Implant success in distracted bone versus autogenous bone-grafted sites.
Identifieur interne : 002948 ( Ncbi/Checkpoint ); précédent : 002947; suivant : 002949Implant success in distracted bone versus autogenous bone-grafted sites.
Auteurs : Jeffrey A. Elo [États-Unis] ; Alan S. Herford ; Philip J. BoyneSource :
- The Journal of oral implantology [ 0160-6972 ] ; 2009.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Arcade dentaire (), Arcade dentaire (anatomopathologie), Humains, Implants dentaires, Mandibule (), Mandibule (anatomopathologie), Maxillaire (), Maxillaire (anatomopathologie), Mâchoire édentée (), Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation), Ostéogenèse par distraction, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux (), Procédures de chirurgie reconstructive, Prélèvement d'organes et de tissus (), Reconstruction de crête alvéolaire, Résultat thérapeutique, Transplantation autologue, Transplantation osseuse, Échec de restauration dentaire, Études de suivi, Études rétrospectives.
- MESH :
- anatomopathologie : Arcade dentaire, Mandibule, Maxillaire.
- rééducation et réadaptation : Mâchoire édentée.
- Arcade dentaire, Humains, Implants dentaires, Mandibule, Maxillaire, Mâchoire édentée, Ostéogenèse par distraction, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Procédures de chirurgie reconstructive, Prélèvement d'organes et de tissus, Reconstruction de crête alvéolaire, Résultat thérapeutique, Transplantation autologue, Transplantation osseuse, Échec de restauration dentaire, Études de suivi, Études rétrospectives.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Alveolar Ridge Augmentation, Bone Transplantation, Dental Arch (pathology), Dental Arch (surgery), Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods), Dental Implants, Dental Restoration Failure, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Jaw, Edentulous (surgery), Mandible (pathology), Mandible (surgery), Maxilla (pathology), Maxilla (surgery), Osteogenesis, Distraction, Reconstructive Surgical Procedures, Retrospective Studies, Tissue and Organ Harvesting (methods), Transplantation, Autologous, Treatment Outcome.
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- methods : Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Tissue and Organ Harvesting.
- pathology : Dental Arch, Mandible, Maxilla.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous.
- surgery : Dental Arch, Jaw, Edentulous, Mandible, Maxilla.
- Alveolar Ridge Augmentation, Bone Transplantation, Dental Restoration Failure, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Osteogenesis, Distraction, Reconstructive Surgical Procedures, Retrospective Studies, Transplantation, Autologous, Treatment Outcome.
Abstract
Endosseous implants are the treatment of choice for restoring function and reconstructing most edentulous areas of the maxilla and mandible. In general, alveolar bone defects can be reconstructed by either distraction osteogenesis or autogenous bone grafting. After alveolar reconstruction, endosseous implants are used to support and retain the prosthesis for restoration of form and function. Eighty-two consecutive patients requiring alveolar augmentation prior to implant placement were evaluated. All patients were given treatment options for reconstructing their alveolar defects, which included autogenous bone grafting vs distraction osteogenesis. Sixty-five patients received autogenous grafts (anterior iliac crest: 44; retromolar: 17; tibia: 2; chin: 2), and 17 patients underwent distraction osteogenesis prior to implant placement. A total of 184 implants were placed in the autogenous bone-grafted sites and 56 implants in the distracted bone sites. Implants placed in sites restored with autogenous bone grafts had an implant success rate of 97% (178/184), whereas implants placed in distracted bone sites had a success rate of 98% (55/56). In the autogenous grafted group, 3 implants failed in the posterior mandible, one in the anterior maxilla, one in the anterior mandible, and one in the posterior maxilla. In the distraction group, one implant failed in the posterior mandible. Both techniques are associated with good success rates. There was no statistical difference between implant success in autogenous bone vs distracted bone sites in this group of patients.
DOI: 10.1563/1548-1336-35.4.181
PubMed: 19813422
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: 001E76
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: 001E76
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: 001E76
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: 002948
- to stream Ncbi, to step Curation: 002948
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:19813422Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Implant success in distracted bone versus autogenous bone-grafted sites.</title><author><name sortKey="Elo, Jeffrey A" sort="Elo, Jeffrey A" uniqKey="Elo J" first="Jeffrey A" last="Elo">Jeffrey A. Elo</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, CA 92350, USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, CA 92350</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>CA 92350</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Herford, Alan S" sort="Herford, Alan S" uniqKey="Herford A" first="Alan S" last="Herford">Alan S. Herford</name></author><author><name sortKey="Boyne, Philip J" sort="Boyne, Philip J" uniqKey="Boyne P" first="Philip J" last="Boyne">Philip J. Boyne</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2009">2009</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:19813422</idno><idno type="pmid">19813422</idno><idno type="doi">10.1563/1548-1336-35.4.181</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001E76</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001E76</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">001E76</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">001E76</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">001E76</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">001E76</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">002948</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">002948</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">002948</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Implant success in distracted bone versus autogenous bone-grafted sites.</title><author><name sortKey="Elo, Jeffrey A" sort="Elo, Jeffrey A" uniqKey="Elo J" first="Jeffrey A" last="Elo">Jeffrey A. Elo</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, CA 92350, USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, CA 92350</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>CA 92350</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Herford, Alan S" sort="Herford, Alan S" uniqKey="Herford A" first="Alan S" last="Herford">Alan S. Herford</name></author><author><name sortKey="Boyne, Philip J" sort="Boyne, Philip J" uniqKey="Boyne P" first="Philip J" last="Boyne">Philip J. Boyne</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The Journal of oral implantology</title><idno type="ISSN">0160-6972</idno><imprint><date when="2009" type="published">2009</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation</term><term>Bone Transplantation</term><term>Dental Arch (pathology)</term><term>Dental Arch (surgery)</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term><term>Mandible (pathology)</term><term>Mandible (surgery)</term><term>Maxilla (pathology)</term><term>Maxilla (surgery)</term><term>Osteogenesis, Distraction</term><term>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</term><term>Retrospective Studies</term><term>Tissue and Organ Harvesting (methods)</term><term>Transplantation, Autologous</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Arcade dentaire ()</term><term>Arcade dentaire (anatomopathologie)</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Mandibule ()</term><term>Mandibule (anatomopathologie)</term><term>Maxillaire ()</term><term>Maxillaire (anatomopathologie)</term><term>Mâchoire édentée ()</term><term>Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term><term>Ostéogenèse par distraction</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux ()</term><term>Procédures de chirurgie reconstructive</term><term>Prélèvement d'organes et de tissus ()</term><term>Reconstruction de crête alvéolaire</term><term>Résultat thérapeutique</term><term>Transplantation autologue</term><term>Transplantation osseuse</term><term>Échec de restauration dentaire</term><term>Études de suivi</term><term>Études rétrospectives</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="anatomopathologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Arcade dentaire</term><term>Mandibule</term><term>Maxillaire</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Tissue and Organ Harvesting</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="pathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Arch</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxilla</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Arch</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxilla</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation</term><term>Bone Transplantation</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Osteogenesis, Distraction</term><term>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</term><term>Retrospective Studies</term><term>Transplantation, Autologous</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Arcade dentaire</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Mandibule</term><term>Maxillaire</term><term>Mâchoire édentée</term><term>Ostéogenèse par distraction</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Procédures de chirurgie reconstructive</term><term>Prélèvement d'organes et de tissus</term><term>Reconstruction de crête alvéolaire</term><term>Résultat thérapeutique</term><term>Transplantation autologue</term><term>Transplantation osseuse</term><term>Échec de restauration dentaire</term><term>Études de suivi</term><term>Études rétrospectives</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Endosseous implants are the treatment of choice for restoring function and reconstructing most edentulous areas of the maxilla and mandible. In general, alveolar bone defects can be reconstructed by either distraction osteogenesis or autogenous bone grafting. After alveolar reconstruction, endosseous implants are used to support and retain the prosthesis for restoration of form and function. Eighty-two consecutive patients requiring alveolar augmentation prior to implant placement were evaluated. All patients were given treatment options for reconstructing their alveolar defects, which included autogenous bone grafting vs distraction osteogenesis. Sixty-five patients received autogenous grafts (anterior iliac crest: 44; retromolar: 17; tibia: 2; chin: 2), and 17 patients underwent distraction osteogenesis prior to implant placement. A total of 184 implants were placed in the autogenous bone-grafted sites and 56 implants in the distracted bone sites. Implants placed in sites restored with autogenous bone grafts had an implant success rate of 97% (178/184), whereas implants placed in distracted bone sites had a success rate of 98% (55/56). In the autogenous grafted group, 3 implants failed in the posterior mandible, one in the anterior maxilla, one in the anterior mandible, and one in the posterior maxilla. In the distraction group, one implant failed in the posterior mandible. Both techniques are associated with good success rates. There was no statistical difference between implant success in autogenous bone vs distracted bone sites in this group of patients.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li></country></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Boyne, Philip J" sort="Boyne, Philip J" uniqKey="Boyne P" first="Philip J" last="Boyne">Philip J. Boyne</name><name sortKey="Herford, Alan S" sort="Herford, Alan S" uniqKey="Herford A" first="Alan S" last="Herford">Alan S. Herford</name></noCountry><country name="États-Unis"><noRegion><name sortKey="Elo, Jeffrey A" sort="Elo, Jeffrey A" uniqKey="Elo J" first="Jeffrey A" last="Elo">Jeffrey A. Elo</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Ncbi/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002948 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 002948 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Ncbi
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:19813422
|texte= Implant success in distracted bone versus autogenous bone-grafted sites.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:19813422" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |