Oral health‐related quality of life is important for patients, but what about populations?
Identifieur interne : 003923 ( Main/Merge ); précédent : 003922; suivant : 003924Oral health‐related quality of life is important for patients, but what about populations?
Auteurs : Gary D. Slade [États-Unis]Source :
- Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology [ 0301-5661 ] ; 2012-10.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
- topic : Santé publique, Impact social.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Acta odontol scand, Adverse impacts, Aggregated health status, Aust dent, Chapel hill, Clinical dogma, Clinical studies, Community dent, Conceptual framework, Contextual measure, Dent, Dental care, Dental conditions, Dental disease, Dental ecology, Dental researchers, Dentate, Dentate patients, Dentate people, Denture, Effect size, Epidemiol, Fundamental limitation, Health care systems, Health outcomes, Health qual life outcomes, Implant, Important difference, Mandibular dentures, Medicine committee, Narrative review, Older generations, Oral conditions, Oral disease, Oral disorders, Oral health, Oral health impact, Oral healthrelated quality, Oral quality, Population health, Public health, Review research, Slade, Social impact, Strong evidence, Subjective dimensions, Systematic review, Tooth loss, Unprecedented levels, Work loss, World health organization, Young adults.
- Teeft :
- Acta odontol scand, Adverse impacts, Aggregated health status, Aust dent, Chapel hill, Clinical dogma, Clinical studies, Community dent, Conceptual framework, Contextual measure, Dent, Dental care, Dental conditions, Dental disease, Dental ecology, Dental researchers, Dentate, Dentate patients, Dentate people, Denture, Effect size, Epidemiol, Fundamental limitation, Health care systems, Health outcomes, Health qual life outcomes, Implant, Important difference, Mandibular dentures, Medicine committee, Narrative review, Older generations, Oral conditions, Oral disease, Oral disorders, Oral health, Oral health impact, Oral healthrelated quality, Oral quality, Population health, Public health, Review research, Slade, Social impact, Strong evidence, Subjective dimensions, Systematic review, Tooth loss, Unprecedented levels, Work loss, World health organization, Young adults.
Abstract
To review population‐based research into oral health‐related quality of life.
Url:
- https://api.istex.fr/document/1C41E356586F635EA34003F6D0F3594199005B36/fulltext/pdf
- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3652582
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2012.00718.x
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 000E03
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 000E03
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000D76
- to stream Pmc, to step Corpus: 002610
- to stream Pmc, to step Curation: 002610
- to stream Pmc, to step Checkpoint: 001D61
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: 004138
- to stream Ncbi, to step Curation: 004138
- to stream Ncbi, to step Checkpoint: 004138
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:1C41E356586F635EA34003F6D0F3594199005B36Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Oral health‐related quality of life is important for patients, but what about populations?</title><author><name sortKey="Slade, Gary D" sort="Slade, Gary D" uniqKey="Slade G" first="Gary D." last="Slade">Gary D. Slade</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:1C41E356586F635EA34003F6D0F3594199005B36</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0528.2012.00718.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/1C41E356586F635EA34003F6D0F3594199005B36/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000E03</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000E03</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000E03</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000D76</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000D76</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0301-5661:2012:Slade G:oral:health:related</idno><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3652582</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:3652582</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">002610</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">002610</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">002610</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Curation">002610</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">001D61</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Checkpoint">001D61</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">004138</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">004138</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">004138</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0301-5661:2012:Slade G:oral:health:related</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">003923</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Oral health‐related quality of life is important for patients, but what about populations?</title><author><name sortKey="Slade, Gary D" sort="Slade, Gary D" uniqKey="Slade G" first="Gary D." last="Slade">Gary D. Slade</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Dental Ecology, University of North Carolina, NC, Chapel Hill</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Chapel Hill</wicri:noRegion></affiliation><affiliation></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">États-Unis</country></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology</title><title level="j" type="sub">Festschrift in Honour of John Spencer</title><title level="j" type="alt">COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY</title><idno type="ISSN">0301-5661</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0528</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">40</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="39">39</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="43">43</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">5</biblScope><date type="published" when="2012-10">2012-10</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0301-5661</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0301-5661</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Acta odontol scand</term><term>Adverse impacts</term><term>Aggregated health status</term><term>Aust dent</term><term>Chapel hill</term><term>Clinical dogma</term><term>Clinical studies</term><term>Community dent</term><term>Conceptual framework</term><term>Contextual measure</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental care</term><term>Dental conditions</term><term>Dental disease</term><term>Dental ecology</term><term>Dental researchers</term><term>Dentate</term><term>Dentate patients</term><term>Dentate people</term><term>Denture</term><term>Effect size</term><term>Epidemiol</term><term>Fundamental limitation</term><term>Health care systems</term><term>Health outcomes</term><term>Health qual life outcomes</term><term>Implant</term><term>Important difference</term><term>Mandibular dentures</term><term>Medicine committee</term><term>Narrative review</term><term>Older generations</term><term>Oral conditions</term><term>Oral disease</term><term>Oral disorders</term><term>Oral health</term><term>Oral health impact</term><term>Oral healthrelated quality</term><term>Oral quality</term><term>Population health</term><term>Public health</term><term>Review research</term><term>Slade</term><term>Social impact</term><term>Strong evidence</term><term>Subjective dimensions</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Tooth loss</term><term>Unprecedented levels</term><term>Work loss</term><term>World health organization</term><term>Young adults</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Acta odontol scand</term><term>Adverse impacts</term><term>Aggregated health status</term><term>Aust dent</term><term>Chapel hill</term><term>Clinical dogma</term><term>Clinical studies</term><term>Community dent</term><term>Conceptual framework</term><term>Contextual measure</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental care</term><term>Dental conditions</term><term>Dental disease</term><term>Dental ecology</term><term>Dental researchers</term><term>Dentate</term><term>Dentate patients</term><term>Dentate people</term><term>Denture</term><term>Effect size</term><term>Epidemiol</term><term>Fundamental limitation</term><term>Health care systems</term><term>Health outcomes</term><term>Health qual life outcomes</term><term>Implant</term><term>Important difference</term><term>Mandibular dentures</term><term>Medicine committee</term><term>Narrative review</term><term>Older generations</term><term>Oral conditions</term><term>Oral disease</term><term>Oral disorders</term><term>Oral health</term><term>Oral health impact</term><term>Oral healthrelated quality</term><term>Oral quality</term><term>Population health</term><term>Public health</term><term>Review research</term><term>Slade</term><term>Social impact</term><term>Strong evidence</term><term>Subjective dimensions</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Tooth loss</term><term>Unprecedented levels</term><term>Work loss</term><term>World health organization</term><term>Young adults</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Santé publique</term><term>Impact social</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">To review population‐based research into oral health‐related quality of life.</div></front></TEI><double doi="10.1111/j.1600-0528.2012.00718.x"><ISTEX><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Oral health‐related quality of life is important for patients, but what about populations?</title><author><name sortKey="Slade, Gary D" sort="Slade, Gary D" uniqKey="Slade G" first="Gary D." last="Slade">Gary D. Slade</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:1C41E356586F635EA34003F6D0F3594199005B36</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0528.2012.00718.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/1C41E356586F635EA34003F6D0F3594199005B36/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000E03</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000E03</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000E03</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000D76</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000D76</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0301-5661:2012:Slade G:oral:health:related</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Oral health‐related quality of life is important for patients, but what about populations?</title><author><name sortKey="Slade, Gary D" sort="Slade, Gary D" uniqKey="Slade G" first="Gary D." last="Slade">Gary D. Slade</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Dental Ecology, University of North Carolina, NC, Chapel Hill</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Chapel Hill</wicri:noRegion></affiliation><affiliation></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">États-Unis</country></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology</title><title level="j" type="sub">Festschrift in Honour of John Spencer</title><title level="j" type="alt">COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY</title><idno type="ISSN">0301-5661</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0528</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">40</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="39">39</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="43">43</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">5</biblScope><date type="published" when="2012-10">2012-10</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0301-5661</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0301-5661</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Acta odontol scand</term><term>Adverse impacts</term><term>Aggregated health status</term><term>Aust dent</term><term>Chapel hill</term><term>Clinical dogma</term><term>Clinical studies</term><term>Community dent</term><term>Conceptual framework</term><term>Contextual measure</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental care</term><term>Dental conditions</term><term>Dental disease</term><term>Dental ecology</term><term>Dental researchers</term><term>Dentate</term><term>Dentate patients</term><term>Dentate people</term><term>Denture</term><term>Effect size</term><term>Epidemiol</term><term>Fundamental limitation</term><term>Health care systems</term><term>Health outcomes</term><term>Health qual life outcomes</term><term>Implant</term><term>Important difference</term><term>Mandibular dentures</term><term>Medicine committee</term><term>Narrative review</term><term>Older generations</term><term>Oral conditions</term><term>Oral disease</term><term>Oral disorders</term><term>Oral health</term><term>Oral health impact</term><term>Oral healthrelated quality</term><term>Oral quality</term><term>Population health</term><term>Public health</term><term>Review research</term><term>Slade</term><term>Social impact</term><term>Strong evidence</term><term>Subjective dimensions</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Tooth loss</term><term>Unprecedented levels</term><term>Work loss</term><term>World health organization</term><term>Young adults</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Acta odontol scand</term><term>Adverse impacts</term><term>Aggregated health status</term><term>Aust dent</term><term>Chapel hill</term><term>Clinical dogma</term><term>Clinical studies</term><term>Community dent</term><term>Conceptual framework</term><term>Contextual measure</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental care</term><term>Dental conditions</term><term>Dental disease</term><term>Dental ecology</term><term>Dental researchers</term><term>Dentate</term><term>Dentate patients</term><term>Dentate people</term><term>Denture</term><term>Effect size</term><term>Epidemiol</term><term>Fundamental limitation</term><term>Health care systems</term><term>Health outcomes</term><term>Health qual life outcomes</term><term>Implant</term><term>Important difference</term><term>Mandibular dentures</term><term>Medicine committee</term><term>Narrative review</term><term>Older generations</term><term>Oral conditions</term><term>Oral disease</term><term>Oral disorders</term><term>Oral health</term><term>Oral health impact</term><term>Oral healthrelated quality</term><term>Oral quality</term><term>Population health</term><term>Public health</term><term>Review research</term><term>Slade</term><term>Social impact</term><term>Strong evidence</term><term>Subjective dimensions</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Tooth loss</term><term>Unprecedented levels</term><term>Work loss</term><term>World health organization</term><term>Young adults</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Santé publique</term><term>Impact social</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">To review population‐based research into oral health‐related quality of life.</div></front></TEI></ISTEX><PMC><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Oral health related quality of life is important for patients, but what about populations?</title><author><name sortKey="Slade, Gary D" sort="Slade, Gary D" uniqKey="Slade G" first="Gary D." last="Slade">Gary D. Slade</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">22998303</idno><idno type="pmc">3652582</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3652582</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:3652582</idno><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0528.2012.00718.x</idno><date when="2012">2012</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">002610</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">002610</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">002610</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Curation">002610</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">001D61</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Checkpoint">001D61</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">004138</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">004138</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">004138</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0301-5661:2012:Slade G:oral:health:related</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Oral health related quality of life is important for patients, but what about populations?</title><author><name sortKey="Slade, Gary D" sort="Slade, Gary D" uniqKey="Slade G" first="Gary D." last="Slade">Gary D. Slade</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Community dentistry and oral epidemiology</title><idno type="ISSN">0301-5661</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0528</idno><imprint><date when="2012">2012</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><sec id="S1"><title>Objectives</title><p id="P1">To review population-based research into oral health related quality of life.</p></sec><sec id="S2"><title>Methods</title><p id="P2">Narrative review of selected publications.</p></sec><sec id="S3"><title>Results</title><p id="P3">In the 1970s, there were two incentives to assess non-clinical aspects of health: 1) a desire to understand impacts of disease on individuals’ quality of life; 2) a search for population-level measures that might better quantify the impact of health care systems on populations. Dental researchers responded to those incentives, creating dozens of questionnaires that assess individuals’ ratings of subjective oral health and quality of life. This has been a boon for clinical dental research, for example, by showing marked improvements in subjective oral health in patients receiving implant-supported dentures. Also, health surveys show poorer subjective oral health among disadvantaged population groups. However, the same measures show only modest benefits of general dental care. Furthermore, several population surveys show that today’s young adults, who grew up with widespread exposure to preventive dental programs, have poorer subjective oral health than earlier generations that experienced unprecedented levels of oral disease. Yet to materialize is the hope that “socio-dental indicators” of subjective oral health might provide a meaningful metric to demonstrate population-level benefits of dental care. A fundamental limitation is that population health is a contextual measure, not merely the aggregated health status of individuals within the population.</p></sec><sec id="S4"><title>Conclusion</title><p id="P4">While researchers have successfully broken with clinical dogma by assessing subjective dimensions of individuals’ oral health, they have failed to explicitly ask people to assess the oral health of the community in which they live.</p></sec></div></front></TEI></PMC></double></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003923 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 003923 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Main
|étape= Merge
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:1C41E356586F635EA34003F6D0F3594199005B36
|texte= Oral health‐related quality of life is important for patients, but what about populations?
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |