Resonance frequency analysis of dental implants placed at the posterior maxilla varying the surface treatment only: A randomized clinical trial
Identifieur interne : 007048 ( Ncbi/Merge ); précédent : 007047; suivant : 007049Resonance frequency analysis of dental implants placed at the posterior maxilla varying the surface treatment only: A randomized clinical trial
Auteurs : Marcelo M. Novellino ; Newton Sesma ; Piero R. Zanardi ; Dalva C. LaganáSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2017.
Abstract
Chemical modifications of the dental implant surface that improve the wettability result in a faster and better osseointegration.
The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the implant stability quotient (ISQ) of implants with similar designs, treated with 2 surfaces, sandblasted acid‐etched (SAE) and hydrophilic SAE, within the initial 16 weeks of healing.
A total of 64 implants (32 SAE—control group and 32 modified SAE—test group) with the same design, length, and diameter (conical and compressive, 4.3 × 10 mm) were inserted into the posterior maxillae of 21 patients partially edentulous. The ISQ values were collected at post‐surgery (T0), 1 week (T1), 2 weeks (T2), 3 weeks (T3), 5 weeks (T4), 8 weeks (T5), 12 weeks (T6), and 16 weeks (T7).
None of the implants failed. Test group presented ISQ values higher than the control group (ANOVA—
The current study suggests that implants with hydrophilic surface (modified SAE) integrate faster than implants with SAE surface. The stability gain of the test group was 2.24 times faster than the control group after 5 weeks of evaluation at the posterior region of the edentulous maxillae.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/cid.12510
PubMed: 28631408
PubMed Central: 5655931
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Pmc, to step Corpus: 002B03
- to stream Pmc, to step Curation: 002B03
- to stream Pmc, to step Checkpoint: 000076
Links to Exploration step
PMC:5655931Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Resonance frequency analysis of dental implants placed at the posterior maxilla varying the surface treatment only: A randomized clinical trial</title><author><name sortKey="Novellino, Marcelo M" sort="Novellino, Marcelo M" uniqKey="Novellino M" first="Marcelo M." last="Novellino">Marcelo M. Novellino</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="cid12510-aff-0001"></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sesma, Newton" sort="Sesma, Newton" uniqKey="Sesma N" first="Newton" last="Sesma">Newton Sesma</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="cid12510-aff-0001"></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Zanardi, Piero R" sort="Zanardi, Piero R" uniqKey="Zanardi P" first="Piero R." last="Zanardi">Piero R. Zanardi</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="cid12510-aff-0001"></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lagana, Dalva C" sort="Lagana, Dalva C" uniqKey="Lagana D" first="Dalva C." last="Laganá">Dalva C. Laganá</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="cid12510-aff-0001"></nlm:aff></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">28631408</idno><idno type="pmc">5655931</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5655931</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:5655931</idno><idno type="doi">10.1111/cid.12510</idno><date when="2017">2017</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">002B03</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">002B03</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">002B03</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Curation">002B03</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">000076</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000076</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">007048</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Resonance frequency analysis of dental implants placed at the posterior maxilla varying the surface treatment only: A randomized clinical trial</title><author><name sortKey="Novellino, Marcelo M" sort="Novellino, Marcelo M" uniqKey="Novellino M" first="Marcelo M." last="Novellino">Marcelo M. Novellino</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="cid12510-aff-0001"></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sesma, Newton" sort="Sesma, Newton" uniqKey="Sesma N" first="Newton" last="Sesma">Newton Sesma</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="cid12510-aff-0001"></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Zanardi, Piero R" sort="Zanardi, Piero R" uniqKey="Zanardi P" first="Piero R." last="Zanardi">Piero R. Zanardi</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="cid12510-aff-0001"></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lagana, Dalva C" sort="Lagana, Dalva C" uniqKey="Lagana D" first="Dalva C." last="Laganá">Dalva C. Laganá</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="cid12510-aff-0001"></nlm:aff></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><date when="2017">2017</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><title>Abstract</title><sec id="cid12510-sec-0001"><title>Background</title><p>Chemical modifications of the dental implant surface that improve the wettability result in a faster and better osseointegration.</p></sec><sec id="cid12510-sec-0002"><title>Purpose</title><p>The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the implant stability quotient (ISQ) of implants with similar designs, treated with 2 surfaces, sandblasted acid‐etched (SAE) and hydrophilic SAE, within the initial 16 weeks of healing.</p></sec><sec id="cid12510-sec-0003"><title>Material and methods</title><p>A total of 64 implants (32 SAE—control group and 32 modified SAE—test group) with the same design, length, and diameter (conical and compressive, 4.3 × 10 mm) were inserted into the posterior maxillae of 21 patients partially edentulous. The ISQ values were collected at post‐surgery (T0), 1 week (T1), 2 weeks (T2), 3 weeks (T3), 5 weeks (T4), 8 weeks (T5), 12 weeks (T6), and 16 weeks (T7).</p></sec><sec id="cid12510-sec-0004"><title>Results</title><p>None of the implants failed. Test group presented ISQ values higher than the control group (ANOVA—<italic>P</italic> < .01) from T5 to T7. When comparing groups regarding the amount of time required to achieve ISQ ≥ 70 as a reference, there was a statistically significant difference (cox regression—<italic>P</italic> < .01), and a hazard ratio of 2.24 (CI 1.62‐3.11). At the 1‐year follow‐up, there was a drop out of 1 patient, and 2 implants were no longer evaluated. Survival rate for both groups was 100% at the 1‐year follow‐up.</p></sec><sec id="cid12510-sec-0005"><title>Conclusions</title><p>The current study suggests that implants with hydrophilic surface (modified SAE) integrate faster than implants with SAE surface. The stability gain of the test group was 2.24 times faster than the control group after 5 weeks of evaluation at the posterior region of the edentulous maxillae.</p></sec></div></front><back><div1 type="bibliography"><listBibl><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Branemark, P" uniqKey="Branemark P">P‐I Branemark</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct></listBibl></div1></back></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-dir>properties open_access</pmc-dir>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Clin Implant Dent Relat Res</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Clin Implant Dent Relat Res</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="doi">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">CID</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1523-0899</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1708-8208</issn><publisher><publisher-name>John Wiley and Sons Inc.</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Hoboken</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">28631408</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">5655931</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/cid.12510</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">CID12510</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="overline"><subject>Original Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Resonance frequency analysis of dental implants placed at the posterior maxilla varying the surface treatment only: A randomized clinical trial</article-title><alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">NOVELLINO et al.</alt-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib id="cid12510-cr-0001" contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Novellino</surname><given-names>Marcelo M.</given-names></name><degrees>DDS, MSc, PhD</degrees><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9850-5784</contrib-id><address><email>mmnovellino@gmail.com</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="cid12510-aff-0001"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib id="cid12510-cr-0002" contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Sesma</surname><given-names>Newton</given-names></name><degrees>DDS, MSD, PhD</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="cid12510-aff-0001"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib id="cid12510-cr-0003" contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Zanardi</surname><given-names>Piero R.</given-names></name><degrees>DDS, MSc, PhD</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="cid12510-aff-0001"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib id="cid12510-cr-0004" contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Laganá</surname><given-names>Dalva C.</given-names></name><degrees>DDS, MSD, PhD</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="cid12510-aff-0001"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="cid12510-aff-0001"><label><sup>1</sup></label><named-content content-type="organisation-division">Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry</named-content><institution>University of São Paulo</institution><named-content content-type="city">São Paulo</named-content><country country="BR">Brazil</country></aff><author-notes><corresp id="correspondenceTo"><label>*</label><bold>Correspondence</bold> Marcelo Michele Novellino, Departamento de Prótese, Universidade de São Paulo, Prof. Lineu Prestes avenue 2227, São Paulo 05508‐000, Brazil. Email: <email>mmnovellino@gmail.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>6</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>10</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>19</volume><issue>5</issue><issue-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/cid.2017.19.issue-5</issue-id><fpage>770</fpage><lpage>775</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>08</day><month>2</month><year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>22</day><month>5</month><year>2017</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>24</day><month>5</month><year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><pmc-comment> © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. </pmc-comment>
