Comparison of Crestal Bone Loss along Two Implant Crest Module Designs
Identifieur interne : 005841 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 005840; suivant : 005842Comparison of Crestal Bone Loss along Two Implant Crest Module Designs
Auteurs : Mm GoswamiSource :
- Medical Journal, Armed Forces India [ 0377-1237 ] ; 2009.
Abstract
Crestal bone loss along the dental implant surface deranges its prognosis and is known to occur with implants having 02 mm smooth crest module/collar design. Implants with rough coated crest module/collar design are said to reduce crestal bone loss. Comparison of crestal bone loss with both crest module/collar designs of implants needs to be done.
Twenty cases were selected. Each case received one implant with smooth collar design (Group-A) and one implant with coated rough collar design (Group-B). All the 40 implants were prosthetically loaded after a healing period of six months. Crestal bone loss was measured on mesial, distal, buccal and lingual side of each implant using maxillofacial computed tomography at six, twelve and eighteen months time interval after placing the implants. Soft tissue evaluation was carried out around each implant using Gingival, Plaque and Calculus Indices, six and twelve months after loading the implants.
After 18 months i.e. one year after loading the implants, Group-A implants showed an overall average crestal bone loss of 1.53 mm and Group-B implants showed average bone loss of 1.42 mm, the difference being statistically significant (p < 0.05). For both types of implants, average crestal bone loss was maximum on the buccal side, followed by mesial, lingual and distal sides. Soft tissue evaluation revealed that the tissues remained healthy till the end of study for both types of implants.
Crestal bone loss was less among implants with rough collar design as compared to smooth collar design.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/S0377-1237(09)80091-9
PubMed: 27408284
PubMed Central: 4921389
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Pmc, to step Corpus: 002497
- to stream Pmc, to step Curation: 002497
- to stream Pmc, to step Checkpoint: 002569
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: 006869
- to stream Ncbi, to step Curation: 006869
- to stream Ncbi, to step Checkpoint: 006869
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 005902
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 005841
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of Crestal Bone Loss along Two Implant Crest Module Designs</title><author><name sortKey="Goswami, Mm" sort="Goswami, Mm" uniqKey="Goswami M" first="Mm" last="Goswami">Mm Goswami</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff1">Graded Specialist (Prosthodontics), MDC, Meerut</nlm:aff><wicri:noCountry code="subfield">Meerut</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">27408284</idno><idno type="pmc">4921389</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4921389</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:4921389</idno><idno type="doi">10.1016/S0377-1237(09)80091-9</idno><date when="2009">2009</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">002497</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">002497</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">002497</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Curation">002497</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">002569</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Checkpoint">002569</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">006869</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">006869</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">006869</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0377-1237:2009:Goswami M:comparison:of:crestal</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">005902</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">005841</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">005841</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Comparison of Crestal Bone Loss along Two Implant Crest Module Designs</title><author><name sortKey="Goswami, Mm" sort="Goswami, Mm" uniqKey="Goswami M" first="Mm" last="Goswami">Mm Goswami</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="aff1">Graded Specialist (Prosthodontics), MDC, Meerut</nlm:aff><wicri:noCountry code="subfield">Meerut</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Medical Journal, Armed Forces India</title><idno type="ISSN">0377-1237</idno><imprint><date when="2009">2009</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Background</title><p>Crestal bone loss along the dental implant surface deranges its prognosis and is known to occur with implants having 02 mm smooth crest module/collar design. Implants with rough coated crest module/collar design are said to reduce crestal bone loss. Comparison of crestal bone loss with both crest module/collar designs of implants needs to be done.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>Twenty cases were selected. Each case received one implant with smooth collar design (Group-A) and one implant with coated rough collar design (Group-B). All the 40 implants were prosthetically loaded after a healing period of six months. Crestal bone loss was measured on mesial, distal, buccal and lingual side of each implant using maxillofacial computed tomography at six, twelve and eighteen months time interval after placing the implants. Soft tissue evaluation was carried out around each implant using Gingival, Plaque and Calculus Indices, six and twelve months after loading the implants.</p></sec><sec><title>Result</title><p>After 18 months i.e. one year after loading the implants, Group-A implants showed an overall average crestal bone loss of 1.53 mm and Group-B implants showed average bone loss of 1.42 mm, the difference being statistically significant (p < 0.05). For both types of implants, average crestal bone loss was maximum on the buccal side, followed by mesial, lingual and distal sides. Soft tissue evaluation revealed that the tissues remained healthy till the end of study for both types of implants.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>Crestal bone loss was less among implants with rough collar design as compared to smooth collar design.</p></sec></div></front></TEI><affiliations><list></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Goswami, Mm" sort="Goswami, Mm" uniqKey="Goswami M" first="Mm" last="Goswami">Mm Goswami</name></noCountry></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005841 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 005841 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= PMC:4921389
|texte= Comparison of Crestal Bone Loss along Two Implant Crest Module Designs
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:27408284" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |