EdenteV2, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000015

Socioeconomic inequalities in oral health in different European welfare state regimes

Identifieur interne : 000015 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000014; suivant : 000016

Socioeconomic inequalities in oral health in different European welfare state regimes

Auteurs : Carol C. Guarnizo-Herreno ; Richard G. Watt ; Hynek Pikhart ; Aubrey Sheiham ; Georgios Tsakos

Source :

Journal of epidemiology and community health : (1979) [ 0143-005X ] ; 2013.

RBID : Pascal:13-0275662

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Pathologie dentaire, Socioéconomie, Aspect économique, Aspect social, Santé publique, Statut socioéconomique, Inégalité, Cavité buccale, Santé bucco-dentaire, Europe, Européen, Bien être économique, Assurance maladie, Médecine.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Bucco-dental health, Dental disease, Economic aspect, Europe, European, Health insurance, Inequality, Medicine, Oral cavity, Public health, Social aspect, Socioeconomic status, Socioeconomics, Welfare.

Abstract

Background There is very little information about the relationship between welfare regimes and oral health inequalities. We compared socioeconomic inequalities in adults' oral health in five European welfare-state regimes: Scandinavian, Anglo-Saxon, Bismarckian, Southern and Eastern. Methods Using data from the oral health module of the Eurobarometer 72.3 survey, we assessed inequalities in two self-reported oral health measures: no functional dentition (less than 20 natural teeth) and edentulousness (no natural teeth). Occupational social class, education and subjective social status (SSS) were included as socioeconomic position indicators. We estimated age-standardised prevalence rates, ORs, the Relative Index of Inequality (RII) and the Slope Index of Inequality (SII). Results The Scandinavian regime showed the lowest prevalence rates of the two oral health measures while the Eastern showed the highest. In all welfare regimes there was a general pattern of social gradients by occupational social class and education. Relative educational inequalities in no functional dentition were largest in the Scandinavian welfare regime (RII=3.81; 95% CI 2.68 to 5.42). The Scandinavian and Southern regimes showed the largest relative inequalities in edentulousness by occupation and education, respectively. There were larger absolute inequalities in no functional dentition in the Eastern regime by occupation (SII=42.16; 95% CI 31.42 to 52.89) and in the Southern by SSS (SII=27.92; 95% CI 17.36 to 38.47). Conclusions Oral health inequalities in adults exist in all welfare-state regimes, but contrary to what may be expected from theory, they are not smaller in the Scandinavian regime. Future work should examine the potential mechanisms linking welfare provision and oral health inequalities.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0143-005X`
A03		`1`		`@0 J. epidemiol. community health : (1979)`
A05				`@2 67`
A06				`@2 9`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Socioeconomic inequalities in oral health in different European welfare state regimes`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 GUARNIZO-HERRENO (Carol C.)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 WATT (Richard G.)`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 PIKHART (Hynek)`
A11	`04`	`1`		`@1 SHEIHAM (Aubrey)`
A11	`05`	`1`		`@1 TSAKOS (Georgios)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London @2 London @3 GBR @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut. @Z 4 aut. @Z 5 aut.`
A14	`02`			`@1 Departamento de Salud Colectiva, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional de Colombia @2 Bogotá @3 COL @Z 1 aut.`
A20				`@1 728-735`
A21				`@1 2013`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 9272 @5 354000506586170050`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2013 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 65 ref.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 13-0275662`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Journal of epidemiology and community health : (1979)`
A66	`01`			`@0 GBR`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 Background There is very little information about the relationship between welfare regimes and oral health inequalities. We compared socioeconomic inequalities in adults' oral health in five European welfare-state regimes: Scandinavian, Anglo-Saxon, Bismarckian, Southern and Eastern. Methods Using data from the oral health module of the Eurobarometer 72.3 survey, we assessed inequalities in two self-reported oral health measures: no functional dentition (less than 20 natural teeth) and edentulousness (no natural teeth). Occupational social class, education and subjective social status (SSS) were included as socioeconomic position indicators. We estimated age-standardised prevalence rates, ORs, the Relative Index of Inequality (RII) and the Slope Index of Inequality (SII). Results The Scandinavian regime showed the lowest prevalence rates of the two oral health measures while the Eastern showed the highest. In all welfare regimes there was a general pattern of social gradients by occupational social class and education. Relative educational inequalities in no functional dentition were largest in the Scandinavian welfare regime (RII=3.81; 95% CI 2.68 to 5.42). The Scandinavian and Southern regimes showed the largest relative inequalities in edentulousness by occupation and education, respectively. There were larger absolute inequalities in no functional dentition in the Eastern regime by occupation (SII=42.16; 95% CI 31.42 to 52.89) and in the Southern by SSS (SII=27.92; 95% CI 17.36 to 38.47). Conclusions Oral health inequalities in adults exist in all welfare-state regimes, but contrary to what may be expected from theory, they are not smaller in the Scandinavian regime. Future work should examine the potential mechanisms linking welfare provision and oral health inequalities.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002B30A11`
C02	`02`	`X`		`@0 002B01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Pathologie dentaire @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Dental disease @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Diente patología @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Socioéconomie @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Socioeconomics @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Socioeconomía @5 02`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Aspect économique @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Economic aspect @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Aspecto económico @5 03`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Aspect social @5 05`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Social aspect @5 05`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Aspecto social @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Santé publique @5 06`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Public health @5 06`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Salud pública @5 06`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Statut socioéconomique @5 08`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Socioeconomic status @5 08`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estatuto socioeconómico @5 08`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Inégalité @5 09`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Inequality @5 09`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Desigualdad @5 09`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Cavité buccale @5 11`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Oral cavity @5 11`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cavidad bucal @5 11`
C03	`09`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Santé bucco-dentaire @5 12`
C03	`09`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Bucco-dental health @5 12`
C03	`09`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Salud bucodental @5 12`
C03	`10`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Europe @2 NG @5 17`
C03	`10`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Europe @2 NG @5 17`
C03	`10`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Europa @2 NG @5 17`
C03	`11`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Européen @5 18`
C03	`11`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 European @5 18`
C03	`11`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Europeo @5 18`
C03	`12`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Bien être économique @5 19`
C03	`12`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Welfare @5 19`
C03	`12`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Bienestar económico @5 19`
C03	`13`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Assurance maladie @5 20`
C03	`13`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Health insurance @5 20`
C03	`13`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Seguro enfermedad @5 20`
C03	`14`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Médecine @5 21`
C03	`14`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Medicine @5 21`
C03	`14`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Medicina @5 21`
C07	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Stomatologie @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Stomatology @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estomatología @5 37`
N21				`@1 259`
N44	`01`			`@1 OTO`
N82				`@1 OTO`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 13-0275662 INIST
ET :	Socioeconomic inequalities in oral health in different European welfare state regimes
AU :	GUARNIZO-HERRENO (Carol C.); WATT (Richard G.); PIKHART (Hynek); SHEIHAM (Aubrey); TSAKOS (Georgios)
AF :	Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London/London/Royaume-Uni (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut.); Departamento de Salud Colectiva, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional de Colombia/Bogotá/Colombie (1 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Journal of epidemiology and community health : (1979); ISSN 0143-005X; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2013; Vol. 67; No. 9; Pp. 728-735; Bibl. 65 ref.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	Background There is very little information about the relationship between welfare regimes and oral health inequalities. We compared socioeconomic inequalities in adults' oral health in five European welfare-state regimes: Scandinavian, Anglo-Saxon, Bismarckian, Southern and Eastern. Methods Using data from the oral health module of the Eurobarometer 72.3 survey, we assessed inequalities in two self-reported oral health measures: no functional dentition (less than 20 natural teeth) and edentulousness (no natural teeth). Occupational social class, education and subjective social status (SSS) were included as socioeconomic position indicators. We estimated age-standardised prevalence rates, ORs, the Relative Index of Inequality (RII) and the Slope Index of Inequality (SII). Results The Scandinavian regime showed the lowest prevalence rates of the two oral health measures while the Eastern showed the highest. In all welfare regimes there was a general pattern of social gradients by occupational social class and education. Relative educational inequalities in no functional dentition were largest in the Scandinavian welfare regime (RII=3.81; 95% CI 2.68 to 5.42). The Scandinavian and Southern regimes showed the largest relative inequalities in edentulousness by occupation and education, respectively. There were larger absolute inequalities in no functional dentition in the Eastern regime by occupation (SII=42.16; 95% CI 31.42 to 52.89) and in the Southern by SSS (SII=27.92; 95% CI 17.36 to 38.47). Conclusions Oral health inequalities in adults exist in all welfare-state regimes, but contrary to what may be expected from theory, they are not smaller in the Scandinavian regime. Future work should examine the potential mechanisms linking welfare provision and oral health inequalities.
CC :	002B30A11; 002B01
FD :	Pathologie dentaire; Socioéconomie; Aspect économique; Aspect social; Santé publique; Statut socioéconomique; Inégalité; Cavité buccale; Santé bucco-dentaire; Europe; Européen; Bien être économique; Assurance maladie; Médecine
FG :	Stomatologie
ED :	Dental disease; Socioeconomics; Economic aspect; Social aspect; Public health; Socioeconomic status; Inequality; Oral cavity; Bucco-dental health; Europe; European; Welfare; Health insurance; Medicine
EG :	Stomatology
SD :	Diente patología; Socioeconomía; Aspecto económico; Aspecto social; Salud pública; Estatuto socioeconómico; Desigualdad; Cavidad bucal; Salud bucodental; Europa; Europeo; Bienestar económico; Seguro enfermedad; Medicina
LO :	INIST-9272.354000506586170050
ID :	13-0275662

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:13-0275662

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Socioeconomic inequalities in oral health in different European welfare state regimes</title>
<author><name sortKey="Guarnizo Herreno, Carol C" sort="Guarnizo Herreno, Carol C" uniqKey="Guarnizo Herreno C" first="Carol C." last="Guarnizo-Herreno">Carol C. Guarnizo-Herreno</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Departamento de Salud Colectiva, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional de Colombia</s1>
<s2>Bogotá</s2>
<s3>COL</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Watt, Richard G" sort="Watt, Richard G" uniqKey="Watt R" first="Richard G." last="Watt">Richard G. Watt</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Pikhart, Hynek" sort="Pikhart, Hynek" uniqKey="Pikhart H" first="Hynek" last="Pikhart">Hynek Pikhart</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Sheiham, Aubrey" sort="Sheiham, Aubrey" uniqKey="Sheiham A" first="Aubrey" last="Sheiham">Aubrey Sheiham</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Tsakos, Georgios" sort="Tsakos, Georgios" uniqKey="Tsakos G" first="Georgios" last="Tsakos">Georgios Tsakos</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">13-0275662</idno>
<date when="2013">2013</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 13-0275662 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:13-0275662</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000015</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Socioeconomic inequalities in oral health in different European welfare state regimes</title>
<author><name sortKey="Guarnizo Herreno, Carol C" sort="Guarnizo Herreno, Carol C" uniqKey="Guarnizo Herreno C" first="Carol C." last="Guarnizo-Herreno">Carol C. Guarnizo-Herreno</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Departamento de Salud Colectiva, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional de Colombia</s1>
<s2>Bogotá</s2>
<s3>COL</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Watt, Richard G" sort="Watt, Richard G" uniqKey="Watt R" first="Richard G." last="Watt">Richard G. Watt</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Pikhart, Hynek" sort="Pikhart, Hynek" uniqKey="Pikhart H" first="Hynek" last="Pikhart">Hynek Pikhart</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Sheiham, Aubrey" sort="Sheiham, Aubrey" uniqKey="Sheiham A" first="Aubrey" last="Sheiham">Aubrey Sheiham</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Tsakos, Georgios" sort="Tsakos, Georgios" uniqKey="Tsakos G" first="Georgios" last="Tsakos">Georgios Tsakos</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of epidemiology and community health : (1979)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. epidemiol. community health : (1979)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0143-005X</idno>
<imprint><date when="2013">2013</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of epidemiology and community health : (1979)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. epidemiol. community health : (1979)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0143-005X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Bucco-dental health</term>
<term>Dental disease</term>
<term>Economic aspect</term>
<term>Europe</term>
<term>European</term>
<term>Health insurance</term>
<term>Inequality</term>
<term>Medicine</term>
<term>Oral cavity</term>
<term>Public health</term>
<term>Social aspect</term>
<term>Socioeconomic status</term>
<term>Socioeconomics</term>
<term>Welfare</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Pathologie dentaire</term>
<term>Socioéconomie</term>
<term>Aspect économique</term>
<term>Aspect social</term>
<term>Santé publique</term>
<term>Statut socioéconomique</term>
<term>Inégalité</term>
<term>Cavité buccale</term>
<term>Santé bucco-dentaire</term>
<term>Europe</term>
<term>Européen</term>
<term>Bien être économique</term>
<term>Assurance maladie</term>
<term>Médecine</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Background There is very little information about the relationship between welfare regimes and oral health inequalities. We compared socioeconomic inequalities in adults' oral health in five European welfare-state regimes: Scandinavian, Anglo-Saxon, Bismarckian, Southern and Eastern. Methods Using data from the oral health module of the Eurobarometer 72.3 survey, we assessed inequalities in two self-reported oral health measures: no functional dentition (less than 20 natural teeth) and edentulousness (no natural teeth). Occupational social class, education and subjective social status (SSS) were included as socioeconomic position indicators. We estimated age-standardised prevalence rates, ORs, the Relative Index of Inequality (RII) and the Slope Index of Inequality (SII). Results The Scandinavian regime showed the lowest prevalence rates of the two oral health measures while the Eastern showed the highest. In all welfare regimes there was a general pattern of social gradients by occupational social class and education. Relative educational inequalities in no functional dentition were largest in the Scandinavian welfare regime (RII=3.81; 95% CI 2.68 to 5.42). The Scandinavian and Southern regimes showed the largest relative inequalities in edentulousness by occupation and education, respectively. There were larger absolute inequalities in no functional dentition in the Eastern regime by occupation (SII=42.16; 95% CI 31.42 to 52.89) and in the Southern by SSS (SII=27.92; 95% CI 17.36 to 38.47). Conclusions Oral health inequalities in adults exist in all welfare-state regimes, but contrary to what may be expected from theory, they are not smaller in the Scandinavian regime. Future work should examine the potential mechanisms linking welfare provision and oral health inequalities.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0143-005X</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. epidemiol. community health : (1979)</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>67</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>9</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Socioeconomic inequalities in oral health in different European welfare state regimes</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>GUARNIZO-HERRENO (Carol C.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>WATT (Richard G.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>PIKHART (Hynek)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>SHEIHAM (Aubrey)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>TSAKOS (Georgios)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>Departamento de Salud Colectiva, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional de Colombia</s1>
<s2>Bogotá</s2>
<s3>COL</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>728-735</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2013</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>9272</s2>
<s5>354000506586170050</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2013 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>65 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>13-0275662</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of epidemiology and community health : (1979)</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>GBR</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Background There is very little information about the relationship between welfare regimes and oral health inequalities. We compared socioeconomic inequalities in adults' oral health in five European welfare-state regimes: Scandinavian, Anglo-Saxon, Bismarckian, Southern and Eastern. Methods Using data from the oral health module of the Eurobarometer 72.3 survey, we assessed inequalities in two self-reported oral health measures: no functional dentition (less than 20 natural teeth) and edentulousness (no natural teeth). Occupational social class, education and subjective social status (SSS) were included as socioeconomic position indicators. We estimated age-standardised prevalence rates, ORs, the Relative Index of Inequality (RII) and the Slope Index of Inequality (SII). Results The Scandinavian regime showed the lowest prevalence rates of the two oral health measures while the Eastern showed the highest. In all welfare regimes there was a general pattern of social gradients by occupational social class and education. Relative educational inequalities in no functional dentition were largest in the Scandinavian welfare regime (RII=3.81; 95% CI 2.68 to 5.42). The Scandinavian and Southern regimes showed the largest relative inequalities in edentulousness by occupation and education, respectively. There were larger absolute inequalities in no functional dentition in the Eastern regime by occupation (SII=42.16; 95% CI 31.42 to 52.89) and in the Southern by SSS (SII=27.92; 95% CI 17.36 to 38.47). Conclusions Oral health inequalities in adults exist in all welfare-state regimes, but contrary to what may be expected from theory, they are not smaller in the Scandinavian regime. Future work should examine the potential mechanisms linking welfare provision and oral health inequalities.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B30A11</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>002B01</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pathologie dentaire</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Dental disease</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Diente patología</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Socioéconomie</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Socioeconomics</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Socioeconomía</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Aspect économique</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Economic aspect</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Aspecto económico</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Aspect social</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Social aspect</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Aspecto social</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Santé publique</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Public health</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Salud pública</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Statut socioéconomique</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Socioeconomic status</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estatuto socioeconómico</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Inégalité</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Inequality</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Desigualdad</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cavité buccale</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Oral cavity</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cavidad bucal</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Santé bucco-dentaire</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Bucco-dental health</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Salud bucodental</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Europe</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Europe</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Europa</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Européen</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>European</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Europeo</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Bien être économique</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Welfare</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Bienestar económico</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Assurance maladie</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Health insurance</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Seguro enfermedad</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Médecine</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Medicine</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Medicina</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Stomatologie</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Stomatology</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estomatología</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>259</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 13-0275662 INIST</NO>
<ET>Socioeconomic inequalities in oral health in different European welfare state regimes</ET>
<AU>GUARNIZO-HERRENO (Carol C.); WATT (Richard G.); PIKHART (Hynek); SHEIHAM (Aubrey); TSAKOS (Georgios)</AU>
<AF>Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London/London/Royaume-Uni (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut.); Departamento de Salud Colectiva, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional de Colombia/Bogotá/Colombie (1 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of epidemiology and community health : (1979); ISSN 0143-005X; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2013; Vol. 67; No. 9; Pp. 728-735; Bibl. 65 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Background There is very little information about the relationship between welfare regimes and oral health inequalities. We compared socioeconomic inequalities in adults' oral health in five European welfare-state regimes: Scandinavian, Anglo-Saxon, Bismarckian, Southern and Eastern. Methods Using data from the oral health module of the Eurobarometer 72.3 survey, we assessed inequalities in two self-reported oral health measures: no functional dentition (less than 20 natural teeth) and edentulousness (no natural teeth). Occupational social class, education and subjective social status (SSS) were included as socioeconomic position indicators. We estimated age-standardised prevalence rates, ORs, the Relative Index of Inequality (RII) and the Slope Index of Inequality (SII). Results The Scandinavian regime showed the lowest prevalence rates of the two oral health measures while the Eastern showed the highest. In all welfare regimes there was a general pattern of social gradients by occupational social class and education. Relative educational inequalities in no functional dentition were largest in the Scandinavian welfare regime (RII=3.81; 95% CI 2.68 to 5.42). The Scandinavian and Southern regimes showed the largest relative inequalities in edentulousness by occupation and education, respectively. There were larger absolute inequalities in no functional dentition in the Eastern regime by occupation (SII=42.16; 95% CI 31.42 to 52.89) and in the Southern by SSS (SII=27.92; 95% CI 17.36 to 38.47). Conclusions Oral health inequalities in adults exist in all welfare-state regimes, but contrary to what may be expected from theory, they are not smaller in the Scandinavian regime. Future work should examine the potential mechanisms linking welfare provision and oral health inequalities.</EA>
<CC>002B30A11; 002B01</CC>
<FD>Pathologie dentaire; Socioéconomie; Aspect économique; Aspect social; Santé publique; Statut socioéconomique; Inégalité; Cavité buccale; Santé bucco-dentaire; Europe; Européen; Bien être économique; Assurance maladie; Médecine</FD>
<FG>Stomatologie</FG>
<ED>Dental disease; Socioeconomics; Economic aspect; Social aspect; Public health; Socioeconomic status; Inequality; Oral cavity; Bucco-dental health; Europe; European; Welfare; Health insurance; Medicine</ED>
<EG>Stomatology</EG>
<SD>Diente patología; Socioeconomía; Aspecto económico; Aspecto social; Salud pública; Estatuto socioeconómico; Desigualdad; Cavidad bucal; Salud bucodental; Europa; Europeo; Bienestar económico; Seguro enfermedad; Medicina</SD>
<LO>INIST-9272.354000506586170050</LO>
<ID>13-0275662</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000015 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000015 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:13-0275662
   |texte=   Socioeconomic inequalities in oral health in different European welfare state regimes
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022

	Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Socioeconomic inequalities in oral health in different European welfare state regimes

Socioeconomic inequalities in oral health in different European welfare state regimes

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri