Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Influence of two different approaches to reporting implant survival outcomes for five different prosthodontic applications.

Identifieur interne : 000831 ( Ncbi/Curation ); précédent : 000830; suivant : 000832

Influence of two different approaches to reporting implant survival outcomes for five different prosthodontic applications.

Auteurs : H F Morris [États-Unis] ; S. Ochi

Source :

RBID : pubmed:11885186

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Over the years, the definition of implant failure has varied, with some investigators accounting for all implants placed, while others discard failures that occurred before clinical loading. The influence of stresses transmitted to various bone densities, by different prosthetic appliances as well as the method used to determine failures, needs to be clearly understood. This paper reports on the influence of two different methods of determining 36-month survival of implants used to support different dental prostheses.

DOI: 10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.90
PubMed: 11885186

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

pubmed:11885186

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Influence of two different approaches to reporting implant survival outcomes for five different prosthodontic applications.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Morris, H F" sort="Morris, H F" uniqKey="Morris H" first="H F" last="Morris">H F Morris</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Dental Implant Clinical Research Group, VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Dental Implant Clinical Research Group, VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>MI</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ochi, S" sort="Ochi, S" uniqKey="Ochi S" first="S" last="Ochi">S. Ochi</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2000">2000</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:11885186</idno>
<idno type="pmid">11885186</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.90</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003588</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003588</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">003588</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">003588</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">003588</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">003588</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">000831</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">000831</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Influence of two different approaches to reporting implant survival outcomes for five different prosthodontic applications.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Morris, H F" sort="Morris, H F" uniqKey="Morris H" first="H F" last="Morris">H F Morris</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Dental Implant Clinical Research Group, VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Dental Implant Clinical Research Group, VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>MI</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ochi, S" sort="Ochi, S" uniqKey="Ochi S" first="S" last="Ochi">S. Ochi</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Annals of periodontology</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1553-0841</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2000" type="published">2000</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Aged, 80 and over</term>
<term>Bone Density</term>
<term>Coated Materials, Biocompatible</term>
<term>Dental Alloys</term>
<term>Dental Implants</term>
<term>Dental Implants, Single-Tooth</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term>
<term>Dental Restoration Failure</term>
<term>Durapatite</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Follow-Up Studies</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation)</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery)</term>
<term>Linear Models</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Mandible (surgery)</term>
<term>Maxilla (surgery)</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Prospective Studies</term>
<term>Stress, Mechanical</term>
<term>Survival Analysis</term>
<term>Titanium</term>
<term>Treatment Outcome</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Alliage dentaire</term>
<term>Analyse de survie</term>
<term>Conception de prothèse dentaire</term>
<term>Contrainte mécanique</term>
<term>Densité osseuse</term>
<term>Durapatite</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Implants dentaires</term>
<term>Implants dentaires unitaires</term>
<term>Mandibule ()</term>
<term>Matériaux revêtus, biocompatibles</term>
<term>Maxillaire ()</term>
<term>Modèles linéaires</term>
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée ()</term>
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term>
<term>Mâchoire édentée ()</term>
<term>Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term>
<term>Résultat thérapeutique</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
<term>Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus</term>
<term>Titane</term>
<term>Échec de restauration dentaire</term>
<term>Études de suivi</term>
<term>Études prospectives</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en">
<term>Coated Materials, Biocompatible</term>
<term>Dental Alloys</term>
<term>Dental Implants</term>
<term>Durapatite</term>
<term>Titanium</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en">
<term>Jaw, Edentulous</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term>
<term>Mâchoire édentée</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en">
<term>Jaw, Edentulous</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Maxilla</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Aged, 80 and over</term>
<term>Bone Density</term>
<term>Dental Implants, Single-Tooth</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term>
<term>Dental Restoration Failure</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Follow-Up Studies</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Linear Models</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Prospective Studies</term>
<term>Stress, Mechanical</term>
<term>Survival Analysis</term>
<term>Treatment Outcome</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Alliage dentaire</term>
<term>Analyse de survie</term>
<term>Conception de prothèse dentaire</term>
<term>Contrainte mécanique</term>
<term>Densité osseuse</term>
<term>Durapatite</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Implants dentaires</term>
<term>Implants dentaires unitaires</term>
<term>Mandibule</term>
<term>Matériaux revêtus, biocompatibles</term>
<term>Maxillaire</term>
<term>Modèles linéaires</term>
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term>
<term>Mâchoire édentée</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term>
<term>Résultat thérapeutique</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
<term>Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus</term>
<term>Titane</term>
<term>Échec de restauration dentaire</term>
<term>Études de suivi</term>
<term>Études prospectives</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Over the years, the definition of implant failure has varied, with some investigators accounting for all implants placed, while others discard failures that occurred before clinical loading. The influence of stresses transmitted to various bone densities, by different prosthetic appliances as well as the method used to determine failures, needs to be clearly understood. This paper reports on the influence of two different methods of determining 36-month survival of implants used to support different dental prostheses.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Ncbi/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000831 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000831 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Ncbi
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:11885186
   |texte=   Influence of two different approaches to reporting implant survival outcomes for five different prosthodontic applications.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:11885186" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022