What some concepts might not be

What some concepts might not be

Source :

• Cognition [ 0010-0277 ] ; 1983.

Descripteurs français

• Wicri :
  • topic : Prototype.

English descriptors

• KwdEn :
  • Allowable latitude, Anonymous reviewer, Armstrong, Attribute, Atypical exemplars, Biological taxa, Cambridge university press, Categories prototypes, Categorization, Category, Category exemplariness, Category exemplars, Category members, Category membership, Category name, Category structure, Category types, Central value, Certain concepts, Chicken soup, Class members, Class membership, Classical theory, Cognitive psychology, Compositional meaning, Concept structure, Conceptual, Conceptual core, Conceptual domains, Conceptual organization, Conceptual structure, Considerable agreement, Core description, Definitional, Definitional theory, Definitional view, Different structures, Dual theory, Empiricist program, Everyday categories, Everyday concepts, Exemplar, Exemplariness, Exemplariness effect, Exemplariness ratings, Experimental findings, Experimental literature, Family resemblance description, Family resemblance structure, Family resemblances, Featural, Featural description, Featural substrate, Feature, Feature descriptions, Feature theories, Feature theory, First booklet, First task, Fodor, Foolish birds, Fuzzy categories, Fuzzy sets, General theory, Gleitman, Good example, Good exemplars, Grey hair, Grey haired, Harvard university press, Heuristic identification schemes, Human subjects, Identification features, Identification function, Identification functions, Identification procedure, Identification procedures, Internal structure, Jones family, Katz, Large number, Lexical, Lexical concepts, Lexical entailments, Lexical semantics, Linguistic community, Lower ratings, Meaning atoms, Mental categories, Mental life, Mental representation, Mental structure, Mervis, Method subjects, Metric space, Natural categories, Natural concepts, Natural language, Necessary properties, Nominal essences, Original publication, Osherson, Other categories, Other concepts, Other half, Other hand, Partial replication, Personal communication, Plane geometry figure, Plane geometry figures, Poorer exemplars, Present discussion, Present experiment, Prime numbers, Primitive base, Privileged properties, Privileged property, Problem concerns, Prototype, Prototype categories, Prototype descriptions, Prototype theories, Prototype theorists, Prototype theory, Prototype view, Prototypelike responses, Prototypic categories, Prototypical, Prototypical member, Psychological validity, Rank correlations, Rate exemplars, Rate items, Rating, Rating category membership, Real essences, Relevant features, Response patterns, Rosch, Same categories, Same exemplars, Same items, Same subjects, Same time, Semantic categories, Semantic memory, Semantic theory, Semantics, Separate page, Simple categories, Smith brothers, Stimulus materials, Such categories, Such features, Such findings, Superordinate, True sentences, Undergraduate volunteers, Various categories, Various concepts, Verification, Verification task, Verification time, Verification times, Wanner, Welldefined, Welldefined categories, Whatsome concepts, Whole words, Word frequency.
• Teeft :
  • Allowable latitude, Anonymous reviewer, Armstrong, Attribute, Atypical exemplars, Biological taxa, Cambridge university press, Categories prototypes, Categorization, Category, Category exemplariness, Category exemplars, Category members, Category membership, Category name, Category structure, Category types, Central value, Certain concepts, Chicken soup, Class members, Class membership, Classical theory, Cognitive psychology, Compositional meaning, Concept structure, Conceptual, Conceptual core, Conceptual domains, Conceptual organization, Conceptual structure, Considerable agreement, Core description, Definitional, Definitional theory, Definitional view, Different structures, Dual theory, Empiricist program, Everyday categories, Everyday concepts, Exemplar, Exemplariness, Exemplariness effect, Exemplariness ratings, Experimental findings, Experimental literature, Family resemblance description, Family resemblance structure, Family resemblances, Featural, Featural description, Featural substrate, Feature, Feature descriptions, Feature theories, Feature theory, First booklet, First task, Fodor, Foolish birds, Fuzzy categories, Fuzzy sets, General theory, Gleitman, Good example, Good exemplars, Grey hair, Grey haired, Harvard university press, Heuristic identification schemes, Human subjects, Identification features, Identification function, Identification functions, Identification procedure, Identification procedures, Internal structure, Jones family, Katz, Large number, Lexical, Lexical concepts, Lexical entailments, Lexical semantics, Linguistic community, Lower ratings, Meaning atoms, Mental categories, Mental life, Mental representation, Mental structure, Mervis, Method subjects, Metric space, Natural categories, Natural concepts, Natural language, Necessary properties, Nominal essences, Original publication, Osherson, Other categories, Other concepts, Other half, Other hand, Partial replication, Personal communication, Plane geometry figure, Plane geometry figures, Poorer exemplars, Present discussion, Present experiment, Prime numbers, Primitive base, Privileged properties, Privileged property, Problem concerns, Prototype, Prototype categories, Prototype descriptions, Prototype theories, Prototype theorists, Prototype theory, Prototype view, Prototypelike responses, Prototypic categories, Prototypical, Prototypical member, Psychological validity, Rank correlations, Rate exemplars, Rate items, Rating, Rating category membership, Real essences, Relevant features, Response patterns, Rosch, Same categories, Same exemplars, Same items, Same subjects, Same time, Semantic categories, Semantic memory, Semantic theory, Semantics, Separate page, Simple categories, Smith brothers, Stimulus materials, Such categories, Such features, Such findings, Superordinate, True sentences, Undergraduate volunteers, Various categories, Various concepts, Verification, Verification task, Verification time, Verification times, Wanner, Welldefined, Welldefined categories, Whatsome concepts, Whole words, Word frequency.

Abstract

• https://api.istex.fr/document/AF7DDFABE62FBA4866E4799681B79BE145AE68BD/fulltext/pdf

Affiliations:

• États-Unis

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

• to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 005757
• to stream Istex, to step Curation: 005757
• to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 006146
• to stream Main, to step Merge: 00DA73
• to stream Main, to step Curation: 00D212

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 00D212 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 00D212 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:AF7DDFABE62FBA4866E4799681B79BE145AE68BD
   |texte=   What some concepts might not be
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022