EdenteV2, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000229

Crestal Bone Changes Around Implants With Reduced Abutment Diameter Placed Non-Submerged and at Subcrestal Positions: A 1-Year Radiographic Evaluation

Identifieur interne : 000229 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000228; suivant : 000230

Crestal Bone Changes Around Implants With Reduced Abutment Diameter Placed Non-Submerged and at Subcrestal Positions: A 1-Year Radiographic Evaluation

Auteurs : Ryan Donovan ; Alan Fetner ; Theofilos Koutouzis ; Tord Lundgren

Source :

Journal of periodontology : (1970) [ 0022-3492 ] ; 2010.

RBID : Pascal:10-0166364

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Ostéopénie, Radiographie, Radiologie, Os alvéolaire, Implanté, Diamètre, Position, Evaluation, Dent, Fuite, Ostéointégration, Titane, Dentisterie, Traitement, Implant dentaire.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Alveolar bone, Dental implant, Dentistry, Diameter, Evaluation, Implanted, Leak, Osteointegration, Osteopenia, Position, Radiography, Radiology, Titanium, Tooth, Treatment.

Abstract

Background: There is limited information about two-part implants placed in subcrestal positions. The aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the 1-year outcome of implants placed non-submerged and in a subcrestal position. Methods: Records of 50 consecutive partially edentulous patients restored with dental implants were reviewed. For each implant, radiographs from the surgical appointment were compared to those from the 1-year follow-up visit and evaluated regarding: 1) the degree of subcrestal positioning of the implant, 2) changes of marginal hard tissue height over time, and 3) if the marginal hard tissue could be detected on the implant platform at the follow-up visit. Results: The overall survival rate from baseline to the last recorded follow-up visit was 100%. At the surgery, the implants were placed, on average, 1.37 mm (mesial) and 1.28 mm (distal) subcrestally. The mean marginal loss of hard tissues was 0.11 ± 0.30 mm. There were no statistical significant differences regarding the loss of marginal hard tissues between mesial and distal surfaces or the maxilla versus the mandible. There was no statistical significant correlation regarding the degree of subcrestal implant position and loss of marginal mineralized hard tissue (r = 0.15; P >0.05). The mineralized hard tissue on the implant shoulder was found in 69% of the implants at the 1-year follow-up visit. Conclusions: The present study reported a minimal loss of mineralized hard tissue around dental implants placed non-submerged and at subcrestal positions. In addition, these implants had hard tissue healing that extended onto the implant shoulders on most of the observed implants.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0022-3492`
A03		`1`		`@0 J. periodontol. : (1970)`
A05				`@2 81`
A06				`@2 3`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Crestal Bone Changes Around Implants With Reduced Abutment Diameter Placed Non-Submerged and at Subcrestal Positions: A 1-Year Radiographic Evaluation`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 DONOVAN (Ryan)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 FETNER (Alan)`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 KOUTOUZIS (Theofilos)`
A11	`04`	`1`		`@1 LUNDGREN (Tord)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, University of Florida @2 Gainesville, FL @3 USA @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut. @Z 4 aut.`
A20				`@1 428-434`
A21				`@1 2010`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 874 @5 354000181479680140`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2010 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 33 ref.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 10-0166364`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Journal of periodontology : (1970)`
A66	`01`			`@0 USA`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 Background: There is limited information about two-part implants placed in subcrestal positions. The aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the 1-year outcome of implants placed non-submerged and in a subcrestal position. Methods: Records of 50 consecutive partially edentulous patients restored with dental implants were reviewed. For each implant, radiographs from the surgical appointment were compared to those from the 1-year follow-up visit and evaluated regarding: 1) the degree of subcrestal positioning of the implant, 2) changes of marginal hard tissue height over time, and 3) if the marginal hard tissue could be detected on the implant platform at the follow-up visit. Results: The overall survival rate from baseline to the last recorded follow-up visit was 100%. At the surgery, the implants were placed, on average, 1.37 mm (mesial) and 1.28 mm (distal) subcrestally. The mean marginal loss of hard tissues was 0.11 ± 0.30 mm. There were no statistical significant differences regarding the loss of marginal hard tissues between mesial and distal surfaces or the maxilla versus the mandible. There was no statistical significant correlation regarding the degree of subcrestal implant position and loss of marginal mineralized hard tissue (r = 0.15; P >0.05). The mineralized hard tissue on the implant shoulder was found in 69% of the implants at the 1-year follow-up visit. Conclusions: The present study reported a minimal loss of mineralized hard tissue around dental implants placed non-submerged and at subcrestal positions. In addition, these implants had hard tissue healing that extended onto the implant shoulders on most of the observed implants.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002B10`
C02	`02`	`X`		`@0 002B25C02`
C02	`03`	`X`		`@0 002B15A`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Ostéopénie @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Osteopenia @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Osteopenia @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Radiographie @5 04`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Radiography @5 04`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Radiografía @5 04`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Radiologie @5 05`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Radiology @5 05`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Radiología @5 05`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Os alvéolaire @5 07`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Alveolar bone @5 07`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Hueso alveolar @5 07`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Implanté @5 08`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Implanted @5 08`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Implantado @5 08`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Diamètre @5 09`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Diameter @5 09`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Diámetro @5 09`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Position @5 13`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Position @5 13`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Posición @5 13`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Evaluation @5 14`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Evaluation @5 14`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Evaluación @5 14`
C03	`09`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Dent @5 15`
C03	`09`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Tooth @5 15`
C03	`09`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Diente @5 15`
C03	`10`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Fuite @5 16`
C03	`10`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Leak @5 16`
C03	`10`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Salida @5 16`
C03	`11`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Ostéointégration @5 17`
C03	`11`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Osteointegration @5 17`
C03	`11`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Osteointegración @5 17`
C03	`12`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Titane @2 NC @5 18`
C03	`12`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Titanium @2 NC @5 18`
C03	`12`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Titanio @2 NC @5 18`
C03	`13`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Dentisterie @5 30`
C03	`13`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Dentistry @5 30`
C03	`13`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Odontología @5 30`
C03	`14`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Traitement @5 31`
C03	`14`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Treatment @5 31`
C03	`14`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Tratamiento @5 31`
C03	`15`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Implant dentaire @4 CD @5 96`
C03	`15`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Dental implant @4 CD @5 96`
C07	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Exploration @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Exploration @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Exploración @5 37`
C07	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Radiodiagnostic @5 38`
C07	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Radiodiagnosis @5 38`
C07	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Radiodiagnóstico @5 38`
C07	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Pathologie du système ostéoarticulaire @5 39`
C07	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Diseases of the osteoarticular system @5 39`
C07	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Sistema osteoarticular patología @5 39`
N21				`@1 109`
N44	`01`			`@1 OTO`
N82				`@1 OTO`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 10-0166364 INIST
ET :	Crestal Bone Changes Around Implants With Reduced Abutment Diameter Placed Non-Submerged and at Subcrestal Positions: A 1-Year Radiographic Evaluation
AU :	DONOVAN (Ryan); FETNER (Alan); KOUTOUZIS (Theofilos); LUNDGREN (Tord)
AF :	Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, University of Florida/Gainesville, FL/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Journal of periodontology : (1970); ISSN 0022-3492; Etats-Unis; Da. 2010; Vol. 81; No. 3; Pp. 428-434; Bibl. 33 ref.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	Background: There is limited information about two-part implants placed in subcrestal positions. The aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the 1-year outcome of implants placed non-submerged and in a subcrestal position. Methods: Records of 50 consecutive partially edentulous patients restored with dental implants were reviewed. For each implant, radiographs from the surgical appointment were compared to those from the 1-year follow-up visit and evaluated regarding: 1) the degree of subcrestal positioning of the implant, 2) changes of marginal hard tissue height over time, and 3) if the marginal hard tissue could be detected on the implant platform at the follow-up visit. Results: The overall survival rate from baseline to the last recorded follow-up visit was 100%. At the surgery, the implants were placed, on average, 1.37 mm (mesial) and 1.28 mm (distal) subcrestally. The mean marginal loss of hard tissues was 0.11 ± 0.30 mm. There were no statistical significant differences regarding the loss of marginal hard tissues between mesial and distal surfaces or the maxilla versus the mandible. There was no statistical significant correlation regarding the degree of subcrestal implant position and loss of marginal mineralized hard tissue (r = 0.15; P >0.05). The mineralized hard tissue on the implant shoulder was found in 69% of the implants at the 1-year follow-up visit. Conclusions: The present study reported a minimal loss of mineralized hard tissue around dental implants placed non-submerged and at subcrestal positions. In addition, these implants had hard tissue healing that extended onto the implant shoulders on most of the observed implants.
CC :	002B10; 002B25C02; 002B15A
FD :	Ostéopénie; Radiographie; Radiologie; Os alvéolaire; Implanté; Diamètre; Position; Evaluation; Dent; Fuite; Ostéointégration; Titane; Dentisterie; Traitement; Implant dentaire
FG :	Exploration; Radiodiagnostic; Pathologie du système ostéoarticulaire
ED :	Osteopenia; Radiography; Radiology; Alveolar bone; Implanted; Diameter; Position; Evaluation; Tooth; Leak; Osteointegration; Titanium; Dentistry; Treatment; Dental implant
EG :	Exploration; Radiodiagnosis; Diseases of the osteoarticular system
SD :	Osteopenia; Radiografía; Radiología; Hueso alveolar; Implantado; Diámetro; Posición; Evaluación; Diente; Salida; Osteointegración; Titanio; Odontología; Tratamiento
LO :	INIST-874.354000181479680140
ID :	10-0166364

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:10-0166364

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Crestal Bone Changes Around Implants With Reduced Abutment Diameter Placed Non-Submerged and at Subcrestal Positions: A 1-Year Radiographic Evaluation</title>
<author><name sortKey="Donovan, Ryan" sort="Donovan, Ryan" uniqKey="Donovan R" first="Ryan" last="Donovan">Ryan Donovan</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, University of Florida</s1>
<s2>Gainesville, FL</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Fetner, Alan" sort="Fetner, Alan" uniqKey="Fetner A" first="Alan" last="Fetner">Alan Fetner</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, University of Florida</s1>
<s2>Gainesville, FL</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Koutouzis, Theofilos" sort="Koutouzis, Theofilos" uniqKey="Koutouzis T" first="Theofilos" last="Koutouzis">Theofilos Koutouzis</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, University of Florida</s1>
<s2>Gainesville, FL</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Lundgren, Tord" sort="Lundgren, Tord" uniqKey="Lundgren T" first="Tord" last="Lundgren">Tord Lundgren</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, University of Florida</s1>
<s2>Gainesville, FL</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">10-0166364</idno>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 10-0166364 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:10-0166364</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000229</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Crestal Bone Changes Around Implants With Reduced Abutment Diameter Placed Non-Submerged and at Subcrestal Positions: A 1-Year Radiographic Evaluation</title>
<author><name sortKey="Donovan, Ryan" sort="Donovan, Ryan" uniqKey="Donovan R" first="Ryan" last="Donovan">Ryan Donovan</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, University of Florida</s1>
<s2>Gainesville, FL</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Fetner, Alan" sort="Fetner, Alan" uniqKey="Fetner A" first="Alan" last="Fetner">Alan Fetner</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, University of Florida</s1>
<s2>Gainesville, FL</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Koutouzis, Theofilos" sort="Koutouzis, Theofilos" uniqKey="Koutouzis T" first="Theofilos" last="Koutouzis">Theofilos Koutouzis</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, University of Florida</s1>
<s2>Gainesville, FL</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Lundgren, Tord" sort="Lundgren, Tord" uniqKey="Lundgren T" first="Tord" last="Lundgren">Tord Lundgren</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, University of Florida</s1>
<s2>Gainesville, FL</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of periodontology : (1970)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. periodontol. : (1970)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3492</idno>
<imprint><date when="2010">2010</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of periodontology : (1970)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. periodontol. : (1970)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3492</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar bone</term>
<term>Dental implant</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Diameter</term>
<term>Evaluation</term>
<term>Implanted</term>
<term>Leak</term>
<term>Osteointegration</term>
<term>Osteopenia</term>
<term>Position</term>
<term>Radiography</term>
<term>Radiology</term>
<term>Titanium</term>
<term>Tooth</term>
<term>Treatment</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Ostéopénie</term>
<term>Radiographie</term>
<term>Radiologie</term>
<term>Os alvéolaire</term>
<term>Implanté</term>
<term>Diamètre</term>
<term>Position</term>
<term>Evaluation</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Fuite</term>
<term>Ostéointégration</term>
<term>Titane</term>
<term>Dentisterie</term>
<term>Traitement</term>
<term>Implant dentaire</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Background: There is limited information about two-part implants placed in subcrestal positions. The aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the 1-year outcome of implants placed non-submerged and in a subcrestal position. Methods: Records of 50 consecutive partially edentulous patients restored with dental implants were reviewed. For each implant, radiographs from the surgical appointment were compared to those from the 1-year follow-up visit and evaluated regarding: 1) the degree of subcrestal positioning of the implant, 2) changes of marginal hard tissue height over time, and 3) if the marginal hard tissue could be detected on the implant platform at the follow-up visit. Results: The overall survival rate from baseline to the last recorded follow-up visit was 100%. At the surgery, the implants were placed, on average, 1.37 mm (mesial) and 1.28 mm (distal) subcrestally. The mean marginal loss of hard tissues was 0.11 ± 0.30 mm. There were no statistical significant differences regarding the loss of marginal hard tissues between mesial and distal surfaces or the maxilla versus the mandible. There was no statistical significant correlation regarding the degree of subcrestal implant position and loss of marginal mineralized hard tissue (r = 0.15; P >0.05). The mineralized hard tissue on the implant shoulder was found in 69% of the implants at the 1-year follow-up visit. Conclusions: The present study reported a minimal loss of mineralized hard tissue around dental implants placed non-submerged and at subcrestal positions. In addition, these implants had hard tissue healing that extended onto the implant shoulders on most of the observed implants.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0022-3492</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. periodontol. : (1970)</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>81</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>3</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Crestal Bone Changes Around Implants With Reduced Abutment Diameter Placed Non-Submerged and at Subcrestal Positions: A 1-Year Radiographic Evaluation</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>DONOVAN (Ryan)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>FETNER (Alan)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>KOUTOUZIS (Theofilos)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>LUNDGREN (Tord)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, University of Florida</s1>
<s2>Gainesville, FL</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>428-434</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2010</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>874</s2>
<s5>354000181479680140</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2010 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>33 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>10-0166364</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of periodontology : (1970)</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Background: There is limited information about two-part implants placed in subcrestal positions. The aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the 1-year outcome of implants placed non-submerged and in a subcrestal position. Methods: Records of 50 consecutive partially edentulous patients restored with dental implants were reviewed. For each implant, radiographs from the surgical appointment were compared to those from the 1-year follow-up visit and evaluated regarding: 1) the degree of subcrestal positioning of the implant, 2) changes of marginal hard tissue height over time, and 3) if the marginal hard tissue could be detected on the implant platform at the follow-up visit. Results: The overall survival rate from baseline to the last recorded follow-up visit was 100%. At the surgery, the implants were placed, on average, 1.37 mm (mesial) and 1.28 mm (distal) subcrestally. The mean marginal loss of hard tissues was 0.11 ± 0.30 mm. There were no statistical significant differences regarding the loss of marginal hard tissues between mesial and distal surfaces or the maxilla versus the mandible. There was no statistical significant correlation regarding the degree of subcrestal implant position and loss of marginal mineralized hard tissue (r = 0.15; P >0.05). The mineralized hard tissue on the implant shoulder was found in 69% of the implants at the 1-year follow-up visit. Conclusions: The present study reported a minimal loss of mineralized hard tissue around dental implants placed non-submerged and at subcrestal positions. In addition, these implants had hard tissue healing that extended onto the implant shoulders on most of the observed implants.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B10</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>002B25C02</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="03" i2="X"><s0>002B15A</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Ostéopénie</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Osteopenia</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Osteopenia</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Radiographie</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Radiography</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Radiografía</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Radiologie</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Radiology</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Radiología</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Os alvéolaire</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Alveolar bone</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hueso alveolar</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Implanté</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Implanted</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Implantado</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Diamètre</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Diameter</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Diámetro</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Position</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Position</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Posición</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Evaluation</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Evaluation</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Evaluación</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dent</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Tooth</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Diente</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Fuite</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Leak</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Salida</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Ostéointégration</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Osteointegration</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Osteointegración</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Titane</s0>
<s2>NC</s2>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Titanium</s0>
<s2>NC</s2>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Titanio</s0>
<s2>NC</s2>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dentisterie</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Dentistry</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Odontología</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Traitement</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Treatment</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tratamiento</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="15" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Implant dentaire</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="15" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Dental implant</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Exploration</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Exploration</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Exploración</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Radiodiagnostic</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Radiodiagnosis</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Radiodiagnóstico</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pathologie du système ostéoarticulaire</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sistema osteoarticular patología</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>109</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 10-0166364 INIST</NO>
<ET>Crestal Bone Changes Around Implants With Reduced Abutment Diameter Placed Non-Submerged and at Subcrestal Positions: A 1-Year Radiographic Evaluation</ET>
<AU>DONOVAN (Ryan); FETNER (Alan); KOUTOUZIS (Theofilos); LUNDGREN (Tord)</AU>
<AF>Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, University of Florida/Gainesville, FL/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of periodontology : (1970); ISSN 0022-3492; Etats-Unis; Da. 2010; Vol. 81; No. 3; Pp. 428-434; Bibl. 33 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Background: There is limited information about two-part implants placed in subcrestal positions. The aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the 1-year outcome of implants placed non-submerged and in a subcrestal position. Methods: Records of 50 consecutive partially edentulous patients restored with dental implants were reviewed. For each implant, radiographs from the surgical appointment were compared to those from the 1-year follow-up visit and evaluated regarding: 1) the degree of subcrestal positioning of the implant, 2) changes of marginal hard tissue height over time, and 3) if the marginal hard tissue could be detected on the implant platform at the follow-up visit. Results: The overall survival rate from baseline to the last recorded follow-up visit was 100%. At the surgery, the implants were placed, on average, 1.37 mm (mesial) and 1.28 mm (distal) subcrestally. The mean marginal loss of hard tissues was 0.11 ± 0.30 mm. There were no statistical significant differences regarding the loss of marginal hard tissues between mesial and distal surfaces or the maxilla versus the mandible. There was no statistical significant correlation regarding the degree of subcrestal implant position and loss of marginal mineralized hard tissue (r = 0.15; P >0.05). The mineralized hard tissue on the implant shoulder was found in 69% of the implants at the 1-year follow-up visit. Conclusions: The present study reported a minimal loss of mineralized hard tissue around dental implants placed non-submerged and at subcrestal positions. In addition, these implants had hard tissue healing that extended onto the implant shoulders on most of the observed implants.</EA>
<CC>002B10; 002B25C02; 002B15A</CC>
<FD>Ostéopénie; Radiographie; Radiologie; Os alvéolaire; Implanté; Diamètre; Position; Evaluation; Dent; Fuite; Ostéointégration; Titane; Dentisterie; Traitement; Implant dentaire</FD>
<FG>Exploration; Radiodiagnostic; Pathologie du système ostéoarticulaire</FG>
<ED>Osteopenia; Radiography; Radiology; Alveolar bone; Implanted; Diameter; Position; Evaluation; Tooth; Leak; Osteointegration; Titanium; Dentistry; Treatment; Dental implant</ED>
<EG>Exploration; Radiodiagnosis; Diseases of the osteoarticular system</EG>
<SD>Osteopenia; Radiografía; Radiología; Hueso alveolar; Implantado; Diámetro; Posición; Evaluación; Diente; Salida; Osteointegración; Titanio; Odontología; Tratamiento</SD>
<LO>INIST-874.354000181479680140</LO>
<ID>10-0166364</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000229 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000229 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:10-0166364
   |texte=   Crestal Bone Changes Around Implants With Reduced Abutment Diameter Placed Non-Submerged and at Subcrestal Positions: A 1-Year Radiographic Evaluation
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022

	Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Crestal Bone Changes Around Implants With Reduced Abutment Diameter Placed Non-Submerged and at Subcrestal Positions: A 1-Year Radiographic Evaluation

Crestal Bone Changes Around Implants With Reduced Abutment Diameter Placed Non-Submerged and at Subcrestal Positions: A 1-Year Radiographic Evaluation

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri