CBCT-based bone quality assessment: are Hounsfield units applicable?
Identifieur interne : 005559 ( Ncbi/Curation ); précédent : 005558; suivant : 005560CBCT-based bone quality assessment: are Hounsfield units applicable?
Auteurs : R. Pauwels ; R. Jacobs ; S R Singer ; M. MupparapuSource :
- Dentomaxillofacial Radiology [ 0250-832X ] ; 2014.
Abstract
CBCT is a widely applied imaging modality in dentistry. It enables the visualization of high-contrast structures of the oral region (bone, teeth, air cavities) at a high resolution. CBCT is now commonly used for the assessment of bone quality, primarily for pre-operative implant planning. Traditionally, bone quality parameters and classifications were primarily based on bone density, which could be estimated through the use of Hounsfield units derived from multidetector CT (MDCT) data sets. However, there are crucial differences between MDCT and CBCT, which complicates the use of quantitative gray values (GVs) for the latter. From experimental as well as clinical research, it can be seen that great variability of GVs can exist on CBCT images owing to various reasons that are inherently associated with this technique (
Url:
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20140238
PubMed: 25315442
PubMed Central: 4277442
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Pmc, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000449
- to stream Pmc, to step Curation: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000449
- to stream Pmc, to step Checkpoint: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001589
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :005559
Links to Exploration step
PMC:4277442Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">CBCT-based bone quality assessment: are Hounsfield units applicable?</title>
<author><name sortKey="Pauwels, R" sort="Pauwels, R" uniqKey="Pauwels R" first="R" last="Pauwels">R. Pauwels</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff1"></nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff2"></nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Jacobs, R" sort="Jacobs, R" uniqKey="Jacobs R" first="R" last="Jacobs">R. Jacobs</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff2"></nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Singer, S R" sort="Singer, S R" uniqKey="Singer S" first="S R" last="Singer">S R Singer</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff3"></nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mupparapu, M" sort="Mupparapu, M" uniqKey="Mupparapu M" first="M" last="Mupparapu">M. Mupparapu</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff4"></nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="pmid">25315442</idno>
<idno type="pmc">4277442</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4277442</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:4277442</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1259/dmfr.20140238</idno>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000449</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">000449</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">000449</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Curation">000449</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">001589</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Checkpoint">001589</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">005559</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">005559</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">CBCT-based bone quality assessment: are Hounsfield units applicable?</title>
<author><name sortKey="Pauwels, R" sort="Pauwels, R" uniqKey="Pauwels R" first="R" last="Pauwels">R. Pauwels</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff1"></nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff2"></nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Jacobs, R" sort="Jacobs, R" uniqKey="Jacobs R" first="R" last="Jacobs">R. Jacobs</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff2"></nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Singer, S R" sort="Singer, S R" uniqKey="Singer S" first="S R" last="Singer">S R Singer</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff3"></nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mupparapu, M" sort="Mupparapu, M" uniqKey="Mupparapu M" first="M" last="Mupparapu">M. Mupparapu</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff4"></nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Dentomaxillofacial Radiology</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0250-832X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1476-542X</idno>
<imprint><date when="2014">2014</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p>CBCT is a widely applied imaging modality in dentistry. It enables the visualization of high-contrast structures of the oral region (bone, teeth, air cavities) at a high resolution. CBCT is now commonly used for the assessment of bone quality, primarily for pre-operative implant planning. Traditionally, bone quality parameters and classifications were primarily based on bone density, which could be estimated through the use of Hounsfield units derived from multidetector CT (MDCT) data sets. However, there are crucial differences between MDCT and CBCT, which complicates the use of quantitative gray values (GVs) for the latter. From experimental as well as clinical research, it can be seen that great variability of GVs can exist on CBCT images owing to various reasons that are inherently associated with this technique (<italic>i.e.</italic>
the limited field size, relatively high amount of scattered radiation and limitations of currently applied reconstruction algorithms). Although attempts have been made to correct for GV variability, it can be postulated that the quantitative use of GVs in CBCT should be generally avoided at this time. In addition, recent research and clinical findings have shifted the paradigm of bone quality from a density-based analysis to a structural evaluation of the bone. The ever-improving image quality of CBCT allows it to display trabecular bone patterns, indicating that it may be possible to apply structural analysis methods that are commonly used in micro-CT and histology.</p>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Ncbi/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005559 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 005559 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Ncbi |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= PMC:4277442 |texte= CBCT-based bone quality assessment: are Hounsfield units applicable? }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25315442" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. | ![]() |