Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Comparative evaluation of border molding, using two different techniques in maxillary edentulous arches - An in vivo study

Identifieur interne : 004D83 ( Ncbi/Curation ); précédent : 004D82; suivant : 004D84

Comparative evaluation of border molding, using two different techniques in maxillary edentulous arches - An in vivo study

Auteurs : Rameshbabu Yarapatineni ; Abhishek Vilekar ; J Phani Kumar ; G Ajay Kumar ; Prasad Aravind ; P Anil Kumar

Source :

RBID : PMC:3895723

Abstract

Background:This study was undertaken to compare the retention between sectional border molding using low fusing greenstick compound and single step border molding using condensation silicone (putty) impression material in three stages- A. Immediately following border molding, B. After final impression and C. With the finished permanent denture base. Materials & Methods:In this study evaluation of retentive values of sectional border molding (Group I) (custom impression trays border molded with green stick compound ) and single step border molding (Group II) ( border molding with condensation silicone (putty) impression material ). In both techniques definitive wash impression were made with light body condensation silicone and permanent denture base with heat cure polymerization resin. Results:Group II was significantly higher (mean=8011.43) than Group I (mean=5777.43) in test-A. The t-value (1.5883) infers that there was significant difference between Group I and Group II (p =0.15). Group I was significantly higher (mean=6718.57) than Group II (mean=5224.29) in test -B. The t-value (1.6909) infers that there was significant difference between Group I and Group II (p=0.17). Group II was higher (mean=4025.14) than Group I (mean=3835.07) in test -C. The t-value was 0.1239. But it was found to be statistically insignificant (p=0.005). Conclusion:Within the limitation of this clinical study border molding custom tray with low fusing green stick compound provided similar retention as compared to custom impression tray with condensation silicone in permanent denture base. How to cite this article:Yarapatineni R, Vilekar A, Kumar JP, Kumar GA, Aravind P, Kumar PA. Comparative evaluation of border molding, using two different techniques in maxillary edentulous arches - An in vivo study. J Int Oral Health 2013; 5(6):82-7.


Url:
PubMed: 24453450
PubMed Central: 3895723

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

PMC:3895723

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Comparative evaluation of border molding, using two different techniques in maxillary edentulous arches - An in vivo study</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Yarapatineni, Rameshbabu" sort="Yarapatineni, Rameshbabu" uniqKey="Yarapatineni R" first="Rameshbabu" last="Yarapatineni">Rameshbabu Yarapatineni</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Vilekar, Abhishek" sort="Vilekar, Abhishek" uniqKey="Vilekar A" first="Abhishek" last="Vilekar">Abhishek Vilekar</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kumar, J Phani" sort="Kumar, J Phani" uniqKey="Kumar J" first="J Phani" last="Kumar">J Phani Kumar</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kumar, G Ajay" sort="Kumar, G Ajay" uniqKey="Kumar G" first="G Ajay" last="Kumar">G Ajay Kumar</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Aravind, Prasad" sort="Aravind, Prasad" uniqKey="Aravind P" first="Prasad" last="Aravind">Prasad Aravind</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kumar, P Anil" sort="Kumar, P Anil" uniqKey="Kumar P" first="P Anil" last="Kumar">P Anil Kumar</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="pmid">24453450</idno>
<idno type="pmc">3895723</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3895723</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:3895723</idno>
<date when="2013">2013</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">002437</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">002437</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">002437</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Curation">002437</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">001A95</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Checkpoint">001A95</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">004D83</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">004D83</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Comparative evaluation of border molding, using two different techniques in maxillary edentulous arches - An in vivo study</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Yarapatineni, Rameshbabu" sort="Yarapatineni, Rameshbabu" uniqKey="Yarapatineni R" first="Rameshbabu" last="Yarapatineni">Rameshbabu Yarapatineni</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Vilekar, Abhishek" sort="Vilekar, Abhishek" uniqKey="Vilekar A" first="Abhishek" last="Vilekar">Abhishek Vilekar</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kumar, J Phani" sort="Kumar, J Phani" uniqKey="Kumar J" first="J Phani" last="Kumar">J Phani Kumar</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kumar, G Ajay" sort="Kumar, G Ajay" uniqKey="Kumar G" first="G Ajay" last="Kumar">G Ajay Kumar</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Aravind, Prasad" sort="Aravind, Prasad" uniqKey="Aravind P" first="Prasad" last="Aravind">Prasad Aravind</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kumar, P Anil" sort="Kumar, P Anil" uniqKey="Kumar P" first="P Anil" last="Kumar">P Anil Kumar</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Journal of International Oral Health : JIOH</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0976-7428</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">0976-1799</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2013">2013</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<p>
<bold>Background:</bold>
This study was undertaken to compare the retention between sectional border molding using low fusing greenstick compound and single step border molding using condensation silicone (putty) impression material in three stages- A. Immediately following border molding, B. After final impression and C. With the finished permanent denture base.
<bold>Materials & Methods:</bold>
In this study evaluation of retentive values of sectional border molding (Group I) (custom impression trays border molded with green stick compound ) and single step border molding (Group II) ( border molding with condensation silicone (putty) impression material ). In both techniques definitive wash impression were made with light body condensation silicone and permanent denture base with heat cure polymerization resin.
<bold>Results:</bold>
Group II was significantly higher (mean=8011.43) than Group I (mean=5777.43) in test-A. The t-value (1.5883) infers that there was significant difference between Group I and Group II (p =0.15). Group I was significantly higher (mean=6718.57) than Group II (mean=5224.29) in test -B. The t-value (1.6909) infers that there was significant difference between Group I and Group II (p=0.17). Group II was higher (mean=4025.14) than Group I (mean=3835.07) in test -C. The t-value was 0.1239. But it was found to be statistically insignificant (p=0.005).
<bold>Conclusion:</bold>
Within the limitation of this clinical study border molding custom tray with low fusing green stick compound provided similar retention as compared to custom impression tray with condensation silicone in permanent denture base.
<bold>How to cite this article:</bold>
Yarapatineni R, Vilekar A, Kumar JP, Kumar GA, Aravind P, Kumar PA. Comparative evaluation of border molding, using two different techniques in maxillary edentulous arches - An in vivo study.
<italic>J Int Oral Health 2013; 5(6):82-7</italic>
. </p>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Ncbi/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004D83 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 004D83 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Ncbi
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     PMC:3895723
   |texte=   Comparative evaluation of border molding, using two different techniques in maxillary edentulous arches - An in vivo study
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:24453450" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022