<copyright-statement content-type="article-copyright">© 2017 The Authors Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright-statement><license license-type="creativeCommonsBy"><license-p>This is an open access article under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution</ext-link> License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="file:CID-19-770.pdf"></self-uri><abstract><title>Abstract</title><sec id="cid12510-sec-0001"><title>Background</title><p>Chemical modifications of the dental implant surface that improve the wettability result in a faster and better osseointegration.</p></sec><sec id="cid12510-sec-0002"><title>Purpose</title><p>The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the implant stability quotient (ISQ) of implants with similar designs, treated with 2 surfaces, sandblasted acid‐etched (SAE) and hydrophilic SAE, within the initial 16 weeks of healing.</p></sec><sec id="cid12510-sec-0003"><title>Material and methods</title><p>A total of 64 implants (32 SAE—control group and 32 modified SAE—test group) with the same design, length, and diameter (conical and compressive, 4.3 × 10 mm) were inserted into the posterior maxillae of 21 patients partially edentulous. The ISQ values were collected at post‐surgery (T0), 1 week (T1), 2 weeks (T2), 3 weeks (T3), 5 weeks (T4), 8 weeks (T5), 12 weeks (T6), and 16 weeks (T7).</p></sec><sec id="cid12510-sec-0004"><title>Results</title><p>None of the implants failed. Test group presented ISQ values higher than the control group (ANOVA—<italic>P</italic> < .01) from T5 to T7. When comparing groups regarding the amount of time required to achieve ISQ ≥ 70 as a reference, there was a statistically significant difference (cox regression—<italic>P</italic> < .01), and a hazard ratio of 2.24 (CI 1.62‐3.11). At the 1‐year follow‐up, there was a drop out of 1 patient, and 2 implants were no longer evaluated. Survival rate for both groups was 100% at the 1‐year follow‐up.</p></sec><sec id="cid12510-sec-0005"><title>Conclusions</title><p>The current study suggests that implants with hydrophilic surface (modified SAE) integrate faster than implants with SAE surface. The stability gain of the test group was 2.24 times faster than the control group after 5 weeks of evaluation at the posterior region of the edentulous maxillae.</p></sec></abstract><kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated"><kwd id="cid12510-kwd-0001">clinical research</kwd><kwd id="cid12510-kwd-0002">implant stability</kwd><kwd id="cid12510-kwd-0003">implant surface</kwd><kwd id="cid12510-kwd-0004">randomized controlled trial</kwd><kwd id="cid12510-kwd-0005">surface properties</kwd></kwd-group><counts><fig-count count="3"></fig-count><table-count count="0"></table-count><page-count count="6"></page-count><word-count count="4724"></word-count></counts><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>source-schema-version-number</meta-name><meta-value>2.0</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>component-id</meta-name><meta-value>cid12510</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>cover-date</meta-name><meta-value>October 2017</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>details-of-publishers-convertor</meta-name><meta-value>Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.2.1 mode:remove_FC converted:25.10.2017</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta><notes><p content-type="self-citation"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" id="cid12510-cit-0001"><string-name><surname>Novellino</surname><given-names>MM</given-names></string-name>,
<string-name><surname>Sesma</surname><given-names>N</given-names></string-name>,
<string-name><surname>Zanardi</surname><given-names>PR</given-names></string-name>,
<string-name><surname>Laganá</surname><given-names>DC</given-names></string-name>. <article-title>Resonance frequency analysis of dental implants placed at the posterior maxilla varying the surface treatment only: A randomized clinical trial</article-title>. <source>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res</source>. <year>2017</year>;<volume>19</volume>:<fpage>770</fpage>–<lpage>775</lpage>. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12510">https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12510</ext-link><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28631408</pub-id></mixed-citation></p><fn-group><fn id="cid12510-note-7536"><p>The copyright line in this article was changed on 13 July 2017 after online publication.</p></fn></fn-group></notes></front></pmc><affiliations><list></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Lagana, Dalva C" sort="Lagana, Dalva C" uniqKey="Lagana D" first="Dalva C." last="Laganá">Dalva C. Laganá</name><name sortKey="Novellino, Marcelo M" sort="Novellino, Marcelo M" uniqKey="Novellino M" first="Marcelo M." last="Novellino">Marcelo M. Novellino</name><name sortKey="Sesma, Newton" sort="Sesma, Newton" uniqKey="Sesma N" first="Newton" last="Sesma">Newton Sesma</name><name sortKey="Zanardi, Piero R" sort="Zanardi, Piero R" uniqKey="Zanardi P" first="Piero R." last="Zanardi">Piero R. Zanardi</name></noCountry></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Ncbi/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007048 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 007048 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Ncbi
|étape= Merge
|type= RBID
|clé= PMC:5655931
|texte= Resonance frequency analysis of dental implants placed at the posterior maxilla varying the surface treatment only: A randomized clinical trial
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:28631408" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |