Free Vascularized Flaps for Reconstruction of the Mandible: Complications, Success, and Dental Rehabilitation
Identifieur interne : 000065 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000064; suivant : 000066Free Vascularized Flaps for Reconstruction of the Mandible: Complications, Success, and Dental Rehabilitation
Auteurs : Johannes T. M. Van Gemert ; Robert J. J. Van Es ; Antoine J. W. P. Rosenberg ; Andries Van Der Bilt ; Ron Koole ; Ellen M. Van CannSource :
- Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery [ 0278-2391 ] ; 2012.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate complications and success of mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flaps, iliac crest flaps, and forearm flaps with reconstruction plates and to evaluate dental rehabilitation after these reconstructions. Patients and Methods: Eighty-three patients with segmental mandibular defects were included. Correlation analyses were used to determine the relationship between reconstruction type and clinical parameters with recipient-site complications and success. The dental rehabilitation was evaluated in successfully reconstructed survivors. Results: Multivariate analyses showed significant correlations between flap type and success (P < .0001). Of the patients, 51 (61%) were alive 2 years after the reconstruction. Mandibular reconstruction with a free forearm flap and reconstruction plate was associated with higher complication rates at the recipient site and higher failure rates compared with reconstruction with free vascularized bone flaps. Of the 32 successfully reconstructed survivors, 14 (44%) had a complete dental rehabilitation, of which 10 had dental implants and 4 did not. Only 6 (29%) of the edentuous survivors ultimately had an implant-supported prosthesis. Conclusions: Reconstruction of the mandible with a free vascularized bone flap is superior to reconstruction with a free forearm flap with a reconstruction plate. Complete dental rehabilitation was reached in fewer than half of the surviving patients.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
pA |
|
---|
Format Inist (serveur)
NO : | PASCAL 12-0278886 INIST |
---|---|
ET : | Free Vascularized Flaps for Reconstruction of the Mandible: Complications, Success, and Dental Rehabilitation |
AU : | VAN GEMERT (Johannes T. M.); ES (Robert J. J. Van); ROSENBERG (Antoine J. W. P.); VAN DER BILT (Andries); KOOLE (Ron); VAN CANN (Ellen M.) |
AF : | Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht/Utrecht/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut., 6 aut.) |
DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
SO : | Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery; ISSN 0278-2391; Coden JOMSDA; Etats-Unis; Da. 2012; Vol. 70; No. 7; Pp. 1692-1698; Bibl. 36 ref. |
LA : | Anglais |
EA : | Purpose: To evaluate complications and success of mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flaps, iliac crest flaps, and forearm flaps with reconstruction plates and to evaluate dental rehabilitation after these reconstructions. Patients and Methods: Eighty-three patients with segmental mandibular defects were included. Correlation analyses were used to determine the relationship between reconstruction type and clinical parameters with recipient-site complications and success. The dental rehabilitation was evaluated in successfully reconstructed survivors. Results: Multivariate analyses showed significant correlations between flap type and success (P < .0001). Of the patients, 51 (61%) were alive 2 years after the reconstruction. Mandibular reconstruction with a free forearm flap and reconstruction plate was associated with higher complication rates at the recipient site and higher failure rates compared with reconstruction with free vascularized bone flaps. Of the 32 successfully reconstructed survivors, 14 (44%) had a complete dental rehabilitation, of which 10 had dental implants and 4 did not. Only 6 (29%) of the edentuous survivors ultimately had an implant-supported prosthesis. Conclusions: Reconstruction of the mandible with a free vascularized bone flap is superior to reconstruction with a free forearm flap with a reconstruction plate. Complete dental rehabilitation was reached in fewer than half of the surviving patients. |
CC : | 002B10 |
FD : | Reconstruction anatomique; Chirurgie; Lambeau libre; Mandibule; Complication; Dent; Réadaptation; Stomatologie; Traitement |
ED : | Anatomical reconstruction; Surgery; Free flap; Mandible; Complication; Tooth; Rehabilitation(human); Stomatology; Treatment |
SD : | Reconstrucción anatómica; Cirugía; Colgajo libre; Mandíbula; Complicación; Diente; Readaptación; Estomatología; Tratamiento |
LO : | INIST-3005.354000500814300290 |
ID : | 12-0278886 |
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:12-0278886Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Free Vascularized Flaps for Reconstruction of the Mandible: Complications, Success, and Dental Rehabilitation</title>
<author><name sortKey="Van Gemert, Johannes T M" sort="Van Gemert, Johannes T M" uniqKey="Van Gemert J" first="Johannes T. M." last="Van Gemert">Johannes T. M. Van Gemert</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht</s1>
<s2>Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Es, Robert J J Van" sort="Es, Robert J J Van" uniqKey="Es R" first="Robert J. J. Van" last="Es">Robert J. J. Van Es</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht</s1>
<s2>Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Rosenberg, Antoine J W P" sort="Rosenberg, Antoine J W P" uniqKey="Rosenberg A" first="Antoine J. W. P." last="Rosenberg">Antoine J. W. P. Rosenberg</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht</s1>
<s2>Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van Der Bilt, Andries" sort="Van Der Bilt, Andries" uniqKey="Van Der Bilt A" first="Andries" last="Van Der Bilt">Andries Van Der Bilt</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht</s1>
<s2>Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Koole, Ron" sort="Koole, Ron" uniqKey="Koole R" first="Ron" last="Koole">Ron Koole</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht</s1>
<s2>Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van Cann, Ellen M" sort="Van Cann, Ellen M" uniqKey="Van Cann E" first="Ellen M." last="Van Cann">Ellen M. Van Cann</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht</s1>
<s2>Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">12-0278886</idno>
<date when="2012">2012</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 12-0278886 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:12-0278886</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000065</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Free Vascularized Flaps for Reconstruction of the Mandible: Complications, Success, and Dental Rehabilitation</title>
<author><name sortKey="Van Gemert, Johannes T M" sort="Van Gemert, Johannes T M" uniqKey="Van Gemert J" first="Johannes T. M." last="Van Gemert">Johannes T. M. Van Gemert</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht</s1>
<s2>Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Es, Robert J J Van" sort="Es, Robert J J Van" uniqKey="Es R" first="Robert J. J. Van" last="Es">Robert J. J. Van Es</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht</s1>
<s2>Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Rosenberg, Antoine J W P" sort="Rosenberg, Antoine J W P" uniqKey="Rosenberg A" first="Antoine J. W. P." last="Rosenberg">Antoine J. W. P. Rosenberg</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht</s1>
<s2>Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van Der Bilt, Andries" sort="Van Der Bilt, Andries" uniqKey="Van Der Bilt A" first="Andries" last="Van Der Bilt">Andries Van Der Bilt</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht</s1>
<s2>Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Koole, Ron" sort="Koole, Ron" uniqKey="Koole R" first="Ron" last="Koole">Ron Koole</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht</s1>
<s2>Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van Cann, Ellen M" sort="Van Cann, Ellen M" uniqKey="Van Cann E" first="Ellen M." last="Van Cann">Ellen M. Van Cann</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht</s1>
<s2>Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. oral maxillofac. surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0278-2391</idno>
<imprint><date when="2012">2012</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. oral maxillofac. surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0278-2391</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Anatomical reconstruction</term>
<term>Complication</term>
<term>Free flap</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Rehabilitation(human)</term>
<term>Stomatology</term>
<term>Surgery</term>
<term>Tooth</term>
<term>Treatment</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Reconstruction anatomique</term>
<term>Chirurgie</term>
<term>Lambeau libre</term>
<term>Mandibule</term>
<term>Complication</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Réadaptation</term>
<term>Stomatologie</term>
<term>Traitement</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Purpose: To evaluate complications and success of mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flaps, iliac crest flaps, and forearm flaps with reconstruction plates and to evaluate dental rehabilitation after these reconstructions. Patients and Methods: Eighty-three patients with segmental mandibular defects were included. Correlation analyses were used to determine the relationship between reconstruction type and clinical parameters with recipient-site complications and success. The dental rehabilitation was evaluated in successfully reconstructed survivors. Results: Multivariate analyses showed significant correlations between flap type and success (P < .0001). Of the patients, 51 (61%) were alive 2 years after the reconstruction. Mandibular reconstruction with a free forearm flap and reconstruction plate was associated with higher complication rates at the recipient site and higher failure rates compared with reconstruction with free vascularized bone flaps. Of the 32 successfully reconstructed survivors, 14 (44%) had a complete dental rehabilitation, of which 10 had dental implants and 4 did not. Only 6 (29%) of the edentuous survivors ultimately had an implant-supported prosthesis. Conclusions: Reconstruction of the mandible with a free vascularized bone flap is superior to reconstruction with a free forearm flap with a reconstruction plate. Complete dental rehabilitation was reached in fewer than half of the surviving patients.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0278-2391</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>JOMSDA</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. oral maxillofac. surg.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>70</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>7</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Free Vascularized Flaps for Reconstruction of the Mandible: Complications, Success, and Dental Rehabilitation</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>VAN GEMERT (Johannes T. M.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>ES (Robert J. J. Van)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>ROSENBERG (Antoine J. W. P.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>VAN DER BILT (Andries)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>KOOLE (Ron)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="06" i2="1"><s1>VAN CANN (Ellen M.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht</s1>
<s2>Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>1692-1698</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2012</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>3005</s2>
<s5>354000500814300290</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2012 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>36 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>12-0278886</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Purpose: To evaluate complications and success of mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flaps, iliac crest flaps, and forearm flaps with reconstruction plates and to evaluate dental rehabilitation after these reconstructions. Patients and Methods: Eighty-three patients with segmental mandibular defects were included. Correlation analyses were used to determine the relationship between reconstruction type and clinical parameters with recipient-site complications and success. The dental rehabilitation was evaluated in successfully reconstructed survivors. Results: Multivariate analyses showed significant correlations between flap type and success (P < .0001). Of the patients, 51 (61%) were alive 2 years after the reconstruction. Mandibular reconstruction with a free forearm flap and reconstruction plate was associated with higher complication rates at the recipient site and higher failure rates compared with reconstruction with free vascularized bone flaps. Of the 32 successfully reconstructed survivors, 14 (44%) had a complete dental rehabilitation, of which 10 had dental implants and 4 did not. Only 6 (29%) of the edentuous survivors ultimately had an implant-supported prosthesis. Conclusions: Reconstruction of the mandible with a free vascularized bone flap is superior to reconstruction with a free forearm flap with a reconstruction plate. Complete dental rehabilitation was reached in fewer than half of the surviving patients.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B10</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Reconstruction anatomique</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Anatomical reconstruction</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Reconstrucción anatómica</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Chirurgie</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Surgery</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cirugía</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Lambeau libre</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Free flap</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Colgajo libre</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Mandibule</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Mandible</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Mandíbula</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Complication</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Complication</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Complicación</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dent</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Tooth</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Diente</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Réadaptation</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Rehabilitation(human)</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Readaptación</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Stomatologie</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Stomatology</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estomatología</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Traitement</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Treatment</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tratamiento</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21><s1>212</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 12-0278886 INIST</NO>
<ET>Free Vascularized Flaps for Reconstruction of the Mandible: Complications, Success, and Dental Rehabilitation</ET>
<AU>VAN GEMERT (Johannes T. M.); ES (Robert J. J. Van); ROSENBERG (Antoine J. W. P.); VAN DER BILT (Andries); KOOLE (Ron); VAN CANN (Ellen M.)</AU>
<AF>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht/Utrecht/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut., 6 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery; ISSN 0278-2391; Coden JOMSDA; Etats-Unis; Da. 2012; Vol. 70; No. 7; Pp. 1692-1698; Bibl. 36 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Purpose: To evaluate complications and success of mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flaps, iliac crest flaps, and forearm flaps with reconstruction plates and to evaluate dental rehabilitation after these reconstructions. Patients and Methods: Eighty-three patients with segmental mandibular defects were included. Correlation analyses were used to determine the relationship between reconstruction type and clinical parameters with recipient-site complications and success. The dental rehabilitation was evaluated in successfully reconstructed survivors. Results: Multivariate analyses showed significant correlations between flap type and success (P < .0001). Of the patients, 51 (61%) were alive 2 years after the reconstruction. Mandibular reconstruction with a free forearm flap and reconstruction plate was associated with higher complication rates at the recipient site and higher failure rates compared with reconstruction with free vascularized bone flaps. Of the 32 successfully reconstructed survivors, 14 (44%) had a complete dental rehabilitation, of which 10 had dental implants and 4 did not. Only 6 (29%) of the edentuous survivors ultimately had an implant-supported prosthesis. Conclusions: Reconstruction of the mandible with a free vascularized bone flap is superior to reconstruction with a free forearm flap with a reconstruction plate. Complete dental rehabilitation was reached in fewer than half of the surviving patients.</EA>
<CC>002B10</CC>
<FD>Reconstruction anatomique; Chirurgie; Lambeau libre; Mandibule; Complication; Dent; Réadaptation; Stomatologie; Traitement</FD>
<ED>Anatomical reconstruction; Surgery; Free flap; Mandible; Complication; Tooth; Rehabilitation(human); Stomatology; Treatment</ED>
<SD>Reconstrucción anatómica; Cirugía; Colgajo libre; Mandíbula; Complicación; Diente; Readaptación; Estomatología; Tratamiento</SD>
<LO>INIST-3005.354000500814300290</LO>
<ID>12-0278886</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000065 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000065 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= Pascal:12-0278886 |texte= Free Vascularized Flaps for Reconstruction of the Mandible: Complications, Success, and Dental Rehabilitation }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |