EdenteV2, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000162

Prospective Evaluation of 2,549 Morse Taper Connection Implants: 1- to 6-Year Data

Identifieur interne : 000162 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000161; suivant : 000163

Prospective Evaluation of 2,549 Morse Taper Connection Implants: 1- to 6-Year Data

Auteurs : Carlo Mangano ; Francesco Mangano ; Jamil A. Shibli ; Lucia Tettamanti ; Michele Figliuzzi ; Susana D'Avila ; Rachel L. Sammons ; Adriano Piattelli

Source :

Journal of periodontology : (1970) [ 0022-3492 ] ; 2011.

RBID : Pascal:11-0100777

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Evaluation, Raccordement, Os, Résorption, Dent, Pronostic, Survie, Dentisterie, Traitement, Implant dentaire.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Bone, Connection, Dental implant, Dentistry, Evaluation, Prognosis, Resorption, Survival, Tooth, Treatment.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the implant survival, the implant-crown success, and the prosthetic complications of 2,549 Morse taper interference-fit connection implants. Methods: A total of 2,549 Morse taper connection implants were inserted in 893 patients from January 2003 until December 2008. At each annual recall, clinical, radiographic, and prosthetic parameters were assessed. The implant-crown success criteria included the absence of pain, suppuration, and clinical mobility; an average distance between the implant shoulder and the first visible bone contact <2 mm from initial surgery; and the absence of prosthetic complications at the implant-abutment interface. Prosthetic restorations were fixed partial prostheses (462 units); fixed full-arch prostheses (60 units); single crowns (531 units); and overdentures (93 units). Results: The cumulative implant survival rate was 98.23% (97.25% maxilla, 99.05% mandible). The implant-crown success was 92.49%. A few prosthetic complications at implant-abutment interface were reported (0.37%). After 6 years, distance between the implant shoulder and the first visible bone contact was 1.10 mm (± 0.30 mm). Conclusion: The use of Morse taper connection implants represents a successful procedure for the rehabilitation of partially and completely edentulous arches.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0022-3492`
A03		`1`		`@0 J. periodontol. : (1970)`
A05				`@2 82`
A06				`@2 1`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Prospective Evaluation of 2,549 Morse Taper Connection Implants: 1- to 6-Year Data`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 MANGANO (Carlo)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 MANGANO (Francesco)`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 SHIBLI (Jamil A.)`
A11	`04`	`1`		`@1 TETTAMANTI (Lucia)`
A11	`05`	`1`		`@1 FIGLIUZZI (Michele)`
A11	`06`	`1`		`@1 D'AVILA (Susana)`
A11	`07`	`1`		`@1 SAMMONS (Rachel L.)`
A11	`08`	`1`		`@1 PIATTELLI (Adriano)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Dental School, University of Varese @2 Varese @3 ITA @Z 1 aut. @Z 4 aut.`
A14	`02`			`@1 Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental Research Division, Guarulhos University @2 Guarulhos, São Paulo @3 BRA @Z 3 aut. @Z 6 aut.`
A14	`03`			`@1 Department of Periodontology, University of Catanzaro @2 Catanzaro @3 ITA @Z 5 aut.`
A14	`04`			`@1 Dental School, University of Birmingham @2 Birmingham @3 GBR @Z 7 aut.`
A14	`05`			`@1 Department of Oral Pathology and Oral Medicine, Dental School, University of Chieti Pescara @2 Chieti @3 ITA @Z 8 aut.`
A20				`@1 52-61`
A21				`@1 2011`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 874 @5 354000193622850050`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2011 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 56 ref.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 11-0100777`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Journal of periodontology : (1970)`
A66	`01`			`@0 USA`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the implant survival, the implant-crown success, and the prosthetic complications of 2,549 Morse taper interference-fit connection implants. Methods: A total of 2,549 Morse taper connection implants were inserted in 893 patients from January 2003 until December 2008. At each annual recall, clinical, radiographic, and prosthetic parameters were assessed. The implant-crown success criteria included the absence of pain, suppuration, and clinical mobility; an average distance between the implant shoulder and the first visible bone contact <2 mm from initial surgery; and the absence of prosthetic complications at the implant-abutment interface. Prosthetic restorations were fixed partial prostheses (462 units); fixed full-arch prostheses (60 units); single crowns (531 units); and overdentures (93 units). Results: The cumulative implant survival rate was 98.23% (97.25% maxilla, 99.05% mandible). The implant-crown success was 92.49%. A few prosthetic complications at implant-abutment interface were reported (0.37%). After 6 years, distance between the implant shoulder and the first visible bone contact was 1.10 mm (± 0.30 mm). Conclusion: The use of Morse taper connection implants represents a successful procedure for the rehabilitation of partially and completely edentulous arches.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002B10`
C02	`02`	`X`		`@0 002B25C02`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Evaluation @5 07`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Evaluation @5 07`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Evaluación @5 07`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Raccordement @5 08`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Connection @5 08`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Conexión @5 08`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Os @5 09`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Bone @5 09`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Hueso @5 09`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Résorption @5 13`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Resorption @5 13`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Resorción @5 13`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Dent @5 14`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Tooth @5 14`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Diente @5 14`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Pronostic @5 15`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Prognosis @5 15`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Pronóstico @5 15`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Survie @5 16`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Survival @5 16`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Sobrevivencia @5 16`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Dentisterie @5 30`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Dentistry @5 30`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Odontología @5 30`
C03	`09`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Traitement @5 31`
C03	`09`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Treatment @5 31`
C03	`09`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Tratamiento @5 31`
C03	`10`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Implant dentaire @4 CD @5 96`
C03	`10`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Dental implant @4 CD @5 96`
N21				`@1 066`
N44	`01`			`@1 OTO`
N82				`@1 OTO`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 11-0100777 INIST
ET :	Prospective Evaluation of 2,549 Morse Taper Connection Implants: 1- to 6-Year Data
AU :	MANGANO (Carlo); MANGANO (Francesco); SHIBLI (Jamil A.); TETTAMANTI (Lucia); FIGLIUZZI (Michele); D'AVILA (Susana); SAMMONS (Rachel L.); PIATTELLI (Adriano)
AF :	Dental School, University of Varese/Varese/Italie (1 aut., 4 aut.); Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental Research Division, Guarulhos University/Guarulhos, São Paulo/Brésil (3 aut., 6 aut.); Department of Periodontology, University of Catanzaro/Catanzaro/Italie (5 aut.); Dental School, University of Birmingham/Birmingham/Royaume-Uni (7 aut.); Department of Oral Pathology and Oral Medicine, Dental School, University of Chieti Pescara/Chieti/Italie (8 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Journal of periodontology : (1970); ISSN 0022-3492; Etats-Unis; Da. 2011; Vol. 82; No. 1; Pp. 52-61; Bibl. 56 ref.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the implant survival, the implant-crown success, and the prosthetic complications of 2,549 Morse taper interference-fit connection implants. Methods: A total of 2,549 Morse taper connection implants were inserted in 893 patients from January 2003 until December 2008. At each annual recall, clinical, radiographic, and prosthetic parameters were assessed. The implant-crown success criteria included the absence of pain, suppuration, and clinical mobility; an average distance between the implant shoulder and the first visible bone contact <2 mm from initial surgery; and the absence of prosthetic complications at the implant-abutment interface. Prosthetic restorations were fixed partial prostheses (462 units); fixed full-arch prostheses (60 units); single crowns (531 units); and overdentures (93 units). Results: The cumulative implant survival rate was 98.23% (97.25% maxilla, 99.05% mandible). The implant-crown success was 92.49%. A few prosthetic complications at implant-abutment interface were reported (0.37%). After 6 years, distance between the implant shoulder and the first visible bone contact was 1.10 mm (± 0.30 mm). Conclusion: The use of Morse taper connection implants represents a successful procedure for the rehabilitation of partially and completely edentulous arches.
CC :	002B10; 002B25C02
FD :	Evaluation; Raccordement; Os; Résorption; Dent; Pronostic; Survie; Dentisterie; Traitement; Implant dentaire
ED :	Evaluation; Connection; Bone; Resorption; Tooth; Prognosis; Survival; Dentistry; Treatment; Dental implant
SD :	Evaluación; Conexión; Hueso; Resorción; Diente; Pronóstico; Sobrevivencia; Odontología; Tratamiento
LO :	INIST-874.354000193622850050
ID :	11-0100777

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:11-0100777

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Prospective Evaluation of 2,549 Morse Taper Connection Implants: 1- to 6-Year Data</title>
<author><name sortKey="Mangano, Carlo" sort="Mangano, Carlo" uniqKey="Mangano C" first="Carlo" last="Mangano">Carlo Mangano</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Dental School, University of Varese</s1>
<s2>Varese</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mangano, Francesco" sort="Mangano, Francesco" uniqKey="Mangano F" first="Francesco" last="Mangano">Francesco Mangano</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Shibli, Jamil A" sort="Shibli, Jamil A" uniqKey="Shibli J" first="Jamil A." last="Shibli">Jamil A. Shibli</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental Research Division, Guarulhos University</s1>
<s2>Guarulhos, São Paulo</s2>
<s3>BRA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Tettamanti, Lucia" sort="Tettamanti, Lucia" uniqKey="Tettamanti L" first="Lucia" last="Tettamanti">Lucia Tettamanti</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Dental School, University of Varese</s1>
<s2>Varese</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Figliuzzi, Michele" sort="Figliuzzi, Michele" uniqKey="Figliuzzi M" first="Michele" last="Figliuzzi">Michele Figliuzzi</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Periodontology, University of Catanzaro</s1>
<s2>Catanzaro</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="D Avila, Susana" sort="D Avila, Susana" uniqKey="D Avila S" first="Susana" last="D'Avila">Susana D'Avila</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental Research Division, Guarulhos University</s1>
<s2>Guarulhos, São Paulo</s2>
<s3>BRA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Sammons, Rachel L" sort="Sammons, Rachel L" uniqKey="Sammons R" first="Rachel L." last="Sammons">Rachel L. Sammons</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Dental School, University of Birmingham</s1>
<s2>Birmingham</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Piattelli, Adriano" sort="Piattelli, Adriano" uniqKey="Piattelli A" first="Adriano" last="Piattelli">Adriano Piattelli</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="05"><s1>Department of Oral Pathology and Oral Medicine, Dental School, University of Chieti Pescara</s1>
<s2>Chieti</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">11-0100777</idno>
<date when="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 11-0100777 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:11-0100777</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000162</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Prospective Evaluation of 2,549 Morse Taper Connection Implants: 1- to 6-Year Data</title>
<author><name sortKey="Mangano, Carlo" sort="Mangano, Carlo" uniqKey="Mangano C" first="Carlo" last="Mangano">Carlo Mangano</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Dental School, University of Varese</s1>
<s2>Varese</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mangano, Francesco" sort="Mangano, Francesco" uniqKey="Mangano F" first="Francesco" last="Mangano">Francesco Mangano</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Shibli, Jamil A" sort="Shibli, Jamil A" uniqKey="Shibli J" first="Jamil A." last="Shibli">Jamil A. Shibli</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental Research Division, Guarulhos University</s1>
<s2>Guarulhos, São Paulo</s2>
<s3>BRA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Tettamanti, Lucia" sort="Tettamanti, Lucia" uniqKey="Tettamanti L" first="Lucia" last="Tettamanti">Lucia Tettamanti</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Dental School, University of Varese</s1>
<s2>Varese</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Figliuzzi, Michele" sort="Figliuzzi, Michele" uniqKey="Figliuzzi M" first="Michele" last="Figliuzzi">Michele Figliuzzi</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Periodontology, University of Catanzaro</s1>
<s2>Catanzaro</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="D Avila, Susana" sort="D Avila, Susana" uniqKey="D Avila S" first="Susana" last="D'Avila">Susana D'Avila</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental Research Division, Guarulhos University</s1>
<s2>Guarulhos, São Paulo</s2>
<s3>BRA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Sammons, Rachel L" sort="Sammons, Rachel L" uniqKey="Sammons R" first="Rachel L." last="Sammons">Rachel L. Sammons</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Dental School, University of Birmingham</s1>
<s2>Birmingham</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Piattelli, Adriano" sort="Piattelli, Adriano" uniqKey="Piattelli A" first="Adriano" last="Piattelli">Adriano Piattelli</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="05"><s1>Department of Oral Pathology and Oral Medicine, Dental School, University of Chieti Pescara</s1>
<s2>Chieti</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of periodontology : (1970)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. periodontol. : (1970)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3492</idno>
<imprint><date when="2011">2011</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of periodontology : (1970)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. periodontol. : (1970)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3492</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone</term>
<term>Connection</term>
<term>Dental implant</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Evaluation</term>
<term>Prognosis</term>
<term>Resorption</term>
<term>Survival</term>
<term>Tooth</term>
<term>Treatment</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Evaluation</term>
<term>Raccordement</term>
<term>Os</term>
<term>Résorption</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Pronostic</term>
<term>Survie</term>
<term>Dentisterie</term>
<term>Traitement</term>
<term>Implant dentaire</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the implant survival, the implant-crown success, and the prosthetic complications of 2,549 Morse taper interference-fit connection implants. Methods: A total of 2,549 Morse taper connection implants were inserted in 893 patients from January 2003 until December 2008. At each annual recall, clinical, radiographic, and prosthetic parameters were assessed. The implant-crown success criteria included the absence of pain, suppuration, and clinical mobility; an average distance between the implant shoulder and the first visible bone contact <2 mm from initial surgery; and the absence of prosthetic complications at the implant-abutment interface. Prosthetic restorations were fixed partial prostheses (462 units); fixed full-arch prostheses (60 units); single crowns (531 units); and overdentures (93 units). Results: The cumulative implant survival rate was 98.23% (97.25% maxilla, 99.05% mandible). The implant-crown success was 92.49%. A few prosthetic complications at implant-abutment interface were reported (0.37%). After 6 years, distance between the implant shoulder and the first visible bone contact was 1.10 mm (± 0.30 mm). Conclusion: The use of Morse taper connection implants represents a successful procedure for the rehabilitation of partially and completely edentulous arches.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0022-3492</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. periodontol. : (1970)</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>82</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>1</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Prospective Evaluation of 2,549 Morse Taper Connection Implants: 1- to 6-Year Data</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>MANGANO (Carlo)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>MANGANO (Francesco)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>SHIBLI (Jamil A.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>TETTAMANTI (Lucia)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>FIGLIUZZI (Michele)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="06" i2="1"><s1>D'AVILA (Susana)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="07" i2="1"><s1>SAMMONS (Rachel L.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="08" i2="1"><s1>PIATTELLI (Adriano)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Dental School, University of Varese</s1>
<s2>Varese</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental Research Division, Guarulhos University</s1>
<s2>Guarulhos, São Paulo</s2>
<s3>BRA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Periodontology, University of Catanzaro</s1>
<s2>Catanzaro</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="04"><s1>Dental School, University of Birmingham</s1>
<s2>Birmingham</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="05"><s1>Department of Oral Pathology and Oral Medicine, Dental School, University of Chieti Pescara</s1>
<s2>Chieti</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>52-61</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2011</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>874</s2>
<s5>354000193622850050</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2011 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>56 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>11-0100777</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of periodontology : (1970)</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the implant survival, the implant-crown success, and the prosthetic complications of 2,549 Morse taper interference-fit connection implants. Methods: A total of 2,549 Morse taper connection implants were inserted in 893 patients from January 2003 until December 2008. At each annual recall, clinical, radiographic, and prosthetic parameters were assessed. The implant-crown success criteria included the absence of pain, suppuration, and clinical mobility; an average distance between the implant shoulder and the first visible bone contact <2 mm from initial surgery; and the absence of prosthetic complications at the implant-abutment interface. Prosthetic restorations were fixed partial prostheses (462 units); fixed full-arch prostheses (60 units); single crowns (531 units); and overdentures (93 units). Results: The cumulative implant survival rate was 98.23% (97.25% maxilla, 99.05% mandible). The implant-crown success was 92.49%. A few prosthetic complications at implant-abutment interface were reported (0.37%). After 6 years, distance between the implant shoulder and the first visible bone contact was 1.10 mm (± 0.30 mm). Conclusion: The use of Morse taper connection implants represents a successful procedure for the rehabilitation of partially and completely edentulous arches.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B10</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>002B25C02</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Evaluation</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Evaluation</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Evaluación</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Raccordement</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Connection</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Conexión</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Os</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Bone</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hueso</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Résorption</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Resorption</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Resorción</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dent</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Tooth</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Diente</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pronostic</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Prognosis</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Pronóstico</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Survie</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Survival</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sobrevivencia</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dentisterie</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Dentistry</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Odontología</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Traitement</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Treatment</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tratamiento</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Implant dentaire</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Dental implant</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21><s1>066</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 11-0100777 INIST</NO>
<ET>Prospective Evaluation of 2,549 Morse Taper Connection Implants: 1- to 6-Year Data</ET>
<AU>MANGANO (Carlo); MANGANO (Francesco); SHIBLI (Jamil A.); TETTAMANTI (Lucia); FIGLIUZZI (Michele); D'AVILA (Susana); SAMMONS (Rachel L.); PIATTELLI (Adriano)</AU>
<AF>Dental School, University of Varese/Varese/Italie (1 aut., 4 aut.); Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental Research Division, Guarulhos University/Guarulhos, São Paulo/Brésil (3 aut., 6 aut.); Department of Periodontology, University of Catanzaro/Catanzaro/Italie (5 aut.); Dental School, University of Birmingham/Birmingham/Royaume-Uni (7 aut.); Department of Oral Pathology and Oral Medicine, Dental School, University of Chieti Pescara/Chieti/Italie (8 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of periodontology : (1970); ISSN 0022-3492; Etats-Unis; Da. 2011; Vol. 82; No. 1; Pp. 52-61; Bibl. 56 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the implant survival, the implant-crown success, and the prosthetic complications of 2,549 Morse taper interference-fit connection implants. Methods: A total of 2,549 Morse taper connection implants were inserted in 893 patients from January 2003 until December 2008. At each annual recall, clinical, radiographic, and prosthetic parameters were assessed. The implant-crown success criteria included the absence of pain, suppuration, and clinical mobility; an average distance between the implant shoulder and the first visible bone contact <2 mm from initial surgery; and the absence of prosthetic complications at the implant-abutment interface. Prosthetic restorations were fixed partial prostheses (462 units); fixed full-arch prostheses (60 units); single crowns (531 units); and overdentures (93 units). Results: The cumulative implant survival rate was 98.23% (97.25% maxilla, 99.05% mandible). The implant-crown success was 92.49%. A few prosthetic complications at implant-abutment interface were reported (0.37%). After 6 years, distance between the implant shoulder and the first visible bone contact was 1.10 mm (± 0.30 mm). Conclusion: The use of Morse taper connection implants represents a successful procedure for the rehabilitation of partially and completely edentulous arches.</EA>
<CC>002B10; 002B25C02</CC>
<FD>Evaluation; Raccordement; Os; Résorption; Dent; Pronostic; Survie; Dentisterie; Traitement; Implant dentaire</FD>
<ED>Evaluation; Connection; Bone; Resorption; Tooth; Prognosis; Survival; Dentistry; Treatment; Dental implant</ED>
<SD>Evaluación; Conexión; Hueso; Resorción; Diente; Pronóstico; Sobrevivencia; Odontología; Tratamiento</SD>
<LO>INIST-874.354000193622850050</LO>
<ID>11-0100777</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000162 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000162 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:11-0100777
   |texte=   Prospective Evaluation of 2,549 Morse Taper Connection Implants: 1- to 6-Year Data
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022

	Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Prospective Evaluation of 2,549 Morse Taper Connection Implants: 1- to 6-Year Data

Prospective Evaluation of 2,549 Morse Taper Connection Implants: 1- to 6-Year Data

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri