[Endosteal stimulation in implantology. Study and results after 2 years].
Identifieur interne : 005F16 ( Ncbi/Merge ); précédent : 005F15; suivant : 005F17[Endosteal stimulation in implantology. Study and results after 2 years].
Auteurs : M. Bert ; J. Itic ; R. SerfatySource :
- Les Cahiers de prothese [ 0397-1643 ] ; 1989.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
- physiologie : Processus alvéolaire.
- rééducation et réadaptation : Mâchoire édentée.
- Humains, Maxillaire, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Régénération osseuse.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- blood supply : Maxilla.
- physiology : Alveolar Process.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous.
- Bone Regeneration, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Humans.
Abstract
Analysis of implant failure in the maxilla has showed that these failures were predominant on bone that had remained toothless for a period exceeding 2 years. Histological and osseostructural studies demonstrate that the loss of maxillary teeth has an essential effect on its vascularisation, more than on the bone loss; this vascularisation is absolutely necessary in order to obtain an adequate and lasting osseointegration. When, after surgical preparation of the receiver bony site, no bleeding is noted, insertion of the implant is postponed. Six weeks later, the new socket is curetted and the scar tissue removed; this showed that, systematically, the vascularisation was markedly increased. Results at 2 years of this "endostal stimulation", applied to Brånemark and I.M.Z. implants, are: 95.5% success in the maxilla, compared to 83% with osseointegration during the same period. This technique may be applied in the posterior mandibular area, when there is a marked resorption and the short implant is only inserted in cortical bone, minimally vascularized, because of the presence of the mandibular canal; the results of this latter technique are actually poor.
PubMed: 2636022
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: 004D51
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: 004D51
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: 004D51
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:2636022Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">[Endosteal stimulation in implantology. Study and results after 2 years].</title><author><name sortKey="Bert, M" sort="Bert, M" uniqKey="Bert M" first="M" last="Bert">M. Bert</name></author><author><name sortKey="Itic, J" sort="Itic, J" uniqKey="Itic J" first="J" last="Itic">J. Itic</name></author><author><name sortKey="Serfaty, R" sort="Serfaty, R" uniqKey="Serfaty R" first="R" last="Serfaty">R. Serfaty</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="1989">1989</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:2636022</idno><idno type="pmid">2636022</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">004D51</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">004D51</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">004D51</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">004D51</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">004D51</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">004D51</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">005F16</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">[Endosteal stimulation in implantology. Study and results after 2 years].</title><author><name sortKey="Bert, M" sort="Bert, M" uniqKey="Bert M" first="M" last="Bert">M. Bert</name></author><author><name sortKey="Itic, J" sort="Itic, J" uniqKey="Itic J" first="J" last="Itic">J. Itic</name></author><author><name sortKey="Serfaty, R" sort="Serfaty, R" uniqKey="Serfaty R" first="R" last="Serfaty">R. Serfaty</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Les Cahiers de prothese</title><idno type="ISSN">0397-1643</idno><imprint><date when="1989" type="published">1989</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Process (physiology)</term><term>Bone Regeneration</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Maxilla (blood supply)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Humains</term><term>Maxillaire ()</term><term>Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Processus alvéolaire (physiologie)</term><term>Régénération osseuse</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="blood supply" xml:lang="en"><term>Maxilla</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Processus alvéolaire</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Process</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone Regeneration</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Humans</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Humains</term><term>Maxillaire</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Régénération osseuse</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Analysis of implant failure in the maxilla has showed that these failures were predominant on bone that had remained toothless for a period exceeding 2 years. Histological and osseostructural studies demonstrate that the loss of maxillary teeth has an essential effect on its vascularisation, more than on the bone loss; this vascularisation is absolutely necessary in order to obtain an adequate and lasting osseointegration. When, after surgical preparation of the receiver bony site, no bleeding is noted, insertion of the implant is postponed. Six weeks later, the new socket is curetted and the scar tissue removed; this showed that, systematically, the vascularisation was markedly increased. Results at 2 years of this "endostal stimulation", applied to Brånemark and I.M.Z. implants, are: 95.5% success in the maxilla, compared to 83% with osseointegration during the same period. This technique may be applied in the posterior mandibular area, when there is a marked resorption and the short implant is only inserted in cortical bone, minimally vascularized, because of the presence of the mandibular canal; the results of this latter technique are actually poor.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">2636022</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>1990</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>28</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2006</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>15</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0397-1643</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Issue>65</Issue><PubDate><Year>1989</Year><Month>Mar</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Les Cahiers de prothese</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Cah Prothese</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>[Endosteal stimulation in implantology. Study and results after 2 years].</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>22-31</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>Analysis of implant failure in the maxilla has showed that these failures were predominant on bone that had remained toothless for a period exceeding 2 years. Histological and osseostructural studies demonstrate that the loss of maxillary teeth has an essential effect on its vascularisation, more than on the bone loss; this vascularisation is absolutely necessary in order to obtain an adequate and lasting osseointegration. When, after surgical preparation of the receiver bony site, no bleeding is noted, insertion of the implant is postponed. Six weeks later, the new socket is curetted and the scar tissue removed; this showed that, systematically, the vascularisation was markedly increased. Results at 2 years of this "endostal stimulation", applied to Brånemark and I.M.Z. implants, are: 95.5% success in the maxilla, compared to 83% with osseointegration during the same period. This technique may be applied in the posterior mandibular area, when there is a marked resorption and the short implant is only inserted in cortical bone, minimally vascularized, because of the presence of the mandibular canal; the results of this latter technique are actually poor.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bert</LastName><ForeName>M</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Itic</LastName><ForeName>J</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Serfaty</LastName><ForeName>R</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>fre</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D004740">English Abstract</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><VernacularTitle>La stimulation endostée en implantologie. Etude et résultats après 2 ans.</VernacularTitle></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>France</Country><MedlineTA>Cah Prothese</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>7613319</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0397-1643</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000539" MajorTopicYN="N">Alveolar Process</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001861" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Regeneration</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008437" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxilla</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000098" MajorTopicYN="Y">blood supply</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>1989</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>1</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>1989</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>1989</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">2636022</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Bert, M" sort="Bert, M" uniqKey="Bert M" first="M" last="Bert">M. Bert</name><name sortKey="Itic, J" sort="Itic, J" uniqKey="Itic J" first="J" last="Itic">J. Itic</name><name sortKey="Serfaty, R" sort="Serfaty, R" uniqKey="Serfaty R" first="R" last="Serfaty">R. Serfaty</name></noCountry></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Ncbi/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005F16 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 005F16 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Ncbi
|étape= Merge
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:2636022
|texte= [Endosteal stimulation in implantology. Study and results after 2 years].
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:2636022" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |