Freestanding and tooth-implant connected prostheses in the treatment of partially edentulous patients Part II: An up to 15-years radiographic evaluation.
Identifieur interne : 008A39 ( Main/Merge ); précédent : 008A38; suivant : 008A40Freestanding and tooth-implant connected prostheses in the treatment of partially edentulous patients Part II: An up to 15-years radiographic evaluation.
Auteurs : I E Naert [Belgique] ; J A Duyck ; M M Hosny ; M. Quirynen ; D. Van SteenbergheSource :
- Clinical oral implants research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2001.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Analyse de variance, Conception de prothèse dentaire, Contrainte mécanique, Facteurs temps, Femelle, Flexibilité, Humains, Implants dentaires, Intervalles de confiance, Modèles linéaires, Mâchoire partiellement édentée (), Mâchoire partiellement édentée (imagerie diagnostique), Mâchoire partiellement édentée (rééducation et réadaptation), Mâle, Piliers dentaires, Pronostic, Propriétés de surface, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Radiographie, Résorption osseuse (imagerie diagnostique), Résultat thérapeutique, Sujet âgé, Élasticité, Études de cohortes, Études de suivi, Études longitudinales.
- MESH :
- imagerie diagnostique : Mâchoire partiellement édentée, Résorption osseuse.
- rééducation et réadaptation : Mâchoire partiellement édentée.
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Analyse de variance, Conception de prothèse dentaire, Contrainte mécanique, Facteurs temps, Femelle, Flexibilité, Humains, Implants dentaires, Intervalles de confiance, Modèles linéaires, Mâchoire partiellement édentée, Mâle, Piliers dentaires, Pronostic, Propriétés de surface, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Radiographie, Résultat thérapeutique, Sujet âgé, Élasticité, Études de cohortes, Études de suivi, Études longitudinales.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Bone Resorption (diagnostic imaging), Cohort Studies, Confidence Intervals, Dental Abutments, Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Elasticity, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (diagnostic imaging), Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation), Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery), Linear Models, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Pliability, Prognosis, Radiography, Stress, Mechanical, Surface Properties, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome.
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- diagnostic imaging : Bone Resorption, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous, Partially.
- surgery : Jaw, Edentulous, Partially.
- Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Cohort Studies, Confidence Intervals, Dental Abutments, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Elasticity, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Linear Models, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Pliability, Prognosis, Radiography, Stress, Mechanical, Surface Properties, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome.
Abstract
A total of 123 patients were followed between January 1983 and July 1998 with 140 tooth-implant connected prostheses. The age of the patients at prosthesis installation ranged from 20 to 79 years (mean 51.8). 339 (Brånemark(R) system) implants were connected to 313 teeth. The loading time ranged from 1.5 to 15 years (mean: 6.5). 123 patients were randomly selected as a control group with freestanding implant-supported prostheses only. The age of the patients at prosthesis installation ranged from 22 to 78 years (mean 52.3). The loading time for the 329 freestanding (Brånemark(R) system) implants ranged from 1.3 to 14.5 years (mean: 6.2). Evolution of the marginal bone stability around the implant in the tooth-implant connected as well as the freestanding group was studied with respect to the prognosis of the implants. Over the period from 0 to 15 years, there was significantly more marginal bone loss (0.7 mm) in tooth-implant connected versus freestanding prostheses. No significant difference in marginal bone loss was found between the non-rigid tooth-implant connected prostheses versus freestanding prostheses. However, there was a significant difference in marginal bone loss for rigid and multi-connected tooth-implant connected prostheses versus freestanding ones. The results of this study indicate that more bone is lost around implants which are rigidly connected to teeth. This suggests that bending load, which is increased in tooth-implant connected prostheses, might be responsible for this phenomenon. These observations favor the use of freestanding prostheses whenever possible. However, the clinical significance of greater bone loss in rigid versus non-rigid connections might outweigh the annoying phenomenon of tooth intrusion in the case of non-rigid tooth connection, when connection is considered.
PubMed: 11359482
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: 003452
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: 003452
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: 003452
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: 000599
- to stream Ncbi, to step Curation: 000599
- to stream Ncbi, to step Checkpoint: 000599
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:11359482Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Freestanding and tooth-implant connected prostheses in the treatment of partially edentulous patients Part II: An up to 15-years radiographic evaluation.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Naert, I E" sort="Naert, I E" uniqKey="Naert I" first="I E" last="Naert">I E Naert</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium. Ignace@MED.Kuleuven.ac.be</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Belgique</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group, Catholic University of Leuven</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Catholic University of Leuven</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Duyck, J A" sort="Duyck, J A" uniqKey="Duyck J" first="J A" last="Duyck">J A Duyck</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hosny, M M" sort="Hosny, M M" uniqKey="Hosny M" first="M M" last="Hosny">M M Hosny</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Quirynen, M" sort="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="M" last="Quirynen">M. Quirynen</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" sort="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="D" last="Van Steenberghe">D. Van Steenberghe</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2001">2001</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:11359482</idno>
<idno type="pmid">11359482</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003452</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003452</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">003452</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">003452</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">003452</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">003452</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">000599</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">000599</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">000599</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0905-7161:2001:Naert I:freestanding:and:tooth</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">008A39</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Freestanding and tooth-implant connected prostheses in the treatment of partially edentulous patients Part II: An up to 15-years radiographic evaluation.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Naert, I E" sort="Naert, I E" uniqKey="Naert I" first="I E" last="Naert">I E Naert</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium. Ignace@MED.Kuleuven.ac.be</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Belgique</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Group, Catholic University of Leuven</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Catholic University of Leuven</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Duyck, J A" sort="Duyck, J A" uniqKey="Duyck J" first="J A" last="Duyck">J A Duyck</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hosny, M M" sort="Hosny, M M" uniqKey="Hosny M" first="M M" last="Hosny">M M Hosny</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Quirynen, M" sort="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="M" last="Quirynen">M. Quirynen</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" sort="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="D" last="Van Steenberghe">D. Van Steenberghe</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Clinical oral implants research</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
<imprint><date when="2001" type="published">2001</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Analysis of Variance</term>
<term>Bone Resorption (diagnostic imaging)</term>
<term>Cohort Studies</term>
<term>Confidence Intervals</term>
<term>Dental Abutments</term>
<term>Dental Implants</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term>
<term>Elasticity</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Follow-Up Studies</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (diagnostic imaging)</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation)</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery)</term>
<term>Linear Models</term>
<term>Longitudinal Studies</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Pliability</term>
<term>Prognosis</term>
<term>Radiography</term>
<term>Stress, Mechanical</term>
<term>Surface Properties</term>
<term>Time Factors</term>
<term>Treatment Outcome</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Analyse de variance</term>
<term>Conception de prothèse dentaire</term>
<term>Contrainte mécanique</term>
<term>Facteurs temps</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Flexibilité</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Implants dentaires</term>
<term>Intervalles de confiance</term>
<term>Modèles linéaires</term>
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée ()</term>
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée (imagerie diagnostique)</term>
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Piliers dentaires</term>
<term>Pronostic</term>
<term>Propriétés de surface</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term>
<term>Radiographie</term>
<term>Résorption osseuse (imagerie diagnostique)</term>
<term>Résultat thérapeutique</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
<term>Élasticité</term>
<term>Études de cohortes</term>
<term>Études de suivi</term>
<term>Études longitudinales</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone Resorption</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="imagerie diagnostique" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term>
<term>Résorption osseuse</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Analysis of Variance</term>
<term>Cohort Studies</term>
<term>Confidence Intervals</term>
<term>Dental Abutments</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term>
<term>Elasticity</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Follow-Up Studies</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Linear Models</term>
<term>Longitudinal Studies</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Pliability</term>
<term>Prognosis</term>
<term>Radiography</term>
<term>Stress, Mechanical</term>
<term>Surface Properties</term>
<term>Time Factors</term>
<term>Treatment Outcome</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Analyse de variance</term>
<term>Conception de prothèse dentaire</term>
<term>Contrainte mécanique</term>
<term>Facteurs temps</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Flexibilité</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Implants dentaires</term>
<term>Intervalles de confiance</term>
<term>Modèles linéaires</term>
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Piliers dentaires</term>
<term>Pronostic</term>
<term>Propriétés de surface</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term>
<term>Radiographie</term>
<term>Résultat thérapeutique</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
<term>Élasticité</term>
<term>Études de cohortes</term>
<term>Études de suivi</term>
<term>Études longitudinales</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">A total of 123 patients were followed between January 1983 and July 1998 with 140 tooth-implant connected prostheses. The age of the patients at prosthesis installation ranged from 20 to 79 years (mean 51.8). 339 (Brånemark(R) system) implants were connected to 313 teeth. The loading time ranged from 1.5 to 15 years (mean: 6.5). 123 patients were randomly selected as a control group with freestanding implant-supported prostheses only. The age of the patients at prosthesis installation ranged from 22 to 78 years (mean 52.3). The loading time for the 329 freestanding (Brånemark(R) system) implants ranged from 1.3 to 14.5 years (mean: 6.2). Evolution of the marginal bone stability around the implant in the tooth-implant connected as well as the freestanding group was studied with respect to the prognosis of the implants. Over the period from 0 to 15 years, there was significantly more marginal bone loss (0.7 mm) in tooth-implant connected versus freestanding prostheses. No significant difference in marginal bone loss was found between the non-rigid tooth-implant connected prostheses versus freestanding prostheses. However, there was a significant difference in marginal bone loss for rigid and multi-connected tooth-implant connected prostheses versus freestanding ones. The results of this study indicate that more bone is lost around implants which are rigidly connected to teeth. This suggests that bending load, which is increased in tooth-implant connected prostheses, might be responsible for this phenomenon. These observations favor the use of freestanding prostheses whenever possible. However, the clinical significance of greater bone loss in rigid versus non-rigid connections might outweigh the annoying phenomenon of tooth intrusion in the case of non-rigid tooth connection, when connection is considered.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 008A39 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 008A39 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Main |étape= Merge |type= RBID |clé= pubmed:11359482 |texte= Freestanding and tooth-implant connected prostheses in the treatment of partially edentulous patients Part II: An up to 15-years radiographic evaluation. }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:11359482" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |