Groups, Equality, and the Promise of Democratic Politics
Identifieur interne : 004782 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 004781; suivant : 004783Groups, Equality, and the Promise of Democratic Politics
Auteurs : Christopher Kutz [États-Unis]Source :
- Issues in Legal Scholarship [ 1539-8323 ] ; 2003-05-29.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Academic criteria, Action programs, Adarand, Affirmative, Affirmative action, Affirmative action program, Affirmative action programs, Antidiscrimination, Antidiscrimination interpretation, Antidiscrimination principle, Antisubordination, Antisubordination principle, Antisubordination theory, Cambridge university press, Citizenship, Civil rights, Civil rights movement, Collective agency, Collective interests, Common self, Compelling nature, Democratic citizenship, Democratic politics, Democratic politics christopher kutz, Discriminatory, Discriminatory practices, Equal citizenship, Equal dignity, Equal protection, Equal protection clause, Equal protection doctrine, Fair treatment, Fiss, Fourteenth amendment, Group levels, Harvard university press, Individual members, Judicial inquiry, Judith butler, Kutz, Legal academy, Legal scholarship, Legal scholarship ymposium, Legislative goal, Michael sandel, Original position, Other hand, Other words, Political process, Preferred interpretation, Prima facie, Private firms, Racial discrimination, Rawls, Relative status, Remedial, Remedial principle, Remedial understanding, Residential segregation, Same time, Selective universities, Social contract, Social group, Social groups, Social identity, Social phenomenon, Social policy, Social reformers, Social world, Strict scrutiny, Subordination, Substantive inquiry, Such programs, Supreme court, University admissions, Warren court, White supremacy system, Ymposium.
- Teeft :
- Academic criteria, Action programs, Adarand, Affirmative, Affirmative action, Affirmative action program, Affirmative action programs, Antidiscrimination, Antidiscrimination interpretation, Antidiscrimination principle, Antisubordination, Antisubordination principle, Antisubordination theory, Cambridge university press, Citizenship, Civil rights, Civil rights movement, Collective agency, Collective interests, Common self, Compelling nature, Democratic citizenship, Democratic politics, Democratic politics christopher kutz, Discriminatory, Discriminatory practices, Equal citizenship, Equal dignity, Equal protection, Equal protection clause, Equal protection doctrine, Fair treatment, Fiss, Fourteenth amendment, Group levels, Harvard university press, Individual members, Judicial inquiry, Judith butler, Kutz, Legal academy, Legal scholarship, Legal scholarship ymposium, Legislative goal, Michael sandel, Original position, Other hand, Other words, Political process, Preferred interpretation, Prima facie, Private firms, Racial discrimination, Rawls, Relative status, Remedial, Remedial principle, Remedial understanding, Residential segregation, Same time, Selective universities, Social contract, Social group, Social groups, Social identity, Social phenomenon, Social policy, Social reformers, Social world, Strict scrutiny, Subordination, Substantive inquiry, Such programs, Supreme court, University admissions, Warren court, White supremacy system, Ymposium.
Abstract
Owen Fiss' "Groups and the Equal Protection Clause" appeared at a time when the possibilities of progress seemed boundless in overcoming U.S. racial divisions. The courts had firmly taken on the role of social reformers, redistributing status and privilege in the ways so incisively limned by his article. Since then, however, movement towards residential and educational integration has stalled if not actually retreated, a significant black-white wage gap remains, and affirmative action programs in employment and education have become widely disfavored in both judicial and popular opinion. What happened? I argue that the blame for the changing winds lies, partly and ironically, with the very conception of equal protection that Fiss promotes. His essentially remedial understanding of equal protection, according to which courts ought to block state action that perpetuates the subordination of blacks and other disadvantaged groups, and to permit or even require state action undoing the subordination, both presupposes and promotes a politics that replaces political agency with a struggle for spoils before a superior authority. What we need instead, I suggest, is an interpretation of equal protection that can support a reconstructive and enduring democratic politics. I call this understanding the "equal political agency" interpretation, and describe its implications for race-based social policy.
Url:
DOI: 10.2202/1539-8323.1040
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 006E10
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 006E10
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 001727
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 004811
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 004782
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Groups, Equality, and the Promise of Democratic Politics</title>
<author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Kutz, Christopher" sort="Kutz, Christopher" uniqKey="Kutz C" first="Christopher" last="Kutz">Christopher Kutz</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:DD8885F9C9AB17D5F8FF728042B824161D714B0B</idno>
<date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="doi">10.2202/1539-8323.1040</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/DD8885F9C9AB17D5F8FF728042B824161D714B0B/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006E10</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006E10</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">006E10</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">001727</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">001727</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">004811</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">004782</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">004782</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Groups, Equality, and the Promise of Democratic Politics</title>
<author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Kutz, Christopher" sort="Kutz, Christopher" uniqKey="Kutz C" first="Christopher" last="Kutz">Christopher Kutz</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3"><country>États-Unis</country>
<placeName><settlement type="city">Berkeley (Californie)</settlement>
<region type="state">Californie</region>
</placeName>
<wicri:orgArea>1School of Law, Boalt Hall, University of California</wicri:orgArea>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="3"><country>États-Unis</country>
<placeName><settlement type="city">Berkeley (Californie)</settlement>
<region type="state">Californie</region>
</placeName>
<wicri:orgArea>School of Law, Boalt Hall, University of California</wicri:orgArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j">Issues in Legal Scholarship</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1539-8323</idno>
<imprint><publisher>De Gruyter</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2003-05-29">2003-05-29</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">2</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Academic criteria</term>
<term>Action programs</term>
<term>Adarand</term>
<term>Affirmative</term>
<term>Affirmative action</term>
<term>Affirmative action program</term>
<term>Affirmative action programs</term>
<term>Antidiscrimination</term>
<term>Antidiscrimination interpretation</term>
<term>Antidiscrimination principle</term>
<term>Antisubordination</term>
<term>Antisubordination principle</term>
<term>Antisubordination theory</term>
<term>Cambridge university press</term>
<term>Citizenship</term>
<term>Civil rights</term>
<term>Civil rights movement</term>
<term>Collective agency</term>
<term>Collective interests</term>
<term>Common self</term>
<term>Compelling nature</term>
<term>Democratic citizenship</term>
<term>Democratic politics</term>
<term>Democratic politics christopher kutz</term>
<term>Discriminatory</term>
<term>Discriminatory practices</term>
<term>Equal citizenship</term>
<term>Equal dignity</term>
<term>Equal protection</term>
<term>Equal protection clause</term>
<term>Equal protection doctrine</term>
<term>Fair treatment</term>
<term>Fiss</term>
<term>Fourteenth amendment</term>
<term>Group levels</term>
<term>Harvard university press</term>
<term>Individual members</term>
<term>Judicial inquiry</term>
<term>Judith butler</term>
<term>Kutz</term>
<term>Legal academy</term>
<term>Legal scholarship</term>
<term>Legal scholarship ymposium</term>
<term>Legislative goal</term>
<term>Michael sandel</term>
<term>Original position</term>
<term>Other hand</term>
<term>Other words</term>
<term>Political process</term>
<term>Preferred interpretation</term>
<term>Prima facie</term>
<term>Private firms</term>
<term>Racial discrimination</term>
<term>Rawls</term>
<term>Relative status</term>
<term>Remedial</term>
<term>Remedial principle</term>
<term>Remedial understanding</term>
<term>Residential segregation</term>
<term>Same time</term>
<term>Selective universities</term>
<term>Social contract</term>
<term>Social group</term>
<term>Social groups</term>
<term>Social identity</term>
<term>Social phenomenon</term>
<term>Social policy</term>
<term>Social reformers</term>
<term>Social world</term>
<term>Strict scrutiny</term>
<term>Subordination</term>
<term>Substantive inquiry</term>
<term>Such programs</term>
<term>Supreme court</term>
<term>University admissions</term>
<term>Warren court</term>
<term>White supremacy system</term>
<term>Ymposium</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Academic criteria</term>
<term>Action programs</term>
<term>Adarand</term>
<term>Affirmative</term>
<term>Affirmative action</term>
<term>Affirmative action program</term>
<term>Affirmative action programs</term>
<term>Antidiscrimination</term>
<term>Antidiscrimination interpretation</term>
<term>Antidiscrimination principle</term>
<term>Antisubordination</term>
<term>Antisubordination principle</term>
<term>Antisubordination theory</term>
<term>Cambridge university press</term>
<term>Citizenship</term>
<term>Civil rights</term>
<term>Civil rights movement</term>
<term>Collective agency</term>
<term>Collective interests</term>
<term>Common self</term>
<term>Compelling nature</term>
<term>Democratic citizenship</term>
<term>Democratic politics</term>
<term>Democratic politics christopher kutz</term>
<term>Discriminatory</term>
<term>Discriminatory practices</term>
<term>Equal citizenship</term>
<term>Equal dignity</term>
<term>Equal protection</term>
<term>Equal protection clause</term>
<term>Equal protection doctrine</term>
<term>Fair treatment</term>
<term>Fiss</term>
<term>Fourteenth amendment</term>
<term>Group levels</term>
<term>Harvard university press</term>
<term>Individual members</term>
<term>Judicial inquiry</term>
<term>Judith butler</term>
<term>Kutz</term>
<term>Legal academy</term>
<term>Legal scholarship</term>
<term>Legal scholarship ymposium</term>
<term>Legislative goal</term>
<term>Michael sandel</term>
<term>Original position</term>
<term>Other hand</term>
<term>Other words</term>
<term>Political process</term>
<term>Preferred interpretation</term>
<term>Prima facie</term>
<term>Private firms</term>
<term>Racial discrimination</term>
<term>Rawls</term>
<term>Relative status</term>
<term>Remedial</term>
<term>Remedial principle</term>
<term>Remedial understanding</term>
<term>Residential segregation</term>
<term>Same time</term>
<term>Selective universities</term>
<term>Social contract</term>
<term>Social group</term>
<term>Social groups</term>
<term>Social identity</term>
<term>Social phenomenon</term>
<term>Social policy</term>
<term>Social reformers</term>
<term>Social world</term>
<term>Strict scrutiny</term>
<term>Subordination</term>
<term>Substantive inquiry</term>
<term>Such programs</term>
<term>Supreme court</term>
<term>University admissions</term>
<term>Warren court</term>
<term>White supremacy system</term>
<term>Ymposium</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Droits civiques</term>
<term>Enquête judiciaire</term>
<term>Discrimination raciale</term>
<term>Politique sociale</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Owen Fiss' "Groups and the Equal Protection Clause" appeared at a time when the possibilities of progress seemed boundless in overcoming U.S. racial divisions. The courts had firmly taken on the role of social reformers, redistributing status and privilege in the ways so incisively limned by his article. Since then, however, movement towards residential and educational integration has stalled if not actually retreated, a significant black-white wage gap remains, and affirmative action programs in employment and education have become widely disfavored in both judicial and popular opinion. What happened? I argue that the blame for the changing winds lies, partly and ironically, with the very conception of equal protection that Fiss promotes. His essentially remedial understanding of equal protection, according to which courts ought to block state action that perpetuates the subordination of blacks and other disadvantaged groups, and to permit or even require state action undoing the subordination, both presupposes and promotes a politics that replaces political agency with a struggle for spoils before a superior authority. What we need instead, I suggest, is an interpretation of equal protection that can support a reconstructive and enduring democratic politics. I call this understanding the "equal political agency" interpretation, and describe its implications for race-based social policy.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li>
</country>
<region><li>Californie</li>
</region>
<settlement><li>Berkeley (Californie)</li>
</settlement>
</list>
<tree><country name="États-Unis"><region name="Californie"><name sortKey="Kutz, Christopher" sort="Kutz, Christopher" uniqKey="Kutz C" first="Christopher" last="Kutz">Christopher Kutz</name>
</region>
<name sortKey="Kutz, Christopher" sort="Kutz, Christopher" uniqKey="Kutz C" first="Christopher" last="Kutz">Christopher Kutz</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004782 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 004782 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Main |étape= Exploration |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:DD8885F9C9AB17D5F8FF728042B824161D714B0B |texte= Groups, Equality, and the Promise of Democratic Politics }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |