Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Reporting of dental status from full-arch radiographs: Descriptive analysis and methodological aspects

Identifieur interne : 005563 ( Ncbi/Checkpoint ); précédent : 005562; suivant : 005564

Reporting of dental status from full-arch radiographs: Descriptive analysis and methodological aspects

Auteurs : Fabian Huettig ; Detlef Axmann

Source :

RBID : PMC:4198409

Abstract

AIM: To identify standards, how entities of dental status are assessed and reported from full-arch radiographs of adults.

METHODS: A PubMed (Medline) search was performed in November 2011. Literature had to report at least one out of four defined entities using radiographs: number of teeth or implants; caries, fillings or restorations; root-canal fillings and apical health; alveolar bone level. Cohorts included to the study had to be of adult age. Methods of radiographic assessment were noted and checked for the later mode of report in text, tables or diagrams. For comparability, the encountered mode of report was operationalized to a logical expression.

RESULTS: Thirty-seven out of 199 articles were evaluated via full-text review. Only one article reported all four entities. Eight articles reported at the maximum 3 comparable entities. However, comparability is impeded because of the usage of absolute or relative frequency, mean or median values as well as grouping. Furthermore the methods of assessment were different or not described sufficiently. Consequently, established sum scores turned out to be highly questionable, too. The amount of missing data within all studies remained unclear. It is even so remissed to mention supernumerary and aplased teeth as well as the count of third molars.

CONCLUSION: Data about dental findings from radiographs is, if at all possible, only comparable with serious limitations. A standardization of both, assessing and reporting entities of dental status from radiographs is missing and has to be established within a report guideline.


Url:
DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i10.552
PubMed: 25325067
PubMed Central: 4198409


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

PMC:4198409

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Reporting of dental status from full-arch radiographs: Descriptive analysis and methodological aspects</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Huettig, Fabian" sort="Huettig, Fabian" uniqKey="Huettig F" first="Fabian" last="Huettig">Fabian Huettig</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Axmann, Detlef" sort="Axmann, Detlef" uniqKey="Axmann D" first="Detlef" last="Axmann">Detlef Axmann</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="pmid">25325067</idno>
<idno type="pmc">4198409</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4198409</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:4198409</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.12998/wjcc.v2.i10.552</idno>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">002571</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">002571</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">002571</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Curation">002571</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">001241</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Checkpoint">001241</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">005563</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">005563</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">005563</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Reporting of dental status from full-arch radiographs: Descriptive analysis and methodological aspects</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Huettig, Fabian" sort="Huettig, Fabian" uniqKey="Huettig F" first="Fabian" last="Huettig">Fabian Huettig</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Axmann, Detlef" sort="Axmann, Detlef" uniqKey="Axmann D" first="Detlef" last="Axmann">Detlef Axmann</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">World Journal of Clinical Cases : WJCC</title>
<idno type="ISSN">2307-8960</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">2307-8960</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<p>AIM: To identify standards, how entities of dental status are assessed and reported from full-arch radiographs of adults.</p>
<p>METHODS: A PubMed (Medline) search was performed in November 2011. Literature had to report at least one out of four defined entities using radiographs: number of teeth or implants; caries, fillings or restorations; root-canal fillings and apical health; alveolar bone level. Cohorts included to the study had to be of adult age. Methods of radiographic assessment were noted and checked for the later mode of report in text, tables or diagrams. For comparability, the encountered mode of report was operationalized to a logical expression.</p>
<p>RESULTS: Thirty-seven out of 199 articles were evaluated
<italic>via</italic>
full-text review. Only one article reported all four entities. Eight articles reported at the maximum 3 comparable entities. However, comparability is impeded because of the usage of absolute or relative frequency, mean or median values as well as grouping. Furthermore the methods of assessment were different or not described sufficiently. Consequently, established sum scores turned out to be highly questionable, too. The amount of missing data within all studies remained unclear. It is even so remissed to mention supernumerary and aplased teeth as well as the count of third molars.</p>
<p>CONCLUSION: Data about dental findings from radiographs is, if at all possible, only comparable with serious limitations. A standardization of both, assessing and reporting entities of dental status from radiographs is missing and has to be established within a report guideline.</p>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list></list>
<tree>
<noCountry>
<name sortKey="Axmann, Detlef" sort="Axmann, Detlef" uniqKey="Axmann D" first="Detlef" last="Axmann">Detlef Axmann</name>
<name sortKey="Huettig, Fabian" sort="Huettig, Fabian" uniqKey="Huettig F" first="Fabian" last="Huettig">Fabian Huettig</name>
</noCountry>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Ncbi/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005563 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 005563 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Ncbi
   |étape=   Checkpoint
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     PMC:4198409
   |texte=   Reporting of dental status from full-arch radiographs: Descriptive analysis and methodological aspects
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Checkpoint/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:25325067" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022