Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Determinants of patients' treatment preferences in a clinical trial

Identifieur interne : 008F55 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 008F54; suivant : 008F56

Determinants of patients' treatment preferences in a clinical trial

Auteurs : Manal A. Awad ; Stanley H. Shapiro ; James P. Lund [Canada] ; Jocelyne S. Feine

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:6E3341811285D421CE00074FDA5BD1DECD37023B

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Abstract – Several researchers have suggested that patients' preferences for a particular form of treatment should be taken into account in clinical trials. Preferences may influence the outcome of treatment, especially in trials when patients cannot be blinded to the type of treatment received and the outcome is based on patients' evaluations of therapy. Participants in this study were 136 edentulous patients who took part in a randomised controlled clinical trial comparing two types of treatments for edentulism: conventional dentures and implant‐supported prostheses. Prior to receiving treatment, subjects were required to complete a questionnaire regarding their satisfaction with their present prostheses. In addition, they were asked to indicate which treatment they would prefer if given a choice. The objective of this study was to determine whether there are important differences among study participants between patients who have a treatment preference and those who do not. The effects of satisfaction with pre‐treatment prostheses, age, gender and level of education on preferences were examined. Level of satisfaction with the original dentures and level of education were significant predictors of preference. Compared to subjects who rated their satisfaction with their current condition as ‘low’, the odds ratios associated with having a preference for implant treatment were 0.31 (95% CI: 0.09 to 0.96) for subjects who rated their prostheses in the ‘medium’ range and 0.11 (95% CI: 0.03 to 0.41) for those who rated in the ‘high’ range. In addition, subjects with high levels of education were significantly less likely to have a preference for either conventional or implant treatments (OR=0.18, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.77 and OR=0.20, 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.76, respectively) compared to those with low education. Neither age nor gender was a significant predictor of preference. We suggest that study designs which incorporate patients' preferences must take into account possible differences between preference groups that might confound the relationship between preference and the outcome of interest.

Url:
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2000.028002119.x


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Determinants of patients' treatment preferences in a clinical trial</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Awad, Manal A" sort="Awad, Manal A" uniqKey="Awad M" first="Manal A." last="Awad">Manal A. Awad</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Shapiro, Stanley H" sort="Shapiro, Stanley H" uniqKey="Shapiro S" first="Stanley H." last="Shapiro">Stanley H. Shapiro</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lund, James P" sort="Lund, James P" uniqKey="Lund J" first="James P." last="Lund">James P. Lund</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Feine, Jocelyne S" sort="Feine, Jocelyne S" uniqKey="Feine J" first="Jocelyne S." last="Feine">Jocelyne S. Feine</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:6E3341811285D421CE00074FDA5BD1DECD37023B</idno>
<date when="2000" year="2000">2000</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1034/j.1600-0528.2000.028002119.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/6E3341811285D421CE00074FDA5BD1DECD37023B/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003654</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003654</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">003654</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">003F99</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">003F99</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0301-5661:2000:Awad M:determinants:of:patients</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">009340</idno>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:10730720</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003731</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003731</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">003731</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">003731</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">003731</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">003731</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">000279</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">000279</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">000279</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0301-5661:2000:Awad M:determinants:of:patients</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">009028</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">008F55</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">008F55</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">Determinants of patients' treatment preferences in a clinical trial</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Awad, Manal A" sort="Awad, Manal A" uniqKey="Awad M" first="Manal A." last="Awad">Manal A. Awad</name>
<affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField"></wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Shapiro, Stanley H" sort="Shapiro, Stanley H" uniqKey="Shapiro S" first="Stanley H." last="Shapiro">Stanley H. Shapiro</name>
<affiliation></affiliation>
<affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField"></wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lund, James P" sort="Lund, James P" uniqKey="Lund J" first="James P." last="Lund">James P. Lund</name>
<affiliation></affiliation>
<affiliation></affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Université de Montréal, Centre de recherche en science neurologiques, Monatreal, Quebec</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Quebec</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Feine, Jocelyne S" sort="Feine, Jocelyne S" uniqKey="Feine J" first="Jocelyne S." last="Feine">Jocelyne S. Feine</name>
<affiliation></affiliation>
<affiliation></affiliation>
<affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField"></wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">COMMUNITY DENTISTRY ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0301-5661</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1600-0528</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">28</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="119">119</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="125">125</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope>
<publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher>
<pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2000-04">2000-04</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0301-5661</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0301-5661</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Brewin bradley</term>
<term>Chi-Square Distribution</term>
<term>Choice Behavior</term>
<term>Clinical trial</term>
<term>Clinical trials</term>
<term>College degree</term>
<term>Community dent</term>
<term>Conventional dentures</term>
<term>Conventional treatment</term>
<term>Current prostheses</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported (psychology)</term>
<term>Denture, Complete, Lower (psychology)</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Educational Status</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Gender</term>
<term>General satisfaction</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant treatment</term>
<term>Implant treatments</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Mcgill university faculty</term>
<term>Medical intervention</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Odds Ratio</term>
<term>Odds ratios</term>
<term>Older patients</term>
<term>Oral prostheses</term>
<term>Other factors</term>
<term>Other hand</term>
<term>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) (methods)</term>
<term>Overall satisfaction</term>
<term>Particular form</term>
<term>Particular treatment</term>
<term>Particular treatment modality</term>
<term>Patient Satisfaction</term>
<term>Patient preference</term>
<term>Patient preferences</term>
<term>Preference</term>
<term>Preference groups</term>
<term>Preferred treatment</term>
<term>Present prostheses</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Randomised</term>
<term>Randomized</term>
<term>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic (psychology)</term>
<term>Reference outcome category</term>
<term>Regression Analysis</term>
<term>Reproducibility of Results</term>
<term>Standard treatment</term>
<term>Strong preference</term>
<term>Strong preferences</term>
<term>Study designs</term>
<term>Surgical procedure</term>
<term>Treatment modality</term>
<term>Treatment outcome</term>
<term>Treatment preference</term>
<term>Treatment preferences</term>
<term>University degree</term>
<term>Visual analogue scale</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Analyse de régression</term>
<term>Comportement de choix</term>
<term>Essais contrôlés randomisés comme sujet (psychologie)</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Loi du khi-deux</term>
<term>Mandibule</term>
<term>Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Niveau d'instruction</term>
<term>Odds ratio</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire complète inférieure (psychologie)</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée (psychologie)</term>
<term>Reproductibilité des résultats</term>
<term>Satisfaction du patient</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
<term>Évaluation de résultat (soins) ()</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en">
<term>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychologie" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Essais contrôlés randomisés comme sujet</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire complète inférieure</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychology" xml:lang="en">
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term>
<term>Denture, Complete, Lower</term>
<term>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en">
<term>Jaw, Edentulous</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Mâchoire édentée</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Brewin bradley</term>
<term>Chi-Square Distribution</term>
<term>Choice Behavior</term>
<term>Clinical trial</term>
<term>Clinical trials</term>
<term>College degree</term>
<term>Community dent</term>
<term>Conventional dentures</term>
<term>Conventional treatment</term>
<term>Current prostheses</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Educational Status</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Gender</term>
<term>General satisfaction</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant treatment</term>
<term>Implant treatments</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Mcgill university faculty</term>
<term>Medical intervention</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Odds Ratio</term>
<term>Odds ratios</term>
<term>Older patients</term>
<term>Oral prostheses</term>
<term>Other factors</term>
<term>Other hand</term>
<term>Overall satisfaction</term>
<term>Particular form</term>
<term>Particular treatment</term>
<term>Particular treatment modality</term>
<term>Patient Satisfaction</term>
<term>Patient preference</term>
<term>Patient preferences</term>
<term>Preference</term>
<term>Preference groups</term>
<term>Preferred treatment</term>
<term>Present prostheses</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Randomised</term>
<term>Randomized</term>
<term>Reference outcome category</term>
<term>Regression Analysis</term>
<term>Reproducibility of Results</term>
<term>Standard treatment</term>
<term>Strong preference</term>
<term>Strong preferences</term>
<term>Study designs</term>
<term>Surgical procedure</term>
<term>Treatment modality</term>
<term>Treatment outcome</term>
<term>Treatment preference</term>
<term>Treatment preferences</term>
<term>University degree</term>
<term>Visual analogue scale</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Analyse de régression</term>
<term>Comportement de choix</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Loi du khi-deux</term>
<term>Mandibule</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Niveau d'instruction</term>
<term>Odds ratio</term>
<term>Reproductibilité des résultats</term>
<term>Satisfaction du patient</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
<term>Évaluation de résultat (soins)</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract">Abstract – Several researchers have suggested that patients' preferences for a particular form of treatment should be taken into account in clinical trials. Preferences may influence the outcome of treatment, especially in trials when patients cannot be blinded to the type of treatment received and the outcome is based on patients' evaluations of therapy. Participants in this study were 136 edentulous patients who took part in a randomised controlled clinical trial comparing two types of treatments for edentulism: conventional dentures and implant‐supported prostheses. Prior to receiving treatment, subjects were required to complete a questionnaire regarding their satisfaction with their present prostheses. In addition, they were asked to indicate which treatment they would prefer if given a choice. The objective of this study was to determine whether there are important differences among study participants between patients who have a treatment preference and those who do not. The effects of satisfaction with pre‐treatment prostheses, age, gender and level of education on preferences were examined. Level of satisfaction with the original dentures and level of education were significant predictors of preference. Compared to subjects who rated their satisfaction with their current condition as ‘low’, the odds ratios associated with having a preference for implant treatment were 0.31 (95% CI: 0.09 to 0.96) for subjects who rated their prostheses in the ‘medium’ range and 0.11 (95% CI: 0.03 to 0.41) for those who rated in the ‘high’ range. In addition, subjects with high levels of education were significantly less likely to have a preference for either conventional or implant treatments (OR=0.18, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.77 and OR=0.20, 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.76, respectively) compared to those with low education. Neither age nor gender was a significant predictor of preference. We suggest that study designs which incorporate patients' preferences must take into account possible differences between preference groups that might confound the relationship between preference and the outcome of interest.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>Canada</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree>
<noCountry>
<name sortKey="Awad, Manal A" sort="Awad, Manal A" uniqKey="Awad M" first="Manal A." last="Awad">Manal A. Awad</name>
<name sortKey="Feine, Jocelyne S" sort="Feine, Jocelyne S" uniqKey="Feine J" first="Jocelyne S." last="Feine">Jocelyne S. Feine</name>
<name sortKey="Shapiro, Stanley H" sort="Shapiro, Stanley H" uniqKey="Shapiro S" first="Stanley H." last="Shapiro">Stanley H. Shapiro</name>
</noCountry>
<country name="Canada">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Lund, James P" sort="Lund, James P" uniqKey="Lund J" first="James P." last="Lund">James P. Lund</name>
</noRegion>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 008F55 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 008F55 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:6E3341811285D421CE00074FDA5BD1DECD37023B
   |texte=   Determinants of patients' treatment preferences in a clinical trial
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022