Developing abbreviated OHIP versions for use with TMD patients
Identifieur interne : 003B84 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 003B83; suivant : 003B85Developing abbreviated OHIP versions for use with TMD patients
Auteurs : M. J. Van Der Meulen [Pays-Bas] ; M. T. John [États-Unis] ; M. Naeije [Pays-Bas] ; F. Lobbezoo [Pays-Bas]Source :
- Journal of Oral Rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 2012-01.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abbreviated, Abbreviated dutch ohip versions, Abbreviated ohip versions, Abbreviated ohips, Abbreviated versions, Academic centre, Average interitem correlation, Average interitem correlations, Behavioral sciences, Blackwell publishing, Characteristic pain intensity, Chronic pain, Clinical application, Community dent, Consecutive patients, Consortium network, Convergent validity, Dent, Dentistry amsterdam, Dichotomous response options, Disability, Disability checklist, Disability days, Disability points, Disability score, Disability scores, Dutch version, Epidemiol, Facial pain, Full denture patients, Group validity, High disability, Interitem, Interitem correlation, Internal consistency, Japanese study, Long form, Mouth sensations, Ohip, Ohip scores, Ohip summary scores, Ohip versions, Ohips, Ohrqol, Oral conditions, Oral health, Oral health impact, Oral health impact community dent, Oral health impact translation, Oral health status, Oral kinesiology, Oral parafunctions, Oral quality, Oral rehabil, Original questionnaire, Orofac pain, Other hand, Other populations, Other settings, Pain intensity, Pain intensity grade, Painrelated disability scores, Patient burden, Present results, Present study, Prosthodontic patients, Psychological disability, Psychological discomfort, Psychometric, Psychometric properties, Recent study, Reliability, Response scales, Short form, Short versions, Somatisation, Statistical analyses, Summary scores, Temporomandibular, Temporomandibular disorders, Tertile, Total scores.
- Teeft :
- Abbreviated, Abbreviated dutch ohip versions, Abbreviated ohip versions, Abbreviated ohips, Abbreviated versions, Academic centre, Average interitem correlation, Average interitem correlations, Behavioral sciences, Blackwell publishing, Characteristic pain intensity, Chronic pain, Clinical application, Community dent, Consecutive patients, Consortium network, Convergent validity, Dent, Dentistry amsterdam, Dichotomous response options, Disability, Disability checklist, Disability days, Disability points, Disability score, Disability scores, Dutch version, Epidemiol, Facial pain, Full denture patients, Group validity, High disability, Interitem, Interitem correlation, Internal consistency, Japanese study, Long form, Mouth sensations, Ohip, Ohip scores, Ohip summary scores, Ohip versions, Ohips, Ohrqol, Oral conditions, Oral health, Oral health impact, Oral health impact community dent, Oral health impact translation, Oral health status, Oral kinesiology, Oral parafunctions, Oral quality, Oral rehabil, Original questionnaire, Orofac pain, Other hand, Other populations, Other settings, Pain intensity, Pain intensity grade, Painrelated disability scores, Patient burden, Present results, Present study, Prosthodontic patients, Psychological disability, Psychological discomfort, Psychometric, Psychometric properties, Recent study, Reliability, Response scales, Short form, Short versions, Somatisation, Statistical analyses, Summary scores, Temporomandibular, Temporomandibular disorders, Tertile, Total scores.
Abstract
summary The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric characteristics of three versions of the Dutch Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP‐NL), for clinical use with temporomandibular disorder (TMD) patients. To that end, two abbreviated OHIP versions (OHIP‐NL14 and OHIP‐NL5) were developed by respectively selecting 14 and five items from the officially translated and culturally adapted original 49‐item OHIP‐NL questionnaire. A total of 245 consecutive patients, referred by their dentist to the TMD clinic of the Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (77% women; mean age ± s.d. = 41·0 ± 14·9 years), completed the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/TMD) axis II questionnaire and the OHIP‐NL. Reliability and validity of all three OHIP versions were compared, and their associations with four psychological axis II variables, indicating the level of impairment of patients with TMD, were examined. According to guidelines for clinical application, internal consistency scores were sufficient for OHIP‐NL and OHIP‐NL14, but insufficient for OHIP‐NL5. Test–retest reliability (n = 64) was excellent for OHIP‐NL and OHIP‐NL14 and fair to good for OHIP‐NL5. For all three versions, there was evidence for score validity: associations between OHIP summary scores on the one hand and validation variables and other RDC/TMD axis II variables on the other hand met the expectations and were statistically significant (P < 0·001). In conclusion, the OHIP‐NL and OHIP‐NL14 both performed comparatively well and better than the OHIP‐NL5. When the length of the questionnaire (i.e. the time needed for its completion) is an issue, the OHIP‐14 would therefore be the preferred version.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02242.x
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 000821
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 000821
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 001054
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 003C01
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 003B84
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Developing abbreviated OHIP versions for use with TMD patients</title><author><name sortKey="Van Der Meulen, M J" sort="Van Der Meulen, M J" uniqKey="Van Der Meulen M" first="M. J." last="Van Der Meulen">M. J. Van Der Meulen</name></author><author><name sortKey="John, M T" sort="John, M T" uniqKey="John M" first="M. T." last="John">M. T. John</name></author><author><name sortKey="Naeije, M" sort="Naeije, M" uniqKey="Naeije M" first="M." last="Naeije">M. Naeije</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lobbezoo, F" sort="Lobbezoo, F" uniqKey="Lobbezoo F" first="F." last="Lobbezoo">F. Lobbezoo</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:10BAADEE1DA5A80D88CCAAB89BE5B9837478869C</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02242.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/10BAADEE1DA5A80D88CCAAB89BE5B9837478869C/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000821</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000821</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000821</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">001054</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">001054</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0305-182X:2012:Van Der Meulen M:developing:abbreviated:ohip</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">003C01</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">003B84</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">003B84</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Developing abbreviated OHIP versions for use with TMD patients</title><author><name sortKey="Van Der Meulen, M J" sort="Van Der Meulen, M J" uniqKey="Van Der Meulen M" first="M. J." last="Van Der Meulen">M. J. Van Der Meulen</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country>Pays-Bas</country><placeName><settlement type="city">Amsterdam</settlement><region nuts="2" type="province">Hollande-Septentrionale</region></placeName><wicri:orgArea>Department of Oral Kinesiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Research Institute MOVE, University of Amsterdam and VU University Amsterdam</wicri:orgArea></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Center for Special Dental Care (SBT), Amsterdam</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Amsterdam</settlement><region nuts="2" type="province">Hollande-Septentrionale</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="John, M T" sort="John, M T" uniqKey="John M" first="M. T." last="John">M. T. John</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Diagnostic and Biological Sciences, Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">Minnesota</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Naeije, M" sort="Naeije, M" uniqKey="Naeije M" first="M." last="Naeije">M. Naeije</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country>Pays-Bas</country><placeName><settlement type="city">Amsterdam</settlement><region nuts="2" type="province">Hollande-Septentrionale</region></placeName><wicri:orgArea>Department of Oral Kinesiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Research Institute MOVE, University of Amsterdam and VU University Amsterdam</wicri:orgArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lobbezoo, F" sort="Lobbezoo, F" uniqKey="Lobbezoo F" first="F." last="Lobbezoo">F. Lobbezoo</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country>Pays-Bas</country><placeName><settlement type="city">Amsterdam</settlement><region nuts="2" type="province">Hollande-Septentrionale</region></placeName><wicri:orgArea>Department of Oral Kinesiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Research Institute MOVE, University of Amsterdam and VU University Amsterdam</wicri:orgArea></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">39</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="18">18</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="27">27</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-01">2012-01</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abbreviated</term><term>Abbreviated dutch ohip versions</term><term>Abbreviated ohip versions</term><term>Abbreviated ohips</term><term>Abbreviated versions</term><term>Academic centre</term><term>Average interitem correlation</term><term>Average interitem correlations</term><term>Behavioral sciences</term><term>Blackwell publishing</term><term>Characteristic pain intensity</term><term>Chronic pain</term><term>Clinical application</term><term>Community dent</term><term>Consecutive patients</term><term>Consortium network</term><term>Convergent validity</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dentistry amsterdam</term><term>Dichotomous response options</term><term>Disability</term><term>Disability checklist</term><term>Disability days</term><term>Disability points</term><term>Disability score</term><term>Disability scores</term><term>Dutch version</term><term>Epidemiol</term><term>Facial pain</term><term>Full denture patients</term><term>Group validity</term><term>High disability</term><term>Interitem</term><term>Interitem correlation</term><term>Internal consistency</term><term>Japanese study</term><term>Long form</term><term>Mouth sensations</term><term>Ohip</term><term>Ohip scores</term><term>Ohip summary scores</term><term>Ohip versions</term><term>Ohips</term><term>Ohrqol</term><term>Oral conditions</term><term>Oral health</term><term>Oral health impact</term><term>Oral health impact community dent</term><term>Oral health impact translation</term><term>Oral health status</term><term>Oral kinesiology</term><term>Oral parafunctions</term><term>Oral quality</term><term>Oral rehabil</term><term>Original questionnaire</term><term>Orofac pain</term><term>Other hand</term><term>Other populations</term><term>Other settings</term><term>Pain intensity</term><term>Pain intensity grade</term><term>Painrelated disability scores</term><term>Patient burden</term><term>Present results</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prosthodontic patients</term><term>Psychological disability</term><term>Psychological discomfort</term><term>Psychometric</term><term>Psychometric properties</term><term>Recent study</term><term>Reliability</term><term>Response scales</term><term>Short form</term><term>Short versions</term><term>Somatisation</term><term>Statistical analyses</term><term>Summary scores</term><term>Temporomandibular</term><term>Temporomandibular disorders</term><term>Tertile</term><term>Total scores</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abbreviated</term><term>Abbreviated dutch ohip versions</term><term>Abbreviated ohip versions</term><term>Abbreviated ohips</term><term>Abbreviated versions</term><term>Academic centre</term><term>Average interitem correlation</term><term>Average interitem correlations</term><term>Behavioral sciences</term><term>Blackwell publishing</term><term>Characteristic pain intensity</term><term>Chronic pain</term><term>Clinical application</term><term>Community dent</term><term>Consecutive patients</term><term>Consortium network</term><term>Convergent validity</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dentistry amsterdam</term><term>Dichotomous response options</term><term>Disability</term><term>Disability checklist</term><term>Disability days</term><term>Disability points</term><term>Disability score</term><term>Disability scores</term><term>Dutch version</term><term>Epidemiol</term><term>Facial pain</term><term>Full denture patients</term><term>Group validity</term><term>High disability</term><term>Interitem</term><term>Interitem correlation</term><term>Internal consistency</term><term>Japanese study</term><term>Long form</term><term>Mouth sensations</term><term>Ohip</term><term>Ohip scores</term><term>Ohip summary scores</term><term>Ohip versions</term><term>Ohips</term><term>Ohrqol</term><term>Oral conditions</term><term>Oral health</term><term>Oral health impact</term><term>Oral health impact community dent</term><term>Oral health impact translation</term><term>Oral health status</term><term>Oral kinesiology</term><term>Oral parafunctions</term><term>Oral quality</term><term>Oral rehabil</term><term>Original questionnaire</term><term>Orofac pain</term><term>Other hand</term><term>Other populations</term><term>Other settings</term><term>Pain intensity</term><term>Pain intensity grade</term><term>Painrelated disability scores</term><term>Patient burden</term><term>Present results</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prosthodontic patients</term><term>Psychological disability</term><term>Psychological discomfort</term><term>Psychometric</term><term>Psychometric properties</term><term>Recent study</term><term>Reliability</term><term>Response scales</term><term>Short form</term><term>Short versions</term><term>Somatisation</term><term>Statistical analyses</term><term>Summary scores</term><term>Temporomandibular</term><term>Temporomandibular disorders</term><term>Tertile</term><term>Total scores</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">summary The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric characteristics of three versions of the Dutch Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP‐NL), for clinical use with temporomandibular disorder (TMD) patients. To that end, two abbreviated OHIP versions (OHIP‐NL14 and OHIP‐NL5) were developed by respectively selecting 14 and five items from the officially translated and culturally adapted original 49‐item OHIP‐NL questionnaire. A total of 245 consecutive patients, referred by their dentist to the TMD clinic of the Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (77% women; mean age ± s.d. = 41·0 ± 14·9 years), completed the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/TMD) axis II questionnaire and the OHIP‐NL. Reliability and validity of all three OHIP versions were compared, and their associations with four psychological axis II variables, indicating the level of impairment of patients with TMD, were examined. According to guidelines for clinical application, internal consistency scores were sufficient for OHIP‐NL and OHIP‐NL14, but insufficient for OHIP‐NL5. Test–retest reliability (n = 64) was excellent for OHIP‐NL and OHIP‐NL14 and fair to good for OHIP‐NL5. For all three versions, there was evidence for score validity: associations between OHIP summary scores on the one hand and validation variables and other RDC/TMD axis II variables on the other hand met the expectations and were statistically significant (P < 0·001). In conclusion, the OHIP‐NL and OHIP‐NL14 both performed comparatively well and better than the OHIP‐NL5. When the length of the questionnaire (i.e. the time needed for its completion) is an issue, the OHIP‐14 would therefore be the preferred version.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Pays-Bas</li><li>États-Unis</li></country><region><li>Hollande-Septentrionale</li><li>Minnesota</li></region><settlement><li>Amsterdam</li></settlement></list><tree><country name="Pays-Bas"><region name="Hollande-Septentrionale"><name sortKey="Van Der Meulen, M J" sort="Van Der Meulen, M J" uniqKey="Van Der Meulen M" first="M. J." last="Van Der Meulen">M. J. Van Der Meulen</name></region><name sortKey="Lobbezoo, F" sort="Lobbezoo, F" uniqKey="Lobbezoo F" first="F." last="Lobbezoo">F. Lobbezoo</name><name sortKey="Naeije, M" sort="Naeije, M" uniqKey="Naeije M" first="M." last="Naeije">M. Naeije</name><name sortKey="Van Der Meulen, M J" sort="Van Der Meulen, M J" uniqKey="Van Der Meulen M" first="M. J." last="Van Der Meulen">M. J. Van Der Meulen</name></country><country name="États-Unis"><region name="Minnesota"><name sortKey="John, M T" sort="John, M T" uniqKey="John M" first="M. T." last="John">M. T. John</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003B84 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 003B84 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:10BAADEE1DA5A80D88CCAAB89BE5B9837478869C
|texte= Developing abbreviated OHIP versions for use with TMD patients
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |