Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Alternative bone expansion technique for implant placement in atrophic edentulous maxilla and mandible.

Identifieur interne : 004340 ( Main/Merge ); précédent : 004339; suivant : 004341

Alternative bone expansion technique for implant placement in atrophic edentulous maxilla and mandible.

Auteurs : Neophytos Demetriades [États-Unis] ; Jong Il Park ; Constantinos Laskarides

Source :

RBID : pubmed:20662673

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

This clinical review is an evaluation of the effectiveness of the split ridge bone augmentation technique performed in the atrophic maxilla and mandible with buccolingual bony defects. The osseointegration success of implant placement in the area of split ridge bone augmentation is assessed and compared to implant success rates indicated in the literature. This evaluation includes 15 patients who were treated with alveolar split ridge bone augmentation at Tufts University School of Dental Medicine. During initial consultation, all patients were diagnosed with a buccolingual bone dimension of 3-5 mm on the edentulous alveolar crest. This bony buccolingual dimension was inadequate for placement of implants of desirable width and correct angulation as dictated by the prosthetic requirements. Crestal split augmentation technique involved a surgical osteotomy that was followed by alveolar crest split and augmentation after buccolingual bony plate expansion, prior to implantation. Implants were placed either immediately or 3 weeks after the initial augmentation. No fixation was used to stabilize the buccal bony cortex after the completion of the augmentation. All patients were placed on periodic follow-ups for a 24-month period postoperatively. Implant success was determined with the use of Buser's Criteria. In total, 33 implants were placed in 15 patients. The overall success rate of osseointegration of the endosseous implants placed in the area of split ridge bone augmentation was found to be 97%. One patient presented with facial bone resorption and implant mobility 4 months after the surgery. The implant was removed and the area was reconstructed with autogenous bone graft and later implanted with an endosseous implant. Our results indicate that the split crest bone augmentation technique is a valid reconstructive procedure that can be used to augment the buccolingual alveolar defect prior to implant placement providing good bone foundation for placement of implants with desirable width in favorable angulation. In comparison to traditional bone grafts techniques, crestal split ridge bone augmentation enables placement of dental implants immediately or 3 weeks after augmentation and eradicates the possible morbidity of the donor sites.

DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00028
PubMed: 20662673

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

pubmed:20662673

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Alternative bone expansion technique for implant placement in atrophic edentulous maxilla and mandible.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Demetriades, Neophytos" sort="Demetriades, Neophytos" uniqKey="Demetriades N" first="Neophytos" last="Demetriades">Neophytos Demetriades</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. neophytos.demetriades@tufts.edu</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>MA</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Park, Jong Il" sort="Park, Jong Il" uniqKey="Park J" first="Jong Il" last="Park">Jong Il Park</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Laskarides, Constantinos" sort="Laskarides, Constantinos" uniqKey="Laskarides C" first="Constantinos" last="Laskarides">Constantinos Laskarides</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:20662673</idno>
<idno type="pmid">20662673</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00028</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001482</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001482</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">001482</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">001482</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">001482</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">001482</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">002F72</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">002F72</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">002F72</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0160-6972:2011:Demetriades N:alternative:bone:expansion</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">004340</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Alternative bone expansion technique for implant placement in atrophic edentulous maxilla and mandible.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Demetriades, Neophytos" sort="Demetriades, Neophytos" uniqKey="Demetriades N" first="Neophytos" last="Demetriades">Neophytos Demetriades</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. neophytos.demetriades@tufts.edu</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>MA</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Park, Jong Il" sort="Park, Jong Il" uniqKey="Park J" first="Jong Il" last="Park">Jong Il Park</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Laskarides, Constantinos" sort="Laskarides, Constantinos" uniqKey="Laskarides C" first="Constantinos" last="Laskarides">Constantinos Laskarides</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">The Journal of oral implantology</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0160-6972</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2011" type="published">2011</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Alveolar Bone Loss (diagnostic imaging)</term>
<term>Alveolar Bone Loss (etiology)</term>
<term>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation (methods)</term>
<term>Bone Transplantation</term>
<term>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</term>
<term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term>
<term>Dental Implants (adverse effects)</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis Retention</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term>
<term>Dental Restoration Failure</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (diagnostic imaging)</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation)</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery)</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Mandible (surgery)</term>
<term>Maxilla (surgery)</term>
<term>Time Factors</term>
<term>Treatment Outcome</term>
<term>Vibration</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Facteurs temps</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Implants dentaires (effets indésirables)</term>
<term>Mandibule ()</term>
<term>Maxillaire ()</term>
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée ()</term>
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée (imagerie diagnostique)</term>
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux ()</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term>
<term>Reconstruction de crête alvéolaire ()</term>
<term>Résorption alvéolaire (imagerie diagnostique)</term>
<term>Résorption alvéolaire (étiologie)</term>
<term>Résultat thérapeutique</term>
<term>Rétention de prothèse dentaire</term>
<term>Tomodensitométrie à faisceau conique</term>
<term>Transplantation osseuse</term>
<term>Vibration</term>
<term>Échec de restauration dentaire</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="adverse effects" xml:lang="en">
<term>Dental Implants</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en">
<term>Alveolar Bone Loss</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="effets indésirables" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Implants dentaires</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="etiology" xml:lang="en">
<term>Alveolar Bone Loss</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="imagerie diagnostique" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term>
<term>Résorption alvéolaire</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en">
<term>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation</term>
<term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en">
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en">
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Maxilla</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="étiologie" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Résorption alvéolaire</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en">
<term>Bone Transplantation</term>
<term>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis Retention</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term>
<term>Dental Restoration Failure</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Time Factors</term>
<term>Treatment Outcome</term>
<term>Vibration</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Facteurs temps</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Mandibule</term>
<term>Maxillaire</term>
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term>
<term>Reconstruction de crête alvéolaire</term>
<term>Résultat thérapeutique</term>
<term>Rétention de prothèse dentaire</term>
<term>Tomodensitométrie à faisceau conique</term>
<term>Transplantation osseuse</term>
<term>Vibration</term>
<term>Échec de restauration dentaire</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This clinical review is an evaluation of the effectiveness of the split ridge bone augmentation technique performed in the atrophic maxilla and mandible with buccolingual bony defects. The osseointegration success of implant placement in the area of split ridge bone augmentation is assessed and compared to implant success rates indicated in the literature. This evaluation includes 15 patients who were treated with alveolar split ridge bone augmentation at Tufts University School of Dental Medicine. During initial consultation, all patients were diagnosed with a buccolingual bone dimension of 3-5 mm on the edentulous alveolar crest. This bony buccolingual dimension was inadequate for placement of implants of desirable width and correct angulation as dictated by the prosthetic requirements. Crestal split augmentation technique involved a surgical osteotomy that was followed by alveolar crest split and augmentation after buccolingual bony plate expansion, prior to implantation. Implants were placed either immediately or 3 weeks after the initial augmentation. No fixation was used to stabilize the buccal bony cortex after the completion of the augmentation. All patients were placed on periodic follow-ups for a 24-month period postoperatively. Implant success was determined with the use of Buser's Criteria. In total, 33 implants were placed in 15 patients. The overall success rate of osseointegration of the endosseous implants placed in the area of split ridge bone augmentation was found to be 97%. One patient presented with facial bone resorption and implant mobility 4 months after the surgery. The implant was removed and the area was reconstructed with autogenous bone graft and later implanted with an endosseous implant. Our results indicate that the split crest bone augmentation technique is a valid reconstructive procedure that can be used to augment the buccolingual alveolar defect prior to implant placement providing good bone foundation for placement of implants with desirable width in favorable angulation. In comparison to traditional bone grafts techniques, crestal split ridge bone augmentation enables placement of dental implants immediately or 3 weeks after augmentation and eradicates the possible morbidity of the donor sites.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004340 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 004340 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Merge
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:20662673
   |texte=   Alternative bone expansion technique for implant placement in atrophic edentulous maxilla and mandible.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:20662673" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022