Treatment outcome with implant-retained overdentures: Part II—Patient satisfaction and predictability of subjective treatment outcome
Identifieur interne : 00B120 ( Main/Merge ); précédent : 00B119; suivant : 00B121Treatment outcome with implant-retained overdentures: Part II—Patient satisfaction and predictability of subjective treatment outcome
Auteurs : Marco S. Cune [Pays-Bas] ; Cornelis De Putter [Pays-Bas] ; Johan Hoogstraten [Pays-Bas]Source :
- The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry [ 0022-3913 ] ; 1994.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
- topic : Utrecht.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Baseline, Baseline patient, Clinical outcome, Clinical treatment outcome, Community dent, Complete dentures, Cune, Dent, Dental implants, Dentistry, Denture, Denture complaints, Denture problems, Denture wearers, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Factor analysis, Food particles, Hoogstraten, Implant, Implant system, Implant treatment, Katholieke universiteit nijmegen, Limited number, Lower denture, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular denture, Maxillary, Maxillary denture, Maxillofac, More problems, Multiple regression analysis, Nationwide study, Nonresolved complaints, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral rehabil, Oral rehabilitation, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated fixtures, Osseointegrated implants, Other studies, Overdentures, Patient satisfaction, Posttreatment, Posttreatment groups, Posttreatment measurement, Pretreatment, Pretreatment group, Pretreatment measurement, Prosthet, Prosthet dent, Prosthetic dentistry, Reference group, Scale score, Scale scores, Significant differences, Social desirability, Special issue, Standard deviations, Subjective treatment outcome, Tijdschr tandheelk, Transmandibular implant, Treatment characteristics, Treatment outcome, Upper denture, Utrecht, Value labels, Vrije universiteit.
- Teeft :
- Baseline, Baseline patient, Clinical outcome, Clinical treatment outcome, Community dent, Complete dentures, Cune, Dent, Dental implants, Dentistry, Denture, Denture complaints, Denture problems, Denture wearers, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Factor analysis, Food particles, Hoogstraten, Implant, Implant system, Implant treatment, Katholieke universiteit nijmegen, Limited number, Lower denture, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular denture, Maxillary, Maxillary denture, Maxillofac, More problems, Multiple regression analysis, Nationwide study, Nonresolved complaints, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral rehabil, Oral rehabilitation, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated fixtures, Osseointegrated implants, Other studies, Overdentures, Patient satisfaction, Posttreatment, Posttreatment groups, Posttreatment measurement, Pretreatment, Pretreatment group, Pretreatment measurement, Prosthet, Prosthet dent, Prosthetic dentistry, Reference group, Scale score, Scale scores, Significant differences, Social desirability, Special issue, Standard deviations, Subjective treatment outcome, Tijdschr tandheelk, Transmandibular implant, Treatment characteristics, Treatment outcome, Upper denture, Utrecht, Value labels, Vrije universiteit.
Abstract
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of implant-overdenture treatment (IOT) on patients' complaints about dentures and the degree to which subjective treatment outcome could be predicted from baseline patient and treatment characteristics. Four groups of patients were distinguished: one pretreatment group, two posttreatment groups (1 year after treatment) and one reference group of denture wearers, who had not applied for any kind of treatment. They finished a questionnaire with 20 statements on denture complaints. Four scales concerning denture complaints could be distinguished and named after their underlying variables. Differences between the groups were analyzed. IOT treatment was shown to be very effective on a wide range of denture complaints. Little change was seen in patient satisfaction with regard to maxillary dentures when measured on the scales, although many patients wanted improvement in retention and stability for the maxillary denture after IOT treatment in the mandible. Sixteen percent of the denture wearers who had not applied for IOT expressed complaints regarding their mandibular dentures that matched or were more severe than those of the patients that had applied for IOT, before the actual start of treatment. Although generally the subjective treatment outcome of IOT was favorable, it could not be individually predicted from baseline patient and treatment characteristics.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90073-6
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 005593
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 005593
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 004F40
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:AC30DCCA4FB669DB530669BF00C8A0FD0860A1E8Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Treatment outcome with implant-retained overdentures: Part II—Patient satisfaction and predictability of subjective treatment outcome</title>
<author><name sortKey="Cune, Marco S" sort="Cune, Marco S" uniqKey="Cune M" first="Marco S." last="Cune">Marco S. Cune</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="De Putter, Cornelis" sort="De Putter, Cornelis" uniqKey="De Putter C" first="Cornelis" last="De Putter">Cornelis De Putter</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hoogstraten, Johan" sort="Hoogstraten, Johan" uniqKey="Hoogstraten J" first="Johan" last="Hoogstraten">Johan Hoogstraten</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:AC30DCCA4FB669DB530669BF00C8A0FD0860A1E8</idno>
<date when="1994" year="1994">1994</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/0022-3913(94)90073-6</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/AC30DCCA4FB669DB530669BF00C8A0FD0860A1E8/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">005593</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">005593</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">005593</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">004F40</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">004F40</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0022-3913:1994:Cune M:treatment:outcome:with</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">00B120</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Treatment outcome with implant-retained overdentures: Part II—Patient satisfaction and predictability of subjective treatment outcome</title>
<author><name sortKey="Cune, Marco S" sort="Cune, Marco S" uniqKey="Cune M" first="Marco S." last="Cune">Marco S. Cune</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>University of Utrecht, Utrecht</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName><settlement type="city">Utrecht</settlement>
<region nuts="2" type="province">Utrecht (province)</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="De Putter, Cornelis" sort="De Putter, Cornelis" uniqKey="De Putter C" first="Cornelis" last="De Putter">Cornelis De Putter</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>University of Utrecht, Utrecht</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName><settlement type="city">Utrecht</settlement>
<region nuts="2" type="province">Utrecht (province)</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hoogstraten, Johan" sort="Hoogstraten, Johan" uniqKey="Hoogstraten J" first="Johan" last="Hoogstraten">Johan Hoogstraten</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>University of Utrecht, Utrecht</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName><settlement type="city">Utrecht</settlement>
<region nuts="2" type="province">Utrecht (province)</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j">The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">YMPR</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno>
<imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<date type="published" when="1994">1994</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">72</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="152">152</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="158">158</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Baseline</term>
<term>Baseline patient</term>
<term>Clinical outcome</term>
<term>Clinical treatment outcome</term>
<term>Community dent</term>
<term>Complete dentures</term>
<term>Cune</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture complaints</term>
<term>Denture problems</term>
<term>Denture wearers</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Factor analysis</term>
<term>Food particles</term>
<term>Hoogstraten</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant system</term>
<term>Implant treatment</term>
<term>Katholieke universiteit nijmegen</term>
<term>Limited number</term>
<term>Lower denture</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Mandibular denture</term>
<term>Maxillary</term>
<term>Maxillary denture</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>More problems</term>
<term>Multiple regression analysis</term>
<term>Nationwide study</term>
<term>Nonresolved complaints</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Oral rehabil</term>
<term>Oral rehabilitation</term>
<term>Osseointegrated</term>
<term>Osseointegrated fixtures</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Other studies</term>
<term>Overdentures</term>
<term>Patient satisfaction</term>
<term>Posttreatment</term>
<term>Posttreatment groups</term>
<term>Posttreatment measurement</term>
<term>Pretreatment</term>
<term>Pretreatment group</term>
<term>Pretreatment measurement</term>
<term>Prosthet</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic dentistry</term>
<term>Reference group</term>
<term>Scale score</term>
<term>Scale scores</term>
<term>Significant differences</term>
<term>Social desirability</term>
<term>Special issue</term>
<term>Standard deviations</term>
<term>Subjective treatment outcome</term>
<term>Tijdschr tandheelk</term>
<term>Transmandibular implant</term>
<term>Treatment characteristics</term>
<term>Treatment outcome</term>
<term>Upper denture</term>
<term>Utrecht</term>
<term>Value labels</term>
<term>Vrije universiteit</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Baseline</term>
<term>Baseline patient</term>
<term>Clinical outcome</term>
<term>Clinical treatment outcome</term>
<term>Community dent</term>
<term>Complete dentures</term>
<term>Cune</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture complaints</term>
<term>Denture problems</term>
<term>Denture wearers</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Factor analysis</term>
<term>Food particles</term>
<term>Hoogstraten</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant system</term>
<term>Implant treatment</term>
<term>Katholieke universiteit nijmegen</term>
<term>Limited number</term>
<term>Lower denture</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Mandibular denture</term>
<term>Maxillary</term>
<term>Maxillary denture</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>More problems</term>
<term>Multiple regression analysis</term>
<term>Nationwide study</term>
<term>Nonresolved complaints</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Oral rehabil</term>
<term>Oral rehabilitation</term>
<term>Osseointegrated</term>
<term>Osseointegrated fixtures</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Other studies</term>
<term>Overdentures</term>
<term>Patient satisfaction</term>
<term>Posttreatment</term>
<term>Posttreatment groups</term>
<term>Posttreatment measurement</term>
<term>Pretreatment</term>
<term>Pretreatment group</term>
<term>Pretreatment measurement</term>
<term>Prosthet</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic dentistry</term>
<term>Reference group</term>
<term>Scale score</term>
<term>Scale scores</term>
<term>Significant differences</term>
<term>Social desirability</term>
<term>Special issue</term>
<term>Standard deviations</term>
<term>Subjective treatment outcome</term>
<term>Tijdschr tandheelk</term>
<term>Transmandibular implant</term>
<term>Treatment characteristics</term>
<term>Treatment outcome</term>
<term>Upper denture</term>
<term>Utrecht</term>
<term>Value labels</term>
<term>Vrije universiteit</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Utrecht</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of implant-overdenture treatment (IOT) on patients' complaints about dentures and the degree to which subjective treatment outcome could be predicted from baseline patient and treatment characteristics. Four groups of patients were distinguished: one pretreatment group, two posttreatment groups (1 year after treatment) and one reference group of denture wearers, who had not applied for any kind of treatment. They finished a questionnaire with 20 statements on denture complaints. Four scales concerning denture complaints could be distinguished and named after their underlying variables. Differences between the groups were analyzed. IOT treatment was shown to be very effective on a wide range of denture complaints. Little change was seen in patient satisfaction with regard to maxillary dentures when measured on the scales, although many patients wanted improvement in retention and stability for the maxillary denture after IOT treatment in the mandible. Sixteen percent of the denture wearers who had not applied for IOT expressed complaints regarding their mandibular dentures that matched or were more severe than those of the patients that had applied for IOT, before the actual start of treatment. Although generally the subjective treatment outcome of IOT was favorable, it could not be individually predicted from baseline patient and treatment characteristics.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 00B120 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 00B120 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Main |étape= Merge |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:AC30DCCA4FB669DB530669BF00C8A0FD0860A1E8 |texte= Treatment outcome with implant-retained overdentures: Part II—Patient satisfaction and predictability of subjective treatment outcome }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |