Prevalence, Location, and Size of Maxillary Sinus Septa: Panoramic Radiograph Versus Computed Tomography Scan
Identifieur interne : 000159 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000158; suivant : 000160Prevalence, Location, and Size of Maxillary Sinus Septa: Panoramic Radiograph Versus Computed Tomography Scan
Auteurs : Laura Maestre-Ferrin ; Celia Carrillo-Garcia ; S Nnica Galan-Gil ; Maria Penarrocha-Diago ; Miguel Penarrocha-DiagoSource :
- Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery [ 0278-2391 ] ; 2011.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the prevalence, location, and size of maxillary sinus septa, and to compare the results of panoramic radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans. Materials and Methods: This study included 30 patients, 17 women and 13 men, with a mean age of 50.9 years (range, 28-73 years), undergoing treatment planning for implant-supported restorations in the maxilla. Three observers analyzed the panoramic radiographs, the conventional CT scans in acetate, and the Implametric 3-dimensional CT (3Dent, Valencia, Spain). The maxillary sinus septa of each patient and the type of septa, as well as its location and size, were recorded. Results: In 60 maxillary sinuses, panoramic radiographs showed 32 septa (53.3%); CT in acetate showed 42 septa (70%); and Implametric 3-dimensional CT showed 40 septa (66.7%). Most septa (60%) were located in the middle region of the maxillary sinus, 22.5% in the posterior region, and 17.5% in the anterior region. The mean height of the septa was 4.78 ± 1.76 mm. Panoramic radiographs led to an erroneous diagnosis in 46.5% of the cases. Conclusions: Maxillary sinus septa are a frequent anatomic variation. They can be found in any of the maxillary sinus regions independently of patient edentulism. The panoramic radiograph can lead to false-positive and false-negative findings in the visualization of septa in almost half of cases. Therefore, whenever a maxillary sinus lift is planned, a thorough study of the affected sinus should be made using CT.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
pA |
|
---|
Format Inist (serveur)
NO : | PASCAL 11-0104517 INIST |
---|---|
ET : | Prevalence, Location, and Size of Maxillary Sinus Septa: Panoramic Radiograph Versus Computed Tomography Scan |
AU : | MAESTRE-FERRIN (Laura); CARRILLO-GARCIA (Celia); GALAN-GIL (Sónnica); PENARROCHA-DIAGO (Maria); PENARROCHA-DIAGO (Miguel) |
AF : | Valencia University Medical and Dental School/Valencia/Espagne (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut.) |
DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
SO : | Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery; ISSN 0278-2391; Coden JOMSDA; Etats-Unis; Da. 2011; Vol. 69; No. 2; Pp. 507-511; Bibl. 13 ref. |
LA : | Anglais |
EA : | Purpose: To determine the prevalence, location, and size of maxillary sinus septa, and to compare the results of panoramic radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans. Materials and Methods: This study included 30 patients, 17 women and 13 men, with a mean age of 50.9 years (range, 28-73 years), undergoing treatment planning for implant-supported restorations in the maxilla. Three observers analyzed the panoramic radiographs, the conventional CT scans in acetate, and the Implametric 3-dimensional CT (3Dent, Valencia, Spain). The maxillary sinus septa of each patient and the type of septa, as well as its location and size, were recorded. Results: In 60 maxillary sinuses, panoramic radiographs showed 32 septa (53.3%); CT in acetate showed 42 septa (70%); and Implametric 3-dimensional CT showed 40 septa (66.7%). Most septa (60%) were located in the middle region of the maxillary sinus, 22.5% in the posterior region, and 17.5% in the anterior region. The mean height of the septa was 4.78 ± 1.76 mm. Panoramic radiographs led to an erroneous diagnosis in 46.5% of the cases. Conclusions: Maxillary sinus septa are a frequent anatomic variation. They can be found in any of the maxillary sinus regions independently of patient edentulism. The panoramic radiograph can lead to false-positive and false-negative findings in the visualization of septa in almost half of cases. Therefore, whenever a maxillary sinus lift is planned, a thorough study of the affected sinus should be made using CT. |
CC : | 002B10 |
FD : | Radiographie panoramique; Tomographie panoramique; Tomodensitométrie; Prévalence; Taille; Sinus maxillaire; Etude comparative; Chirurgie; Stomatologie; Traitement |
FG : | Epidémiologie; Radiodiagnostic; Exploration; Imagerie médicale |
ED : | Panoramic radiography; Panoramic tomography; Computerized axial tomography; Prevalence; Size; Maxillary sinus; Comparative study; Surgery; Stomatology; Treatment |
EG : | Epidemiology; Radiodiagnosis; Exploration; Medical imagery |
SD : | Radiografía panorámica; Tomografía panorámica; Tomodensitometría; Prevalencia; Talla; Seno maxilar; Estudio comparativo; Cirugía; Estomatología; Tratamiento |
LO : | INIST-3005.354000193630770270 |
ID : | 11-0104517 |
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:11-0104517Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Prevalence, Location, and Size of Maxillary Sinus Septa: Panoramic Radiograph Versus Computed Tomography Scan</title>
<author><name sortKey="Maestre Ferrin, Laura" sort="Maestre Ferrin, Laura" uniqKey="Maestre Ferrin L" first="Laura" last="Maestre-Ferrin">Laura Maestre-Ferrin</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Valencia University Medical and Dental School</s1>
<s2>Valencia</s2>
<s3>ESP</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Carrillo Garcia, Celia" sort="Carrillo Garcia, Celia" uniqKey="Carrillo Garcia C" first="Celia" last="Carrillo-Garcia">Celia Carrillo-Garcia</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Valencia University Medical and Dental School</s1>
<s2>Valencia</s2>
<s3>ESP</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Galan Gil, S Nnica" sort="Galan Gil, S Nnica" uniqKey="Galan Gil S" first="S Nnica" last="Galan-Gil">S Nnica Galan-Gil</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Valencia University Medical and Dental School</s1>
<s2>Valencia</s2>
<s3>ESP</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Penarrocha Diago, Maria" sort="Penarrocha Diago, Maria" uniqKey="Penarrocha Diago M" first="Maria" last="Penarrocha-Diago">Maria Penarrocha-Diago</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Valencia University Medical and Dental School</s1>
<s2>Valencia</s2>
<s3>ESP</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Penarrocha Diago, Miguel" sort="Penarrocha Diago, Miguel" uniqKey="Penarrocha Diago M" first="Miguel" last="Penarrocha-Diago">Miguel Penarrocha-Diago</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Valencia University Medical and Dental School</s1>
<s2>Valencia</s2>
<s3>ESP</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">11-0104517</idno>
<date when="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 11-0104517 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:11-0104517</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000159</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Prevalence, Location, and Size of Maxillary Sinus Septa: Panoramic Radiograph Versus Computed Tomography Scan</title>
<author><name sortKey="Maestre Ferrin, Laura" sort="Maestre Ferrin, Laura" uniqKey="Maestre Ferrin L" first="Laura" last="Maestre-Ferrin">Laura Maestre-Ferrin</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Valencia University Medical and Dental School</s1>
<s2>Valencia</s2>
<s3>ESP</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Carrillo Garcia, Celia" sort="Carrillo Garcia, Celia" uniqKey="Carrillo Garcia C" first="Celia" last="Carrillo-Garcia">Celia Carrillo-Garcia</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Valencia University Medical and Dental School</s1>
<s2>Valencia</s2>
<s3>ESP</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Galan Gil, S Nnica" sort="Galan Gil, S Nnica" uniqKey="Galan Gil S" first="S Nnica" last="Galan-Gil">S Nnica Galan-Gil</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Valencia University Medical and Dental School</s1>
<s2>Valencia</s2>
<s3>ESP</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Penarrocha Diago, Maria" sort="Penarrocha Diago, Maria" uniqKey="Penarrocha Diago M" first="Maria" last="Penarrocha-Diago">Maria Penarrocha-Diago</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Valencia University Medical and Dental School</s1>
<s2>Valencia</s2>
<s3>ESP</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Penarrocha Diago, Miguel" sort="Penarrocha Diago, Miguel" uniqKey="Penarrocha Diago M" first="Miguel" last="Penarrocha-Diago">Miguel Penarrocha-Diago</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Valencia University Medical and Dental School</s1>
<s2>Valencia</s2>
<s3>ESP</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. oral maxillofac. surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0278-2391</idno>
<imprint><date when="2011">2011</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. oral maxillofac. surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0278-2391</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Comparative study</term>
<term>Computerized axial tomography</term>
<term>Maxillary sinus</term>
<term>Panoramic radiography</term>
<term>Panoramic tomography</term>
<term>Prevalence</term>
<term>Size</term>
<term>Stomatology</term>
<term>Surgery</term>
<term>Treatment</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Radiographie panoramique</term>
<term>Tomographie panoramique</term>
<term>Tomodensitométrie</term>
<term>Prévalence</term>
<term>Taille</term>
<term>Sinus maxillaire</term>
<term>Etude comparative</term>
<term>Chirurgie</term>
<term>Stomatologie</term>
<term>Traitement</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Purpose: To determine the prevalence, location, and size of maxillary sinus septa, and to compare the results of panoramic radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans. Materials and Methods: This study included 30 patients, 17 women and 13 men, with a mean age of 50.9 years (range, 28-73 years), undergoing treatment planning for implant-supported restorations in the maxilla. Three observers analyzed the panoramic radiographs, the conventional CT scans in acetate, and the Implametric 3-dimensional CT (3Dent, Valencia, Spain). The maxillary sinus septa of each patient and the type of septa, as well as its location and size, were recorded. Results: In 60 maxillary sinuses, panoramic radiographs showed 32 septa (53.3%); CT in acetate showed 42 septa (70%); and Implametric 3-dimensional CT showed 40 septa (66.7%). Most septa (60%) were located in the middle region of the maxillary sinus, 22.5% in the posterior region, and 17.5% in the anterior region. The mean height of the septa was 4.78 ± 1.76 mm. Panoramic radiographs led to an erroneous diagnosis in 46.5% of the cases. Conclusions: Maxillary sinus septa are a frequent anatomic variation. They can be found in any of the maxillary sinus regions independently of patient edentulism. The panoramic radiograph can lead to false-positive and false-negative findings in the visualization of septa in almost half of cases. Therefore, whenever a maxillary sinus lift is planned, a thorough study of the affected sinus should be made using CT.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0278-2391</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>JOMSDA</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. oral maxillofac. surg.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>69</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>2</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Prevalence, Location, and Size of Maxillary Sinus Septa: Panoramic Radiograph Versus Computed Tomography Scan</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>MAESTRE-FERRIN (Laura)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>CARRILLO-GARCIA (Celia)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>GALAN-GIL (Sónnica)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>PENARROCHA-DIAGO (Maria)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>PENARROCHA-DIAGO (Miguel)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Valencia University Medical and Dental School</s1>
<s2>Valencia</s2>
<s3>ESP</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>507-511</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2011</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>3005</s2>
<s5>354000193630770270</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2011 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>13 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>11-0104517</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Purpose: To determine the prevalence, location, and size of maxillary sinus septa, and to compare the results of panoramic radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans. Materials and Methods: This study included 30 patients, 17 women and 13 men, with a mean age of 50.9 years (range, 28-73 years), undergoing treatment planning for implant-supported restorations in the maxilla. Three observers analyzed the panoramic radiographs, the conventional CT scans in acetate, and the Implametric 3-dimensional CT (3Dent, Valencia, Spain). The maxillary sinus septa of each patient and the type of septa, as well as its location and size, were recorded. Results: In 60 maxillary sinuses, panoramic radiographs showed 32 septa (53.3%); CT in acetate showed 42 septa (70%); and Implametric 3-dimensional CT showed 40 septa (66.7%). Most septa (60%) were located in the middle region of the maxillary sinus, 22.5% in the posterior region, and 17.5% in the anterior region. The mean height of the septa was 4.78 ± 1.76 mm. Panoramic radiographs led to an erroneous diagnosis in 46.5% of the cases. Conclusions: Maxillary sinus septa are a frequent anatomic variation. They can be found in any of the maxillary sinus regions independently of patient edentulism. The panoramic radiograph can lead to false-positive and false-negative findings in the visualization of septa in almost half of cases. Therefore, whenever a maxillary sinus lift is planned, a thorough study of the affected sinus should be made using CT.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B10</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Radiographie panoramique</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Panoramic radiography</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Radiografía panorámica</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Tomographie panoramique</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Panoramic tomography</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tomografía panorámica</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Tomodensitométrie</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Computerized axial tomography</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tomodensitometría</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Prévalence</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Prevalence</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Prevalencia</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Taille</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Size</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Talla</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Sinus maxillaire</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Maxillary sinus</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Seno maxilar</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude comparative</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Comparative study</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio comparativo</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Chirurgie</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Surgery</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cirugía</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Stomatologie</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Stomatology</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estomatología</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Traitement</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Treatment</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tratamiento</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Epidémiologie</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Epidemiology</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Epidemiología</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Radiodiagnostic</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Radiodiagnosis</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Radiodiagnóstico</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Exploration</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Exploration</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Exploración</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Imagerie médicale</s0>
<s5>40</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Medical imagery</s0>
<s5>40</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Imaginería médica</s0>
<s5>40</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>066</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 11-0104517 INIST</NO>
<ET>Prevalence, Location, and Size of Maxillary Sinus Septa: Panoramic Radiograph Versus Computed Tomography Scan</ET>
<AU>MAESTRE-FERRIN (Laura); CARRILLO-GARCIA (Celia); GALAN-GIL (Sónnica); PENARROCHA-DIAGO (Maria); PENARROCHA-DIAGO (Miguel)</AU>
<AF>Valencia University Medical and Dental School/Valencia/Espagne (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery; ISSN 0278-2391; Coden JOMSDA; Etats-Unis; Da. 2011; Vol. 69; No. 2; Pp. 507-511; Bibl. 13 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Purpose: To determine the prevalence, location, and size of maxillary sinus septa, and to compare the results of panoramic radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans. Materials and Methods: This study included 30 patients, 17 women and 13 men, with a mean age of 50.9 years (range, 28-73 years), undergoing treatment planning for implant-supported restorations in the maxilla. Three observers analyzed the panoramic radiographs, the conventional CT scans in acetate, and the Implametric 3-dimensional CT (3Dent, Valencia, Spain). The maxillary sinus septa of each patient and the type of septa, as well as its location and size, were recorded. Results: In 60 maxillary sinuses, panoramic radiographs showed 32 septa (53.3%); CT in acetate showed 42 septa (70%); and Implametric 3-dimensional CT showed 40 septa (66.7%). Most septa (60%) were located in the middle region of the maxillary sinus, 22.5% in the posterior region, and 17.5% in the anterior region. The mean height of the septa was 4.78 ± 1.76 mm. Panoramic radiographs led to an erroneous diagnosis in 46.5% of the cases. Conclusions: Maxillary sinus septa are a frequent anatomic variation. They can be found in any of the maxillary sinus regions independently of patient edentulism. The panoramic radiograph can lead to false-positive and false-negative findings in the visualization of septa in almost half of cases. Therefore, whenever a maxillary sinus lift is planned, a thorough study of the affected sinus should be made using CT.</EA>
<CC>002B10</CC>
<FD>Radiographie panoramique; Tomographie panoramique; Tomodensitométrie; Prévalence; Taille; Sinus maxillaire; Etude comparative; Chirurgie; Stomatologie; Traitement</FD>
<FG>Epidémiologie; Radiodiagnostic; Exploration; Imagerie médicale</FG>
<ED>Panoramic radiography; Panoramic tomography; Computerized axial tomography; Prevalence; Size; Maxillary sinus; Comparative study; Surgery; Stomatology; Treatment</ED>
<EG>Epidemiology; Radiodiagnosis; Exploration; Medical imagery</EG>
<SD>Radiografía panorámica; Tomografía panorámica; Tomodensitometría; Prevalencia; Talla; Seno maxilar; Estudio comparativo; Cirugía; Estomatología; Tratamiento</SD>
<LO>INIST-3005.354000193630770270</LO>
<ID>11-0104517</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000159 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000159 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= Pascal:11-0104517 |texte= Prevalence, Location, and Size of Maxillary Sinus Septa: Panoramic Radiograph Versus Computed Tomography Scan }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |