Bone strains around apically free versus grafted implants in the posterior maxilla of human cadavers.
Identifieur interne : 001C06 ( Ncbi/Merge ); précédent : 001C05; suivant : 001C07Bone strains around apically free versus grafted implants in the posterior maxilla of human cadavers.
Auteurs : Murat Cavit Cehreli [Turquie] ; Murat Akkocaoglu ; Ayhan Comert ; Ibrahim Tekdemir ; Kivanc AkcaSource :
- Medical & biological engineering & computing [ 0140-0118 ] ; 2007.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- methods : Dental Stress Analysis.
- physiology : Maxilla.
- physiopathology : Jaw, Edentulous, Partially.
- Biomechanical Phenomena, Cadaver, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Stress, Mechanical.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to compare the bone strains of apically free versus grafted implants in the posterior maxilla. The experiments were undertaken in four edentulous maxillary posterior regions of fresh human cadavers, having a minimum bone height of 8 mm. In each bone fragment, two Ø 4.1 mm x 12 mm Straumann implants were placed, and insertion torque values (ITV) and implant stability quotients (ISQ) of the implants were quantified to determine implant anchorage. Two splinted crowns were fabricated for each experimental model. Strain gauges were bonded on the buccal and sinus floor cortical bones around apically free and grafted implants. Microstrains were recorded by a data acquisition system and corresponding software at a sample rate of 10 KHz under central and buccally oriented lateral-axial static loads of 100 and 150 N in separate cases. The data were compared by independent T test at a significance level set at P<0.05. Bone tissue strains on the buccal cortical areas adjacent to apically free implants were higher than those of apically grafted implants (P<0.05). The differences ranged between 10 and 48 mu epsilon under central and lateral axial loads of 100 and 150 N. The shift in load application from central to buccally oriented lateral axial mode increased strains between 60 and 201 mu epsilon on buccal cortical bone around apically free and grafted implants (P<0.05). Bone strains around anterior implants were higher than those of posterior implants. Microstrains in the sinus floor cortical bone in apically grafted models were slightly higher than apically free models. Bone tissue strains on the buccal cortical areas adjacent to apicallyfree implants are higher than those of apically grafted implants. Sinus lifting, resulting in an enhanced apical support, slightly increases strains at the sinus floor region, but leads to a decrease in bone strains around the collar of supporting implants.
DOI: 10.1007/s11517-007-0173-2
PubMed: 17340154
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: 002524
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: 002524
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: 002524
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:17340154Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Bone strains around apically free versus grafted implants in the posterior maxilla of human cadavers.</title><author><name sortKey="Cehreli, Murat Cavit" sort="Cehreli, Murat Cavit" uniqKey="Cehreli M" first="Murat Cavit" last="Cehreli">Murat Cavit Cehreli</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Prosthodontist, CosmORAL Oral and Dental Health Polyclinics, Cinnah 7/5, 06680, Kavaklidere, Ankara, Turkey. mcehreli@hotmail.com</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Turquie</country><wicri:regionArea>Prosthodontist, CosmORAL Oral and Dental Health Polyclinics, Cinnah 7/5, 06680, Kavaklidere, Ankara</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Ankara</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Akkocaoglu, Murat" sort="Akkocaoglu, Murat" uniqKey="Akkocaoglu M" first="Murat" last="Akkocaoglu">Murat Akkocaoglu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Comert, Ayhan" sort="Comert, Ayhan" uniqKey="Comert A" first="Ayhan" last="Comert">Ayhan Comert</name></author><author><name sortKey="Tekdemir, Ibrahim" sort="Tekdemir, Ibrahim" uniqKey="Tekdemir I" first="Ibrahim" last="Tekdemir">Ibrahim Tekdemir</name></author><author><name sortKey="Akca, Kivanc" sort="Akca, Kivanc" uniqKey="Akca K" first="Kivanc" last="Akca">Kivanc Akca</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2007">2007</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:17340154</idno><idno type="pmid">17340154</idno><idno type="doi">10.1007/s11517-007-0173-2</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">002524</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002524</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">002524</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">002524</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">002524</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">002524</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">001C06</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Bone strains around apically free versus grafted implants in the posterior maxilla of human cadavers.</title><author><name sortKey="Cehreli, Murat Cavit" sort="Cehreli, Murat Cavit" uniqKey="Cehreli M" first="Murat Cavit" last="Cehreli">Murat Cavit Cehreli</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Prosthodontist, CosmORAL Oral and Dental Health Polyclinics, Cinnah 7/5, 06680, Kavaklidere, Ankara, Turkey. mcehreli@hotmail.com</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Turquie</country><wicri:regionArea>Prosthodontist, CosmORAL Oral and Dental Health Polyclinics, Cinnah 7/5, 06680, Kavaklidere, Ankara</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Ankara</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Akkocaoglu, Murat" sort="Akkocaoglu, Murat" uniqKey="Akkocaoglu M" first="Murat" last="Akkocaoglu">Murat Akkocaoglu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Comert, Ayhan" sort="Comert, Ayhan" uniqKey="Comert A" first="Ayhan" last="Comert">Ayhan Comert</name></author><author><name sortKey="Tekdemir, Ibrahim" sort="Tekdemir, Ibrahim" uniqKey="Tekdemir I" first="Ibrahim" last="Tekdemir">Ibrahim Tekdemir</name></author><author><name sortKey="Akca, Kivanc" sort="Akca, Kivanc" uniqKey="Akca K" first="Kivanc" last="Akca">Kivanc Akca</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Medical & biological engineering & computing</title><idno type="ISSN">0140-0118</idno><imprint><date when="2007" type="published">2007</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Biomechanical Phenomena</term><term>Cadaver</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Stress Analysis (methods)</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (physiopathology)</term><term>Male</term><term>Maxilla (physiology)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Stress, Mechanical</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Analyse du stress dentaire ()</term><term>Cadavre</term><term>Conception de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Contrainte mécanique</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Maxillaire (physiologie)</term><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée (physiopathologie)</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Phénomènes biomécaniques</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Stress Analysis</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Maxillaire</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Maxilla</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiopathologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiopathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Biomechanical Phenomena</term><term>Cadaver</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Stress, Mechanical</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Analyse du stress dentaire</term><term>Cadavre</term><term>Conception de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Contrainte mécanique</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Phénomènes biomécaniques</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The objective of this study was to compare the bone strains of apically free versus grafted implants in the posterior maxilla. The experiments were undertaken in four edentulous maxillary posterior regions of fresh human cadavers, having a minimum bone height of 8 mm. In each bone fragment, two Ø 4.1 mm x 12 mm Straumann implants were placed, and insertion torque values (ITV) and implant stability quotients (ISQ) of the implants were quantified to determine implant anchorage. Two splinted crowns were fabricated for each experimental model. Strain gauges were bonded on the buccal and sinus floor cortical bones around apically free and grafted implants. Microstrains were recorded by a data acquisition system and corresponding software at a sample rate of 10 KHz under central and buccally oriented lateral-axial static loads of 100 and 150 N in separate cases. The data were compared by independent T test at a significance level set at P<0.05. Bone tissue strains on the buccal cortical areas adjacent to apically free implants were higher than those of apically grafted implants (P<0.05). The differences ranged between 10 and 48 mu epsilon under central and lateral axial loads of 100 and 150 N. The shift in load application from central to buccally oriented lateral axial mode increased strains between 60 and 201 mu epsilon on buccal cortical bone around apically free and grafted implants (P<0.05). Bone strains around anterior implants were higher than those of posterior implants. Microstrains in the sinus floor cortical bone in apically grafted models were slightly higher than apically free models. Bone tissue strains on the buccal cortical areas adjacent to apicallyfree implants are higher than those of apically grafted implants. Sinus lifting, resulting in an enhanced apical support, slightly increases strains at the sinus floor region, but leads to a decrease in bone strains around the collar of supporting implants.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">17340154</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2007</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>23</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2017</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>04</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0140-0118</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>45</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>2007</Year><Month>Apr</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Medical & biological engineering & computing</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Med Biol Eng Comput</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Bone strains around apically free versus grafted implants in the posterior maxilla of human cadavers.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>395-402</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>The objective of this study was to compare the bone strains of apically free versus grafted implants in the posterior maxilla. The experiments were undertaken in four edentulous maxillary posterior regions of fresh human cadavers, having a minimum bone height of 8 mm. In each bone fragment, two Ø 4.1 mm x 12 mm Straumann implants were placed, and insertion torque values (ITV) and implant stability quotients (ISQ) of the implants were quantified to determine implant anchorage. Two splinted crowns were fabricated for each experimental model. Strain gauges were bonded on the buccal and sinus floor cortical bones around apically free and grafted implants. Microstrains were recorded by a data acquisition system and corresponding software at a sample rate of 10 KHz under central and buccally oriented lateral-axial static loads of 100 and 150 N in separate cases. The data were compared by independent T test at a significance level set at P<0.05. Bone tissue strains on the buccal cortical areas adjacent to apically free implants were higher than those of apically grafted implants (P<0.05). The differences ranged between 10 and 48 mu epsilon under central and lateral axial loads of 100 and 150 N. The shift in load application from central to buccally oriented lateral axial mode increased strains between 60 and 201 mu epsilon on buccal cortical bone around apically free and grafted implants (P<0.05). Bone strains around anterior implants were higher than those of posterior implants. Microstrains in the sinus floor cortical bone in apically grafted models were slightly higher than apically free models. Bone tissue strains on the buccal cortical areas adjacent to apicallyfree implants are higher than those of apically grafted implants. Sinus lifting, resulting in an enhanced apical support, slightly increases strains at the sinus floor region, but leads to a decrease in bone strains around the collar of supporting implants.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Cehreli</LastName><ForeName>Murat Cavit</ForeName><Initials>MC</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Prosthodontist, CosmORAL Oral and Dental Health Polyclinics, Cinnah 7/5, 06680, Kavaklidere, Ankara, Turkey. mcehreli@hotmail.com</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Akkocaoglu</LastName><ForeName>Murat</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Comert</LastName><ForeName>Ayhan</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Tekdemir</LastName><ForeName>Ibrahim</ForeName><Initials>I</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Akca</LastName><ForeName>Kivanc</ForeName><Initials>K</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2007</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>06</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Med Biol Eng Comput</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>7704869</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0140-0118</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Nov;88(5):461-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12473993</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Jun;15(3):339-45</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15142097</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Dec;13(6):657-65</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12519342</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Jan;93(1):38-44</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15623996</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Prosthodont. 2002 Mar-Apr;15(2):115-21</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11951799</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Jun;13(3):260-73</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12010156</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Ann Periodontol. 2003 Dec;8(1):328-43</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14971260</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998 Mar-Apr;13(2):219-26</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9581408</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Compendium. 1994 Feb;15(2):152, 154-6, 158 passim; quiz 162</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8055503</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Apr;15(2):249-57</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15008938</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Dec;16(6):715-22</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16307579</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Med Biol Eng Comput. 2006 Mar;44(1-2):86-94</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16929925</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomed Mater Res. 2001 May 1;58(3):277-81</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11319741</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Dec;13(6):581-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12519331</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2001 Oct;21(5):517-23</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11693244</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Mar-Apr;19(2):247-59</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15101597</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Apr;16(2):202-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15777330</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Mar-Apr;19(2):266-73</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15101599</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Oral Surg. 1980 Aug;38(8):613-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">6993637</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000 Jun;11(3):256-65</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11168217</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Sep-Oct;19(5):743-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15508992</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Arch Oral Biol. 2000 Jul;45(7):543-50</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10785517</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomech. 1993 Oct;26(10):1249-52</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8253829</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Oral Implantol. 2004;30(2):59-68</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15119454</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Oral Rehabil. 2002 Apr;29(4):394-400</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11966975</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 Sep-Oct;18(5):667-74</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14579954</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003 Dec;23(6):557-65</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14703759</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2004 Dec;24(6):565-77</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15626319</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11 Suppl 1:126-45</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11168262</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001696" MajorTopicYN="N">Biomechanical Phenomena</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002102" MajorTopicYN="N">Cadaver</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017267" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003799" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Stress Analysis</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000503" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiopathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008437" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxilla</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013314" MajorTopicYN="N">Stress, Mechanical</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2006</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>16</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2007</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>13</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2007</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>7</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2007</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>24</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2007</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>7</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17340154</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s11517-007-0173-2</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Turquie</li></country></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Akca, Kivanc" sort="Akca, Kivanc" uniqKey="Akca K" first="Kivanc" last="Akca">Kivanc Akca</name><name sortKey="Akkocaoglu, Murat" sort="Akkocaoglu, Murat" uniqKey="Akkocaoglu M" first="Murat" last="Akkocaoglu">Murat Akkocaoglu</name><name sortKey="Comert, Ayhan" sort="Comert, Ayhan" uniqKey="Comert A" first="Ayhan" last="Comert">Ayhan Comert</name><name sortKey="Tekdemir, Ibrahim" sort="Tekdemir, Ibrahim" uniqKey="Tekdemir I" first="Ibrahim" last="Tekdemir">Ibrahim Tekdemir</name></noCountry><country name="Turquie"><noRegion><name sortKey="Cehreli, Murat Cavit" sort="Cehreli, Murat Cavit" uniqKey="Cehreli M" first="Murat Cavit" last="Cehreli">Murat Cavit Cehreli</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Ncbi/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001C06 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 001C06 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Ncbi
|étape= Merge
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:17340154
|texte= Bone strains around apically free versus grafted implants in the posterior maxilla of human cadavers.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:17340154" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |