Suitability of differently designed matrix‐based implant surface coatings: An animal study on bone formation
Identifieur interne : 006309 ( Main/Merge ); précédent : 006308; suivant : 006310Suitability of differently designed matrix‐based implant surface coatings: An animal study on bone formation
Auteurs : Bernd Stadlinger [Allemagne] ; Eckart Pilling [Allemagne] ; Matthias Huhle [Allemagne] ; Evgenij Khavkin [Allemagne] ; Susanne Bierbaum [Allemagne] ; Dieter Scharnweber [Allemagne] ; Eberhard Kuhlisch [Allemagne] ; Uwe Eckelt [Allemagne] ; Ronald Mai [Allemagne]Source :
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials [ 1552-4973 ] ; 2008-11.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
- topic : Biomatériau, Titane.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adhesion, Animal study, Appl biomater, Biomaterials, Biomed, Biomed mater, Biomedical, Biomedical materials research part, Body weight faustan, Bone apposition, Bone formation, Bone growth, Bone implant contact, Bone regeneration, Bone tissue, Brillogenesis buffer, Calvarial osteoblasts, Cathodic polarization, Cell adhesion, Chondroitin sulfate, Collagen, Collagen matrices, Collagen type, Dard, Dental implants, Different surface coatings, Dresden, Drill hole, Early stages, Experimental implant, Experimental implants, Extracellular matrix, Fluorochrome excitation, Former drill hole, Fourth week, General anesthesia, Histologic section, Histological, Histological sections, Host bone, Implant, Implant design, Implant placement, Implant surface, Implant surface coatings, Implant surfaces, Implantofugal direction, Lamellar bone, Length axis, Major focus, Mater, Matrix, Mature bone, Mineralization, Mineralized, Mineralized collagen, Mineralized collagen type, Native host bone, Obvious differences, Online issue, Osseointegration, Osteoblast, Osteoblastic cells, Osteoid seams, Peptide, Periimplant, Periimplant region, Periimplant tissue, Positive effects, Preexisting bone, Sandblasted titanium, Scharnweber, Second week, Such coatings, Surface coating, Surface state, Technology dresden, Third week, Titanium, Titanium implants, Titanium surface, Uncoated, Uncoated implants, Uncoated titanium, Vivo studies, Wiley periodicals, Worch.
- Teeft :
- Adhesion, Animal study, Appl biomater, Biomaterials, Biomed, Biomed mater, Biomedical, Biomedical materials research part, Body weight faustan, Bone apposition, Bone formation, Bone growth, Bone implant contact, Bone regeneration, Bone tissue, Brillogenesis buffer, Calvarial osteoblasts, Cathodic polarization, Cell adhesion, Chondroitin sulfate, Collagen, Collagen matrices, Collagen type, Dard, Dental implants, Different surface coatings, Dresden, Drill hole, Early stages, Experimental implant, Experimental implants, Extracellular matrix, Fluorochrome excitation, Former drill hole, Fourth week, General anesthesia, Histologic section, Histological, Histological sections, Host bone, Implant, Implant design, Implant placement, Implant surface, Implant surface coatings, Implant surfaces, Implantofugal direction, Lamellar bone, Length axis, Major focus, Mater, Matrix, Mature bone, Mineralization, Mineralized, Mineralized collagen, Mineralized collagen type, Native host bone, Obvious differences, Online issue, Osseointegration, Osteoblast, Osteoblastic cells, Osteoid seams, Peptide, Periimplant, Periimplant region, Periimplant tissue, Positive effects, Preexisting bone, Sandblasted titanium, Scharnweber, Second week, Such coatings, Surface coating, Surface state, Technology dresden, Third week, Titanium, Titanium implants, Titanium surface, Uncoated, Uncoated implants, Uncoated titanium, Vivo studies, Wiley periodicals, Worch.
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of the present study was to assay how bone formation around dental implants is influenced by differently composed collagen matrices and RGD peptide as implant surface coatings compared to a sandblasted titanium surface. Material and Methods: Five different implant surface coatings were designed: titanium (sandblasted), collagen type I, collagen type I&III, RGD‐peptide, and mineralized collagen. Sixty experimental implants of a square‐shaped design were inserted into the mandibles of 12 minipigs, 3 months following extraction of the premolar teeth. During the 6‐month study period, sequential polyfluorochrome labeling was performed. After sacrifice, bone implant contact (BIC) was evaluated using histologic and histomorphometric methods. Results: New bone formation was observed against all implant surfaces. Polyfluorochrome labeling showed that bone growth started from the host bone in the majority of samples. The highest BIC was measured for collagen I and collagen I/III coated implants; however, significant differences between the coatings could not be found. Conclusion: Osseointegration was achieved for all implant surfaces. Although a statistically significant increase in BIC could not be demonstrated for the experimental coatings after the 6 months study period, there was also no discernible detrimental effect of the coatings in comparison to the uncoated titanium surfaces. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2008
Url:
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31138
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 000681
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 000681
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 002496
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:0E038B4A8C21D7B07C37F9E78879140A2E483865Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Suitability of differently designed matrix‐based implant surface coatings: An animal study on bone formation</title><author><name sortKey="Stadlinger, Bernd" sort="Stadlinger, Bernd" uniqKey="Stadlinger B" first="Bernd" last="Stadlinger">Bernd Stadlinger</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pilling, Eckart" sort="Pilling, Eckart" uniqKey="Pilling E" first="Eckart" last="Pilling">Eckart Pilling</name></author><author><name sortKey="Huhle, Matthias" sort="Huhle, Matthias" uniqKey="Huhle M" first="Matthias" last="Huhle">Matthias Huhle</name></author><author><name sortKey="Khavkin, Evgenij" sort="Khavkin, Evgenij" uniqKey="Khavkin E" first="Evgenij" last="Khavkin">Evgenij Khavkin</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bierbaum, Susanne" sort="Bierbaum, Susanne" uniqKey="Bierbaum S" first="Susanne" last="Bierbaum">Susanne Bierbaum</name></author><author><name sortKey="Scharnweber, Dieter" sort="Scharnweber, Dieter" uniqKey="Scharnweber D" first="Dieter" last="Scharnweber">Dieter Scharnweber</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kuhlisch, Eberhard" sort="Kuhlisch, Eberhard" uniqKey="Kuhlisch E" first="Eberhard" last="Kuhlisch">Eberhard Kuhlisch</name></author><author><name sortKey="Eckelt, Uwe" sort="Eckelt, Uwe" uniqKey="Eckelt U" first="Uwe" last="Eckelt">Uwe Eckelt</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mai, Ronald" sort="Mai, Ronald" uniqKey="Mai R" first="Ronald" last="Mai">Ronald Mai</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:0E038B4A8C21D7B07C37F9E78879140A2E483865</idno><date when="2008" year="2008">2008</date><idno type="doi">10.1002/jbm.b.31138</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/0E038B4A8C21D7B07C37F9E78879140A2E483865/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000681</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000681</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000681</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">002496</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">002496</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">1552-4973:2008:Stadlinger B:suitability:of:differently</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">006309</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Suitability of differently designed matrix‐based implant surface coatings: An animal study on bone formation</title><author><name sortKey="Stadlinger, Bernd" sort="Stadlinger, Bernd" uniqKey="Stadlinger B" first="Bernd" last="Stadlinger">Bernd Stadlinger</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Technology Dresden, D‐01307 Dresden</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="land" nuts="1">Saxe (Land)</region><region type="district" nuts="2">District de Dresde</region><settlement type="city">Dresde</settlement></placeName></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">Allemagne</country></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>Correspondence address: Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Technology Dresden, D‐01307 Dresden</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="land" nuts="1">Saxe (Land)</region><region type="district" nuts="2">District de Dresde</region><settlement type="city">Dresde</settlement></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pilling, Eckart" sort="Pilling, Eckart" uniqKey="Pilling E" first="Eckart" last="Pilling">Eckart Pilling</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Technology Dresden, D‐01307 Dresden</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="land" nuts="1">Saxe (Land)</region><region type="district" nuts="2">District de Dresde</region><settlement type="city">Dresde</settlement></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Huhle, Matthias" sort="Huhle, Matthias" uniqKey="Huhle M" first="Matthias" last="Huhle">Matthias Huhle</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Technology Dresden, D‐01307 Dresden</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="land" nuts="1">Saxe (Land)</region><region type="district" nuts="2">District de Dresde</region><settlement type="city">Dresde</settlement></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Khavkin, Evgenij" sort="Khavkin, Evgenij" uniqKey="Khavkin E" first="Evgenij" last="Khavkin">Evgenij Khavkin</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Technology Dresden, D‐01307 Dresden</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="land" nuts="1">Saxe (Land)</region><region type="district" nuts="2">District de Dresde</region><settlement type="city">Dresde</settlement></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bierbaum, Susanne" sort="Bierbaum, Susanne" uniqKey="Bierbaum S" first="Susanne" last="Bierbaum">Susanne Bierbaum</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>Max‐Bergmann‐Center of Biomaterials, University of Technology Dresden, D‐01062 Dresden</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>01062 Dresden</wicri:noRegion><wicri:noRegion>D‐01062 Dresden</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Scharnweber, Dieter" sort="Scharnweber, Dieter" uniqKey="Scharnweber D" first="Dieter" last="Scharnweber">Dieter Scharnweber</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>Max‐Bergmann‐Center of Biomaterials, University of Technology Dresden, D‐01062 Dresden</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>01062 Dresden</wicri:noRegion><wicri:noRegion>D‐01062 Dresden</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kuhlisch, Eberhard" sort="Kuhlisch, Eberhard" uniqKey="Kuhlisch E" first="Eberhard" last="Kuhlisch">Eberhard Kuhlisch</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>Institute for Medical Informatics and Biometry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Technology Dresden, D‐01307 Dresden</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="land" nuts="1">Saxe (Land)</region><region type="district" nuts="2">District de Dresde</region><settlement type="city">Dresde</settlement></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Eckelt, Uwe" sort="Eckelt, Uwe" uniqKey="Eckelt U" first="Uwe" last="Eckelt">Uwe Eckelt</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Technology Dresden, D‐01307 Dresden</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="land" nuts="1">Saxe (Land)</region><region type="district" nuts="2">District de Dresde</region><settlement type="city">Dresde</settlement></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mai, Ronald" sort="Mai, Ronald" uniqKey="Mai R" first="Ronald" last="Mai">Ronald Mai</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Technology Dresden, D‐01307 Dresden</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="land" nuts="1">Saxe (Land)</region><region type="district" nuts="2">District de Dresde</region><settlement type="city">Dresde</settlement></placeName></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART B: APPLIED BIOMATERIALS</title><idno type="ISSN">1552-4973</idno><idno type="eISSN">1552-4981</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">87B</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="516">516</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="524">524</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><pubPlace>Hoboken</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2008-11">2008-11</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1552-4973</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1552-4973</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adhesion</term><term>Animal study</term><term>Appl biomater</term><term>Biomaterials</term><term>Biomed</term><term>Biomed mater</term><term>Biomedical</term><term>Biomedical materials research part</term><term>Body weight faustan</term><term>Bone apposition</term><term>Bone formation</term><term>Bone growth</term><term>Bone implant contact</term><term>Bone regeneration</term><term>Bone tissue</term><term>Brillogenesis buffer</term><term>Calvarial osteoblasts</term><term>Cathodic polarization</term><term>Cell adhesion</term><term>Chondroitin sulfate</term><term>Collagen</term><term>Collagen matrices</term><term>Collagen type</term><term>Dard</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Different surface coatings</term><term>Dresden</term><term>Drill hole</term><term>Early stages</term><term>Experimental implant</term><term>Experimental implants</term><term>Extracellular matrix</term><term>Fluorochrome excitation</term><term>Former drill hole</term><term>Fourth week</term><term>General anesthesia</term><term>Histologic section</term><term>Histological</term><term>Histological sections</term><term>Host bone</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant design</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant surface</term><term>Implant surface coatings</term><term>Implant surfaces</term><term>Implantofugal direction</term><term>Lamellar bone</term><term>Length axis</term><term>Major focus</term><term>Mater</term><term>Matrix</term><term>Mature bone</term><term>Mineralization</term><term>Mineralized</term><term>Mineralized collagen</term><term>Mineralized collagen type</term><term>Native host bone</term><term>Obvious differences</term><term>Online issue</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Osteoblast</term><term>Osteoblastic cells</term><term>Osteoid seams</term><term>Peptide</term><term>Periimplant</term><term>Periimplant region</term><term>Periimplant tissue</term><term>Positive effects</term><term>Preexisting bone</term><term>Sandblasted titanium</term><term>Scharnweber</term><term>Second week</term><term>Such coatings</term><term>Surface coating</term><term>Surface state</term><term>Technology dresden</term><term>Third week</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Titanium surface</term><term>Uncoated</term><term>Uncoated implants</term><term>Uncoated titanium</term><term>Vivo studies</term><term>Wiley periodicals</term><term>Worch</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Adhesion</term><term>Animal study</term><term>Appl biomater</term><term>Biomaterials</term><term>Biomed</term><term>Biomed mater</term><term>Biomedical</term><term>Biomedical materials research part</term><term>Body weight faustan</term><term>Bone apposition</term><term>Bone formation</term><term>Bone growth</term><term>Bone implant contact</term><term>Bone regeneration</term><term>Bone tissue</term><term>Brillogenesis buffer</term><term>Calvarial osteoblasts</term><term>Cathodic polarization</term><term>Cell adhesion</term><term>Chondroitin sulfate</term><term>Collagen</term><term>Collagen matrices</term><term>Collagen type</term><term>Dard</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Different surface coatings</term><term>Dresden</term><term>Drill hole</term><term>Early stages</term><term>Experimental implant</term><term>Experimental implants</term><term>Extracellular matrix</term><term>Fluorochrome excitation</term><term>Former drill hole</term><term>Fourth week</term><term>General anesthesia</term><term>Histologic section</term><term>Histological</term><term>Histological sections</term><term>Host bone</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant design</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant surface</term><term>Implant surface coatings</term><term>Implant surfaces</term><term>Implantofugal direction</term><term>Lamellar bone</term><term>Length axis</term><term>Major focus</term><term>Mater</term><term>Matrix</term><term>Mature bone</term><term>Mineralization</term><term>Mineralized</term><term>Mineralized collagen</term><term>Mineralized collagen type</term><term>Native host bone</term><term>Obvious differences</term><term>Online issue</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Osteoblast</term><term>Osteoblastic cells</term><term>Osteoid seams</term><term>Peptide</term><term>Periimplant</term><term>Periimplant region</term><term>Periimplant tissue</term><term>Positive effects</term><term>Preexisting bone</term><term>Sandblasted titanium</term><term>Scharnweber</term><term>Second week</term><term>Such coatings</term><term>Surface coating</term><term>Surface state</term><term>Technology dresden</term><term>Third week</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Titanium surface</term><term>Uncoated</term><term>Uncoated implants</term><term>Uncoated titanium</term><term>Vivo studies</term><term>Wiley periodicals</term><term>Worch</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Biomatériau</term><term>Titane</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Introduction: The aim of the present study was to assay how bone formation around dental implants is influenced by differently composed collagen matrices and RGD peptide as implant surface coatings compared to a sandblasted titanium surface. Material and Methods: Five different implant surface coatings were designed: titanium (sandblasted), collagen type I, collagen type I&III, RGD‐peptide, and mineralized collagen. Sixty experimental implants of a square‐shaped design were inserted into the mandibles of 12 minipigs, 3 months following extraction of the premolar teeth. During the 6‐month study period, sequential polyfluorochrome labeling was performed. After sacrifice, bone implant contact (BIC) was evaluated using histologic and histomorphometric methods. Results: New bone formation was observed against all implant surfaces. Polyfluorochrome labeling showed that bone growth started from the host bone in the majority of samples. The highest BIC was measured for collagen I and collagen I/III coated implants; however, significant differences between the coatings could not be found. Conclusion: Osseointegration was achieved for all implant surfaces. Although a statistically significant increase in BIC could not be demonstrated for the experimental coatings after the 6 months study period, there was also no discernible detrimental effect of the coatings in comparison to the uncoated titanium surfaces. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2008</div></front></TEI></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 006309 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 006309 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Main
|étape= Merge
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:0E038B4A8C21D7B07C37F9E78879140A2E483865
|texte= Suitability of differently designed matrix‐based implant surface coatings: An animal study on bone formation
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |