Efficiency of Immediately Loaded Mandibular Full‐Arch Implant Restorations
Identifieur interne : 008225 ( Main/Merge ); précédent : 008224; suivant : 008226Efficiency of Immediately Loaded Mandibular Full‐Arch Implant Restorations
Auteurs : Winston Chee [États-Unis] ; Sajid Jivraj [États-Unis]Source :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2003-05.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Active treatment, Average time, Chairside time, Conventional protocol, Definitive prostheses, Dentistry, Denture, Denture fracture, Edentulous, Edentulous mandibles, Healing period, Immediate loading, Implant, Implant abutments, Implant insertion, Implant placement, Insertion, Local anesthesia, Mandible, Mandibular, Maxillary, Mental foramina, Occlusion, Oral maxillofac implants, Patient visits, Post insertion, Postoperative, Postoperative visits, Prosthesis, Provisional restoration, Southern california, Standard abutments, Surgical, Suture removal, Temporary cylinders.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Active treatment, Average time, Chairside time, Conventional protocol, Definitive prostheses, Dentistry, Denture, Denture fracture, Edentulous, Edentulous mandibles, Healing period, Immediate loading, Implant, Implant abutments, Implant insertion, Implant placement, Insertion, Local anesthesia, Mandible, Mandibular, Maxillary, Mental foramina, Occlusion, Oral maxillofac implants, Patient visits, Post insertion, Postoperative, Postoperative visits, Prosthesis, Provisional restoration, Southern california, Standard abutments, Surgical, Suture removal, Temporary cylinders.
Abstract
Background: The concept of immediately loading dental implants in fully edentulous patients offers patients many benefits, including the ability to eat post placement and improved comfort during healing. This approach may also minimize the number of patient visits when compared with the traditional approach of implant placement and healing over a 3‐ to 4‐month healing period. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the number of treatment visits for patients undergoing traditional implant placement and healing with that of patients receiving immediate implant loading prior to construction of the definitive prostheses. Materials and Methods: This case series evaluated two patient groups. Group 1 consisted of seven patients who were edentulous in the mandible. After implant placement, the implants were covered by oral mucosa during 3 to 4 months of healing. During this time patients wore relined mandibular dentures. Group 2 consisted of seven patients who had their implants immediately loaded with fixed prostheses on the day of implant placement. Results: The implants in both groups were integrated successfully; however, the number of patient visits between implant placement and construction of the definitive prostheses was 38 in the conventionally loaded group and 1 in the immediately loaded group. Conclusions: The group with immediate loading required significantly fewer postoperative visits compared with the conventionally loaded group.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00182.x
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 000589
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 000589
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 003616
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:0C61AC65A7290B7EC1CE5FF7A3DAAA65F640F34FLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Efficiency of Immediately Loaded Mandibular Full‐Arch Implant Restorations</title>
<author><name sortKey="Chee, Winston" sort="Chee, Winston" uniqKey="Chee W" first="Winston" last="Chee">Winston Chee</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Jivraj, Sajid" sort="Jivraj, Sajid" uniqKey="Jivraj S" first="Sajid" last="Jivraj">Sajid Jivraj</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:0C61AC65A7290B7EC1CE5FF7A3DAAA65F640F34F</idno>
<date when="2003" year="2003">2003</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00182.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/0C61AC65A7290B7EC1CE5FF7A3DAAA65F640F34F/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000589</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000589</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000589</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">003616</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">003616</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">1523-0899:2003:Chee W:efficiency:of:immediately</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">008225</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Efficiency of Immediately Loaded Mandibular Full‐Arch Implant Restorations</title>
<author><name sortKey="Chee, Winston" sort="Chee, Winston" uniqKey="Chee W" first="Winston" last="Chee">Winston Chee</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="4"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Ralph and Jean Bleak professor of restorative dentistry; director, Implant Dentistry; co‐director, Advanced Prosthodontics, University of Southern California, School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName><region type="state">Californie</region>
<settlement type="city">Los Angeles</settlement>
</placeName>
<orgName type="university">Université de Californie du Sud</orgName>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Jivraj, Sajid" sort="Jivraj, Sajid" uniqKey="Jivraj S" first="Sajid" last="Jivraj">Sajid Jivraj</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="4"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Assistant professor of Clinical Dentistry, University of Southern California, School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName><region type="state">Californie</region>
<settlement type="city">Los Angeles</settlement>
</placeName>
<orgName type="university">Université de Californie du Sud</orgName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">5</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="52">52</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="56">56</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">5</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2003-05">2003-05</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term>
<term>Active treatment</term>
<term>Average time</term>
<term>Chairside time</term>
<term>Conventional protocol</term>
<term>Definitive prostheses</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture fracture</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous mandibles</term>
<term>Healing period</term>
<term>Immediate loading</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant abutments</term>
<term>Implant insertion</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Insertion</term>
<term>Local anesthesia</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Maxillary</term>
<term>Mental foramina</term>
<term>Occlusion</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Patient visits</term>
<term>Post insertion</term>
<term>Postoperative</term>
<term>Postoperative visits</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Provisional restoration</term>
<term>Southern california</term>
<term>Standard abutments</term>
<term>Surgical</term>
<term>Suture removal</term>
<term>Temporary cylinders</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term>
<term>Active treatment</term>
<term>Average time</term>
<term>Chairside time</term>
<term>Conventional protocol</term>
<term>Definitive prostheses</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture fracture</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous mandibles</term>
<term>Healing period</term>
<term>Immediate loading</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant abutments</term>
<term>Implant insertion</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Insertion</term>
<term>Local anesthesia</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Maxillary</term>
<term>Mental foramina</term>
<term>Occlusion</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Patient visits</term>
<term>Post insertion</term>
<term>Postoperative</term>
<term>Postoperative visits</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Provisional restoration</term>
<term>Southern california</term>
<term>Standard abutments</term>
<term>Surgical</term>
<term>Suture removal</term>
<term>Temporary cylinders</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Background: The concept of immediately loading dental implants in fully edentulous patients offers patients many benefits, including the ability to eat post placement and improved comfort during healing. This approach may also minimize the number of patient visits when compared with the traditional approach of implant placement and healing over a 3‐ to 4‐month healing period. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the number of treatment visits for patients undergoing traditional implant placement and healing with that of patients receiving immediate implant loading prior to construction of the definitive prostheses. Materials and Methods: This case series evaluated two patient groups. Group 1 consisted of seven patients who were edentulous in the mandible. After implant placement, the implants were covered by oral mucosa during 3 to 4 months of healing. During this time patients wore relined mandibular dentures. Group 2 consisted of seven patients who had their implants immediately loaded with fixed prostheses on the day of implant placement. Results: The implants in both groups were integrated successfully; however, the number of patient visits between implant placement and construction of the definitive prostheses was 38 in the conventionally loaded group and 1 in the immediately loaded group. Conclusions: The group with immediate loading required significantly fewer postoperative visits compared with the conventionally loaded group.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 008225 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 008225 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Main |étape= Merge |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:0C61AC65A7290B7EC1CE5FF7A3DAAA65F640F34F |texte= Efficiency of Immediately Loaded Mandibular Full‐Arch Implant Restorations }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. | ![]() |