Curation
Ncbi
Racine
Curation
Checkpoint
Ncbi
Racine
Ncbi
Exploration
Accueil
Racine
Racine

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Do tooth gaps matter? Evaluation of self-assessments: a pilot study.

Identifieur interne : 001E53 ( Ncbi/Curation ); précédent : 001E52; suivant : 001E54

Do tooth gaps matter? Evaluation of self-assessments: a pilot study.

Auteurs : T A Trovik [Norvège] ; T I Berge

Source :

RBID : pubmed:17919247

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

This study aimed to test the hypothesis stating no difference in number of teeth or tooth gaps counted by the dentist or the patient. The sample consisted of 49 randomly selected regular patients and their dentists (response rate 10%, 53% males). Mean age of the patients was 53.6 +/- 11.9 years. The mean number of teeth was 26.5, 20/49 reported tooth gaps (excluding second and third molars) and 12/20 had visible gaps. The calculation of patients' detection of gaps showed a sensitivity = 79%, specificity = 96% and a positive predictive value of 95%. The patients reported more teeth in the maxilla and fewer teeth in the mandible compared with their dentists. More teeth were misdiagnosed as the number of teeth increased in the mandible. Patients reported more gaps than dentists in both jaws (NS); an average of 0.04, 0.18 and 0.22 misdiagnosed gaps in the maxilla, mandible and for both jaws respectively. Agreement on tooth present/missing in the maxilla was 91.3% (+/-9.82) and in the mandible 88.2% (+/-10.44). Correlation between self-report and dentist's report of the number of teeth present and the number of gaps in the maxilla was (Pearson's r) 0.94 and 0.83. One person with self-perceived visible gaps and five persons with non-visible gaps were recommended treatment; two persons agreed about a treatment need. Self-assessments of tooth gaps show limited but acceptable sensitivity and excellent specificity. No significant differences in tooth counting were found when comparing self-reports and dentists' reports. The study should be tried on a larger scale.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01778.x
PubMed: 17919247

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

Links to Exploration step

pubmed:17919247

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Do tooth gaps matter? Evaluation of self-assessments: a pilot study.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Trovik, T A" sort="Trovik, T A" uniqKey="Trovik T" first="T A" last="Trovik">T A Trovik</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral Sciences - Centre for Clinical Dental Research, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. tordis.trovik@cih.uib.no</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Norvège</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral Sciences - Centre for Clinical Dental Research, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Bergen</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Berge, T I" sort="Berge, T I" uniqKey="Berge T" first="T I" last="Berge">T I Berge</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2007">2007</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:17919247</idno>
<idno type="pmid">17919247</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01778.x</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">002348</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002348</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">002348</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">002348</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">002348</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">002348</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">001E53</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">001E53</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Do tooth gaps matter? Evaluation of self-assessments: a pilot study.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Trovik, T A" sort="Trovik, T A" uniqKey="Trovik T" first="T A" last="Trovik">T A Trovik</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral Sciences - Centre for Clinical Dental Research, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. tordis.trovik@cih.uib.no</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Norvège</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral Sciences - Centre for Clinical Dental Research, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Bergen</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Berge, T I" sort="Berge, T I" uniqKey="Berge T" first="T I" last="Berge">T I Berge</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Journal of oral rehabilitation</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2007" type="published">2007</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Attitude of Health Personnel</term>
<term>Attitude to Health</term>
<term>Dentist-Patient Relations</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (diagnosis)</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Maxilla</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Norway</term>
<term>Pilot Projects</term>
<term>Reproducibility of Results</term>
<term>Self-Assessment</term>
<term>Sensitivity and Specificity</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Attitude du personnel soignant</term>
<term>Attitude envers la santé</term>
<term>Auto-évaluation (psychologie)</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Mandibule</term>
<term>Maxillaire</term>
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée (diagnostic)</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Norvège</term>
<term>Projets pilotes</term>
<term>Relations dentiste-patient</term>
<term>Reproductibilité des résultats</term>
<term>Sensibilité et spécificité</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en">
<term>Norway</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnosis" xml:lang="en">
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Attitude of Health Personnel</term>
<term>Attitude to Health</term>
<term>Dentist-Patient Relations</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Maxilla</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Pilot Projects</term>
<term>Reproducibility of Results</term>
<term>Self-Assessment</term>
<term>Sensitivity and Specificity</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Attitude du personnel soignant</term>
<term>Attitude envers la santé</term>
<term>Auto-évaluation (psychologie)</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Mandibule</term>
<term>Maxillaire</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Norvège</term>
<term>Projets pilotes</term>
<term>Relations dentiste-patient</term>
<term>Reproductibilité des résultats</term>
<term>Sensibilité et spécificité</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="geographic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Norvège</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This study aimed to test the hypothesis stating no difference in number of teeth or tooth gaps counted by the dentist or the patient. The sample consisted of 49 randomly selected regular patients and their dentists (response rate 10%, 53% males). Mean age of the patients was 53.6 +/- 11.9 years. The mean number of teeth was 26.5, 20/49 reported tooth gaps (excluding second and third molars) and 12/20 had visible gaps. The calculation of patients' detection of gaps showed a sensitivity = 79%, specificity = 96% and a positive predictive value of 95%. The patients reported more teeth in the maxilla and fewer teeth in the mandible compared with their dentists. More teeth were misdiagnosed as the number of teeth increased in the mandible. Patients reported more gaps than dentists in both jaws (NS); an average of 0.04, 0.18 and 0.22 misdiagnosed gaps in the maxilla, mandible and for both jaws respectively. Agreement on tooth present/missing in the maxilla was 91.3% (+/-9.82) and in the mandible 88.2% (+/-10.44). Correlation between self-report and dentist's report of the number of teeth present and the number of gaps in the maxilla was (Pearson's r) 0.94 and 0.83. One person with self-perceived visible gaps and five persons with non-visible gaps were recommended treatment; two persons agreed about a treatment need. Self-assessments of tooth gaps show limited but acceptable sensitivity and excellent specificity. No significant differences in tooth counting were found when comparing self-reports and dentists' reports. The study should be tried on a larger scale.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Ncbi/Curation

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001E53 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 001E53 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Ncbi
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:17919247
   |texte=   Do tooth gaps matter? Evaluation of self-assessments: a pilot study.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:17919247" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022