Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Utility of the gagging problem assessment questionnaire in assessing patient sensitivity to dental treatments

Identifieur interne : 003590 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 003589; suivant : 003591

Utility of the gagging problem assessment questionnaire in assessing patient sensitivity to dental treatments

Auteurs : Z. Z. Akarslan ; A. Z. Y. Biçer [Turquie]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:389219E76CCEB879BACAC7DE2DB885AC72AB1283

English descriptors

Abstract

Summary  Although the Gagging Problem Assessment Questionnaire (GPA) can be used to identify patients with gag reflex, it does not provide information about patient sensitivity to dental procedures. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of GPA in determining patient sensitivity (i.e. gag reflex) in response to intra‐oral radiography and impression‐taking procedures. The study included 95 patients (65 women; mean age, 44·2 ± 13·4 years) undergoing dental treatment at a Turkish dental school. Patients completed the patient section of the GPA before their dental examination. An observing dentist monitored and scored the gag reflex of patients during each step of intra‐oral radiographic examination and impression taking. The overall sensitivity of the patient to the entire process was also recorded. Descriptive statistics, one‐way analysis of variance and the Tukey’s test were used for statistical analysis. Patients with GPA scores of 1·00–1·74 did not show any gagging or displayed only mild discomfort during the procedures. Patients with GPA scores of 1·75–3·24 showed moderate gagging, which was managed with prophylactic and suppressive precautions. Patients with GPA scores of 3·25–4·00 were unable to complete the procedures because of gagging. Differences (all P < 0·001) were found between the three groups for the observed responses of patients during radiography (F, 203·343), impression (F, 175·035) and radiography + impression procedures (F, 228·319), with no significant difference between women and men. In conclusion, GPA may be helpful for the prediction of patient sensitivity to dental treatments.

Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02321.x


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Utility of the gagging problem assessment questionnaire in assessing patient sensitivity to dental treatments</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Akarslan, Z Z" sort="Akarslan, Z Z" uniqKey="Akarslan Z" first="Z. Z." last="Akarslan">Z. Z. Akarslan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bicer, A Z Y" sort="Bicer, A Z Y" uniqKey="Bicer A" first="A. Z. Y." last="Biçer">A. Z. Y. Biçer</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:389219E76CCEB879BACAC7DE2DB885AC72AB1283</idno>
<date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02321.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/389219E76CCEB879BACAC7DE2DB885AC72AB1283/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001B67</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001B67</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001B67</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000A60</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000A60</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0305-182X:2012:Akarslan Z:utility:of:the</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">003607</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">003590</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">003590</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">Utility of the gagging problem assessment questionnaire in assessing patient sensitivity to dental treatments</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Akarslan, Z Z" sort="Akarslan, Z Z" uniqKey="Akarslan Z" first="Z. Z." last="Akarslan">Z. Z. Akarslan</name>
<affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="no comma">Departments of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bicer, A Z Y" sort="Bicer, A Z Y" uniqKey="Bicer A" first="A. Z. Y." last="Biçer">A. Z. Y. Biçer</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Turquie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Prosthodontics, Gazi University School of Dentistry, Ankara</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Ankara</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">39</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">12</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="948">948</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="955">955</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2012-12">2012-12</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Anterior teeth</term>
<term>Bicer table</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Corresponding question</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental</term>
<term>Dental chair</term>
<term>Dental examination</term>
<term>Dental impression</term>
<term>Dental procedure</term>
<term>Dental procedures</term>
<term>Dental staff</term>
<term>Dental treatments</term>
<term>Descriptive statistics</term>
<term>Education level</term>
<term>Education levels</term>
<term>Entire process</term>
<term>Entire sample</term>
<term>Further explanation</term>
<term>Gazi university school</term>
<term>Impression material</term>
<term>Impression procedures</term>
<term>Maxillofacial radiology</term>
<term>Medical history</term>
<term>Mild discomfort</term>
<term>Mouth feeling</term>
<term>Oral cavity</term>
<term>Oral rehabil</term>
<term>Overall sensitivity</term>
<term>Overall sensitivity scores</term>
<term>Patient part</term>
<term>Patient portion</term>
<term>Patient section</term>
<term>Patient sensitivity</term>
<term>Patient tolerance</term>
<term>Periodontal treatment</term>
<term>Pilot study</term>
<term>Posterior teeth</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Problem assessment</term>
<term>Problem assessment questionnaire</term>
<term>Problem assessment table</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthodontic treatment</term>
<term>Radiograph</term>
<term>Radiographic</term>
<term>Radiographic examination</term>
<term>Radiographic procedure</term>
<term>Radiographic procedures</term>
<term>Radiography</term>
<term>Radiography impression procedures</term>
<term>Removable</term>
<term>Removable prosthesis</term>
<term>Standard form</term>
<term>Standard forms</term>
<term>Statistical analysis</term>
<term>Tolerance scores</term>
<term>Total number</term>
<term>Total refusal</term>
<term>Total sample</term>
<term>Tray placement</term>
<term>Turkish version</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Anterior teeth</term>
<term>Bicer table</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Corresponding question</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental</term>
<term>Dental chair</term>
<term>Dental examination</term>
<term>Dental impression</term>
<term>Dental procedure</term>
<term>Dental procedures</term>
<term>Dental staff</term>
<term>Dental treatments</term>
<term>Descriptive statistics</term>
<term>Education level</term>
<term>Education levels</term>
<term>Entire process</term>
<term>Entire sample</term>
<term>Further explanation</term>
<term>Gazi university school</term>
<term>Impression material</term>
<term>Impression procedures</term>
<term>Maxillofacial radiology</term>
<term>Medical history</term>
<term>Mild discomfort</term>
<term>Mouth feeling</term>
<term>Oral cavity</term>
<term>Oral rehabil</term>
<term>Overall sensitivity</term>
<term>Overall sensitivity scores</term>
<term>Patient part</term>
<term>Patient portion</term>
<term>Patient section</term>
<term>Patient sensitivity</term>
<term>Patient tolerance</term>
<term>Periodontal treatment</term>
<term>Pilot study</term>
<term>Posterior teeth</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Problem assessment</term>
<term>Problem assessment questionnaire</term>
<term>Problem assessment table</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthodontic treatment</term>
<term>Radiograph</term>
<term>Radiographic</term>
<term>Radiographic examination</term>
<term>Radiographic procedure</term>
<term>Radiographic procedures</term>
<term>Radiography</term>
<term>Radiography impression procedures</term>
<term>Removable</term>
<term>Removable prosthesis</term>
<term>Standard form</term>
<term>Standard forms</term>
<term>Statistical analysis</term>
<term>Tolerance scores</term>
<term>Total number</term>
<term>Total refusal</term>
<term>Total sample</term>
<term>Tray placement</term>
<term>Turkish version</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract">Summary  Although the Gagging Problem Assessment Questionnaire (GPA) can be used to identify patients with gag reflex, it does not provide information about patient sensitivity to dental procedures. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of GPA in determining patient sensitivity (i.e. gag reflex) in response to intra‐oral radiography and impression‐taking procedures. The study included 95 patients (65 women; mean age, 44·2 ± 13·4 years) undergoing dental treatment at a Turkish dental school. Patients completed the patient section of the GPA before their dental examination. An observing dentist monitored and scored the gag reflex of patients during each step of intra‐oral radiographic examination and impression taking. The overall sensitivity of the patient to the entire process was also recorded. Descriptive statistics, one‐way analysis of variance and the Tukey’s test were used for statistical analysis. Patients with GPA scores of 1·00–1·74 did not show any gagging or displayed only mild discomfort during the procedures. Patients with GPA scores of 1·75–3·24 showed moderate gagging, which was managed with prophylactic and suppressive precautions. Patients with GPA scores of 3·25–4·00 were unable to complete the procedures because of gagging. Differences (all P < 0·001) were found between the three groups for the observed responses of patients during radiography (F, 203·343), impression (F, 175·035) and radiography + impression procedures (F, 228·319), with no significant difference between women and men. In conclusion, GPA may be helpful for the prediction of patient sensitivity to dental treatments.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>Turquie</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree>
<noCountry>
<name sortKey="Akarslan, Z Z" sort="Akarslan, Z Z" uniqKey="Akarslan Z" first="Z. Z." last="Akarslan">Z. Z. Akarslan</name>
</noCountry>
<country name="Turquie">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Bicer, A Z Y" sort="Bicer, A Z Y" uniqKey="Bicer A" first="A. Z. Y." last="Biçer">A. Z. Y. Biçer</name>
</noRegion>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003590 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 003590 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:389219E76CCEB879BACAC7DE2DB885AC72AB1283
   |texte=   Utility of the gagging problem assessment questionnaire in assessing patient sensitivity to dental treatments
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022