Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Free Vascularized Flaps for Reconstruction of the Mandible: Complications, Success, and Dental Rehabilitation

Identifieur interne : 000065 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000064; suivant : 000066

Free Vascularized Flaps for Reconstruction of the Mandible: Complications, Success, and Dental Rehabilitation

Auteurs : Johannes T. M. Van Gemert ; Robert J. J. Van Es ; Antoine J. W. P. Rosenberg ; Andries Van Der Bilt ; Ron Koole ; Ellen M. Van Cann

Source :

RBID : Pascal:12-0278886

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate complications and success of mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flaps, iliac crest flaps, and forearm flaps with reconstruction plates and to evaluate dental rehabilitation after these reconstructions. Patients and Methods: Eighty-three patients with segmental mandibular defects were included. Correlation analyses were used to determine the relationship between reconstruction type and clinical parameters with recipient-site complications and success. The dental rehabilitation was evaluated in successfully reconstructed survivors. Results: Multivariate analyses showed significant correlations between flap type and success (P < .0001). Of the patients, 51 (61%) were alive 2 years after the reconstruction. Mandibular reconstruction with a free forearm flap and reconstruction plate was associated with higher complication rates at the recipient site and higher failure rates compared with reconstruction with free vascularized bone flaps. Of the 32 successfully reconstructed survivors, 14 (44%) had a complete dental rehabilitation, of which 10 had dental implants and 4 did not. Only 6 (29%) of the edentuous survivors ultimately had an implant-supported prosthesis. Conclusions: Reconstruction of the mandible with a free vascularized bone flap is superior to reconstruction with a free forearm flap with a reconstruction plate. Complete dental rehabilitation was reached in fewer than half of the surviving patients.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0278-2391
A02 01      @0 JOMSDA
A03   1    @0 J. oral maxillofac. surg.
A05       @2 70
A06       @2 7
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Free Vascularized Flaps for Reconstruction of the Mandible: Complications, Success, and Dental Rehabilitation
A11 01  1    @1 VAN GEMERT (Johannes T. M.)
A11 02  1    @1 ES (Robert J. J. Van)
A11 03  1    @1 ROSENBERG (Antoine J. W. P.)
A11 04  1    @1 VAN DER BILT (Andries)
A11 05  1    @1 KOOLE (Ron)
A11 06  1    @1 VAN CANN (Ellen M.)
A14 01      @1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht @2 Utrecht @3 NLD @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut. @Z 4 aut. @Z 5 aut. @Z 6 aut.
A20       @1 1692-1698
A21       @1 2012
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 3005 @5 354000500814300290
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2012 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 36 ref.
A47 01  1    @0 12-0278886
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery
A66 01      @0 USA
C01 01    ENG  @0 Purpose: To evaluate complications and success of mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flaps, iliac crest flaps, and forearm flaps with reconstruction plates and to evaluate dental rehabilitation after these reconstructions. Patients and Methods: Eighty-three patients with segmental mandibular defects were included. Correlation analyses were used to determine the relationship between reconstruction type and clinical parameters with recipient-site complications and success. The dental rehabilitation was evaluated in successfully reconstructed survivors. Results: Multivariate analyses showed significant correlations between flap type and success (P < .0001). Of the patients, 51 (61%) were alive 2 years after the reconstruction. Mandibular reconstruction with a free forearm flap and reconstruction plate was associated with higher complication rates at the recipient site and higher failure rates compared with reconstruction with free vascularized bone flaps. Of the 32 successfully reconstructed survivors, 14 (44%) had a complete dental rehabilitation, of which 10 had dental implants and 4 did not. Only 6 (29%) of the edentuous survivors ultimately had an implant-supported prosthesis. Conclusions: Reconstruction of the mandible with a free vascularized bone flap is superior to reconstruction with a free forearm flap with a reconstruction plate. Complete dental rehabilitation was reached in fewer than half of the surviving patients.
C02 01  X    @0 002B10
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Reconstruction anatomique @5 04
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Anatomical reconstruction @5 04
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Reconstrucción anatómica @5 04
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Chirurgie @5 05
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Surgery @5 05
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Cirugía @5 05
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Lambeau libre @5 07
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 Free flap @5 07
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Colgajo libre @5 07
C03 04  X  FRE  @0 Mandibule @5 08
C03 04  X  ENG  @0 Mandible @5 08
C03 04  X  SPA  @0 Mandíbula @5 08
C03 05  X  FRE  @0 Complication @5 09
C03 05  X  ENG  @0 Complication @5 09
C03 05  X  SPA  @0 Complicación @5 09
C03 06  X  FRE  @0 Dent @5 13
C03 06  X  ENG  @0 Tooth @5 13
C03 06  X  SPA  @0 Diente @5 13
C03 07  X  FRE  @0 Réadaptation @5 14
C03 07  X  ENG  @0 Rehabilitation(human) @5 14
C03 07  X  SPA  @0 Readaptación @5 14
C03 08  X  FRE  @0 Stomatologie @5 15
C03 08  X  ENG  @0 Stomatology @5 15
C03 08  X  SPA  @0 Estomatología @5 15
C03 09  X  FRE  @0 Traitement @5 30
C03 09  X  ENG  @0 Treatment @5 30
C03 09  X  SPA  @0 Tratamiento @5 30
N21       @1 212
N44 01      @1 OTO
N82       @1 OTO

Format Inist (serveur)

NO : PASCAL 12-0278886 INIST
ET : Free Vascularized Flaps for Reconstruction of the Mandible: Complications, Success, and Dental Rehabilitation
AU : VAN GEMERT (Johannes T. M.); ES (Robert J. J. Van); ROSENBERG (Antoine J. W. P.); VAN DER BILT (Andries); KOOLE (Ron); VAN CANN (Ellen M.)
AF : Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht/Utrecht/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut., 6 aut.)
DT : Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO : Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery; ISSN 0278-2391; Coden JOMSDA; Etats-Unis; Da. 2012; Vol. 70; No. 7; Pp. 1692-1698; Bibl. 36 ref.
LA : Anglais
EA : Purpose: To evaluate complications and success of mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flaps, iliac crest flaps, and forearm flaps with reconstruction plates and to evaluate dental rehabilitation after these reconstructions. Patients and Methods: Eighty-three patients with segmental mandibular defects were included. Correlation analyses were used to determine the relationship between reconstruction type and clinical parameters with recipient-site complications and success. The dental rehabilitation was evaluated in successfully reconstructed survivors. Results: Multivariate analyses showed significant correlations between flap type and success (P < .0001). Of the patients, 51 (61%) were alive 2 years after the reconstruction. Mandibular reconstruction with a free forearm flap and reconstruction plate was associated with higher complication rates at the recipient site and higher failure rates compared with reconstruction with free vascularized bone flaps. Of the 32 successfully reconstructed survivors, 14 (44%) had a complete dental rehabilitation, of which 10 had dental implants and 4 did not. Only 6 (29%) of the edentuous survivors ultimately had an implant-supported prosthesis. Conclusions: Reconstruction of the mandible with a free vascularized bone flap is superior to reconstruction with a free forearm flap with a reconstruction plate. Complete dental rehabilitation was reached in fewer than half of the surviving patients.
CC : 002B10
FD : Reconstruction anatomique; Chirurgie; Lambeau libre; Mandibule; Complication; Dent; Réadaptation; Stomatologie; Traitement
ED : Anatomical reconstruction; Surgery; Free flap; Mandible; Complication; Tooth; Rehabilitation(human); Stomatology; Treatment
SD : Reconstrucción anatómica; Cirugía; Colgajo libre; Mandíbula; Complicación; Diente; Readaptación; Estomatología; Tratamiento
LO : INIST-3005.354000500814300290
ID : 12-0278886

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:12-0278886

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Free Vascularized Flaps for Reconstruction of the Mandible: Complications, Success, and Dental Rehabilitation</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Gemert, Johannes T M" sort="Van Gemert, Johannes T M" uniqKey="Van Gemert J" first="Johannes T. M." last="Van Gemert">Johannes T. M. Van Gemert</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht</s1>
<s2>Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Es, Robert J J Van" sort="Es, Robert J J Van" uniqKey="Es R" first="Robert J. J. Van" last="Es">Robert J. J. Van Es</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht</s1>
<s2>Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Rosenberg, Antoine J W P" sort="Rosenberg, Antoine J W P" uniqKey="Rosenberg A" first="Antoine J. W. P." last="Rosenberg">Antoine J. W. P. Rosenberg</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht</s1>
<s2>Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Der Bilt, Andries" sort="Van Der Bilt, Andries" uniqKey="Van Der Bilt A" first="Andries" last="Van Der Bilt">Andries Van Der Bilt</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht</s1>
<s2>Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Koole, Ron" sort="Koole, Ron" uniqKey="Koole R" first="Ron" last="Koole">Ron Koole</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht</s1>
<s2>Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Cann, Ellen M" sort="Van Cann, Ellen M" uniqKey="Van Cann E" first="Ellen M." last="Van Cann">Ellen M. Van Cann</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht</s1>
<s2>Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">12-0278886</idno>
<date when="2012">2012</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 12-0278886 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:12-0278886</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000065</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Free Vascularized Flaps for Reconstruction of the Mandible: Complications, Success, and Dental Rehabilitation</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Gemert, Johannes T M" sort="Van Gemert, Johannes T M" uniqKey="Van Gemert J" first="Johannes T. M." last="Van Gemert">Johannes T. M. Van Gemert</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht</s1>
<s2>Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Es, Robert J J Van" sort="Es, Robert J J Van" uniqKey="Es R" first="Robert J. J. Van" last="Es">Robert J. J. Van Es</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht</s1>
<s2>Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Rosenberg, Antoine J W P" sort="Rosenberg, Antoine J W P" uniqKey="Rosenberg A" first="Antoine J. W. P." last="Rosenberg">Antoine J. W. P. Rosenberg</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht</s1>
<s2>Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Der Bilt, Andries" sort="Van Der Bilt, Andries" uniqKey="Van Der Bilt A" first="Andries" last="Van Der Bilt">Andries Van Der Bilt</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht</s1>
<s2>Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Koole, Ron" sort="Koole, Ron" uniqKey="Koole R" first="Ron" last="Koole">Ron Koole</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht</s1>
<s2>Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Cann, Ellen M" sort="Van Cann, Ellen M" uniqKey="Van Cann E" first="Ellen M." last="Van Cann">Ellen M. Van Cann</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht</s1>
<s2>Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. oral maxillofac. surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0278-2391</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2012">2012</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. oral maxillofac. surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0278-2391</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Anatomical reconstruction</term>
<term>Complication</term>
<term>Free flap</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Rehabilitation(human)</term>
<term>Stomatology</term>
<term>Surgery</term>
<term>Tooth</term>
<term>Treatment</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Reconstruction anatomique</term>
<term>Chirurgie</term>
<term>Lambeau libre</term>
<term>Mandibule</term>
<term>Complication</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Réadaptation</term>
<term>Stomatologie</term>
<term>Traitement</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Purpose: To evaluate complications and success of mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flaps, iliac crest flaps, and forearm flaps with reconstruction plates and to evaluate dental rehabilitation after these reconstructions. Patients and Methods: Eighty-three patients with segmental mandibular defects were included. Correlation analyses were used to determine the relationship between reconstruction type and clinical parameters with recipient-site complications and success. The dental rehabilitation was evaluated in successfully reconstructed survivors. Results: Multivariate analyses showed significant correlations between flap type and success (P < .0001). Of the patients, 51 (61%) were alive 2 years after the reconstruction. Mandibular reconstruction with a free forearm flap and reconstruction plate was associated with higher complication rates at the recipient site and higher failure rates compared with reconstruction with free vascularized bone flaps. Of the 32 successfully reconstructed survivors, 14 (44%) had a complete dental rehabilitation, of which 10 had dental implants and 4 did not. Only 6 (29%) of the edentuous survivors ultimately had an implant-supported prosthesis. Conclusions: Reconstruction of the mandible with a free vascularized bone flap is superior to reconstruction with a free forearm flap with a reconstruction plate. Complete dental rehabilitation was reached in fewer than half of the surviving patients.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0278-2391</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01">
<s0>JOMSDA</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>J. oral maxillofac. surg.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>70</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>7</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Free Vascularized Flaps for Reconstruction of the Mandible: Complications, Success, and Dental Rehabilitation</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>VAN GEMERT (Johannes T. M.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>ES (Robert J. J. Van)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1">
<s1>ROSENBERG (Antoine J. W. P.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1">
<s1>VAN DER BILT (Andries)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1">
<s1>KOOLE (Ron)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="06" i2="1">
<s1>VAN CANN (Ellen M.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht</s1>
<s2>Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>1692-1698</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2012</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>3005</s2>
<s5>354000500814300290</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2012 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>36 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>12-0278886</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>Purpose: To evaluate complications and success of mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flaps, iliac crest flaps, and forearm flaps with reconstruction plates and to evaluate dental rehabilitation after these reconstructions. Patients and Methods: Eighty-three patients with segmental mandibular defects were included. Correlation analyses were used to determine the relationship between reconstruction type and clinical parameters with recipient-site complications and success. The dental rehabilitation was evaluated in successfully reconstructed survivors. Results: Multivariate analyses showed significant correlations between flap type and success (P < .0001). Of the patients, 51 (61%) were alive 2 years after the reconstruction. Mandibular reconstruction with a free forearm flap and reconstruction plate was associated with higher complication rates at the recipient site and higher failure rates compared with reconstruction with free vascularized bone flaps. Of the 32 successfully reconstructed survivors, 14 (44%) had a complete dental rehabilitation, of which 10 had dental implants and 4 did not. Only 6 (29%) of the edentuous survivors ultimately had an implant-supported prosthesis. Conclusions: Reconstruction of the mandible with a free vascularized bone flap is superior to reconstruction with a free forearm flap with a reconstruction plate. Complete dental rehabilitation was reached in fewer than half of the surviving patients.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>002B10</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Reconstruction anatomique</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Anatomical reconstruction</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Reconstrucción anatómica</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Chirurgie</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Surgery</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Cirugía</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Lambeau libre</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Free flap</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Colgajo libre</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Mandibule</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Mandible</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Mandíbula</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Complication</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Complication</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Complicación</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Dent</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Tooth</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Diente</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Réadaptation</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Rehabilitation(human)</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Readaptación</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Stomatologie</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Stomatology</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Estomatología</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Traitement</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Treatment</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Tratamiento</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21>
<s1>212</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01">
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82>
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server>
<NO>PASCAL 12-0278886 INIST</NO>
<ET>Free Vascularized Flaps for Reconstruction of the Mandible: Complications, Success, and Dental Rehabilitation</ET>
<AU>VAN GEMERT (Johannes T. M.); ES (Robert J. J. Van); ROSENBERG (Antoine J. W. P.); VAN DER BILT (Andries); KOOLE (Ron); VAN CANN (Ellen M.)</AU>
<AF>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht/Utrecht/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut., 6 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery; ISSN 0278-2391; Coden JOMSDA; Etats-Unis; Da. 2012; Vol. 70; No. 7; Pp. 1692-1698; Bibl. 36 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Purpose: To evaluate complications and success of mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flaps, iliac crest flaps, and forearm flaps with reconstruction plates and to evaluate dental rehabilitation after these reconstructions. Patients and Methods: Eighty-three patients with segmental mandibular defects were included. Correlation analyses were used to determine the relationship between reconstruction type and clinical parameters with recipient-site complications and success. The dental rehabilitation was evaluated in successfully reconstructed survivors. Results: Multivariate analyses showed significant correlations between flap type and success (P < .0001). Of the patients, 51 (61%) were alive 2 years after the reconstruction. Mandibular reconstruction with a free forearm flap and reconstruction plate was associated with higher complication rates at the recipient site and higher failure rates compared with reconstruction with free vascularized bone flaps. Of the 32 successfully reconstructed survivors, 14 (44%) had a complete dental rehabilitation, of which 10 had dental implants and 4 did not. Only 6 (29%) of the edentuous survivors ultimately had an implant-supported prosthesis. Conclusions: Reconstruction of the mandible with a free vascularized bone flap is superior to reconstruction with a free forearm flap with a reconstruction plate. Complete dental rehabilitation was reached in fewer than half of the surviving patients.</EA>
<CC>002B10</CC>
<FD>Reconstruction anatomique; Chirurgie; Lambeau libre; Mandibule; Complication; Dent; Réadaptation; Stomatologie; Traitement</FD>
<ED>Anatomical reconstruction; Surgery; Free flap; Mandible; Complication; Tooth; Rehabilitation(human); Stomatology; Treatment</ED>
<SD>Reconstrucción anatómica; Cirugía; Colgajo libre; Mandíbula; Complicación; Diente; Readaptación; Estomatología; Tratamiento</SD>
<LO>INIST-3005.354000500814300290</LO>
<ID>12-0278886</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000065 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000065 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:12-0278886
   |texte=   Free Vascularized Flaps for Reconstruction of the Mandible: Complications, Success, and Dental Rehabilitation
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022