EdenteV2, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000301

A Novel Decision-Making Process for Tooth Retention or Extraction

Identifieur interne : 000301 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000300; suivant : 000302

A Novel Decision-Making Process for Tooth Retention or Extraction

Auteurs : Gustavo Avila ; Pablo Galindo-Moreno ; Stephen Soehren ; Carl E. Misch ; Thiago Morelli ; Hom-Lay Wang

Source :

Journal of periodontology [ 0022-3492 ] ; 2009.

RBID : Pascal:09-0152672

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Parodontopathie, Prise de décision, Denture, Dent, Rétention, Extraction, Implant, Dentisterie.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Decision making, Dentistry, Extraction, Implant, Periodontal disease, Retention, Teeth, Tooth.

Abstract

Background: Implant-supported restorations have become the most popular therapeutic option for professionals and patients for the treatment of total and partial edentulism. When implants are placed in an ideal position, with adequate prosthetic loading and proper maintenance, they can have success rates >90% over 15 years of function. Implants may be considered a better therapeutic alternative than performing more extensive conservative procedures in an attempt to save or maintain a compromised tooth. Inadequate indication for tooth extraction has resulted in the sacrifice of many sound savable teeth. This article presents a chart that can assist clinicians in making the right decision when they are deciding which route to take. Methods: Articles published in peer-reviewed English journals were selected using several scientific databases and subsequently reviewed. Book sources were also searched. Individual tooth- and patient-related features were thoroughly analyzed, particularly when determining if a tooth should be indicated for extraction. Results: A color-based decision-making chart with six different levels, including several factors, was developed based upon available scientific literature. The rationale for including these factors is provided, and its interpretation is justified with literature support. Conclusion: The decision-making chart provided may serve as a reference guide for dentists when making the decision to save or extract a compromised tooth.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0022-3492`
A03		`1`		`@0 J. periodontol.`
A05				`@2 80`
A06				`@2 3`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 A Novel Decision-Making Process for Tooth Retention or Extraction`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 AVILA (Gustavo)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 GALINDO-MORENO (Pablo)`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 SOEHREN (Stephen)`
A11	`04`	`1`		`@1 MISCH (Carl E.)`
A11	`05`	`1`		`@1 MORELLI (Thiago)`
A11	`06`	`1`		`@1 WANG (Hom-Lay)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Graduate Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan @2 Ann Arbor, MI @3 USA @Z 1 aut. @Z 5 aut.`
A14	`02`			`@1 Department of Oral Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Granada @2 Granada @3 ESP @Z 2 aut.`
A14	`03`			`@1 Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan @3 USA @Z 3 aut. @Z 4 aut. @Z 6 aut.`
A20				`@1 476-491`
A21				`@1 2009`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 874 @5 354000184826620150`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2009 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 130 ref.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 09-0152672`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Journal of periodontology`
A66	`01`			`@0 USA`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 Background: Implant-supported restorations have become the most popular therapeutic option for professionals and patients for the treatment of total and partial edentulism. When implants are placed in an ideal position, with adequate prosthetic loading and proper maintenance, they can have success rates >90% over 15 years of function. Implants may be considered a better therapeutic alternative than performing more extensive conservative procedures in an attempt to save or maintain a compromised tooth. Inadequate indication for tooth extraction has resulted in the sacrifice of many sound savable teeth. This article presents a chart that can assist clinicians in making the right decision when they are deciding which route to take. Methods: Articles published in peer-reviewed English journals were selected using several scientific databases and subsequently reviewed. Book sources were also searched. Individual tooth- and patient-related features were thoroughly analyzed, particularly when determining if a tooth should be indicated for extraction. Results: A color-based decision-making chart with six different levels, including several factors, was developed based upon available scientific literature. The rationale for including these factors is provided, and its interpretation is justified with literature support. Conclusion: The decision-making chart provided may serve as a reference guide for dentists when making the decision to save or extract a compromised tooth.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002B10C02`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Parodontopathie @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Periodontal disease @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Parodontopatía @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Prise de décision @5 07`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Decision making @5 07`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Toma decision @5 07`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Denture @5 08`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Teeth @5 08`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Dentado @5 08`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Dent @5 09`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Tooth @5 09`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Diente @5 09`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Rétention @5 13`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Retention @5 13`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Retención @5 13`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Extraction @5 14`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Extraction @5 14`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Extracción @5 14`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Implant @5 15`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Implant @5 15`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Implante @5 15`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Dentisterie @5 30`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Dentistry @5 30`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Odontología @5 30`
C07	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Stomatologie @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Stomatology @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estomatología @5 37`
N21				`@1 110`
N44	`01`			`@1 OTO`
N82				`@1 OTO`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 09-0152672 INIST
ET :	A Novel Decision-Making Process for Tooth Retention or Extraction
AU :	AVILA (Gustavo); GALINDO-MORENO (Pablo); SOEHREN (Stephen); MISCH (Carl E.); MORELLI (Thiago); WANG (Hom-Lay)
AF :	Graduate Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan/Ann Arbor, MI/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 5 aut.); Department of Oral Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Granada/Granada/Espagne (2 aut.); Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan/Etats-Unis (3 aut., 4 aut., 6 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Journal of periodontology; ISSN 0022-3492; Etats-Unis; Da. 2009; Vol. 80; No. 3; Pp. 476-491; Bibl. 130 ref.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	Background: Implant-supported restorations have become the most popular therapeutic option for professionals and patients for the treatment of total and partial edentulism. When implants are placed in an ideal position, with adequate prosthetic loading and proper maintenance, they can have success rates >90% over 15 years of function. Implants may be considered a better therapeutic alternative than performing more extensive conservative procedures in an attempt to save or maintain a compromised tooth. Inadequate indication for tooth extraction has resulted in the sacrifice of many sound savable teeth. This article presents a chart that can assist clinicians in making the right decision when they are deciding which route to take. Methods: Articles published in peer-reviewed English journals were selected using several scientific databases and subsequently reviewed. Book sources were also searched. Individual tooth- and patient-related features were thoroughly analyzed, particularly when determining if a tooth should be indicated for extraction. Results: A color-based decision-making chart with six different levels, including several factors, was developed based upon available scientific literature. The rationale for including these factors is provided, and its interpretation is justified with literature support. Conclusion: The decision-making chart provided may serve as a reference guide for dentists when making the decision to save or extract a compromised tooth.
CC :	002B10C02
FD :	Parodontopathie; Prise de décision; Denture; Dent; Rétention; Extraction; Implant; Dentisterie
FG :	Stomatologie
ED :	Periodontal disease; Decision making; Teeth; Tooth; Retention; Extraction; Implant; Dentistry
EG :	Stomatology
SD :	Parodontopatía; Toma decision; Dentado; Diente; Retención; Extracción; Implante; Odontología
LO :	INIST-874.354000184826620150
ID :	09-0152672

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:09-0152672

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">A Novel Decision-Making Process for Tooth Retention or Extraction</title>
<author><name sortKey="Avila, Gustavo" sort="Avila, Gustavo" uniqKey="Avila G" first="Gustavo" last="Avila">Gustavo Avila</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Graduate Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan</s1>
<s2>Ann Arbor, MI</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Galindo Moreno, Pablo" sort="Galindo Moreno, Pablo" uniqKey="Galindo Moreno P" first="Pablo" last="Galindo-Moreno">Pablo Galindo-Moreno</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Oral Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Granada</s1>
<s2>Granada</s2>
<s3>ESP</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Soehren, Stephen" sort="Soehren, Stephen" uniqKey="Soehren S" first="Stephen" last="Soehren">Stephen Soehren</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Misch, Carl E" sort="Misch, Carl E" uniqKey="Misch C" first="Carl E." last="Misch">Carl E. Misch</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Morelli, Thiago" sort="Morelli, Thiago" uniqKey="Morelli T" first="Thiago" last="Morelli">Thiago Morelli</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Graduate Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan</s1>
<s2>Ann Arbor, MI</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Wang, Hom Lay" sort="Wang, Hom Lay" uniqKey="Wang H" first="Hom-Lay" last="Wang">Hom-Lay Wang</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">09-0152672</idno>
<date when="2009">2009</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 09-0152672 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:09-0152672</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000301</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">A Novel Decision-Making Process for Tooth Retention or Extraction</title>
<author><name sortKey="Avila, Gustavo" sort="Avila, Gustavo" uniqKey="Avila G" first="Gustavo" last="Avila">Gustavo Avila</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Graduate Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan</s1>
<s2>Ann Arbor, MI</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Galindo Moreno, Pablo" sort="Galindo Moreno, Pablo" uniqKey="Galindo Moreno P" first="Pablo" last="Galindo-Moreno">Pablo Galindo-Moreno</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Oral Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Granada</s1>
<s2>Granada</s2>
<s3>ESP</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Soehren, Stephen" sort="Soehren, Stephen" uniqKey="Soehren S" first="Stephen" last="Soehren">Stephen Soehren</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Misch, Carl E" sort="Misch, Carl E" uniqKey="Misch C" first="Carl E." last="Misch">Carl E. Misch</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Morelli, Thiago" sort="Morelli, Thiago" uniqKey="Morelli T" first="Thiago" last="Morelli">Thiago Morelli</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Graduate Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan</s1>
<s2>Ann Arbor, MI</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Wang, Hom Lay" sort="Wang, Hom Lay" uniqKey="Wang H" first="Hom-Lay" last="Wang">Hom-Lay Wang</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of periodontology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. periodontol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3492</idno>
<imprint><date when="2009">2009</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of periodontology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. periodontol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3492</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Decision making</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Extraction</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Periodontal disease</term>
<term>Retention</term>
<term>Teeth</term>
<term>Tooth</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Parodontopathie</term>
<term>Prise de décision</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Rétention</term>
<term>Extraction</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Dentisterie</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Background: Implant-supported restorations have become the most popular therapeutic option for professionals and patients for the treatment of total and partial edentulism. When implants are placed in an ideal position, with adequate prosthetic loading and proper maintenance, they can have success rates >90% over 15 years of function. Implants may be considered a better therapeutic alternative than performing more extensive conservative procedures in an attempt to save or maintain a compromised tooth. Inadequate indication for tooth extraction has resulted in the sacrifice of many sound savable teeth. This article presents a chart that can assist clinicians in making the right decision when they are deciding which route to take. Methods: Articles published in peer-reviewed English journals were selected using several scientific databases and subsequently reviewed. Book sources were also searched. Individual tooth- and patient-related features were thoroughly analyzed, particularly when determining if a tooth should be indicated for extraction. Results: A color-based decision-making chart with six different levels, including several factors, was developed based upon available scientific literature. The rationale for including these factors is provided, and its interpretation is justified with literature support. Conclusion: The decision-making chart provided may serve as a reference guide for dentists when making the decision to save or extract a compromised tooth.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0022-3492</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. periodontol.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>80</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>3</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>A Novel Decision-Making Process for Tooth Retention or Extraction</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>AVILA (Gustavo)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>GALINDO-MORENO (Pablo)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>SOEHREN (Stephen)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>MISCH (Carl E.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>MORELLI (Thiago)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="06" i2="1"><s1>WANG (Hom-Lay)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Graduate Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan</s1>
<s2>Ann Arbor, MI</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Oral Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Granada</s1>
<s2>Granada</s2>
<s3>ESP</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>476-491</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2009</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>874</s2>
<s5>354000184826620150</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2009 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>130 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>09-0152672</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of periodontology</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Background: Implant-supported restorations have become the most popular therapeutic option for professionals and patients for the treatment of total and partial edentulism. When implants are placed in an ideal position, with adequate prosthetic loading and proper maintenance, they can have success rates >90% over 15 years of function. Implants may be considered a better therapeutic alternative than performing more extensive conservative procedures in an attempt to save or maintain a compromised tooth. Inadequate indication for tooth extraction has resulted in the sacrifice of many sound savable teeth. This article presents a chart that can assist clinicians in making the right decision when they are deciding which route to take. Methods: Articles published in peer-reviewed English journals were selected using several scientific databases and subsequently reviewed. Book sources were also searched. Individual tooth- and patient-related features were thoroughly analyzed, particularly when determining if a tooth should be indicated for extraction. Results: A color-based decision-making chart with six different levels, including several factors, was developed based upon available scientific literature. The rationale for including these factors is provided, and its interpretation is justified with literature support. Conclusion: The decision-making chart provided may serve as a reference guide for dentists when making the decision to save or extract a compromised tooth.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B10C02</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Parodontopathie</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Periodontal disease</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Parodontopatía</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Prise de décision</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Decision making</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Toma decision</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Denture</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Teeth</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Dentado</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dent</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Tooth</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Diente</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Rétention</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Retention</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Retención</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Extraction</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Extraction</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Extracción</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Implant</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Implant</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Implante</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dentisterie</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Dentistry</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Odontología</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Stomatologie</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Stomatology</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estomatología</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>110</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 09-0152672 INIST</NO>
<ET>A Novel Decision-Making Process for Tooth Retention or Extraction</ET>
<AU>AVILA (Gustavo); GALINDO-MORENO (Pablo); SOEHREN (Stephen); MISCH (Carl E.); MORELLI (Thiago); WANG (Hom-Lay)</AU>
<AF>Graduate Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan/Ann Arbor, MI/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 5 aut.); Department of Oral Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Granada/Granada/Espagne (2 aut.); Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan/Etats-Unis (3 aut., 4 aut., 6 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of periodontology; ISSN 0022-3492; Etats-Unis; Da. 2009; Vol. 80; No. 3; Pp. 476-491; Bibl. 130 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Background: Implant-supported restorations have become the most popular therapeutic option for professionals and patients for the treatment of total and partial edentulism. When implants are placed in an ideal position, with adequate prosthetic loading and proper maintenance, they can have success rates >90% over 15 years of function. Implants may be considered a better therapeutic alternative than performing more extensive conservative procedures in an attempt to save or maintain a compromised tooth. Inadequate indication for tooth extraction has resulted in the sacrifice of many sound savable teeth. This article presents a chart that can assist clinicians in making the right decision when they are deciding which route to take. Methods: Articles published in peer-reviewed English journals were selected using several scientific databases and subsequently reviewed. Book sources were also searched. Individual tooth- and patient-related features were thoroughly analyzed, particularly when determining if a tooth should be indicated for extraction. Results: A color-based decision-making chart with six different levels, including several factors, was developed based upon available scientific literature. The rationale for including these factors is provided, and its interpretation is justified with literature support. Conclusion: The decision-making chart provided may serve as a reference guide for dentists when making the decision to save or extract a compromised tooth.</EA>
<CC>002B10C02</CC>
<FD>Parodontopathie; Prise de décision; Denture; Dent; Rétention; Extraction; Implant; Dentisterie</FD>
<FG>Stomatologie</FG>
<ED>Periodontal disease; Decision making; Teeth; Tooth; Retention; Extraction; Implant; Dentistry</ED>
<EG>Stomatology</EG>
<SD>Parodontopatía; Toma decision; Dentado; Diente; Retención; Extracción; Implante; Odontología</SD>
<LO>INIST-874.354000184826620150</LO>
<ID>09-0152672</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000301 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000301 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:09-0152672
   |texte=   A Novel Decision-Making Process for Tooth Retention or Extraction
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022

	Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

A Novel Decision-Making Process for Tooth Retention or Extraction

A Novel Decision-Making Process for Tooth Retention or Extraction

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri