The Accuracy of Identifying the Greater Palatine Neurovascular Bundle: A Cadaver Study
Identifieur interne : 000127 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000126; suivant : 000128The Accuracy of Identifying the Greater Palatine Neurovascular Bundle: A Cadaver Study
Auteurs : Jia-Hui Fu ; Dawlat G. Hasso ; Chu-Yuan Yeh ; Daylene J. M. Leong ; Hsun-Liang Chan ; Hom-Lay WangSource :
- Journal of periodontology : (1970) [ 0022-3492 ] ; 2011.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Background: The palate is a common site for harvesting subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTG). The size of SCTG that can be harvested is dictated by the position of the greater palatine neurovascular bundle (GPB). The aims of this cadaver study are to assess the accuracy of predicting the location of the GPB on study models and to evaluate anatomic factors that might influence the predictability. Methods: Eleven fully dentate or partially edentulous maxillary cadavers were used. Study models were fabricated after the greater palatine foramen was identified. The GPB was recognized after dissection, from which the distance to the cemento-enamel junction of the first molar and premolar was measured. Eight periodontists and twelve periodontal residents were asked to estimate the location of the GPB on the study models and the same measurements were taken. Comparisons of the estimated and true GPB position were performed. The correlation between the palatal vault height and the variability of detecting the GPB was investigated. Results: The most frequent greater palatine foramen location was between the second and third molars (66.6%). For most cases, there was an underestimation of the location of the GPB up to 4 mm. The interexaminer variability was positively correlated with the vault height. Conclusions: The estimated location of the GPB was commonly closer to the cemento-enamel junction of posterior teeth. Agreement on the location of the GPB was lowered with the presence of high palatal vaults. The results of this study could assist clinicians in planning the location for harvesting SCTG on the hard palate.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
pA |
|
---|
Format Inist (serveur)
NO : | PASCAL 11-0332761 INIST |
---|---|
ET : | The Accuracy of Identifying the Greater Palatine Neurovascular Bundle: A Cadaver Study |
AU : | FU (Jia-Hui); HASSO (Dawlat G.); YEH (Chu-Yuan); LEONG (Daylene J. M.); CHAN (Hsun-Liang); WANG (Hom-Lay) |
AF : | Graduate Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan/Ann Arbor/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut., 6 aut.) |
DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
SO : | Journal of periodontology : (1970); ISSN 0022-3492; Etats-Unis; Da. 2011; Vol. 82; No. 7; Pp. 1000-1006; Bibl. 37 ref. |
LA : | Anglais |
EA : | Background: The palate is a common site for harvesting subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTG). The size of SCTG that can be harvested is dictated by the position of the greater palatine neurovascular bundle (GPB). The aims of this cadaver study are to assess the accuracy of predicting the location of the GPB on study models and to evaluate anatomic factors that might influence the predictability. Methods: Eleven fully dentate or partially edentulous maxillary cadavers were used. Study models were fabricated after the greater palatine foramen was identified. The GPB was recognized after dissection, from which the distance to the cemento-enamel junction of the first molar and premolar was measured. Eight periodontists and twelve periodontal residents were asked to estimate the location of the GPB on the study models and the same measurements were taken. Comparisons of the estimated and true GPB position were performed. The correlation between the palatal vault height and the variability of detecting the GPB was investigated. Results: The most frequent greater palatine foramen location was between the second and third molars (66.6%). For most cases, there was an underestimation of the location of the GPB up to 4 mm. The interexaminer variability was positively correlated with the vault height. Conclusions: The estimated location of the GPB was commonly closer to the cemento-enamel junction of posterior teeth. Agreement on the location of the GPB was lowered with the presence of high palatal vaults. The results of this study could assist clinicians in planning the location for harvesting SCTG on the hard palate. |
CC : | 002B10 |
FD : | Chirurgie; Plastie; Précision; Anatomie; Tissu conjonctif; Gencive; Nerf maxillaire; Palais; Dentisterie; Traitement; Paquet neurovasculaire |
ED : | Surgery; Plasty; Accuracy; Anatomy; Connective tissue; Gingiva; Maxillary nerve; Palate; Dentistry; Treatment |
SD : | Cirugía; Plastia; Precisión; Anatomía; Tejido conjuntivo; Encía; Nervio maxilar; Paladar; Odontología; Tratamiento |
LO : | INIST-874.354000509426310060 |
ID : | 11-0332761 |
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:11-0332761Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">The Accuracy of Identifying the Greater Palatine Neurovascular Bundle: A Cadaver Study</title>
<author><name sortKey="Fu, Jia Hui" sort="Fu, Jia Hui" uniqKey="Fu J" first="Jia-Hui" last="Fu">Jia-Hui Fu</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Graduate Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan</s1>
<s2>Ann Arbor</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hasso, Dawlat G" sort="Hasso, Dawlat G" uniqKey="Hasso D" first="Dawlat G." last="Hasso">Dawlat G. Hasso</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Graduate Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan</s1>
<s2>Ann Arbor</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Yeh, Chu Yuan" sort="Yeh, Chu Yuan" uniqKey="Yeh C" first="Chu-Yuan" last="Yeh">Chu-Yuan Yeh</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Graduate Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan</s1>
<s2>Ann Arbor</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Leong, Daylene J M" sort="Leong, Daylene J M" uniqKey="Leong D" first="Daylene J. M." last="Leong">Daylene J. M. Leong</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Graduate Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan</s1>
<s2>Ann Arbor</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Chan, Hsun Liang" sort="Chan, Hsun Liang" uniqKey="Chan H" first="Hsun-Liang" last="Chan">Hsun-Liang Chan</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Graduate Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan</s1>
<s2>Ann Arbor</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Wang, Hom Lay" sort="Wang, Hom Lay" uniqKey="Wang H" first="Hom-Lay" last="Wang">Hom-Lay Wang</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Graduate Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan</s1>
<s2>Ann Arbor</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">11-0332761</idno>
<date when="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 11-0332761 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:11-0332761</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000127</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">The Accuracy of Identifying the Greater Palatine Neurovascular Bundle: A Cadaver Study</title>
<author><name sortKey="Fu, Jia Hui" sort="Fu, Jia Hui" uniqKey="Fu J" first="Jia-Hui" last="Fu">Jia-Hui Fu</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Graduate Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan</s1>
<s2>Ann Arbor</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hasso, Dawlat G" sort="Hasso, Dawlat G" uniqKey="Hasso D" first="Dawlat G." last="Hasso">Dawlat G. Hasso</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Graduate Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan</s1>
<s2>Ann Arbor</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Yeh, Chu Yuan" sort="Yeh, Chu Yuan" uniqKey="Yeh C" first="Chu-Yuan" last="Yeh">Chu-Yuan Yeh</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Graduate Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan</s1>
<s2>Ann Arbor</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Leong, Daylene J M" sort="Leong, Daylene J M" uniqKey="Leong D" first="Daylene J. M." last="Leong">Daylene J. M. Leong</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Graduate Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan</s1>
<s2>Ann Arbor</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Chan, Hsun Liang" sort="Chan, Hsun Liang" uniqKey="Chan H" first="Hsun-Liang" last="Chan">Hsun-Liang Chan</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Graduate Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan</s1>
<s2>Ann Arbor</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Wang, Hom Lay" sort="Wang, Hom Lay" uniqKey="Wang H" first="Hom-Lay" last="Wang">Hom-Lay Wang</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Graduate Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan</s1>
<s2>Ann Arbor</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of periodontology : (1970)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. periodontol. : (1970)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3492</idno>
<imprint><date when="2011">2011</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of periodontology : (1970)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. periodontol. : (1970)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3492</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Accuracy</term>
<term>Anatomy</term>
<term>Connective tissue</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Gingiva</term>
<term>Maxillary nerve</term>
<term>Palate</term>
<term>Plasty</term>
<term>Surgery</term>
<term>Treatment</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Chirurgie</term>
<term>Plastie</term>
<term>Précision</term>
<term>Anatomie</term>
<term>Tissu conjonctif</term>
<term>Gencive</term>
<term>Nerf maxillaire</term>
<term>Palais</term>
<term>Dentisterie</term>
<term>Traitement</term>
<term>Paquet neurovasculaire</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Background: The palate is a common site for harvesting subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTG). The size of SCTG that can be harvested is dictated by the position of the greater palatine neurovascular bundle (GPB). The aims of this cadaver study are to assess the accuracy of predicting the location of the GPB on study models and to evaluate anatomic factors that might influence the predictability. Methods: Eleven fully dentate or partially edentulous maxillary cadavers were used. Study models were fabricated after the greater palatine foramen was identified. The GPB was recognized after dissection, from which the distance to the cemento-enamel junction of the first molar and premolar was measured. Eight periodontists and twelve periodontal residents were asked to estimate the location of the GPB on the study models and the same measurements were taken. Comparisons of the estimated and true GPB position were performed. The correlation between the palatal vault height and the variability of detecting the GPB was investigated. Results: The most frequent greater palatine foramen location was between the second and third molars (66.6%). For most cases, there was an underestimation of the location of the GPB up to 4 mm. The interexaminer variability was positively correlated with the vault height. Conclusions: The estimated location of the GPB was commonly closer to the cemento-enamel junction of posterior teeth. Agreement on the location of the GPB was lowered with the presence of high palatal vaults. The results of this study could assist clinicians in planning the location for harvesting SCTG on the hard palate.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0022-3492</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. periodontol. : (1970)</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>82</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>7</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>The Accuracy of Identifying the Greater Palatine Neurovascular Bundle: A Cadaver Study</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>FU (Jia-Hui)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>HASSO (Dawlat G.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>YEH (Chu-Yuan)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>LEONG (Daylene J. M.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>CHAN (Hsun-Liang)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="06" i2="1"><s1>WANG (Hom-Lay)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Graduate Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan</s1>
<s2>Ann Arbor</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>1000-1006</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2011</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>874</s2>
<s5>354000509426310060</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2011 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>37 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>11-0332761</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of periodontology : (1970)</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Background: The palate is a common site for harvesting subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTG). The size of SCTG that can be harvested is dictated by the position of the greater palatine neurovascular bundle (GPB). The aims of this cadaver study are to assess the accuracy of predicting the location of the GPB on study models and to evaluate anatomic factors that might influence the predictability. Methods: Eleven fully dentate or partially edentulous maxillary cadavers were used. Study models were fabricated after the greater palatine foramen was identified. The GPB was recognized after dissection, from which the distance to the cemento-enamel junction of the first molar and premolar was measured. Eight periodontists and twelve periodontal residents were asked to estimate the location of the GPB on the study models and the same measurements were taken. Comparisons of the estimated and true GPB position were performed. The correlation between the palatal vault height and the variability of detecting the GPB was investigated. Results: The most frequent greater palatine foramen location was between the second and third molars (66.6%). For most cases, there was an underestimation of the location of the GPB up to 4 mm. The interexaminer variability was positively correlated with the vault height. Conclusions: The estimated location of the GPB was commonly closer to the cemento-enamel junction of posterior teeth. Agreement on the location of the GPB was lowered with the presence of high palatal vaults. The results of this study could assist clinicians in planning the location for harvesting SCTG on the hard palate.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B10</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Chirurgie</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Surgery</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cirugía</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Plastie</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Plasty</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Plastia</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Précision</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Accuracy</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Precisión</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Anatomie</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Anatomy</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Anatomía</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Tissu conjonctif</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Connective tissue</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tejido conjuntivo</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Gencive</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Gingiva</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Encía</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Nerf maxillaire</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Maxillary nerve</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Nervio maxilar</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Palais</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Palate</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Paladar</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dentisterie</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Dentistry</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Odontología</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Traitement</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Treatment</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tratamiento</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Paquet neurovasculaire</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>86</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21><s1>227</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 11-0332761 INIST</NO>
<ET>The Accuracy of Identifying the Greater Palatine Neurovascular Bundle: A Cadaver Study</ET>
<AU>FU (Jia-Hui); HASSO (Dawlat G.); YEH (Chu-Yuan); LEONG (Daylene J. M.); CHAN (Hsun-Liang); WANG (Hom-Lay)</AU>
<AF>Graduate Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan/Ann Arbor/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut., 6 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of periodontology : (1970); ISSN 0022-3492; Etats-Unis; Da. 2011; Vol. 82; No. 7; Pp. 1000-1006; Bibl. 37 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Background: The palate is a common site for harvesting subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTG). The size of SCTG that can be harvested is dictated by the position of the greater palatine neurovascular bundle (GPB). The aims of this cadaver study are to assess the accuracy of predicting the location of the GPB on study models and to evaluate anatomic factors that might influence the predictability. Methods: Eleven fully dentate or partially edentulous maxillary cadavers were used. Study models were fabricated after the greater palatine foramen was identified. The GPB was recognized after dissection, from which the distance to the cemento-enamel junction of the first molar and premolar was measured. Eight periodontists and twelve periodontal residents were asked to estimate the location of the GPB on the study models and the same measurements were taken. Comparisons of the estimated and true GPB position were performed. The correlation between the palatal vault height and the variability of detecting the GPB was investigated. Results: The most frequent greater palatine foramen location was between the second and third molars (66.6%). For most cases, there was an underestimation of the location of the GPB up to 4 mm. The interexaminer variability was positively correlated with the vault height. Conclusions: The estimated location of the GPB was commonly closer to the cemento-enamel junction of posterior teeth. Agreement on the location of the GPB was lowered with the presence of high palatal vaults. The results of this study could assist clinicians in planning the location for harvesting SCTG on the hard palate.</EA>
<CC>002B10</CC>
<FD>Chirurgie; Plastie; Précision; Anatomie; Tissu conjonctif; Gencive; Nerf maxillaire; Palais; Dentisterie; Traitement; Paquet neurovasculaire</FD>
<ED>Surgery; Plasty; Accuracy; Anatomy; Connective tissue; Gingiva; Maxillary nerve; Palate; Dentistry; Treatment</ED>
<SD>Cirugía; Plastia; Precisión; Anatomía; Tejido conjuntivo; Encía; Nervio maxilar; Paladar; Odontología; Tratamiento</SD>
<LO>INIST-874.354000509426310060</LO>
<ID>11-0332761</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000127 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000127 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= Pascal:11-0332761 |texte= The Accuracy of Identifying the Greater Palatine Neurovascular Bundle: A Cadaver Study }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |