The Periotest Method: Implant‐Supported Framework Precision of Fit Evaluation
Identifieur interne : 00A780 ( Main/Merge ); précédent : 00A779; suivant : 00A781The Periotest Method: Implant‐Supported Framework Precision of Fit Evaluation
Auteurs : Kenneth B. May ; Marion J. Edge ; Brien R. Lang ; Rui-Feng WangSource :
- Journal of Prosthodontics [ 1059-941X ] ; 1996-09.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
- topic : Simulation.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Cylinder interface, Dent, Framework, Framework assemblies, Framework condition, Framework conditions, Framework fabrication, Gold cylinders, Guide pins, Implant, Implant components, Implant location, Implant locations, Interface, Midfacial surface, Misfit, Oral maxillofac implants, Osseointegrated, Partial dentures, Patient simulation model, Periotest, Periotest instrument, Periotest method, Prosthesis, Prosthet, Prosthet dent, Ptvs, Quantitative misfit, Significant differences, Simulation, Ssac, Ssac assemblies, Ssac framework, Ssac frameworks, Ssac ssic, Ssic, Ssic frameworks, Sslc assemblies.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Cylinder interface, Dent, Framework, Framework assemblies, Framework condition, Framework conditions, Framework fabrication, Gold cylinders, Guide pins, Implant, Implant components, Implant location, Implant locations, Interface, Midfacial surface, Misfit, Oral maxillofac implants, Osseointegrated, Partial dentures, Patient simulation model, Periotest, Periotest instrument, Periotest method, Prosthesis, Prosthet, Prosthet dent, Ptvs, Quantitative misfit, Significant differences, Simulation, Ssac, Ssac assemblies, Ssac framework, Ssac frameworks, Ssac ssic, Ssic, Ssic frameworks, Sslc assemblies.
Abstract
In this study, the Periotest instrument was used to measure the precision of fit between cast high noble‐metal frameworks and the supporting implants in a patient‐simulation model. Three framework conditions and three implant‐location variables were used to evaluate the rigidity of the assembly as measured by the Periotest method. The framework variables were (1) one‐piece castings (OPC); (2) sectioned‐soldered inaccurate castings (SSIC); and (3) sectioned‐soldered accurate castings (SSAC). The implant‐location variables were right anterior (RA), center (C), and left anterior (LA).
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.1996.tb00298.x
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 004D83
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 004D83
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 004A39
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:9B77ABFE66B0197B5D5460AA1C85B18A7D2EDB14Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The Periotest Method: Implant‐Supported Framework Precision of Fit Evaluation</title>
<author><name sortKey="May, Kenneth B" sort="May, Kenneth B" uniqKey="May K" first="Kenneth B." last="May">Kenneth B. May</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Edge, Marion J" sort="Edge, Marion J" uniqKey="Edge M" first="Marion J." last="Edge">Marion J. Edge</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Lang, Brien R" sort="Lang, Brien R" uniqKey="Lang B" first="Brien R." last="Lang">Brien R. Lang</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Wang, Rui Eng" sort="Wang, Rui Eng" uniqKey="Wang R" first="Rui-Feng" last="Wang">Rui-Feng Wang</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:9B77ABFE66B0197B5D5460AA1C85B18A7D2EDB14</idno>
<date when="1996" year="1996">1996</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1532-849X.1996.tb00298.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/9B77ABFE66B0197B5D5460AA1C85B18A7D2EDB14/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004D83</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">004D83</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">004D83</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">004A39</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">004A39</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">1059-941X:1996:May K:the:periotest:method</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">00A780</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The Periotest Method: Implant‐Supported Framework Precision of Fit Evaluation</title>
<author><name sortKey="May, Kenneth B" sort="May, Kenneth B" uniqKey="May K" first="Kenneth B." last="May">Kenneth B. May</name>
<affiliation></affiliation>
<affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">48109‐1078.</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Edge, Marion J" sort="Edge, Marion J" uniqKey="Edge M" first="Marion J." last="Edge">Marion J. Edge</name>
<affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">MI.</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Lang, Brien R" sort="Lang, Brien R" uniqKey="Lang B" first="Brien R." last="Lang">Brien R. Lang</name>
<affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">MI.</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Wang, Rui Eng" sort="Wang, Rui Eng" uniqKey="Wang R" first="Rui-Feng" last="Wang">Rui-Feng Wang</name>
<affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">MI.</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Prosthodontics</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1059-941X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1532-849X</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">5</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="206">206</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="213">213</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="1996-09">1996-09</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1059-941X</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1059-941X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term>
<term>Cylinder interface</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Framework</term>
<term>Framework assemblies</term>
<term>Framework condition</term>
<term>Framework conditions</term>
<term>Framework fabrication</term>
<term>Gold cylinders</term>
<term>Guide pins</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant components</term>
<term>Implant location</term>
<term>Implant locations</term>
<term>Interface</term>
<term>Midfacial surface</term>
<term>Misfit</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Osseointegrated</term>
<term>Partial dentures</term>
<term>Patient simulation model</term>
<term>Periotest</term>
<term>Periotest instrument</term>
<term>Periotest method</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthet</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Ptvs</term>
<term>Quantitative misfit</term>
<term>Significant differences</term>
<term>Simulation</term>
<term>Ssac</term>
<term>Ssac assemblies</term>
<term>Ssac framework</term>
<term>Ssac frameworks</term>
<term>Ssac ssic</term>
<term>Ssic</term>
<term>Ssic frameworks</term>
<term>Sslc assemblies</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term>
<term>Cylinder interface</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Framework</term>
<term>Framework assemblies</term>
<term>Framework condition</term>
<term>Framework conditions</term>
<term>Framework fabrication</term>
<term>Gold cylinders</term>
<term>Guide pins</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant components</term>
<term>Implant location</term>
<term>Implant locations</term>
<term>Interface</term>
<term>Midfacial surface</term>
<term>Misfit</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Osseointegrated</term>
<term>Partial dentures</term>
<term>Patient simulation model</term>
<term>Periotest</term>
<term>Periotest instrument</term>
<term>Periotest method</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthet</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Ptvs</term>
<term>Quantitative misfit</term>
<term>Significant differences</term>
<term>Simulation</term>
<term>Ssac</term>
<term>Ssac assemblies</term>
<term>Ssac framework</term>
<term>Ssac frameworks</term>
<term>Ssac ssic</term>
<term>Ssic</term>
<term>Ssic frameworks</term>
<term>Sslc assemblies</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Simulation</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract">In this study, the Periotest instrument was used to measure the precision of fit between cast high noble‐metal frameworks and the supporting implants in a patient‐simulation model. Three framework conditions and three implant‐location variables were used to evaluate the rigidity of the assembly as measured by the Periotest method. The framework variables were (1) one‐piece castings (OPC); (2) sectioned‐soldered inaccurate castings (SSIC); and (3) sectioned‐soldered accurate castings (SSAC). The implant‐location variables were right anterior (RA), center (C), and left anterior (LA).</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 00A780 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 00A780 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Main |étape= Merge |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:9B77ABFE66B0197B5D5460AA1C85B18A7D2EDB14 |texte= The Periotest Method: Implant‐Supported Framework Precision of Fit Evaluation }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |