Assessment of bone segmentation quality of cone-beam CT versus multislice spiral CT: a pilot study.
Identifieur interne : 001A37 ( Ncbi/Merge ); précédent : 001A36; suivant : 001A38Assessment of bone segmentation quality of cone-beam CT versus multislice spiral CT: a pilot study.
Auteurs : Miet Loubele [Belgique] ; Frederik Maes ; Filip Schutyser ; Guy Marchal ; Reinhilde Jacobs ; Paul SuetensSource :
- Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics [ 1528-395X ] ; 2006.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adulte d'âge moyen, Algorithmes, Chirurgie assistée par ordinateur, Densité osseuse, Fantômes en imagerie, Femelle, Humains, Imagerie tridimensionnelle (), Modèles anatomiques, Mâchoire (imagerie diagnostique), Mâchoire édentée (imagerie diagnostique), Mâle, Planification des soins du patient, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Projets pilotes, Radiographie dentaire (), Radiographie dentaire (instrumentation), Reproductibilité des résultats, Tomodensitométrie (), Tomodensitométrie (instrumentation), Tomodensitométrie hélicoïdale, Traitement d'image par ordinateur.
- MESH :
- imagerie diagnostique : Mâchoire, Mâchoire édentée.
- instrumentation : Adulte d'âge moyen, Algorithmes, Chirurgie assistée par ordinateur, Densité osseuse, Fantômes en imagerie, Femelle, Humains, Imagerie tridimensionnelle, Modèles anatomiques, Mâle, Planification des soins du patient, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Projets pilotes, Radiographie dentaire, Reproductibilité des résultats, Tomodensitométrie, Tomodensitométrie hélicoïdale, Traitement d'image par ordinateur.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Algorithms, Bone Density, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Imaging, Three-Dimensional (methods), Jaw (diagnostic imaging), Jaw, Edentulous (diagnostic imaging), Male, Middle Aged, Models, Anatomic, Patient Care Planning, Phantoms, Imaging, Pilot Projects, Radiography, Dental (instrumentation), Radiography, Dental (methods), Reproducibility of Results, Surgery, Computer-Assisted, Tomography, Spiral Computed, Tomography, X-Ray Computed (instrumentation), Tomography, X-Ray Computed (methods).
- MESH :
- diagnostic imaging : Jaw, Jaw, Edentulous.
- instrumentation : Radiography, Dental, Tomography, X-Ray Computed.
- methods : Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Radiography, Dental, Tomography, X-Ray Computed.
- Algorithms, Bone Density, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Anatomic, Patient Care Planning, Phantoms, Imaging, Pilot Projects, Reproducibility of Results, Surgery, Computer-Assisted, Tomography, Spiral Computed.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to quantitatively assess the quality of jawbone models generated from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) by comparison with similar models obtained from multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT).
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.10.039
PubMed: 16876067
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: 002698
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: 002698
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: 002698
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:16876067Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Assessment of bone segmentation quality of cone-beam CT versus multislice spiral CT: a pilot study.</title><author><name sortKey="Loubele, Miet" sort="Loubele, Miet" uniqKey="Loubele M" first="Miet" last="Loubele">Miet Loubele</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Medical Image Computing (ESAT+Radiology), Faculties of Engineering and Medicine, K.U. Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Miet.Loubele@uz.kuleuven.be</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Belgique</country><wicri:regionArea>Medical Image Computing (ESAT+Radiology), Faculties of Engineering and Medicine, K.U. Leuven, Leuven</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Leuven</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Maes, Frederik" sort="Maes, Frederik" uniqKey="Maes F" first="Frederik" last="Maes">Frederik Maes</name></author><author><name sortKey="Schutyser, Filip" sort="Schutyser, Filip" uniqKey="Schutyser F" first="Filip" last="Schutyser">Filip Schutyser</name></author><author><name sortKey="Marchal, Guy" sort="Marchal, Guy" uniqKey="Marchal G" first="Guy" last="Marchal">Guy Marchal</name></author><author><name sortKey="Jacobs, Reinhilde" sort="Jacobs, Reinhilde" uniqKey="Jacobs R" first="Reinhilde" last="Jacobs">Reinhilde Jacobs</name></author><author><name sortKey="Suetens, Paul" sort="Suetens, Paul" uniqKey="Suetens P" first="Paul" last="Suetens">Paul Suetens</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2006">2006</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:16876067</idno><idno type="pmid">16876067</idno><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.10.039</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">002698</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002698</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">002698</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">002698</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">002698</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">002698</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">001A37</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Assessment of bone segmentation quality of cone-beam CT versus multislice spiral CT: a pilot study.</title><author><name sortKey="Loubele, Miet" sort="Loubele, Miet" uniqKey="Loubele M" first="Miet" last="Loubele">Miet Loubele</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Medical Image Computing (ESAT+Radiology), Faculties of Engineering and Medicine, K.U. Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Miet.Loubele@uz.kuleuven.be</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Belgique</country><wicri:regionArea>Medical Image Computing (ESAT+Radiology), Faculties of Engineering and Medicine, K.U. Leuven, Leuven</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Leuven</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Maes, Frederik" sort="Maes, Frederik" uniqKey="Maes F" first="Frederik" last="Maes">Frederik Maes</name></author><author><name sortKey="Schutyser, Filip" sort="Schutyser, Filip" uniqKey="Schutyser F" first="Filip" last="Schutyser">Filip Schutyser</name></author><author><name sortKey="Marchal, Guy" sort="Marchal, Guy" uniqKey="Marchal G" first="Guy" last="Marchal">Guy Marchal</name></author><author><name sortKey="Jacobs, Reinhilde" sort="Jacobs, Reinhilde" uniqKey="Jacobs R" first="Reinhilde" last="Jacobs">Reinhilde Jacobs</name></author><author><name sortKey="Suetens, Paul" sort="Suetens, Paul" uniqKey="Suetens P" first="Paul" last="Suetens">Paul Suetens</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics</title><idno type="eISSN">1528-395X</idno><imprint><date when="2006" type="published">2006</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Algorithms</term><term>Bone Density</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</term><term>Imaging, Three-Dimensional (methods)</term><term>Jaw (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Models, Anatomic</term><term>Patient Care Planning</term><term>Phantoms, Imaging</term><term>Pilot Projects</term><term>Radiography, Dental (instrumentation)</term><term>Radiography, Dental (methods)</term><term>Reproducibility of Results</term><term>Surgery, Computer-Assisted</term><term>Tomography, Spiral Computed</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray Computed (instrumentation)</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray Computed (methods)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Algorithmes</term><term>Chirurgie assistée par ordinateur</term><term>Densité osseuse</term><term>Fantômes en imagerie</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Imagerie tridimensionnelle ()</term><term>Modèles anatomiques</term><term>Mâchoire (imagerie diagnostique)</term><term>Mâchoire édentée (imagerie diagnostique)</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Planification des soins du patient</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Projets pilotes</term><term>Radiographie dentaire ()</term><term>Radiographie dentaire (instrumentation)</term><term>Reproductibilité des résultats</term><term>Tomodensitométrie ()</term><term>Tomodensitométrie (instrumentation)</term><term>Tomodensitométrie hélicoïdale</term><term>Traitement d'image par ordinateur</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="imagerie diagnostique" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire</term><term>Mâchoire édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Radiography, Dental</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</term><term>Radiography, Dental</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Algorithms</term><term>Bone Density</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Models, Anatomic</term><term>Patient Care Planning</term><term>Phantoms, Imaging</term><term>Pilot Projects</term><term>Reproducibility of Results</term><term>Surgery, Computer-Assisted</term><term>Tomography, Spiral Computed</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Algorithmes</term><term>Chirurgie assistée par ordinateur</term><term>Densité osseuse</term><term>Fantômes en imagerie</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Imagerie tridimensionnelle</term><term>Modèles anatomiques</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Planification des soins du patient</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Projets pilotes</term><term>Radiographie dentaire</term><term>Reproductibilité des résultats</term><term>Tomodensitométrie</term><term>Tomodensitométrie hélicoïdale</term><term>Traitement d'image par ordinateur</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The objective of this study was to quantitatively assess the quality of jawbone models generated from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) by comparison with similar models obtained from multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT).</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">16876067</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2006</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>16</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>24</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1528-395X</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>102</Volume><Issue>2</Issue><PubDate><Year>2006</Year><Month>Aug</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Assessment of bone segmentation quality of cone-beam CT versus multislice spiral CT: a pilot study.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>225-34</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText Label="OBJECTIVES" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">The objective of this study was to quantitatively assess the quality of jawbone models generated from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) by comparison with similar models obtained from multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MATERIAL AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Three case studies were performed involving images of anthropomorphic head phantoms and real patients acquired with 3 CBCT (NewTom 9000 DVT, Accuitomo 3D, and i-CAT) and 2 MSCT scanners (Somatom VolumeZoom and Lightspeed). Bone was segmented from the CBCT and MSCT images using global thresholding. CBCT vs MSCT segmentation differences were assessed by comparing bone thickness measurements at anatomically corresponding sites, identified automatically by CBCT to MSCT image registration.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">There was a statistically significant difference between the MSCT and CBCT segmented bone thicknesses, varying from 0.05 +/- 0.47 mm (i-CAT) up to 1.2 +/- 1.00 mm (3D Accuitomo, posterior maxilla).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">An automated, reproducible, and observer-independent method has been developed to assess the quality of CBCT bone models using MSCT as a clinically established method of reference. Our validation method is generally applicable in cases where no geometric ground-truth is available.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Loubele</LastName><ForeName>Miet</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Medical Image Computing (ESAT+Radiology), Faculties of Engineering and Medicine, K.U. Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Miet.Loubele@uz.kuleuven.be</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Maes</LastName><ForeName>Frederik</ForeName><Initials>F</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Schutyser</LastName><ForeName>Filip</ForeName><Initials>F</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Marchal</LastName><ForeName>Guy</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Jacobs</LastName><ForeName>Reinhilde</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Suetens</LastName><ForeName>Paul</ForeName><Initials>P</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D023361">Validation Studies</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2006</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>21</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9508562</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1079-2104</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000465" MajorTopicYN="N">Algorithms</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015519" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Density</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007091" MajorTopicYN="N">Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D021621" MajorTopicYN="N">Imaging, Three-Dimensional</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007568" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="Y">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="Y">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008953" MajorTopicYN="N">Models, Anatomic</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010347" MajorTopicYN="N">Patient Care Planning</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019047" MajorTopicYN="N">Phantoms, Imaging</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010865" MajorTopicYN="N">Pilot Projects</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011861" MajorTopicYN="N">Radiography, Dental</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="N">instrumentation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015203" MajorTopicYN="N">Reproducibility of Results</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D025321" MajorTopicYN="N">Surgery, Computer-Assisted</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D036542" MajorTopicYN="N">Tomography, Spiral Computed</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014057" MajorTopicYN="N">Tomography, X-Ray Computed</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="N">instrumentation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2005</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>28</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2005</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>01</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2005</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>06</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2006</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2006</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>17</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2006</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16876067</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">S1079-2104(05)00914-5</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.10.039</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Belgique</li></country></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Jacobs, Reinhilde" sort="Jacobs, Reinhilde" uniqKey="Jacobs R" first="Reinhilde" last="Jacobs">Reinhilde Jacobs</name><name sortKey="Maes, Frederik" sort="Maes, Frederik" uniqKey="Maes F" first="Frederik" last="Maes">Frederik Maes</name><name sortKey="Marchal, Guy" sort="Marchal, Guy" uniqKey="Marchal G" first="Guy" last="Marchal">Guy Marchal</name><name sortKey="Schutyser, Filip" sort="Schutyser, Filip" uniqKey="Schutyser F" first="Filip" last="Schutyser">Filip Schutyser</name><name sortKey="Suetens, Paul" sort="Suetens, Paul" uniqKey="Suetens P" first="Paul" last="Suetens">Paul Suetens</name></noCountry><country name="Belgique"><noRegion><name sortKey="Loubele, Miet" sort="Loubele, Miet" uniqKey="Loubele M" first="Miet" last="Loubele">Miet Loubele</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Ncbi/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001A37 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 001A37 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Ncbi
|étape= Merge
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:16876067
|texte= Assessment of bone segmentation quality of cone-beam CT versus multislice spiral CT: a pilot study.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:16876067" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |