Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Assessment of vertical root fractures using three imaging modalities: cone beam CT, intraoral digital radiography and film

Identifieur interne : 003B98 ( Ncbi/Curation ); précédent : 003B97; suivant : 003B99

Assessment of vertical root fractures using three imaging modalities: cone beam CT, intraoral digital radiography and film

Auteurs : J. Kambungton ; A. Janhom ; S. Prapayasatok ; S. Pongsiriwet

Source :

RBID : PMC:3520378

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of cone beam CT (CBCT) in detecting vertical root fractures and to compare the accuracy with images from an intraoral sensor and from conventional intraoral film.

Methods

60 extracted, single-rooted human teeth were divided equally into two groups: a control group of 30 teeth and an induced fracture group of 30 teeth. All teeth were randomly placed into sockets in six dry mandibles. Each tooth was imaged by three modalities: CBCT, intraoral digital radiography and intraoral F-speed film. Three beam angulations (an orthogonal projection and additional projections with ±20° horizontal shifts of the central ray) were used when radiographs were made using film and a digital sensor. Three oral and maxillofacial radiologists evaluated the presence of root fractures twice in each image modality using a five-point confidence rating scale. Areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (Az) were computed for each observer and modality and were tested for statistical differences using the Kruskal–Wallis test.

Results

There was no statistical difference in the performance of the three modalities (mean of Az values: CBCT = 0.811, film = 0.797 and sensor = 0.775; p = 0.771).

Conclusions

There was no significant difference between intraoral film, a high-resolution complementary metal oxide semiconductor digital imaging system and CBCT in detecting vertical root fractures in mandibular single-rooted teeth.


Url:
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/49798768
PubMed: 22301636
PubMed Central: 3520378

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

PMC:3520378

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Assessment of vertical root fractures using three imaging modalities: cone beam CT, intraoral digital radiography and film</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kambungton, J" sort="Kambungton, J" uniqKey="Kambungton J" first="J" last="Kambungton">J. Kambungton</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Janhom, A" sort="Janhom, A" uniqKey="Janhom A" first="A" last="Janhom">A. Janhom</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Prapayasatok, S" sort="Prapayasatok, S" uniqKey="Prapayasatok S" first="S" last="Prapayasatok">S. Prapayasatok</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pongsiriwet, S" sort="Pongsiriwet, S" uniqKey="Pongsiriwet S" first="S" last="Pongsiriwet">S. Pongsiriwet</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="pmid">22301636</idno>
<idno type="pmc">3520378</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3520378</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:3520378</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1259/dmfr/49798768</idno>
<date when="2012">2012</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">002301</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">002301</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">002301</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Curation">002301</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">001F81</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Checkpoint">001F81</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">003B98</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">003B98</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Assessment of vertical root fractures using three imaging modalities: cone beam CT, intraoral digital radiography and film</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kambungton, J" sort="Kambungton, J" uniqKey="Kambungton J" first="J" last="Kambungton">J. Kambungton</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Janhom, A" sort="Janhom, A" uniqKey="Janhom A" first="A" last="Janhom">A. Janhom</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Prapayasatok, S" sort="Prapayasatok, S" uniqKey="Prapayasatok S" first="S" last="Prapayasatok">S. Prapayasatok</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pongsiriwet, S" sort="Pongsiriwet, S" uniqKey="Pongsiriwet S" first="S" last="Pongsiriwet">S. Pongsiriwet</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Dentomaxillofacial Radiology</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0250-832X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1476-542X</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2012">2012</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<sec>
<title>Objectives</title>
<p>The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of cone beam CT (CBCT) in detecting vertical root fractures and to compare the accuracy with images from an intraoral sensor and from conventional intraoral film.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>60 extracted, single-rooted human teeth were divided equally into two groups: a control group of 30 teeth and an induced fracture group of 30 teeth. All teeth were randomly placed into sockets in six dry mandibles. Each tooth was imaged by three modalities: CBCT, intraoral digital radiography and intraoral F-speed film. Three beam angulations (an orthogonal projection and additional projections with ±20° horizontal shifts of the central ray) were used when radiographs were made using film and a digital sensor. Three oral and maxillofacial radiologists evaluated the presence of root fractures twice in each image modality using a five-point confidence rating scale. Areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (A
<sub>z</sub>
) were computed for each observer and modality and were tested for statistical differences using the Kruskal–Wallis test.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>There was no statistical difference in the performance of the three modalities (mean of A
<sub>z</sub>
values: CBCT = 0.811, film = 0.797 and sensor = 0.775;
<italic>p</italic>
= 0.771).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>There was no significant difference between intraoral film, a high-resolution complementary metal oxide semiconductor digital imaging system and CBCT in detecting vertical root fractures in mandibular single-rooted teeth.</p>
</sec>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Ncbi/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003B98 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 003B98 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Ncbi
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     PMC:3520378
   |texte=   Assessment of vertical root fractures using three imaging modalities: cone beam CT, intraoral digital radiography and film
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:22301636" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022