Assessment of correlation between computerized tomography values of the bone, and maximum torque and resonance frequency values at dental implant placement
Identifieur interne : 007143 ( Main/Merge ); précédent : 007142; suivant : 007144Assessment of correlation between computerized tomography values of the bone, and maximum torque and resonance frequency values at dental implant placement
Auteurs : I. Turkyilmaz ; T. F. Tözüm ; C. Tumer ; E. N. Ozbek [Turquie]Source :
- Journal of Oral Rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 2006-12.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Anterior mandible, Anterior maxilla, Average fastening torque values, Blackwell publishing, Bone densities, Bone density, Bone density value, Bone density values, Bone quality, Branemark, Clin, Clinical study, Computerized tomography, Corresponding correlations, Cylindric drills, Dental implants, Diameter implants, Fastening, Fastening torque, Fastening torque values, Implant, Implant placement, Implant sites, Implant stability, Implant stability quotient, Implant stability values, Insertion, Insertion torque, Journal compilation, Lekholm, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular overdentures, Maxilla, Maxillofac, Maximum torque, Older patients, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral rehabil, Osstell machine, Overdentures, Placement torques, Posterior mandible, Posterior maxilla, Posterior regions, Preoperative, Present study, Previous studies, Primary stability, Resonance frequency analysis, Resonance frequency measurements, Surgical, Surgical procedure, Tiunite, Tomography, Torque, Torque values.
- Teeft :
- Anterior mandible, Anterior maxilla, Average fastening torque values, Blackwell publishing, Bone densities, Bone density, Bone density value, Bone density values, Bone quality, Branemark, Clin, Clinical study, Computerized tomography, Corresponding correlations, Cylindric drills, Dental implants, Diameter implants, Fastening, Fastening torque, Fastening torque values, Implant, Implant placement, Implant sites, Implant stability, Implant stability quotient, Implant stability values, Insertion, Insertion torque, Journal compilation, Lekholm, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular overdentures, Maxilla, Maxillofac, Maximum torque, Older patients, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral rehabil, Osstell machine, Overdentures, Placement torques, Posterior mandible, Posterior maxilla, Posterior regions, Preoperative, Present study, Previous studies, Primary stability, Resonance frequency analysis, Resonance frequency measurements, Surgical, Surgical procedure, Tiunite, Tomography, Torque, Torque values.
Abstract
summary The aim of this study was to determine the bone density in the designated implant sites using computerized tomography (CT), the fastening torque values of dental implants, and the implant stability values using resonance frequency analysis. Further aim was to evaluate a possible correlation between bone density, fastening torque and implant stability. Eighty‐five patients were treated with 158 Brånemark System implants. CT machine was used for preoperative evaluation of the jawbone for each patient, and bone densities were recorded in Hounsfield units (HU). The fastening torque values of all implants were recorded with the OsseoCare equipment. Implant stability measurements were performed with the Osstell machine. The average bone density and fastening torque values were 751·4 ± 256 HU and 39·7 ± 7 Ncm for 158 implants. The average primary implant stability was 73·2 ± 6 ISQ for seventy implants. Strong correlations were observed between the bone density, fastening torque and implant stability values of Brånemark System TiUnite MKIII implants at implant placement (P < 0·001). These results strengthen the hypothesis that it may be possible to predict and quantify initial implant stability and bone quality from pre‐surgical CT diagnosis.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01692.x
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 000C99
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 000C99
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 002D17
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:1A6742553E017024F016B50B7786925705E5029DLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Assessment of correlation between computerized tomography values of the bone, and maximum torque and resonance frequency values at dental implant placement</title>
<author><name sortKey="Turkyilmaz, I" sort="Turkyilmaz, I" uniqKey="Turkyilmaz I" first="I." last="Turkyilmaz">I. Turkyilmaz</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Tozum, T F" sort="Tozum, T F" uniqKey="Tozum T" first="T. F." last="Tözüm">T. F. Tözüm</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Tumer, C" sort="Tumer, C" uniqKey="Tumer C" first="C." last="Tumer">C. Tumer</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Ozbek, E N" sort="Ozbek, E N" uniqKey="Ozbek E" first="E. N." last="Ozbek">E. N. Ozbek</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:1A6742553E017024F016B50B7786925705E5029D</idno>
<date when="2006" year="2006">2006</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01692.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/1A6742553E017024F016B50B7786925705E5029D/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000C99</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000C99</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000C99</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">002D17</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">002D17</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0305-182X:2006:Turkyilmaz I:assessment:of:correlation</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">007143</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Assessment of correlation between computerized tomography values of the bone, and maximum torque and resonance frequency values at dental implant placement</title>
<author><name sortKey="Turkyilmaz, I" sort="Turkyilmaz, I" uniqKey="Turkyilmaz I" first="I." last="Turkyilmaz">I. Turkyilmaz</name>
<affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">Department of Prosthodontics</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Tozum, T F" sort="Tozum, T F" uniqKey="Tozum T" first="T. F." last="Tözüm">T. F. Tözüm</name>
<affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">Department of Periodontology</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Tumer, C" sort="Tumer, C" uniqKey="Tumer C" first="C." last="Tumer">C. Tumer</name>
<affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">University</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Ozbek, E N" sort="Ozbek, E N" uniqKey="Ozbek E" first="E. N." last="Ozbek">E. N. Ozbek</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Turquie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Baskent University, Ankara</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Ankara</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">33</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">12</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="881">881</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="888">888</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2006-12">2006-12</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Anterior mandible</term>
<term>Anterior maxilla</term>
<term>Average fastening torque values</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Bone densities</term>
<term>Bone density</term>
<term>Bone density value</term>
<term>Bone density values</term>
<term>Bone quality</term>
<term>Branemark</term>
<term>Clin</term>
<term>Clinical study</term>
<term>Computerized tomography</term>
<term>Corresponding correlations</term>
<term>Cylindric drills</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Diameter implants</term>
<term>Fastening</term>
<term>Fastening torque</term>
<term>Fastening torque values</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Implant sites</term>
<term>Implant stability</term>
<term>Implant stability quotient</term>
<term>Implant stability values</term>
<term>Insertion</term>
<term>Insertion torque</term>
<term>Journal compilation</term>
<term>Lekholm</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Mandibular overdentures</term>
<term>Maxilla</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>Maximum torque</term>
<term>Older patients</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Oral rehabil</term>
<term>Osstell machine</term>
<term>Overdentures</term>
<term>Placement torques</term>
<term>Posterior mandible</term>
<term>Posterior maxilla</term>
<term>Posterior regions</term>
<term>Preoperative</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Previous studies</term>
<term>Primary stability</term>
<term>Resonance frequency analysis</term>
<term>Resonance frequency measurements</term>
<term>Surgical</term>
<term>Surgical procedure</term>
<term>Tiunite</term>
<term>Tomography</term>
<term>Torque</term>
<term>Torque values</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Anterior mandible</term>
<term>Anterior maxilla</term>
<term>Average fastening torque values</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Bone densities</term>
<term>Bone density</term>
<term>Bone density value</term>
<term>Bone density values</term>
<term>Bone quality</term>
<term>Branemark</term>
<term>Clin</term>
<term>Clinical study</term>
<term>Computerized tomography</term>
<term>Corresponding correlations</term>
<term>Cylindric drills</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Diameter implants</term>
<term>Fastening</term>
<term>Fastening torque</term>
<term>Fastening torque values</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Implant sites</term>
<term>Implant stability</term>
<term>Implant stability quotient</term>
<term>Implant stability values</term>
<term>Insertion</term>
<term>Insertion torque</term>
<term>Journal compilation</term>
<term>Lekholm</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Mandibular overdentures</term>
<term>Maxilla</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>Maximum torque</term>
<term>Older patients</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Oral rehabil</term>
<term>Osstell machine</term>
<term>Overdentures</term>
<term>Placement torques</term>
<term>Posterior mandible</term>
<term>Posterior maxilla</term>
<term>Posterior regions</term>
<term>Preoperative</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Previous studies</term>
<term>Primary stability</term>
<term>Resonance frequency analysis</term>
<term>Resonance frequency measurements</term>
<term>Surgical</term>
<term>Surgical procedure</term>
<term>Tiunite</term>
<term>Tomography</term>
<term>Torque</term>
<term>Torque values</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract">summary The aim of this study was to determine the bone density in the designated implant sites using computerized tomography (CT), the fastening torque values of dental implants, and the implant stability values using resonance frequency analysis. Further aim was to evaluate a possible correlation between bone density, fastening torque and implant stability. Eighty‐five patients were treated with 158 Brånemark System implants. CT machine was used for preoperative evaluation of the jawbone for each patient, and bone densities were recorded in Hounsfield units (HU). The fastening torque values of all implants were recorded with the OsseoCare equipment. Implant stability measurements were performed with the Osstell machine. The average bone density and fastening torque values were 751·4 ± 256 HU and 39·7 ± 7 Ncm for 158 implants. The average primary implant stability was 73·2 ± 6 ISQ for seventy implants. Strong correlations were observed between the bone density, fastening torque and implant stability values of Brånemark System TiUnite MKIII implants at implant placement (P < 0·001). These results strengthen the hypothesis that it may be possible to predict and quantify initial implant stability and bone quality from pre‐surgical CT diagnosis.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007143 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 007143 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Main |étape= Merge |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:1A6742553E017024F016B50B7786925705E5029D |texte= Assessment of correlation between computerized tomography values of the bone, and maximum torque and resonance frequency values at dental implant placement }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |