Effect of Magnetic Field on Bone Healing around Endosseous Implants – An In-vivo Study
Identifieur interne : 006C48 ( Ncbi/Curation ); précédent : 006C47; suivant : 006C49Effect of Magnetic Field on Bone Healing around Endosseous Implants – An In-vivo Study
Auteurs : Mahalakshmi Gujjalapudi ; Chandrasekar Anam ; Praveen Mamidi ; Radha Chiluka ; A. Gautam Kumar ; Ragini BibinagarSource :
- Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research : JCDR [ 2249-782X ] ; 2016.
Abstract
After implant placement, a stress-free healing period of 3-6 months is a pre-requisite to achieve good osseointegration. If this duration could be reduced, the patients would feel happier. Eventhough, immediate loading of implants is a clinically feasible concept; it is not possible in certain situations. Few studies have shown that Static magnetic field is useful to promote bone formation faster after the bone is wounded.
This pilot study was intended to evaluate the tissue response after implant placement under the influence of magnetic field.
Twenty Tidal Spiral implants were used for this study. Two implants were placed in each patient in the anterior mandible corresponding to the B and D regions and the implant on the D region was exposed to magnetic field using safer magnet (Neodymium Boron Iron) and the implant on the B region served as a control. Both the implants were compared for stability using Resonance Frequency Analyzer (RFA) at Days 0, 30, 60 and 90. Mean Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) values were compared on both sides using student’s paired t-test and repeated measures ANOVA (analysis of variance). There was a significant difference in the mean ISQ values, hence, a post-hoc test was done to evaluate whether there is any difference between the follow-ups.
The average ISQ value for implants at 0 day in the B and D regions was 68.6 and 68.7 respectively. The average ISQ value at 30th day, 60th day and 90th day was 73.25, 76.05 and 78.95 respectively on the magnetic side (D region). Whereas on the non-magnetic side (B region) at 30th day, 60th day and 90th day was 68.45, 72.05 and 74.45 respectively.
The implant stability quotient values obtained on the magnetic side were significantly greater than on the non-magnetic side. Positive correlation exists between the magnetic field and osseointegration.
Url:
DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/21509.8666
PubMed: 27891492
PubMed Central: 5121830
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Pmc, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :002024
- to stream Pmc, to step Curation: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :002024
- to stream Pmc, to step Checkpoint: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000743
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :006C48
Links to Exploration step
PMC:5121830Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Effect of Magnetic Field on Bone Healing around Endosseous Implants – An In-vivo Study</title>
<author><name sortKey="Gujjalapudi, Mahalakshmi" sort="Gujjalapudi, Mahalakshmi" uniqKey="Gujjalapudi M" first="Mahalakshmi" last="Gujjalapudi">Mahalakshmi Gujjalapudi</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff1"> Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics,<institution>Government Dental College</institution>
,<addr-line>Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India</addr-line>
.</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Anam, Chandrasekar" sort="Anam, Chandrasekar" uniqKey="Anam C" first="Chandrasekar" last="Anam">Chandrasekar Anam</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff2"> Professor and Head, Department of Prosthodontics,<institution>SVS Dental College</institution>
,<addr-line>Mahabubnagar, Telangana, India</addr-line>
.</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mamidi, Praveen" sort="Mamidi, Praveen" uniqKey="Mamidi P" first="Praveen" last="Mamidi">Praveen Mamidi</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff3"> Professor and Head, Department of Prosthodontics,<institution>PMVIDS and RC</institution>
,<addr-line>Hyderabad, Telangana, India</addr-line>
.</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Chiluka, Radha" sort="Chiluka, Radha" uniqKey="Chiluka R" first="Radha" last="Chiluka">Radha Chiluka</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff4"> Senior Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics,<institution>PMVIDS and RC</institution>
,<addr-line>Hyderabad, Telangana, India</addr-line>
.</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kumar, A Gautam" sort="Kumar, A Gautam" uniqKey="Kumar A" first="A. Gautam" last="Kumar">A. Gautam Kumar</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff5"> Professor, Department of Prosthodontics,<institution>PMVIDS and RC</institution>
,<addr-line>Hyderabad, Telangana, India</addr-line>
.</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Bibinagar, Ragini" sort="Bibinagar, Ragini" uniqKey="Bibinagar R" first="Ragini" last="Bibinagar">Ragini Bibinagar</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff6"> Senior Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics,<institution>PMVIDS and RC</institution>
,<addr-line>Hyderabad, Telangana, India</addr-line>
.</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="pmid">27891492</idno>
<idno type="pmc">5121830</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5121830</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:5121830</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.7860/JCDR/2016/21509.8666</idno>
<date when="2016">2016</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">002024</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">002024</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">002024</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Curation">002024</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">000743</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000743</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">006C48</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">006C48</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Effect of Magnetic Field on Bone Healing around Endosseous Implants – An In-vivo Study</title>
<author><name sortKey="Gujjalapudi, Mahalakshmi" sort="Gujjalapudi, Mahalakshmi" uniqKey="Gujjalapudi M" first="Mahalakshmi" last="Gujjalapudi">Mahalakshmi Gujjalapudi</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff1"> Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics,<institution>Government Dental College</institution>
,<addr-line>Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India</addr-line>
.</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Anam, Chandrasekar" sort="Anam, Chandrasekar" uniqKey="Anam C" first="Chandrasekar" last="Anam">Chandrasekar Anam</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff2"> Professor and Head, Department of Prosthodontics,<institution>SVS Dental College</institution>
,<addr-line>Mahabubnagar, Telangana, India</addr-line>
.</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mamidi, Praveen" sort="Mamidi, Praveen" uniqKey="Mamidi P" first="Praveen" last="Mamidi">Praveen Mamidi</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff3"> Professor and Head, Department of Prosthodontics,<institution>PMVIDS and RC</institution>
,<addr-line>Hyderabad, Telangana, India</addr-line>
.</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Chiluka, Radha" sort="Chiluka, Radha" uniqKey="Chiluka R" first="Radha" last="Chiluka">Radha Chiluka</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff4"> Senior Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics,<institution>PMVIDS and RC</institution>
,<addr-line>Hyderabad, Telangana, India</addr-line>
.</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kumar, A Gautam" sort="Kumar, A Gautam" uniqKey="Kumar A" first="A. Gautam" last="Kumar">A. Gautam Kumar</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff5"> Professor, Department of Prosthodontics,<institution>PMVIDS and RC</institution>
,<addr-line>Hyderabad, Telangana, India</addr-line>
.</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Bibinagar, Ragini" sort="Bibinagar, Ragini" uniqKey="Bibinagar R" first="Ragini" last="Bibinagar">Ragini Bibinagar</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff6"> Senior Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics,<institution>PMVIDS and RC</institution>
,<addr-line>Hyderabad, Telangana, India</addr-line>
.</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research : JCDR</title>
<idno type="ISSN">2249-782X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">0973-709X</idno>
<imprint><date when="2016">2016</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Introduction</title>
<p>After implant placement, a stress-free healing period of 3-6 months is a pre-requisite to achieve good osseointegration. If this duration could be reduced, the patients would feel happier. Eventhough, immediate loading of implants is a clinically feasible concept; it is not possible in certain situations. Few studies have shown that Static magnetic field is useful to promote bone formation faster after the bone is wounded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Aim</title>
<p>This pilot study was intended to evaluate the tissue response after implant placement under the influence of magnetic field.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Materials and Methods</title>
<p>Twenty Tidal Spiral implants were used for this study. Two implants were placed in each patient in the anterior mandible corresponding to the B and D regions and the implant on the D region was exposed to magnetic field using safer magnet (Neodymium Boron Iron) and the implant on the B region served as a control. Both the implants were compared for stability using Resonance Frequency Analyzer (RFA) at Days 0, 30, 60 and 90. Mean Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) values were compared on both sides using student’s paired t-test and repeated measures ANOVA (analysis of variance). There was a significant difference in the mean ISQ values, hence, a post-hoc test was done to evaluate whether there is any difference between the follow-ups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Results</title>
<p>The average ISQ value for implants at 0 day in the B and D regions was 68.6 and 68.7 respectively. The average ISQ value at 30<sup>th</sup>
day, 60<sup>th</sup>
day and 90<sup>th</sup>
day was 73.25, 76.05 and 78.95 respectively on the magnetic side (D region). Whereas on the non-magnetic side (B region) at 30<sup>th</sup>
day, 60<sup>th</sup>
day and 90<sup>th</sup>
day was 68.45, 72.05 and 74.45 respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Conclusion</title>
<p>The implant stability quotient values obtained on the magnetic side were significantly greater than on the non-magnetic side. Positive correlation exists between the magnetic field and osseointegration.</p>
</sec>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Ncbi/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 006C48 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 006C48 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Ncbi |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= PMC:5121830 |texte= Effect of Magnetic Field on Bone Healing around Endosseous Implants – An In-vivo Study }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:27891492" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |