Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Evaluation of Maxillary Incisive Canal Characteristics Related to Dental Implant Treatment With Computerized Tomography: A Clinical Multicenter Study

Identifieur interne : 000084 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000083; suivant : 000085

Evaluation of Maxillary Incisive Canal Characteristics Related to Dental Implant Treatment With Computerized Tomography: A Clinical Multicenter Study

Auteurs : Tolga F. Tözüm ; Güliz N. Güncü ; Ya Gbreve Mur D. Yildirim ; Hasan Guney Yilmaz ; Pablo Galindo-Moreno ; Miguel Velasco-Torres ; Khalid Al-Hezaimi ; Raed Al-Sadhan ; Erdem Karabulut ; Hom-Lay Wang

Source :

RBID : Pascal:12-0160711

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Background: A close anatomic relationship between the incisive canal and the roots of the central maxillary incisors should be kept in mind during dental-implant treatment in the anterior maxilla. The aim of the present study is to analyze incisive canal characteristics on computed tomography (CT) sections and to evaluate its relation to bone anterior to the canal with regard to dental implantation. Methods: A total of 933 partially edentulous and/or edentulous patients scheduled for implant insertion in four dental clinics enrolled in the present study. The following were measured and recorded from CT sections for analysis: 1) diameter and length of the incisive canal; 2) width and length of the bone anterior to the canal; 3) palatal bone width and length; and 4) root width and length of the central incisor. Results: Mean canal length was 10.86 ± 2.67 mm, and mean diameter was 2.59 ± 0.91 mm. Canal length was shortened in edentulous anterior maxilla compared to dentate maxilla. However, canal diameter did not show any difference between dentate and edentulous groups. Males had a longer and wider incisive canal than females. Canal shape was mostly cylindrical in 40.73% of images. No correlation was found with mean canal length and mean canal diameter according to age. Conclusions: Although variations exist in every patient, the findings from this study suggest that sex and dental status are important factors that can affect incisive canal characteristics and amount of bone anterior to the canal. Clinicians should perform careful planning using CT scans before performing dental implant surgeries in premaxillary region.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0022-3492
A03   1    @0 J. periodontol. : (1970)
A05       @2 83
A06       @2 3
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Evaluation of Maxillary Incisive Canal Characteristics Related to Dental Implant Treatment With Computerized Tomography: A Clinical Multicenter Study
A11 01  1    @1 TÖZÜM (Tolga F.)
A11 02  1    @1 GÜNCÜ (Güliz N.)
A11 03  1    @1 YILDIRIM (Ya========gbreve;mur D.)
A11 04  1    @1 GUNEY YILMAZ (Hasan)
A11 05  1    @1 GALINDO-MORENO (Pablo)
A11 06  1    @1 VELASCO-TORRES (Miguel)
A11 07  1    @1 AL-HEZAIMI (Khalid)
A11 08  1    @1 AL-SADHAN (Raed)
A11 09  1    @1 KARABULUT (Erdem)
A11 10  1    @1 WANG (Hom-Lay)
A14 01      @1 Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University @2 Ankara @3 TUR @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut.
A14 02      @1 Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Near East University @2 Mersin @3 TUR @Z 4 aut. @Z 6 aut.
A14 03      @1 Department of Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, University of Granada @2 Granada @3 ESP @Z 5 aut.
A14 04      @1 Division of Periodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University @2 Riyadh @3 SAU @Z 7 aut. @Z 10 aut.
A14 05      @1 Diagnostic Sciences Department, College of Dentistry, King Saud University. @3 USA @Z 5 aut. @Z 8 aut.
A14 06      @1 Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University @3 USA @Z 9 aut.
A14 07      @1 Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan @2 Ann Arbor, MI @3 USA @Z 10 aut.
A20       @1 337-343
A21       @1 2012
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 874 @5 354000194648670100
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2012 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 16 ref.
A47 01  1    @0 12-0160711
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Journal of periodontology : (1970)
A66 01      @0 USA
C01 01    ENG  @0 Background: A close anatomic relationship between the incisive canal and the roots of the central maxillary incisors should be kept in mind during dental-implant treatment in the anterior maxilla. The aim of the present study is to analyze incisive canal characteristics on computed tomography (CT) sections and to evaluate its relation to bone anterior to the canal with regard to dental implantation. Methods: A total of 933 partially edentulous and/or edentulous patients scheduled for implant insertion in four dental clinics enrolled in the present study. The following were measured and recorded from CT sections for analysis: 1) diameter and length of the incisive canal; 2) width and length of the bone anterior to the canal; 3) palatal bone width and length; and 4) root width and length of the central incisor. Results: Mean canal length was 10.86 ± 2.67 mm, and mean diameter was 2.59 ± 0.91 mm. Canal length was shortened in edentulous anterior maxilla compared to dentate maxilla. However, canal diameter did not show any difference between dentate and edentulous groups. Males had a longer and wider incisive canal than females. Canal shape was mostly cylindrical in 40.73% of images. No correlation was found with mean canal length and mean canal diameter according to age. Conclusions: Although variations exist in every patient, the findings from this study suggest that sex and dental status are important factors that can affect incisive canal characteristics and amount of bone anterior to the canal. Clinicians should perform careful planning using CT scans before performing dental implant surgeries in premaxillary region.
C02 01  X    @0 002B10
C02 02  X    @0 002B25C02
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Traitement @5 04
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Treatment @5 04
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Tratamiento @5 04
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Tomodensitométrie @5 05
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Computerized axial tomography @5 05
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Tomodensitometría @5 05
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Chirurgie @5 06
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 Surgery @5 06
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Cirugía @5 06
C03 04  X  FRE  @0 Evaluation @5 07
C03 04  X  ENG  @0 Evaluation @5 07
C03 04  X  SPA  @0 Evaluación @5 07
C03 05  X  FRE  @0 Maxillaire @5 08
C03 05  X  ENG  @0 Maxillary @5 08
C03 05  X  SPA  @0 Maxilar @5 08
C03 06  X  FRE  @0 Homme @5 09
C03 06  X  ENG  @0 Human @5 09
C03 06  X  SPA  @0 Hombre @5 09
C03 07  X  FRE  @0 Incisive @5 13
C03 07  X  ENG  @0 Incisor @5 13
C03 07  X  SPA  @0 Incisivo @5 13
C03 08  X  FRE  @0 Lambeau @5 14
C03 08  X  ENG  @0 Flap (surgery) @5 14
C03 08  X  SPA  @0 Colgajo @5 14
C03 09  X  FRE  @0 Tomographie @5 15
C03 09  X  ENG  @0 Tomography @5 15
C03 09  X  SPA  @0 Tomografía @5 15
C03 10  X  FRE  @0 Dentisterie @5 30
C03 10  X  ENG  @0 Dentistry @5 30
C03 10  X  SPA  @0 Odontología @5 30
C03 11  X  FRE  @0 Implant dentaire @4 CD @5 96
C03 11  X  ENG  @0 Dental implant @4 CD @5 96
C07 01  X  FRE  @0 Imagerie médicale @5 37
C07 01  X  ENG  @0 Medical imagery @5 37
C07 01  X  SPA  @0 Imaginería médica @5 37
C07 02  X  FRE  @0 Radiodiagnostic @5 38
C07 02  X  ENG  @0 Radiodiagnosis @5 38
C07 02  X  SPA  @0 Radiodiagnóstico @5 38
N21       @1 122
N44 01      @1 OTO
N82       @1 OTO

Format Inist (serveur)

NO : PASCAL 12-0160711 INIST
ET : Evaluation of Maxillary Incisive Canal Characteristics Related to Dental Implant Treatment With Computerized Tomography: A Clinical Multicenter Study
AU : TÖZÜM (Tolga F.); GÜNCÜ (Güliz N.); YILDIRIM (Ya========gbreve;mur D.); GUNEY YILMAZ (Hasan); GALINDO-MORENO (Pablo); VELASCO-TORRES (Miguel); AL-HEZAIMI (Khalid); AL-SADHAN (Raed); KARABULUT (Erdem); WANG (Hom-Lay)
AF : Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University/Ankara/Turquie (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut.); Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Near East University/Mersin/Turquie (4 aut., 6 aut.); Department of Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, University of Granada/Granada/Espagne (5 aut.); Division of Periodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University/Riyadh/Arabie Saoudite (7 aut., 10 aut.); Diagnostic Sciences Department, College of Dentistry, King Saud University./Etats-Unis (5 aut., 8 aut.); Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University/Etats-Unis (9 aut.); Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan/Ann Arbor, MI/Etats-Unis (10 aut.)
DT : Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO : Journal of periodontology : (1970); ISSN 0022-3492; Etats-Unis; Da. 2012; Vol. 83; No. 3; Pp. 337-343; Bibl. 16 ref.
LA : Anglais
EA : Background: A close anatomic relationship between the incisive canal and the roots of the central maxillary incisors should be kept in mind during dental-implant treatment in the anterior maxilla. The aim of the present study is to analyze incisive canal characteristics on computed tomography (CT) sections and to evaluate its relation to bone anterior to the canal with regard to dental implantation. Methods: A total of 933 partially edentulous and/or edentulous patients scheduled for implant insertion in four dental clinics enrolled in the present study. The following were measured and recorded from CT sections for analysis: 1) diameter and length of the incisive canal; 2) width and length of the bone anterior to the canal; 3) palatal bone width and length; and 4) root width and length of the central incisor. Results: Mean canal length was 10.86 ± 2.67 mm, and mean diameter was 2.59 ± 0.91 mm. Canal length was shortened in edentulous anterior maxilla compared to dentate maxilla. However, canal diameter did not show any difference between dentate and edentulous groups. Males had a longer and wider incisive canal than females. Canal shape was mostly cylindrical in 40.73% of images. No correlation was found with mean canal length and mean canal diameter according to age. Conclusions: Although variations exist in every patient, the findings from this study suggest that sex and dental status are important factors that can affect incisive canal characteristics and amount of bone anterior to the canal. Clinicians should perform careful planning using CT scans before performing dental implant surgeries in premaxillary region.
CC : 002B10; 002B25C02
FD : Traitement; Tomodensitométrie; Chirurgie; Evaluation; Maxillaire; Homme; Incisive; Lambeau; Tomographie; Dentisterie; Implant dentaire
FG : Imagerie médicale; Radiodiagnostic
ED : Treatment; Computerized axial tomography; Surgery; Evaluation; Maxillary; Human; Incisor; Flap (surgery); Tomography; Dentistry; Dental implant
EG : Medical imagery; Radiodiagnosis
SD : Tratamiento; Tomodensitometría; Cirugía; Evaluación; Maxilar; Hombre; Incisivo; Colgajo; Tomografía; Odontología
LO : INIST-874.354000194648670100
ID : 12-0160711

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:12-0160711

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Evaluation of Maxillary Incisive Canal Characteristics Related to Dental Implant Treatment With Computerized Tomography: A Clinical Multicenter Study</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Tozum, Tolga F" sort="Tozum, Tolga F" uniqKey="Tozum T" first="Tolga F." last="Tözüm">Tolga F. Tözüm</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University</s1>
<s2>Ankara</s2>
<s3>TUR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Guncu, Guliz N" sort="Guncu, Guliz N" uniqKey="Guncu G" first="Güliz N." last="Güncü">Güliz N. Güncü</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University</s1>
<s2>Ankara</s2>
<s3>TUR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Yildirim, Ya Gbreve Mur D" sort="Yildirim, Ya Gbreve Mur D" uniqKey="Yildirim Y" first="Ya Gbreve Mur D." last="Yildirim">Ya Gbreve Mur D. Yildirim</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University</s1>
<s2>Ankara</s2>
<s3>TUR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Guney Yilmaz, Hasan" sort="Guney Yilmaz, Hasan" uniqKey="Guney Yilmaz H" first="Hasan" last="Guney Yilmaz">Hasan Guney Yilmaz</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Near East University</s1>
<s2>Mersin</s2>
<s3>TUR</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Galindo Moreno, Pablo" sort="Galindo Moreno, Pablo" uniqKey="Galindo Moreno P" first="Pablo" last="Galindo-Moreno">Pablo Galindo-Moreno</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="03">
<s1>Department of Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, University of Granada</s1>
<s2>Granada</s2>
<s3>ESP</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="05">
<s1>Diagnostic Sciences Department, College of Dentistry, King Saud University.</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Velasco Torres, Miguel" sort="Velasco Torres, Miguel" uniqKey="Velasco Torres M" first="Miguel" last="Velasco-Torres">Miguel Velasco-Torres</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Near East University</s1>
<s2>Mersin</s2>
<s3>TUR</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Al Hezaimi, Khalid" sort="Al Hezaimi, Khalid" uniqKey="Al Hezaimi K" first="Khalid" last="Al-Hezaimi">Khalid Al-Hezaimi</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="04">
<s1>Division of Periodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University</s1>
<s2>Riyadh</s2>
<s3>SAU</s3>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>10 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Al Sadhan, Raed" sort="Al Sadhan, Raed" uniqKey="Al Sadhan R" first="Raed" last="Al-Sadhan">Raed Al-Sadhan</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="05">
<s1>Diagnostic Sciences Department, College of Dentistry, King Saud University.</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Karabulut, Erdem" sort="Karabulut, Erdem" uniqKey="Karabulut E" first="Erdem" last="Karabulut">Erdem Karabulut</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="06">
<s1>Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>9 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wang, Hom Lay" sort="Wang, Hom Lay" uniqKey="Wang H" first="Hom-Lay" last="Wang">Hom-Lay Wang</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="04">
<s1>Division of Periodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University</s1>
<s2>Riyadh</s2>
<s3>SAU</s3>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>10 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="07">
<s1>Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan</s1>
<s2>Ann Arbor, MI</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>10 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">12-0160711</idno>
<date when="2012">2012</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 12-0160711 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:12-0160711</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000084</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Evaluation of Maxillary Incisive Canal Characteristics Related to Dental Implant Treatment With Computerized Tomography: A Clinical Multicenter Study</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Tozum, Tolga F" sort="Tozum, Tolga F" uniqKey="Tozum T" first="Tolga F." last="Tözüm">Tolga F. Tözüm</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University</s1>
<s2>Ankara</s2>
<s3>TUR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Guncu, Guliz N" sort="Guncu, Guliz N" uniqKey="Guncu G" first="Güliz N." last="Güncü">Güliz N. Güncü</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University</s1>
<s2>Ankara</s2>
<s3>TUR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Yildirim, Ya Gbreve Mur D" sort="Yildirim, Ya Gbreve Mur D" uniqKey="Yildirim Y" first="Ya Gbreve Mur D." last="Yildirim">Ya Gbreve Mur D. Yildirim</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University</s1>
<s2>Ankara</s2>
<s3>TUR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Guney Yilmaz, Hasan" sort="Guney Yilmaz, Hasan" uniqKey="Guney Yilmaz H" first="Hasan" last="Guney Yilmaz">Hasan Guney Yilmaz</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Near East University</s1>
<s2>Mersin</s2>
<s3>TUR</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Galindo Moreno, Pablo" sort="Galindo Moreno, Pablo" uniqKey="Galindo Moreno P" first="Pablo" last="Galindo-Moreno">Pablo Galindo-Moreno</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="03">
<s1>Department of Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, University of Granada</s1>
<s2>Granada</s2>
<s3>ESP</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="05">
<s1>Diagnostic Sciences Department, College of Dentistry, King Saud University.</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Velasco Torres, Miguel" sort="Velasco Torres, Miguel" uniqKey="Velasco Torres M" first="Miguel" last="Velasco-Torres">Miguel Velasco-Torres</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Near East University</s1>
<s2>Mersin</s2>
<s3>TUR</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Al Hezaimi, Khalid" sort="Al Hezaimi, Khalid" uniqKey="Al Hezaimi K" first="Khalid" last="Al-Hezaimi">Khalid Al-Hezaimi</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="04">
<s1>Division of Periodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University</s1>
<s2>Riyadh</s2>
<s3>SAU</s3>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>10 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Al Sadhan, Raed" sort="Al Sadhan, Raed" uniqKey="Al Sadhan R" first="Raed" last="Al-Sadhan">Raed Al-Sadhan</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="05">
<s1>Diagnostic Sciences Department, College of Dentistry, King Saud University.</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Karabulut, Erdem" sort="Karabulut, Erdem" uniqKey="Karabulut E" first="Erdem" last="Karabulut">Erdem Karabulut</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="06">
<s1>Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>9 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wang, Hom Lay" sort="Wang, Hom Lay" uniqKey="Wang H" first="Hom-Lay" last="Wang">Hom-Lay Wang</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="04">
<s1>Division of Periodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University</s1>
<s2>Riyadh</s2>
<s3>SAU</s3>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>10 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="07">
<s1>Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan</s1>
<s2>Ann Arbor, MI</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>10 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of periodontology : (1970)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. periodontol. : (1970)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3492</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2012">2012</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of periodontology : (1970)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. periodontol. : (1970)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3492</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Computerized axial tomography</term>
<term>Dental implant</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Evaluation</term>
<term>Flap (surgery)</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Incisor</term>
<term>Maxillary</term>
<term>Surgery</term>
<term>Tomography</term>
<term>Treatment</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Traitement</term>
<term>Tomodensitométrie</term>
<term>Chirurgie</term>
<term>Evaluation</term>
<term>Maxillaire</term>
<term>Homme</term>
<term>Incisive</term>
<term>Lambeau</term>
<term>Tomographie</term>
<term>Dentisterie</term>
<term>Implant dentaire</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Background: A close anatomic relationship between the incisive canal and the roots of the central maxillary incisors should be kept in mind during dental-implant treatment in the anterior maxilla. The aim of the present study is to analyze incisive canal characteristics on computed tomography (CT) sections and to evaluate its relation to bone anterior to the canal with regard to dental implantation. Methods: A total of 933 partially edentulous and/or edentulous patients scheduled for implant insertion in four dental clinics enrolled in the present study. The following were measured and recorded from CT sections for analysis: 1) diameter and length of the incisive canal; 2) width and length of the bone anterior to the canal; 3) palatal bone width and length; and 4) root width and length of the central incisor. Results: Mean canal length was 10.86 ± 2.67 mm, and mean diameter was 2.59 ± 0.91 mm. Canal length was shortened in edentulous anterior maxilla compared to dentate maxilla. However, canal diameter did not show any difference between dentate and edentulous groups. Males had a longer and wider incisive canal than females. Canal shape was mostly cylindrical in 40.73% of images. No correlation was found with mean canal length and mean canal diameter according to age. Conclusions: Although variations exist in every patient, the findings from this study suggest that sex and dental status are important factors that can affect incisive canal characteristics and amount of bone anterior to the canal. Clinicians should perform careful planning using CT scans before performing dental implant surgeries in premaxillary region.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0022-3492</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>J. periodontol. : (1970)</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>83</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>3</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Evaluation of Maxillary Incisive Canal Characteristics Related to Dental Implant Treatment With Computerized Tomography: A Clinical Multicenter Study</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>TÖZÜM (Tolga F.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>GÜNCÜ (Güliz N.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1">
<s1>YILDIRIM (Ya========gbreve;mur D.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1">
<s1>GUNEY YILMAZ (Hasan)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1">
<s1>GALINDO-MORENO (Pablo)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="06" i2="1">
<s1>VELASCO-TORRES (Miguel)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="07" i2="1">
<s1>AL-HEZAIMI (Khalid)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="08" i2="1">
<s1>AL-SADHAN (Raed)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="09" i2="1">
<s1>KARABULUT (Erdem)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="10" i2="1">
<s1>WANG (Hom-Lay)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University</s1>
<s2>Ankara</s2>
<s3>TUR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Near East University</s1>
<s2>Mersin</s2>
<s3>TUR</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03">
<s1>Department of Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, University of Granada</s1>
<s2>Granada</s2>
<s3>ESP</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="04">
<s1>Division of Periodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University</s1>
<s2>Riyadh</s2>
<s3>SAU</s3>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>10 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="05">
<s1>Diagnostic Sciences Department, College of Dentistry, King Saud University.</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="06">
<s1>Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>9 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="07">
<s1>Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan</s1>
<s2>Ann Arbor, MI</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>10 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>337-343</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2012</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>874</s2>
<s5>354000194648670100</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2012 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>16 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>12-0160711</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Journal of periodontology : (1970)</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>Background: A close anatomic relationship between the incisive canal and the roots of the central maxillary incisors should be kept in mind during dental-implant treatment in the anterior maxilla. The aim of the present study is to analyze incisive canal characteristics on computed tomography (CT) sections and to evaluate its relation to bone anterior to the canal with regard to dental implantation. Methods: A total of 933 partially edentulous and/or edentulous patients scheduled for implant insertion in four dental clinics enrolled in the present study. The following were measured and recorded from CT sections for analysis: 1) diameter and length of the incisive canal; 2) width and length of the bone anterior to the canal; 3) palatal bone width and length; and 4) root width and length of the central incisor. Results: Mean canal length was 10.86 ± 2.67 mm, and mean diameter was 2.59 ± 0.91 mm. Canal length was shortened in edentulous anterior maxilla compared to dentate maxilla. However, canal diameter did not show any difference between dentate and edentulous groups. Males had a longer and wider incisive canal than females. Canal shape was mostly cylindrical in 40.73% of images. No correlation was found with mean canal length and mean canal diameter according to age. Conclusions: Although variations exist in every patient, the findings from this study suggest that sex and dental status are important factors that can affect incisive canal characteristics and amount of bone anterior to the canal. Clinicians should perform careful planning using CT scans before performing dental implant surgeries in premaxillary region.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>002B10</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X">
<s0>002B25C02</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Traitement</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Treatment</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Tratamiento</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Tomodensitométrie</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Computerized axial tomography</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Tomodensitometría</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Chirurgie</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Surgery</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Cirugía</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Evaluation</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Evaluation</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Evaluación</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Maxillaire</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Maxillary</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Maxilar</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Human</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Incisive</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Incisor</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Incisivo</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Lambeau</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Flap (surgery)</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Colgajo</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Tomographie</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Tomography</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Tomografía</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Dentisterie</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Dentistry</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Odontología</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Implant dentaire</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Dental implant</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Imagerie médicale</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Medical imagery</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Imaginería médica</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Radiodiagnostic</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Radiodiagnosis</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Radiodiagnóstico</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21>
<s1>122</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01">
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82>
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server>
<NO>PASCAL 12-0160711 INIST</NO>
<ET>Evaluation of Maxillary Incisive Canal Characteristics Related to Dental Implant Treatment With Computerized Tomography: A Clinical Multicenter Study</ET>
<AU>TÖZÜM (Tolga F.); GÜNCÜ (Güliz N.); YILDIRIM (Ya========gbreve;mur D.); GUNEY YILMAZ (Hasan); GALINDO-MORENO (Pablo); VELASCO-TORRES (Miguel); AL-HEZAIMI (Khalid); AL-SADHAN (Raed); KARABULUT (Erdem); WANG (Hom-Lay)</AU>
<AF>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University/Ankara/Turquie (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut.); Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Near East University/Mersin/Turquie (4 aut., 6 aut.); Department of Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, University of Granada/Granada/Espagne (5 aut.); Division of Periodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University/Riyadh/Arabie Saoudite (7 aut., 10 aut.); Diagnostic Sciences Department, College of Dentistry, King Saud University./Etats-Unis (5 aut., 8 aut.); Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University/Etats-Unis (9 aut.); Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan/Ann Arbor, MI/Etats-Unis (10 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of periodontology : (1970); ISSN 0022-3492; Etats-Unis; Da. 2012; Vol. 83; No. 3; Pp. 337-343; Bibl. 16 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Background: A close anatomic relationship between the incisive canal and the roots of the central maxillary incisors should be kept in mind during dental-implant treatment in the anterior maxilla. The aim of the present study is to analyze incisive canal characteristics on computed tomography (CT) sections and to evaluate its relation to bone anterior to the canal with regard to dental implantation. Methods: A total of 933 partially edentulous and/or edentulous patients scheduled for implant insertion in four dental clinics enrolled in the present study. The following were measured and recorded from CT sections for analysis: 1) diameter and length of the incisive canal; 2) width and length of the bone anterior to the canal; 3) palatal bone width and length; and 4) root width and length of the central incisor. Results: Mean canal length was 10.86 ± 2.67 mm, and mean diameter was 2.59 ± 0.91 mm. Canal length was shortened in edentulous anterior maxilla compared to dentate maxilla. However, canal diameter did not show any difference between dentate and edentulous groups. Males had a longer and wider incisive canal than females. Canal shape was mostly cylindrical in 40.73% of images. No correlation was found with mean canal length and mean canal diameter according to age. Conclusions: Although variations exist in every patient, the findings from this study suggest that sex and dental status are important factors that can affect incisive canal characteristics and amount of bone anterior to the canal. Clinicians should perform careful planning using CT scans before performing dental implant surgeries in premaxillary region.</EA>
<CC>002B10; 002B25C02</CC>
<FD>Traitement; Tomodensitométrie; Chirurgie; Evaluation; Maxillaire; Homme; Incisive; Lambeau; Tomographie; Dentisterie; Implant dentaire</FD>
<FG>Imagerie médicale; Radiodiagnostic</FG>
<ED>Treatment; Computerized axial tomography; Surgery; Evaluation; Maxillary; Human; Incisor; Flap (surgery); Tomography; Dentistry; Dental implant</ED>
<EG>Medical imagery; Radiodiagnosis</EG>
<SD>Tratamiento; Tomodensitometría; Cirugía; Evaluación; Maxilar; Hombre; Incisivo; Colgajo; Tomografía; Odontología</SD>
<LO>INIST-874.354000194648670100</LO>
<ID>12-0160711</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000084 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000084 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:12-0160711
   |texte=   Evaluation of Maxillary Incisive Canal Characteristics Related to Dental Implant Treatment With Computerized Tomography: A Clinical Multicenter Study
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022