Comparison between planned prosthetic trajectory and residual bone trajectory using surgical guides and tomography--a pilot study.
Identifieur interne : 00A564 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 00A563; suivant : 00A565Comparison between planned prosthetic trajectory and residual bone trajectory using surgical guides and tomography--a pilot study.
Auteurs : D M Almog [États-Unis] ; J M Onufrak ; K. Hebel ; S W MeitnerSource :
- The Journal of oral implantology [ 0160-6972 ] ; 1995.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Analyse de variance, Arcade dentaire (imagerie diagnostique), Humains, Mandibule (), Mandibule (imagerie diagnostique), Maxillaire (), Maxillaire (imagerie diagnostique), Modèles anatomiques, Modèles dentaires, Mâchoire partiellement édentée (imagerie diagnostique), Planification des soins du patient, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux (), Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux (instrumentation), Processus alvéolaire (imagerie diagnostique), Projets pilotes, Résorption alvéolaire (imagerie diagnostique), Tomographie à rayons X ().
- MESH :
- imagerie diagnostique : Arcade dentaire, Mandibule, Maxillaire, Mâchoire partiellement édentée, Processus alvéolaire, Résorption alvéolaire.
- instrumentation : Analyse de variance, Humains, Mandibule, Maxillaire, Modèles anatomiques, Modèles dentaires, Planification des soins du patient, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Projets pilotes, Tomographie à rayons X.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Alveolar Bone Loss (diagnostic imaging), Alveolar Process (diagnostic imaging), Analysis of Variance, Dental Arch (diagnostic imaging), Dental Implantation, Endosseous (instrumentation), Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods), Dental Models, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (diagnostic imaging), Mandible (diagnostic imaging), Mandible (surgery), Maxilla (diagnostic imaging), Maxilla (surgery), Models, Anatomic, Patient Care Planning, Pilot Projects, Tomography, X-Ray (methods).
- MESH :
- diagnostic imaging : Alveolar Bone Loss, Alveolar Process, Dental Arch, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, Mandible, Maxilla.
- instrumentation : Dental Implantation, Endosseous.
- methods : Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Tomography, X-Ray.
- surgery : Mandible, Maxilla.
- Analysis of Variance, Dental Models, Humans, Models, Anatomic, Patient Care Planning, Pilot Projects.
Abstract
Implant treatment is a highly technical and complex form of dentistry. Research and experience have shown that the success of dental implant treatment relies on a well-developed treatment plan approach that takes into account factors such as systemic condition, anatomical landmarks, occlusion, shape and density of the jawbone, and type of implant system. Historically, once the tissue was reflected, implant placement was guided by residual bone height and width, using the trajectory that was compatible with the location and direction of available bone, at times compromising prosthetic needs. The purpose of this study was to measure the amount of deviation between planned prosthetic trajectory (PPT), perpendicular to the plane of occlusion, and residual bone trajectory (RBT) in different areas of the maxillary and mandibular dental arches, using tomography in conjunction with surgical guides. Twenty-five patients with a total of 66 implant sites were selected for this study. A surgical guide with a radiopaque indicator was constructed to determine the PPT. Cross-sectional tomograms were taken through the indicator at each implant site. The outlines of the available bone, PPT and RBT, were traced, and the difference in the angulation between the two trajectories was determined. Results showed discrepancies between the PPT and the RBT to be greater in the mandibular molar areas. Further study of such pre-implant diagnostic procedures is needed to understand the relation between the PPT and RBT, thus increasing the predictability of implant success.
PubMed: 8699519
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: 004333
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: 004333
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: 004333
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: 009737
- to stream Ncbi, to step Curation: 009737
- to stream Ncbi, to step Checkpoint: 009737
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 00AB63
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 00A564
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Comparison between planned prosthetic trajectory and residual bone trajectory using surgical guides and tomography--a pilot study.</title><author><name sortKey="Almog, D M" sort="Almog, D M" uniqKey="Almog D" first="D M" last="Almog">D M Almog</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Eastman Dental Center, Rochester, New York, USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, Eastman Dental Center, Rochester, New York</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">État de New York</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Onufrak, J M" sort="Onufrak, J M" uniqKey="Onufrak J" first="J M" last="Onufrak">J M Onufrak</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hebel, K" sort="Hebel, K" uniqKey="Hebel K" first="K" last="Hebel">K. Hebel</name></author><author><name sortKey="Meitner, S W" sort="Meitner, S W" uniqKey="Meitner S" first="S W" last="Meitner">S W Meitner</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="1995">1995</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:8699519</idno><idno type="pmid">8699519</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">004333</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">004333</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">004333</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">004333</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">004333</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">004333</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">009737</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">009737</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">009737</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0160-6972:1995:Almog D:comparison:between:planned</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">00AB63</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">00A564</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">00A564</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Comparison between planned prosthetic trajectory and residual bone trajectory using surgical guides and tomography--a pilot study.</title><author><name sortKey="Almog, D M" sort="Almog, D M" uniqKey="Almog D" first="D M" last="Almog">D M Almog</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Eastman Dental Center, Rochester, New York, USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, Eastman Dental Center, Rochester, New York</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">État de New York</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Onufrak, J M" sort="Onufrak, J M" uniqKey="Onufrak J" first="J M" last="Onufrak">J M Onufrak</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hebel, K" sort="Hebel, K" uniqKey="Hebel K" first="K" last="Hebel">K. Hebel</name></author><author><name sortKey="Meitner, S W" sort="Meitner, S W" uniqKey="Meitner S" first="S W" last="Meitner">S W Meitner</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The Journal of oral implantology</title><idno type="ISSN">0160-6972</idno><imprint><date when="1995" type="published">1995</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Alveolar Process (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Analysis of Variance</term><term>Dental Arch (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (instrumentation)</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term><term>Dental Models</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Mandible (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Mandible (surgery)</term><term>Maxilla (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Maxilla (surgery)</term><term>Models, Anatomic</term><term>Patient Care Planning</term><term>Pilot Projects</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray (methods)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Analyse de variance</term><term>Arcade dentaire (imagerie diagnostique)</term><term>Humains</term><term>Mandibule ()</term><term>Mandibule (imagerie diagnostique)</term><term>Maxillaire ()</term><term>Maxillaire (imagerie diagnostique)</term><term>Modèles anatomiques</term><term>Modèles dentaires</term><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée (imagerie diagnostique)</term><term>Planification des soins du patient</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux ()</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux (instrumentation)</term><term>Processus alvéolaire (imagerie diagnostique)</term><term>Projets pilotes</term><term>Résorption alvéolaire (imagerie diagnostique)</term><term>Tomographie à rayons X ()</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss</term><term>Alveolar Process</term><term>Dental Arch</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxilla</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="imagerie diagnostique" xml:lang="fr"><term>Arcade dentaire</term><term>Mandibule</term><term>Maxillaire</term><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term><term>Processus alvéolaire</term><term>Résorption alvéolaire</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxilla</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Analysis of Variance</term><term>Dental Models</term><term>Humans</term><term>Models, Anatomic</term><term>Patient Care Planning</term><term>Pilot Projects</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Analyse de variance</term><term>Humains</term><term>Mandibule</term><term>Maxillaire</term><term>Modèles anatomiques</term><term>Modèles dentaires</term><term>Planification des soins du patient</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Projets pilotes</term><term>Tomographie à rayons X</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Implant treatment is a highly technical and complex form of dentistry. Research and experience have shown that the success of dental implant treatment relies on a well-developed treatment plan approach that takes into account factors such as systemic condition, anatomical landmarks, occlusion, shape and density of the jawbone, and type of implant system. Historically, once the tissue was reflected, implant placement was guided by residual bone height and width, using the trajectory that was compatible with the location and direction of available bone, at times compromising prosthetic needs. The purpose of this study was to measure the amount of deviation between planned prosthetic trajectory (PPT), perpendicular to the plane of occlusion, and residual bone trajectory (RBT) in different areas of the maxillary and mandibular dental arches, using tomography in conjunction with surgical guides. Twenty-five patients with a total of 66 implant sites were selected for this study. A surgical guide with a radiopaque indicator was constructed to determine the PPT. Cross-sectional tomograms were taken through the indicator at each implant site. The outlines of the available bone, PPT and RBT, were traced, and the difference in the angulation between the two trajectories was determined. Results showed discrepancies between the PPT and the RBT to be greater in the mandibular molar areas. Further study of such pre-implant diagnostic procedures is needed to understand the relation between the PPT and RBT, thus increasing the predictability of implant success.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li></country><region><li>État de New York</li></region></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Hebel, K" sort="Hebel, K" uniqKey="Hebel K" first="K" last="Hebel">K. Hebel</name><name sortKey="Meitner, S W" sort="Meitner, S W" uniqKey="Meitner S" first="S W" last="Meitner">S W Meitner</name><name sortKey="Onufrak, J M" sort="Onufrak, J M" uniqKey="Onufrak J" first="J M" last="Onufrak">J M Onufrak</name></noCountry><country name="États-Unis"><region name="État de New York"><name sortKey="Almog, D M" sort="Almog, D M" uniqKey="Almog D" first="D M" last="Almog">D M Almog</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 00A564 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 00A564 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:8699519
|texte= Comparison between planned prosthetic trajectory and residual bone trajectory using surgical guides and tomography--a pilot study.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:8699519" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |