Surgical and Prosthodontic Consequences of Inadequate Treatment Planning for Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis in the Edentulous Mandible
Identifieur interne :
000179 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus );
précédent :
000178;
suivant :
000180
Surgical and Prosthodontic Consequences of Inadequate Treatment Planning for Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis in the Edentulous Mandible
Auteurs : Avinash S. BidraSource :
-
Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery [ 0278-2391 ] ; 2010.
RBID : Pascal:10-0474016
Descripteurs français
English descriptors
Abstract
Treatment planning for mandibular fixed implant-supported prostheses requires close communication between surgeons and restorative dentists. Improper implant positioning can result in significant difficulty for patient comfort and fabrication of a functional prosthesis. This case report describes the consequences of placing implants with no preoperative planning with regard to the implant position based on the final restorative plan. A 46-year-old male had all of his remaining maxillary and mandibular teeth extracted, and had 5 implants placed immediately in the interforaminal region of the mandible with the intent of providing a fixed prosthesis. Six weeks later, the patient was referred for prosthodontic care. The patient had no prostheses at that time and was in severe pain due to impingement of the lower lip by one of the implants. The implants were deemed to be in unfavorable positions and angulations. Thereafter, the case was treatment-planned systematically, requiring 2 additional surgical procedures-removal of one of the implants and alveoloplasty of posterior mandible for creation of space for prosthetic components. The remaining 4 implants with unfavorable angulations posed a prosthodontic challenge for fabrication of a prosthesis. The situation was eventually managed by fabrication of a screw-retained metal-resin fixed prosthesis over the remaining 4 implants. Although the situation was managed successfully, it resulted in increased time and treatment expenses, additional appointments, and elaborative steps for correction. Prosthodontics-driven treatment planning concepts and guidelines for prevention of such situations are described in this article.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
| pA |
| A01 | 01 | 1 | | @0 0278-2391 |
|---|
| A02 | 01 | | | @0 JOMSDA |
|---|
| A03 | | 1 | | @0 J. oral maxillofac. surg. |
|---|
| A05 | | | | @2 68 |
|---|
| A06 | | | | @2 10 |
|---|
| A08 | 01 | 1 | ENG | @1 Surgical and Prosthodontic Consequences of Inadequate Treatment Planning for Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis in the Edentulous Mandible |
|---|
| A11 | 01 | 1 | | @1 BIDRA (Avinash S.) |
|---|
| A14 | 01 | | | @1 Department of Prosthodontics, University of Texas Health Science Center @2 San Antonio, TX @3 USA @Z 1 aut. |
|---|
| A20 | | | | @1 2528-2536 |
|---|
| A21 | | | | @1 2010 |
|---|
| A23 | 01 | | | @0 ENG |
|---|
| A43 | 01 | | | @1 INIST @2 3005 @5 354000192454490230 |
|---|
| A44 | | | | @0 0000 @1 © 2010 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved. |
|---|
| A45 | | | | @0 19 ref. |
|---|
| A47 | 01 | 1 | | @0 10-0474016 |
|---|
| A60 | | | | @1 P @2 C |
|---|
| A61 | | | | @0 A |
|---|
| A64 | 01 | 1 | | @0 Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery |
|---|
| A66 | 01 | | | @0 USA |
|---|
| C01 | 01 | | ENG | @0 Treatment planning for mandibular fixed implant-supported prostheses requires close communication between surgeons and restorative dentists. Improper implant positioning can result in significant difficulty for patient comfort and fabrication of a functional prosthesis. This case report describes the consequences of placing implants with no preoperative planning with regard to the implant position based on the final restorative plan. A 46-year-old male had all of his remaining maxillary and mandibular teeth extracted, and had 5 implants placed immediately in the interforaminal region of the mandible with the intent of providing a fixed prosthesis. Six weeks later, the patient was referred for prosthodontic care. The patient had no prostheses at that time and was in severe pain due to impingement of the lower lip by one of the implants. The implants were deemed to be in unfavorable positions and angulations. Thereafter, the case was treatment-planned systematically, requiring 2 additional surgical procedures-removal of one of the implants and alveoloplasty of posterior mandible for creation of space for prosthetic components. The remaining 4 implants with unfavorable angulations posed a prosthodontic challenge for fabrication of a prosthesis. The situation was eventually managed by fabrication of a screw-retained metal-resin fixed prosthesis over the remaining 4 implants. Although the situation was managed successfully, it resulted in increased time and treatment expenses, additional appointments, and elaborative steps for correction. Prosthodontics-driven treatment planning concepts and guidelines for prevention of such situations are described in this article. |
|---|
| C02 | 01 | X | | @0 002B10C02 |
|---|
| C03 | 01 | X | FRE | @0 Edentation @5 01 |
|---|
| C03 | 01 | X | ENG | @0 Edentulousness @5 01 |
|---|
| C03 | 01 | X | SPA | @0 Edentación @5 01 |
|---|
| C03 | 02 | X | FRE | @0 Chirurgie @5 04 |
|---|
| C03 | 02 | X | ENG | @0 Surgery @5 04 |
|---|
| C03 | 02 | X | SPA | @0 Cirugía @5 04 |
|---|
| C03 | 03 | X | FRE | @0 Plan traitement @5 05 |
|---|
| C03 | 03 | X | ENG | @0 Treatment planning @5 05 |
|---|
| C03 | 03 | X | SPA | @0 Plan tratamiento @5 05 |
|---|
| C03 | 04 | X | FRE | @0 Prothèse @5 06 |
|---|
| C03 | 04 | X | ENG | @0 Prosthesis @5 06 |
|---|
| C03 | 04 | X | SPA | @0 Prótesis @5 06 |
|---|
| C03 | 05 | X | FRE | @0 Implant @5 07 |
|---|
| C03 | 05 | X | ENG | @0 Implant @5 07 |
|---|
| C03 | 05 | X | SPA | @0 Implante @5 07 |
|---|
| C03 | 06 | X | FRE | @0 Mandibule @5 08 |
|---|
| C03 | 06 | X | ENG | @0 Mandible @5 08 |
|---|
| C03 | 06 | X | SPA | @0 Mandíbula @5 08 |
|---|
| C03 | 07 | X | FRE | @0 Stomatologie @5 09 |
|---|
| C03 | 07 | X | ENG | @0 Stomatology @5 09 |
|---|
| C03 | 07 | X | SPA | @0 Estomatología @5 09 |
|---|
| C03 | 08 | X | FRE | @0 Traitement @5 30 |
|---|
| C03 | 08 | X | ENG | @0 Treatment @5 30 |
|---|
| C03 | 08 | X | SPA | @0 Tratamiento @5 30 |
|---|
| C07 | 01 | X | FRE | @0 Pathologie dentaire @5 37 |
|---|
| C07 | 01 | X | ENG | @0 Dental disease @5 37 |
|---|
| C07 | 01 | X | SPA | @0 Diente patología @5 37 |
|---|
| N21 | | | | @1 312 |
|---|
| N44 | 01 | | | @1 OTO |
|---|
| N82 | | | | @1 OTO |
|---|
|
|---|
| pR |
| A30 | 01 | 1 | ENG | @1 American College of Prosthodontists Meeting @3 Scottsdale, AZ USA @4 2007-11 |
|---|
|
|---|
Format Inist (serveur)
| NO : | PASCAL 10-0474016 INIST |
|---|
| ET : | Surgical and Prosthodontic Consequences of Inadequate Treatment Planning for Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis in the Edentulous Mandible |
|---|
| AU : | BIDRA (Avinash S.) |
|---|
| AF : | Department of Prosthodontics, University of Texas Health Science Center/San Antonio, TX/Etats-Unis (1 aut.) |
|---|
| DT : | Publication en série; Congrès; Niveau analytique |
|---|
| SO : | Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery; ISSN 0278-2391; Coden JOMSDA; Etats-Unis; Da. 2010; Vol. 68; No. 10; Pp. 2528-2536; Bibl. 19 ref. |
|---|
| LA : | Anglais |
|---|
| EA : | Treatment planning for mandibular fixed implant-supported prostheses requires close communication between surgeons and restorative dentists. Improper implant positioning can result in significant difficulty for patient comfort and fabrication of a functional prosthesis. This case report describes the consequences of placing implants with no preoperative planning with regard to the implant position based on the final restorative plan. A 46-year-old male had all of his remaining maxillary and mandibular teeth extracted, and had 5 implants placed immediately in the interforaminal region of the mandible with the intent of providing a fixed prosthesis. Six weeks later, the patient was referred for prosthodontic care. The patient had no prostheses at that time and was in severe pain due to impingement of the lower lip by one of the implants. The implants were deemed to be in unfavorable positions and angulations. Thereafter, the case was treatment-planned systematically, requiring 2 additional surgical procedures-removal of one of the implants and alveoloplasty of posterior mandible for creation of space for prosthetic components. The remaining 4 implants with unfavorable angulations posed a prosthodontic challenge for fabrication of a prosthesis. The situation was eventually managed by fabrication of a screw-retained metal-resin fixed prosthesis over the remaining 4 implants. Although the situation was managed successfully, it resulted in increased time and treatment expenses, additional appointments, and elaborative steps for correction. Prosthodontics-driven treatment planning concepts and guidelines for prevention of such situations are described in this article. |
|---|
| CC : | 002B10C02 |
|---|
| FD : | Edentation; Chirurgie; Plan traitement; Prothèse; Implant; Mandibule; Stomatologie; Traitement |
|---|
| FG : | Pathologie dentaire |
|---|
| ED : | Edentulousness; Surgery; Treatment planning; Prosthesis; Implant; Mandible; Stomatology; Treatment |
|---|
| EG : | Dental disease |
|---|
| SD : | Edentación; Cirugía; Plan tratamiento; Prótesis; Implante; Mandíbula; Estomatología; Tratamiento |
|---|
| LO : | INIST-3005.354000192454490230 |
|---|
| ID : | 10-0474016 |
|---|
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:10-0474016
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Surgical and Prosthodontic Consequences of Inadequate Treatment Planning for Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis in the Edentulous Mandible</title>
<author><name sortKey="Bidra, Avinash S" sort="Bidra, Avinash S" uniqKey="Bidra A" first="Avinash S." last="Bidra">Avinash S. Bidra</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Prosthodontics, University of Texas Health Science Center</s1>
<s2>San Antonio, TX</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">10-0474016</idno>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 10-0474016 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:10-0474016</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000179</idno>
</publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Surgical and Prosthodontic Consequences of Inadequate Treatment Planning for Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis in the Edentulous Mandible</title>
<author><name sortKey="Bidra, Avinash S" sort="Bidra, Avinash S" uniqKey="Bidra A" first="Avinash S." last="Bidra">Avinash S. Bidra</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Prosthodontics, University of Texas Health Science Center</s1>
<s2>San Antonio, TX</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. oral maxillofac. surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0278-2391</idno>
<imprint><date when="2010">2010</date>
</imprint><seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. oral maxillofac. surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0278-2391</idno>
</seriesStmt><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Edentulousness</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Stomatology</term>
<term>Surgery</term>
<term>Treatment</term>
<term>Treatment planning</term>
</keywords><keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Edentation</term>
<term>Chirurgie</term>
<term>Plan traitement</term>
<term>Prothèse</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Mandibule</term>
<term>Stomatologie</term>
<term>Traitement</term>
</keywords><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Treatment planning for mandibular fixed implant-supported prostheses requires close communication between surgeons and restorative dentists. Improper implant positioning can result in significant difficulty for patient comfort and fabrication of a functional prosthesis. This case report describes the consequences of placing implants with no preoperative planning with regard to the implant position based on the final restorative plan. A 46-year-old male had all of his remaining maxillary and mandibular teeth extracted, and had 5 implants placed immediately in the interforaminal region of the mandible with the intent of providing a fixed prosthesis. Six weeks later, the patient was referred for prosthodontic care. The patient had no prostheses at that time and was in severe pain due to impingement of the lower lip by one of the implants. The implants were deemed to be in unfavorable positions and angulations. Thereafter, the case was treatment-planned systematically, requiring 2 additional surgical procedures-removal of one of the implants and alveoloplasty of posterior mandible for creation of space for prosthetic components. The remaining 4 implants with unfavorable angulations posed a prosthodontic challenge for fabrication of a prosthesis. The situation was eventually managed by fabrication of a screw-retained metal-resin fixed prosthesis over the remaining 4 implants. Although the situation was managed successfully, it resulted in increased time and treatment expenses, additional appointments, and elaborative steps for correction. Prosthodontics-driven treatment planning concepts and guidelines for prevention of such situations are described in this article.</div>
</front><inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0278-2391</s0>
</fA01><fA02 i1="01"><s0>JOMSDA</s0>
</fA02><fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. oral maxillofac. surg.</s0>
</fA03><fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Surgical and Prosthodontic Consequences of Inadequate Treatment Planning for Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis in the Edentulous Mandible</s1>
</fA08><fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>BIDRA (Avinash S.)</s1>
</fA11><fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Prosthodontics, University of Texas Health Science Center</s1>
<s2>San Antonio, TX</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14><fA20><s1>2528-2536</s1>
</fA20><fA21><s1>2010</s1>
</fA21><fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23><fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>3005</s2>
<s5>354000192454490230</s5>
</fA43><fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2010 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44><fA45><s0>19 ref.</s0>
</fA45><fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>10-0474016</s0>
</fA47><fA60><s1>P</s1>
<s2>C</s2>
</fA60><fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</s0>
</fA64><fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66><fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Treatment planning for mandibular fixed implant-supported prostheses requires close communication between surgeons and restorative dentists. Improper implant positioning can result in significant difficulty for patient comfort and fabrication of a functional prosthesis. This case report describes the consequences of placing implants with no preoperative planning with regard to the implant position based on the final restorative plan. A 46-year-old male had all of his remaining maxillary and mandibular teeth extracted, and had 5 implants placed immediately in the interforaminal region of the mandible with the intent of providing a fixed prosthesis. Six weeks later, the patient was referred for prosthodontic care. The patient had no prostheses at that time and was in severe pain due to impingement of the lower lip by one of the implants. The implants were deemed to be in unfavorable positions and angulations. Thereafter, the case was treatment-planned systematically, requiring 2 additional surgical procedures-removal of one of the implants and alveoloplasty of posterior mandible for creation of space for prosthetic components. The remaining 4 implants with unfavorable angulations posed a prosthodontic challenge for fabrication of a prosthesis. The situation was eventually managed by fabrication of a screw-retained metal-resin fixed prosthesis over the remaining 4 implants. Although the situation was managed successfully, it resulted in increased time and treatment expenses, additional appointments, and elaborative steps for correction. Prosthodontics-driven treatment planning concepts and guidelines for prevention of such situations are described in this article.</s0>
</fC01><fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B10C02</s0>
</fC02><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Edentation</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Edentulousness</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Edentación</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Chirurgie</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Surgery</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cirugía</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Plan traitement</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Treatment planning</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Plan tratamiento</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Prothèse</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Prosthesis</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Prótesis</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Implant</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Implant</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Implante</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Mandibule</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Mandible</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Mandíbula</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Stomatologie</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Stomatology</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estomatología</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Traitement</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Treatment</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tratamiento</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pathologie dentaire</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Dental disease</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Diente patología</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07><fN21><s1>312</s1>
</fN21><fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44><fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82><pR><fA30 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>American College of Prosthodontists Meeting</s1>
<s3>Scottsdale, AZ USA</s3>
<s4>2007-11</s4>
</fA30><server><NO>PASCAL 10-0474016 INIST</NO>
<ET>Surgical and Prosthodontic Consequences of Inadequate Treatment Planning for Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis in the Edentulous Mandible</ET>
<AU>BIDRA (Avinash S.)</AU>
<AF>Department of Prosthodontics, University of Texas Health Science Center/San Antonio, TX/Etats-Unis (1 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Congrès; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery; ISSN 0278-2391; Coden JOMSDA; Etats-Unis; Da. 2010; Vol. 68; No. 10; Pp. 2528-2536; Bibl. 19 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Treatment planning for mandibular fixed implant-supported prostheses requires close communication between surgeons and restorative dentists. Improper implant positioning can result in significant difficulty for patient comfort and fabrication of a functional prosthesis. This case report describes the consequences of placing implants with no preoperative planning with regard to the implant position based on the final restorative plan. A 46-year-old male had all of his remaining maxillary and mandibular teeth extracted, and had 5 implants placed immediately in the interforaminal region of the mandible with the intent of providing a fixed prosthesis. Six weeks later, the patient was referred for prosthodontic care. The patient had no prostheses at that time and was in severe pain due to impingement of the lower lip by one of the implants. The implants were deemed to be in unfavorable positions and angulations. Thereafter, the case was treatment-planned systematically, requiring 2 additional surgical procedures-removal of one of the implants and alveoloplasty of posterior mandible for creation of space for prosthetic components. The remaining 4 implants with unfavorable angulations posed a prosthodontic challenge for fabrication of a prosthesis. The situation was eventually managed by fabrication of a screw-retained metal-resin fixed prosthesis over the remaining 4 implants. Although the situation was managed successfully, it resulted in increased time and treatment expenses, additional appointments, and elaborative steps for correction. Prosthodontics-driven treatment planning concepts and guidelines for prevention of such situations are described in this article.</EA>
<CC>002B10C02</CC>
<FD>Edentation; Chirurgie; Plan traitement; Prothèse; Implant; Mandibule; Stomatologie; Traitement</FD>
<FG>Pathologie dentaire</FG>
<ED>Edentulousness; Surgery; Treatment planning; Prosthesis; Implant; Mandible; Stomatology; Treatment</ED>
<EG>Dental disease</EG>
<SD>Edentación; Cirugía; Plan tratamiento; Prótesis; Implante; Mandíbula; Estomatología; Tratamiento</SD>
<LO>INIST-3005.354000192454490230</LO>
<ID>10-0474016</ID>
</server>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000179 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000179 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PascalFrancis
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= Pascal:10-0474016
|texte= Surgical and Prosthodontic Consequences of Inadequate Treatment Planning for Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis in the Edentulous Mandible
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022 |  |
