedule was given to 80 patients and a single fraction to 49 patients. Mean follow-up time was 33 months (range: 12-107 months). There was no statistically significant difference between the single-fraction group and the fractionated group with respect to mean tumor diameter (2.6 vs. 2.5 cm) or mean follow-up time (both 33 months). Only mean age (63 years vs. 49 years) was statistically significantly different (p = 0.001). Outcome differences between the single-fraction treatment group and the fractionated treatment group with respect to 5-year local control probability (100% vs. 94%), 5-year facial nerve preservation probability (93% vs. 97%), and 5-year hearing preservation probability (75% vs. 61%) were not statistically significant. The difference in 5-year trigeminal nerve preservation (92% vs. 98%) reached statistical significance (p = 0.048). Conclusion: Linac-based single-fraction radiosurgery seems to be as good as linac-based fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy in vestibular schwannoma patients, except for a small difference in trigeminal nerve preservation rate in favor of a fractionated schedule.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0360-3016</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01">
<s0>IOBPD3</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>Int. j. radiat. oncol. biol. phys.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>56</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>5</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Single-fraction vs. fractionated linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: A single-institution study</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>MEIJER (O. W. M.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>VANDERTOP (W. P.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1">
<s1>BAAYEN (J. C.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1">
<s1>SLOTMAN (B. J.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center</s1>
<s2>Amsterdam</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Department of Neurosurgery, VU University Medical Center</s1>
<s2>Amsterdam</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>1390-1396</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2003</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>17180</s2>
<s5>354000119990010230</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2003 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>31 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>03-0492770</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>Purpose: In this single-institution trial, we investigated whether fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy is superior to single-fraction linac-based radiosurgery with respect to treatment-related toxicity and local control in patients with vestibular schwannoma. Methods and Materials: All 129 vestibular schwannoma patients treated between 1992 and June 2000 at our linac-based radiosurgery facility were analyzed with respect to treatment schedule. Dentate patients were prospectively selected for a fractionated schedule of 5 x 4 Gy and later on 5 x 5 Gy at the 80% isodose in 1 week with a relocatable stereotactic frame. Edentate patients were prospectively selected for a nonfractionated treatment of 1 x 10 Gy and later on 1 x 12.5 Gy at 80% isodose with an invasive stereotactic frame. Both MRI and CT scans were made in all 129 patients within 1 week before treatment. All patients were followed yearly with MRI and physical examination. Results: A fractionated schedule was given to 80 patients and a single fraction to 49 patients. Mean follow-up time was 33 months (range: 12-107 months). There was no statistically significant difference between the single-fraction group and the fractionated group with respect to mean tumor diameter (2.6 vs. 2.5 cm) or mean follow-up time (both 33 months). Only mean age (63 years vs. 49 years) was statistically significantly different (p = 0.001). Outcome differences between the single-fraction treatment group and the fractionated treatment group with respect to 5-year local control probability (100% vs. 94%), 5-year facial nerve preservation probability (93% vs. 97%), and 5-year hearing preservation probability (75% vs. 61%) were not statistically significant. The difference in 5-year trigeminal nerve preservation (92% vs. 98%) reached statistical significance (p = 0.048). Conclusion: Linac-based single-fraction radiosurgery seems to be as good as linac-based fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy in vestibular schwannoma patients, except for a small difference in trigeminal nerve preservation rate in favor of a fractionated schedule.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>002B</s0>
</fC02>
<fN21>
<s1>328</s1>
</fN21>
<fN82>
<s1>DST</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server>
<NO>PASCAL 03-0492770 INIST</NO>
<ET>Single-fraction vs. fractionated linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: A single-institution study</ET>
<AU>MEIJER (O. W. M.); VANDERTOP (W. P.); BAAYEN (J. C.); SLOTMAN (B. J.)</AU>
<AF>Department of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center/Amsterdam/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 4 aut.); Department of Neurosurgery, VU University Medical Center/Amsterdam/Pays-Bas (2 aut., 3 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics; ISSN 0360-3016; Coden IOBPD3; Etats-Unis; Da. 2003; Vol. 56; No. 5; Pp. 1390-1396; Bibl. 31 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Purpose: In this single-institution trial, we investigated whether fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy is superior to single-fraction linac-based radiosurgery with respect to treatment-related toxicity and local control in patients with vestibular schwannoma. Methods and Materials: All 129 vestibular schwannoma patients treated between 1992 and June 2000 at our linac-based radiosurgery facility were analyzed with respect to treatment schedule. Dentate patients were prospectively selected for a fractionated schedule of 5 x 4 Gy and later on 5 x 5 Gy at the 80% isodose in 1 week with a relocatable stereotactic frame. Edentate patients were prospectively selected for a nonfractionated treatment of 1 x 10 Gy and later on 1 x 12.5 Gy at 80% isodose with an invasive stereotactic frame. Both MRI and CT scans were made in all 129 patients within 1 week before treatment. All patients were followed yearly with MRI and physical examination. Results: A fractionated schedule was given to 80 patients and a single fraction to 49 patients. Mean follow-up time was 33 months (range: 12-107 months). There was no statistically significant difference between the single-fraction group and the fractionated group with respect to mean tumor diameter (2.6 vs. 2.5 cm) or mean follow-up time (both 33 months). Only mean age (63 years vs. 49 years) was statistically significantly different (p = 0.001). Outcome differences between the single-fraction treatment group and the fractionated treatment group with respect to 5-year local control probability (100% vs. 94%), 5-year facial nerve preservation probability (93% vs. 97%), and 5-year hearing preservation probability (75% vs. 61%) were not statistically significant. The difference in 5-year trigeminal nerve preservation (92% vs. 98%) reached statistical significance (p = 0.048). Conclusion: Linac-based single-fraction radiosurgery seems to be as good as linac-based fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy in vestibular schwannoma patients, except for a small difference in trigeminal nerve preservation rate in favor of a fractionated schedule.</EA>
<CC>002B</CC>
<LO>INIST-17180.354000119990010230</LO>
<ID>03-0492770</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000584 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000584 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:03-0492770
   |texte=   Single-fraction vs. fractionated linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: A single-institution study
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022