A comparative in vitro study on the retention and stability of implant-supported overdentures.
Identifieur interne : 002731 ( Ncbi/Merge ); précédent : 002730; suivant : 002732A comparative in vitro study on the retention and stability of implant-supported overdentures.
Auteurs : Walid Sadig [Arabie saoudite]Source :
- Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985) [ 1936-7163 ] ; 2009.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Analyse du stress dentaire, Attachement de précision, Bases d'appareil de prothèse dentaire, Conception de prothèse dentaire, Crochets dentaires, Humains, Magnétisme (instrumentation), Mandibule, Modèles dentaires, Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation), Overdenture, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire (instrumentation).
- MESH :
- rééducation et réadaptation : Mâchoire édentée.
- instrumentation : Analyse du stress dentaire, Attachement de précision, Bases d'appareil de prothèse dentaire, Conception de prothèse dentaire, Crochets dentaires, Humains, Magnétisme, Mandibule, Modèles dentaires, Overdenture, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Dental Clasps, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Models, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Stress Analysis, Denture Bases, Denture Precision Attachment, Denture Retention (instrumentation), Denture, Overlay, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Magnetics (instrumentation), Mandible.
- MESH :
- instrumentation : Denture Retention, Magnetics.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous.
- Dental Clasps, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Models, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Stress Analysis, Denture Bases, Denture Precision Attachment, Denture, Overlay, Humans, Mandible.
Abstract
Implant-supported overdentures have become the treatment of choice in restoring complete edentulism, but the number of implants required and type of connectors to assure retention and stability are still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of connector type and implant number and location on the retention and stability of implant-supported overdentures by measuring retentive forces during vertical and 2 types of rotational dislodgment.
PubMed: 19417876
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: 001D68
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: 001D68
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: 001D68
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:19417876Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A comparative in vitro study on the retention and stability of implant-supported overdentures.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Sadig, Walid" sort="Sadig, Walid" uniqKey="Sadig W" first="Walid" last="Sadig">Walid Sadig</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. walidsadig@yahoo.com</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Arabie saoudite</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Riyadh</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2009">2009</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:19417876</idno>
<idno type="pmid">19417876</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001D68</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001D68</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">001D68</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">001D68</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">001D68</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">001D68</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">002731</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">A comparative in vitro study on the retention and stability of implant-supported overdentures.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Sadig, Walid" sort="Sadig, Walid" uniqKey="Sadig W" first="Walid" last="Sadig">Walid Sadig</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. walidsadig@yahoo.com</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Arabie saoudite</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Riyadh</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985)</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1936-7163</idno>
<imprint><date when="2009" type="published">2009</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Clasps</term>
<term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term>
<term>Dental Models</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term>
<term>Dental Stress Analysis</term>
<term>Denture Bases</term>
<term>Denture Precision Attachment</term>
<term>Denture Retention (instrumentation)</term>
<term>Denture, Overlay</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term>
<term>Magnetics (instrumentation)</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Analyse du stress dentaire</term>
<term>Attachement de précision</term>
<term>Bases d'appareil de prothèse dentaire</term>
<term>Conception de prothèse dentaire</term>
<term>Crochets dentaires</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Magnétisme (instrumentation)</term>
<term>Mandibule</term>
<term>Modèles dentaires</term>
<term>Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term>
<term>Overdenture</term>
<term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term>
<term>Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire (instrumentation)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Denture Retention</term>
<term>Magnetics</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire édentée</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Clasps</term>
<term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term>
<term>Dental Models</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term>
<term>Dental Stress Analysis</term>
<term>Denture Bases</term>
<term>Denture Precision Attachment</term>
<term>Denture, Overlay</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Analyse du stress dentaire</term>
<term>Attachement de précision</term>
<term>Bases d'appareil de prothèse dentaire</term>
<term>Conception de prothèse dentaire</term>
<term>Crochets dentaires</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Magnétisme</term>
<term>Mandibule</term>
<term>Modèles dentaires</term>
<term>Overdenture</term>
<term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term>
<term>Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Implant-supported overdentures have become the treatment of choice in restoring complete edentulism, but the number of implants required and type of connectors to assure retention and stability are still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of connector type and implant number and location on the retention and stability of implant-supported overdentures by measuring retentive forces during vertical and 2 types of rotational dislodgment.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">19417876</PMID>
<DateCompleted><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>07</Month>
<Day>07</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>05</Month>
<Day>06</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1936-7163</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>40</Volume>
<Issue>4</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>Apr</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985)</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Quintessence Int</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>A comparative in vitro study on the retention and stability of implant-supported overdentures.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>313-9</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<Abstract><AbstractText Label="OBJECTIVES" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">Implant-supported overdentures have become the treatment of choice in restoring complete edentulism, but the number of implants required and type of connectors to assure retention and stability are still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of connector type and implant number and location on the retention and stability of implant-supported overdentures by measuring retentive forces during vertical and 2 types of rotational dislodgment.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="METHOD AND MATERIALS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Two model designs were selected based on the number and location of the inserted implants: In a first setup, 2 implants were placed in the canine regions; in a second setup, 2 implants were placed in the canine regions and 2 in the premolar regions. Three types of connector were used in each model: magnets, balls, and locators; 10 resin bases were fabricated and 3 hooks fixed at tripodal locations for chain testing. Vertical dislodging forces and 2 aspects (oblique and posterior rotational dislodging forces) of stability were tested.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">Two-way analysis of variance showed significant differences in retention among the 3 connectors in the 2 models, with the lowest values obtained with the magnet group (mean [SD]: 2.15 N [0.09]) and highest values with the locator group (31.30 N [0.12]). Posterior rotational dislodging forces showed higher values than vertical or lateral forces in both models; 4-implant models required higher dislodging forces than did 2-implant models.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Locator connectors provide significantly higher retention and stability of implant-supported overdentures, followed by ball connectors and then magnets. The 2-implant design offers less retention and stability than the 4-implant model. Number of implants and type of connector significantly affected retention and stability of implant-supported overdentures.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sadig</LastName>
<ForeName>Walid</ForeName>
<Initials>W</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. walidsadig@yahoo.com</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Germany</Country>
<MedlineTA>Quintessence Int</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>0342677</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0033-6572</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016734" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Clasps</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003765" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Models</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017267" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003799" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Stress Analysis</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003819" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture Bases</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003834" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture Precision Attachment</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003781" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture Retention</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="Y">instrumentation</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003828" MajorTopicYN="Y">Denture, Overlay</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008280" MajorTopicYN="N">Magnetics</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="N">instrumentation</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>5</Month>
<Day>7</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>5</Month>
<Day>7</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>7</Month>
<Day>8</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19417876</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">14789</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
<affiliations><list><country><li>Arabie saoudite</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree><country name="Arabie saoudite"><noRegion><name sortKey="Sadig, Walid" sort="Sadig, Walid" uniqKey="Sadig W" first="Walid" last="Sadig">Walid Sadig</name>
</noRegion>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Ncbi/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002731 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 002731 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Ncbi |étape= Merge |type= RBID |clé= pubmed:19417876 |texte= A comparative in vitro study on the retention and stability of implant-supported overdentures. }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:19417876" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. | ![]() |