EdenteV2, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000434

Implant treatment without bone grafting in edentulous severely resorbed maxillas : A long-term follow-up study

Identifieur interne : 000434 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000433; suivant : 000435

Implant treatment without bone grafting in edentulous severely resorbed maxillas : A long-term follow-up study

Auteurs : Annika Rosen ; Goran Gynther

Source :

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery [ 0278-2391 ] ; 2007.

RBID : Pascal:07-0252619

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Edentation, Chirurgie, Implant, Traitement, Maxillaire, Long terme, Etude longitudinale, Stomatologie, Greffe osseuse.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Bone graft, Edentulousness, Follow up study, Implant, Long term, Maxillary, Stomatology, Surgery, Treatment.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate retrospectively the surgical outcome of tilted implants in severely resorbed edentulous maxillas as an alternative to bone grafting and the prosthodontic outcome of posterior extension bridges on tilted implants. Patients and Methods: A total of 33 consecutive patients with severely resorbed edentulous maxillas participated in the study. In these patients, the maxillary bone volumes were insufficient for conventional placement of implants to support a fixed prosthesis. As an alternative to bone transplantation, a surgical technique with fenestration of the maxillary sinus to visualize the total amount of maxillary bone was used, followed by implant placement in a tilted manner along the anterior maxillary sinus wall. Thus, 4 to 6 implants of optimal length could be installed in each patient. Nineteen patients were included in this long-term follow-up study and were eligible for clinical evaluation at 8 to 12 years (mean, 10 years) after second-stage surgery. Each patient was examined clinically and radiographically. Results: The 19 patients had a total of 103 implants. In 2 of these patients, 3 fixtures were lost during the first year after second-stage surgery. All other patients had all implants intact with functionally fixed dental prostheses, corresponding to a success rate of 97%. Radiographic examination showed bone resorption in 10% of the implants (10 implants in 5 patients with a total number of 27 implants), with a mean bone loss of 1.2 mm. Mucositis was seen in 47% of the patients. Conclusions: This long-term follow-up study (mean time, 10 years) demonstrates that patients with a severely resorbed maxilla can be treated successfully with conventional implant treatment. This simplified surgical technique can be an alternative to the more resource-demanding technique with bone grafting.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0278-2391`
A02	`01`			`@0 JOMSDA`
A03		`1`		`@0 J. oral maxillofac. surg.`
A05				`@2 65`
A06				`@2 5`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Implant treatment without bone grafting in edentulous severely resorbed maxillas : A long-term follow-up study`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 ROSEN (Annika)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 GYNTHER (Goran)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska Institute /Karolinska University Hospital @2 Huddinge @3 SWE @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut.`
A14	`02`			`@1 Centre for Dental Implants @2 Nacka @3 SWE @Z 2 aut.`
A20				`@1 1010-1016`
A21				`@1 2007`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 3005 @5 354000149444910280`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2007 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 23 ref.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 07-0252619`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery`
A66	`01`			`@0 USA`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 Purpose: To evaluate retrospectively the surgical outcome of tilted implants in severely resorbed edentulous maxillas as an alternative to bone grafting and the prosthodontic outcome of posterior extension bridges on tilted implants. Patients and Methods: A total of 33 consecutive patients with severely resorbed edentulous maxillas participated in the study. In these patients, the maxillary bone volumes were insufficient for conventional placement of implants to support a fixed prosthesis. As an alternative to bone transplantation, a surgical technique with fenestration of the maxillary sinus to visualize the total amount of maxillary bone was used, followed by implant placement in a tilted manner along the anterior maxillary sinus wall. Thus, 4 to 6 implants of optimal length could be installed in each patient. Nineteen patients were included in this long-term follow-up study and were eligible for clinical evaluation at 8 to 12 years (mean, 10 years) after second-stage surgery. Each patient was examined clinically and radiographically. Results: The 19 patients had a total of 103 implants. In 2 of these patients, 3 fixtures were lost during the first year after second-stage surgery. All other patients had all implants intact with functionally fixed dental prostheses, corresponding to a success rate of 97%. Radiographic examination showed bone resorption in 10% of the implants (10 implants in 5 patients with a total number of 27 implants), with a mean bone loss of 1.2 mm. Mucositis was seen in 47% of the patients. Conclusions: This long-term follow-up study (mean time, 10 years) demonstrates that patients with a severely resorbed maxilla can be treated successfully with conventional implant treatment. This simplified surgical technique can be an alternative to the more resource-demanding technique with bone grafting.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002B10C02`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Edentation @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Edentulousness @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Edentación @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Chirurgie @5 04`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Surgery @5 04`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cirugía @5 04`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Implant @5 07`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Implant @5 07`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Implante @5 07`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Traitement @5 08`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Treatment @5 08`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Tratamiento @5 08`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Maxillaire @5 09`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Maxillary @5 09`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Maxilar @5 09`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Long terme @5 13`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Long term @5 13`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Largo plazo @5 13`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Etude longitudinale @5 14`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Follow up study @5 14`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estudio longitudinal @5 14`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Stomatologie @5 15`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Stomatology @5 15`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estomatología @5 15`
C03	`09`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Greffe osseuse @4 CD @5 96`
C03	`09`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Bone graft @4 CD @5 96`
C07	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Dent pathologie @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Dental disease @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Diente patología @5 37`
N21				`@1 169`
N44	`01`			`@1 OTO`
N82				`@1 OTO`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 07-0252619 INIST
ET :	Implant treatment without bone grafting in edentulous severely resorbed maxillas : A long-term follow-up study
AU :	ROSEN (Annika); GYNTHER (Goran)
AF :	Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska Institute /Karolinska University Hospital/Huddinge/Suède (1 aut., 2 aut.); Centre for Dental Implants/Nacka/Suède (2 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery; ISSN 0278-2391; Coden JOMSDA; Etats-Unis; Da. 2007; Vol. 65; No. 5; Pp. 1010-1016; Bibl. 23 ref.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	Purpose: To evaluate retrospectively the surgical outcome of tilted implants in severely resorbed edentulous maxillas as an alternative to bone grafting and the prosthodontic outcome of posterior extension bridges on tilted implants. Patients and Methods: A total of 33 consecutive patients with severely resorbed edentulous maxillas participated in the study. In these patients, the maxillary bone volumes were insufficient for conventional placement of implants to support a fixed prosthesis. As an alternative to bone transplantation, a surgical technique with fenestration of the maxillary sinus to visualize the total amount of maxillary bone was used, followed by implant placement in a tilted manner along the anterior maxillary sinus wall. Thus, 4 to 6 implants of optimal length could be installed in each patient. Nineteen patients were included in this long-term follow-up study and were eligible for clinical evaluation at 8 to 12 years (mean, 10 years) after second-stage surgery. Each patient was examined clinically and radiographically. Results: The 19 patients had a total of 103 implants. In 2 of these patients, 3 fixtures were lost during the first year after second-stage surgery. All other patients had all implants intact with functionally fixed dental prostheses, corresponding to a success rate of 97%. Radiographic examination showed bone resorption in 10% of the implants (10 implants in 5 patients with a total number of 27 implants), with a mean bone loss of 1.2 mm. Mucositis was seen in 47% of the patients. Conclusions: This long-term follow-up study (mean time, 10 years) demonstrates that patients with a severely resorbed maxilla can be treated successfully with conventional implant treatment. This simplified surgical technique can be an alternative to the more resource-demanding technique with bone grafting.
CC :	002B10C02
FD :	Edentation; Chirurgie; Implant; Traitement; Maxillaire; Long terme; Etude longitudinale; Stomatologie; Greffe osseuse
FG :	Dent pathologie
ED :	Edentulousness; Surgery; Implant; Treatment; Maxillary; Long term; Follow up study; Stomatology; Bone graft
EG :	Dental disease
SD :	Edentación; Cirugía; Implante; Tratamiento; Maxilar; Largo plazo; Estudio longitudinal; Estomatología
LO :	INIST-3005.354000149444910280
ID :	07-0252619

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:07-0252619

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Implant treatment without bone grafting in edentulous severely resorbed maxillas : A long-term follow-up study</title>
<author><name sortKey="Rosen, Annika" sort="Rosen, Annika" uniqKey="Rosen A" first="Annika" last="Rosen">Annika Rosen</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska Institute /Karolinska University Hospital</s1>
<s2>Huddinge</s2>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Gynther, Goran" sort="Gynther, Goran" uniqKey="Gynther G" first="Goran" last="Gynther">Goran Gynther</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska Institute /Karolinska University Hospital</s1>
<s2>Huddinge</s2>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Centre for Dental Implants</s1>
<s2>Nacka</s2>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">07-0252619</idno>
<date when="2007">2007</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 07-0252619 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:07-0252619</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000434</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Implant treatment without bone grafting in edentulous severely resorbed maxillas : A long-term follow-up study</title>
<author><name sortKey="Rosen, Annika" sort="Rosen, Annika" uniqKey="Rosen A" first="Annika" last="Rosen">Annika Rosen</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska Institute /Karolinska University Hospital</s1>
<s2>Huddinge</s2>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Gynther, Goran" sort="Gynther, Goran" uniqKey="Gynther G" first="Goran" last="Gynther">Goran Gynther</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska Institute /Karolinska University Hospital</s1>
<s2>Huddinge</s2>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Centre for Dental Implants</s1>
<s2>Nacka</s2>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. oral maxillofac. surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0278-2391</idno>
<imprint><date when="2007">2007</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. oral maxillofac. surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0278-2391</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone graft</term>
<term>Edentulousness</term>
<term>Follow up study</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Long term</term>
<term>Maxillary</term>
<term>Stomatology</term>
<term>Surgery</term>
<term>Treatment</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Edentation</term>
<term>Chirurgie</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Traitement</term>
<term>Maxillaire</term>
<term>Long terme</term>
<term>Etude longitudinale</term>
<term>Stomatologie</term>
<term>Greffe osseuse</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Purpose: To evaluate retrospectively the surgical outcome of tilted implants in severely resorbed edentulous maxillas as an alternative to bone grafting and the prosthodontic outcome of posterior extension bridges on tilted implants. Patients and Methods: A total of 33 consecutive patients with severely resorbed edentulous maxillas participated in the study. In these patients, the maxillary bone volumes were insufficient for conventional placement of implants to support a fixed prosthesis. As an alternative to bone transplantation, a surgical technique with fenestration of the maxillary sinus to visualize the total amount of maxillary bone was used, followed by implant placement in a tilted manner along the anterior maxillary sinus wall. Thus, 4 to 6 implants of optimal length could be installed in each patient. Nineteen patients were included in this long-term follow-up study and were eligible for clinical evaluation at 8 to 12 years (mean, 10 years) after second-stage surgery. Each patient was examined clinically and radiographically. Results: The 19 patients had a total of 103 implants. In 2 of these patients, 3 fixtures were lost during the first year after second-stage surgery. All other patients had all implants intact with functionally fixed dental prostheses, corresponding to a success rate of 97%. Radiographic examination showed bone resorption in 10% of the implants (10 implants in 5 patients with a total number of 27 implants), with a mean bone loss of 1.2 mm. Mucositis was seen in 47% of the patients. Conclusions: This long-term follow-up study (mean time, 10 years) demonstrates that patients with a severely resorbed maxilla can be treated successfully with conventional implant treatment. This simplified surgical technique can be an alternative to the more resource-demanding technique with bone grafting.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0278-2391</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>JOMSDA</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. oral maxillofac. surg.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>65</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>5</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Implant treatment without bone grafting in edentulous severely resorbed maxillas : A long-term follow-up study</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>ROSEN (Annika)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>GYNTHER (Goran)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska Institute /Karolinska University Hospital</s1>
<s2>Huddinge</s2>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>Centre for Dental Implants</s1>
<s2>Nacka</s2>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>1010-1016</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2007</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>3005</s2>
<s5>354000149444910280</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2007 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>23 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>07-0252619</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Purpose: To evaluate retrospectively the surgical outcome of tilted implants in severely resorbed edentulous maxillas as an alternative to bone grafting and the prosthodontic outcome of posterior extension bridges on tilted implants. Patients and Methods: A total of 33 consecutive patients with severely resorbed edentulous maxillas participated in the study. In these patients, the maxillary bone volumes were insufficient for conventional placement of implants to support a fixed prosthesis. As an alternative to bone transplantation, a surgical technique with fenestration of the maxillary sinus to visualize the total amount of maxillary bone was used, followed by implant placement in a tilted manner along the anterior maxillary sinus wall. Thus, 4 to 6 implants of optimal length could be installed in each patient. Nineteen patients were included in this long-term follow-up study and were eligible for clinical evaluation at 8 to 12 years (mean, 10 years) after second-stage surgery. Each patient was examined clinically and radiographically. Results: The 19 patients had a total of 103 implants. In 2 of these patients, 3 fixtures were lost during the first year after second-stage surgery. All other patients had all implants intact with functionally fixed dental prostheses, corresponding to a success rate of 97%. Radiographic examination showed bone resorption in 10% of the implants (10 implants in 5 patients with a total number of 27 implants), with a mean bone loss of 1.2 mm. Mucositis was seen in 47% of the patients. Conclusions: This long-term follow-up study (mean time, 10 years) demonstrates that patients with a severely resorbed maxilla can be treated successfully with conventional implant treatment. This simplified surgical technique can be an alternative to the more resource-demanding technique with bone grafting.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B10C02</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Edentation</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Edentulousness</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Edentación</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Chirurgie</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Surgery</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cirugía</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Implant</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Implant</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Implante</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Traitement</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Treatment</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tratamiento</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Maxillaire</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Maxillary</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Maxilar</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Long terme</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Long term</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Largo plazo</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude longitudinale</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Follow up study</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio longitudinal</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Stomatologie</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Stomatology</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estomatología</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Greffe osseuse</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Bone graft</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dent pathologie</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Dental disease</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Diente patología</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>169</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 07-0252619 INIST</NO>
<ET>Implant treatment without bone grafting in edentulous severely resorbed maxillas : A long-term follow-up study</ET>
<AU>ROSEN (Annika); GYNTHER (Goran)</AU>
<AF>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska Institute /Karolinska University Hospital/Huddinge/Suède (1 aut., 2 aut.); Centre for Dental Implants/Nacka/Suède (2 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery; ISSN 0278-2391; Coden JOMSDA; Etats-Unis; Da. 2007; Vol. 65; No. 5; Pp. 1010-1016; Bibl. 23 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Purpose: To evaluate retrospectively the surgical outcome of tilted implants in severely resorbed edentulous maxillas as an alternative to bone grafting and the prosthodontic outcome of posterior extension bridges on tilted implants. Patients and Methods: A total of 33 consecutive patients with severely resorbed edentulous maxillas participated in the study. In these patients, the maxillary bone volumes were insufficient for conventional placement of implants to support a fixed prosthesis. As an alternative to bone transplantation, a surgical technique with fenestration of the maxillary sinus to visualize the total amount of maxillary bone was used, followed by implant placement in a tilted manner along the anterior maxillary sinus wall. Thus, 4 to 6 implants of optimal length could be installed in each patient. Nineteen patients were included in this long-term follow-up study and were eligible for clinical evaluation at 8 to 12 years (mean, 10 years) after second-stage surgery. Each patient was examined clinically and radiographically. Results: The 19 patients had a total of 103 implants. In 2 of these patients, 3 fixtures were lost during the first year after second-stage surgery. All other patients had all implants intact with functionally fixed dental prostheses, corresponding to a success rate of 97%. Radiographic examination showed bone resorption in 10% of the implants (10 implants in 5 patients with a total number of 27 implants), with a mean bone loss of 1.2 mm. Mucositis was seen in 47% of the patients. Conclusions: This long-term follow-up study (mean time, 10 years) demonstrates that patients with a severely resorbed maxilla can be treated successfully with conventional implant treatment. This simplified surgical technique can be an alternative to the more resource-demanding technique with bone grafting.</EA>
<CC>002B10C02</CC>
<FD>Edentation; Chirurgie; Implant; Traitement; Maxillaire; Long terme; Etude longitudinale; Stomatologie; Greffe osseuse</FD>
<FG>Dent pathologie</FG>
<ED>Edentulousness; Surgery; Implant; Treatment; Maxillary; Long term; Follow up study; Stomatology; Bone graft</ED>
<EG>Dental disease</EG>
<SD>Edentación; Cirugía; Implante; Tratamiento; Maxilar; Largo plazo; Estudio longitudinal; Estomatología</SD>
<LO>INIST-3005.354000149444910280</LO>
<ID>07-0252619</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000434 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000434 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:07-0252619
   |texte=   Implant treatment without bone grafting in edentulous severely resorbed maxillas : A long-term follow-up study
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022

	Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Implant treatment without bone grafting in edentulous severely resorbed maxillas : A long-term follow-up study

Implant treatment without bone grafting in edentulous severely resorbed maxillas : A long-term follow-up study

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri