Determination of vertical dimension of rest. A comparative study.
Identifieur interne : 00CA98 ( Main/Merge ); précédent : 00CA97; suivant : 00CA99Determination of vertical dimension of rest. A comparative study.
Auteurs : C L Babu ; S. Singh ; S N RaoSource :
- The Journal of prosthetic dentistry [ 0022-3913 ] ; 1987.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Attribution aléatoire, Dimension verticale, Femelle, Humains, Muscle masséter (physiopathologie), Muscles masticateurs (physiopathologie), Mâchoire édentée (anatomopathologie), Mâchoire édentée (physiopathologie), Mâle, Prothèse dentaire complète, Rétroaction biologique (psychologie), Sujet âgé, Électromyographie.
- MESH :
- anatomopathologie : Mâchoire édentée.
- physiopathologie : Muscle masséter, Muscles masticateurs, Mâchoire édentée.
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Attribution aléatoire, Dimension verticale, Femelle, Humains, Mâle, Prothèse dentaire complète, Rétroaction biologique (psychologie), Sujet âgé, Électromyographie.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- pathology : Jaw, Edentulous.
- physiopathology : Jaw, Edentulous, Masseter Muscle, Masticatory Muscles.
- Adult, Aged, Biofeedback, Psychology, Denture, Complete, Electromyography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Random Allocation, Vertical Dimension.
Abstract
The present study was undertaken to compare the VDR determined by conventional methods and EMG with biofeedback. Twenty dentulous and 20 edentulous subjects were included in the study. The VDR was determined by conventional methods using phonetic and swallowing methods. The masseter and anterior belly of the digastric muscles were used to determine the VDR by EMG with biofeedback. VDR was determined by dentulous and edentulous subjects by conventional and electromyographic methods. In edentulous subjects the VDR relation was determined by both methods with and without dentures in the mouth. All results were subjected to statistical analysis. The following conclusions are drawn from the study: The VDR as determined by both methods was similar in dentulous subjects. In edentulous subjects the difference in the VDR with and without dentures in the mouth was not statistically significant in both methods. In edentulous subjects the VDR increased in most subjects with the insertion of dentures and decreased in the remaining few subjects by either method. The difference between the VDR determined by conventional and electromyographic methods in edentulous subjects with dentures was not significant, but without dentures the difference was statistically significant. The comparison between the two methods of determining the VDR in dentulous and edentulous subjects with or without dentures in the mouth showed that VDR determined with dentures was closer to that of dentulous subjects than without dentures. It was concluded by the authors that the determination of VDR by either conventional or electromyographic methods with dentures was more accurate than determining the VDR without dentures.
PubMed: 3476732
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: 005085
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: 005085
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: 005085
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: 007898
- to stream Ncbi, to step Curation: 007898
- to stream Ncbi, to step Checkpoint: 007898
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:3476732Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Determination of vertical dimension of rest. A comparative study.</title><author><name sortKey="Babu, C L" sort="Babu, C L" uniqKey="Babu C" first="C L" last="Babu">C L Babu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Singh, S" sort="Singh, S" uniqKey="Singh S" first="S" last="Singh">S. Singh</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rao, S N" sort="Rao, S N" uniqKey="Rao S" first="S N" last="Rao">S N Rao</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="1987">1987</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:3476732</idno><idno type="pmid">3476732</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">005085</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">005085</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">005085</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">005085</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">005085</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">005085</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">007898</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">007898</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">007898</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0022-3913:1987:Babu C:determination:of:vertical</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">00CA98</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Determination of vertical dimension of rest. A comparative study.</title><author><name sortKey="Babu, C L" sort="Babu, C L" uniqKey="Babu C" first="C L" last="Babu">C L Babu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Singh, S" sort="Singh, S" uniqKey="Singh S" first="S" last="Singh">S. Singh</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rao, S N" sort="Rao, S N" uniqKey="Rao S" first="S N" last="Rao">S N Rao</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno><imprint><date when="1987" type="published">1987</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Biofeedback, Psychology</term><term>Denture, Complete</term><term>Electromyography</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (pathology)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (physiopathology)</term><term>Male</term><term>Masseter Muscle (physiopathology)</term><term>Masticatory Muscles (physiopathology)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Random Allocation</term><term>Vertical Dimension</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Attribution aléatoire</term><term>Dimension verticale</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Muscle masséter (physiopathologie)</term><term>Muscles masticateurs (physiopathologie)</term><term>Mâchoire édentée (anatomopathologie)</term><term>Mâchoire édentée (physiopathologie)</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Prothèse dentaire complète</term><term>Rétroaction biologique (psychologie)</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Électromyographie</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="anatomopathologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="pathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiopathologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Muscle masséter</term><term>Muscles masticateurs</term><term>Mâchoire édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiopathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Masseter Muscle</term><term>Masticatory Muscles</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Biofeedback, Psychology</term><term>Denture, Complete</term><term>Electromyography</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Random Allocation</term><term>Vertical Dimension</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Attribution aléatoire</term><term>Dimension verticale</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Prothèse dentaire complète</term><term>Rétroaction biologique (psychologie)</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Électromyographie</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The present study was undertaken to compare the VDR determined by conventional methods and EMG with biofeedback. Twenty dentulous and 20 edentulous subjects were included in the study. The VDR was determined by conventional methods using phonetic and swallowing methods. The masseter and anterior belly of the digastric muscles were used to determine the VDR by EMG with biofeedback. VDR was determined by dentulous and edentulous subjects by conventional and electromyographic methods. In edentulous subjects the VDR relation was determined by both methods with and without dentures in the mouth. All results were subjected to statistical analysis. The following conclusions are drawn from the study: The VDR as determined by both methods was similar in dentulous subjects. In edentulous subjects the difference in the VDR with and without dentures in the mouth was not statistically significant in both methods. In edentulous subjects the VDR increased in most subjects with the insertion of dentures and decreased in the remaining few subjects by either method. The difference between the VDR determined by conventional and electromyographic methods in edentulous subjects with dentures was not significant, but without dentures the difference was statistically significant. The comparison between the two methods of determining the VDR in dentulous and edentulous subjects with or without dentures in the mouth showed that VDR determined with dentures was closer to that of dentulous subjects than without dentures. It was concluded by the authors that the determination of VDR by either conventional or electromyographic methods with dentures was more accurate than determining the VDR without dentures.</div></front></TEI></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 00CA98 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 00CA98 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Main
|étape= Merge
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:3476732
|texte= Determination of vertical dimension of rest. A comparative study.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:3476732" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |